functional neurosurgery

功能神经外科
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:立体脑电图(SEEG)已成为颅内癫痫发作定位的主要方法。成像时,符号学,和头皮脑电图的发现并不完全一致或明确定位,植入的SEEG记录用于测试候选癫痫发作发作区(SOZs)。然后可以将发现的SOZ作为切除的目标,激光烧蚀,或者神经刺激.如果一个SOZ雄辩,切除和消融都是禁忌,因此,识别功能表征对于治疗决策至关重要。作者提出了一种新颖的功能脑映射技术,该技术在行为任务期间利用SEEG中基于任务的电生理变化,并在儿科和成人患者中进行测试。
    方法:记录了20例年龄在6至39岁之间的癫痫患者的SEEG(12例女性,20例患者中有18例<21岁),并接受了植入监测以确定癫痫发作。每个人都执行了1)视觉提示的手的简单重复运动,脚,或记录肌电图时的舌头;2)记录音频时的简单图片命名或动词生成语音任务。在行为和休息之间比较了SEEG记录的功率谱的宽带变化。
    结果:在所有20名患者中完成了运动和/或言语区域的电生理功能绘图。在皮质和白质中都确定了雄辩的代表,通常与经典描述的功能解剖组织以及其他临床作图结果相对应。在健康的大脑中确定了健壮的大脑活动图,发育或获得性结构异常的区域,和SOZs。
    结论:基于任务的电生理标测使用SEEG信号的宽带变化可靠地识别儿童和成人癫痫患者的运动和言语表现。
    OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has become the predominant method for intracranial seizure localization. When imaging, semiology, and scalp EEG findings are not in full agreement or definitively localizing, implanted SEEG recordings are used to test candidate seizure onset zones (SOZs). Discovered SOZs may then be targeted for resection, laser ablation, or neurostimulation. If an SOZ is eloquent, resection and ablation are both contraindicated, so identifying functional representation is crucial for therapeutic decision-making. The authors present a novel functional brain mapping technique that utilizes task-based electrophysiological changes in SEEG during behavioral tasks and test this in pediatric and adult patients.
    METHODS: SEEG was recorded in 20 patients with epilepsy who ranged in age from 6 to 39 years (12 female, 18 of 20 patients < 21 years of age) and underwent implanted monitoring to identify seizure onset. Each performed 1) visually cued simple repetitive movements of the hand, foot, or tongue while electromyography was recorded; and 2) simple picture-naming or verb-generation speech tasks while audio was recorded. Broadband changes in the power spectrum of the SEEG recording were compared between behavior and rest.
    RESULTS: Electrophysiological functional mapping of movement and/or speech areas was completed in all 20 patients. Eloquent representation was identified in both cortex and white matter and generally corresponded to classically described functional anatomical organization as well as other clinical mapping results. Robust maps of brain activity were identified in healthy brain, regions of developmental or acquired structural abnormality, and SOZs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Task-based electrophysiological mapping using broadband changes in the SEEG signal reliably identifies movement and speech representation in pediatric and adult epilepsy patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:消融手术是治疗抵抗性强迫症(TROCD)的最后手段。在过去的20年中,我们中心一直在为符合边缘手术资格的患者使用双侧前囊切开术(BAC)。本报告详细介绍了我们为TROCD使用BAC的经验。
    方法:5名OCD患者符合BAC的资格标准。进入方案很复杂,大约需要6个月才能完成。立体定向射频用于产生囊切开术。冠状平面的病变长度在5.7和16.9mm之间变化。患者随访4至20年。
    结果:所有5例患者(100%)均为应答者,根据广泛接受的标准定义,即在18个月随访时,Yale-Brown强迫症量表(YBOCS)评分降低≥35%。4名患者在48个月时保持应答。一名患者失去了随访。从YBOCS的角度来看,响应者的状态在4至20年的随访中得以维持,在停药后19年有一次复发。现实世界的精神病结果是不同的,因为其他漏洞浮出水面,说明了心理健康的多因素决定因素。没有患者有任何明显的长期神经认知或身体副作用。
    结论:BAC应该仍然是对所有其他干预措施无反应的重度强迫症患者的最后选择。
    BACKGROUND: Ablative surgery is an intervention of last resort for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (TROCD). Our center has been using bilateral anterior capsulotomy (BAC) for the past 20 years for patients eligible for limbic surgery. This report details our experience with BAC for TROCD.
    METHODS: Five patients with OCD met eligibility criteria for BAC. Entry protocols were complex and took around 6 months to complete. Stereotactic radiofrequency was used to produce the capsulotomies. Lesion length varied between 5.7 and 16.9 mm in the coronal plane. Patients were followed between 4 and 20 years.
    RESULTS: All 5 patients (100%) were responders as defined by the widely accepted criteria of a reduction of ≥35% in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) score at 18-month follow-up. Four patients remained responders at the 48 months. One patient was lost to follow-up. Responder status when viewed from the perspective of the YBOCS was sustained over the 4- to 20-year follow-up with one relapse 19 years postsurgery when medications were discontinued. Real-world psychiatric outcomes were different as other vulnerabilities surfaced illustrating the multifactorial determinants of mental health. No patient had any significant long-term neurocognitive or physical side effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: BAC should remain an option of last resort for patients with severe OCD who remain unresponsive to all other interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脑深部电刺激(DBS)已成为对常规治疗无效的帕金森病(PD)患者的有效且安全的治疗方法。随着有关DBS在不同运动障碍中使用的文献的增加,关于执行清醒或睡眠DBS仍然存在争议。本系统综述提供了最全面的文献综述,从各个方面详细比较了这两种技术。
    方法:对PubMed的系统评价,Scopus,WebofScience,并进行了Cochrane图书馆数据库。包括比较睡眠和清醒DBS的任何方面的所有研究。使用非随机干预研究工具中的偏倚风险评估偏倚风险。在考虑基线特征的情况下进行Meta分析。
    结果:31项研究纳入2563例PD患者。共有1423例患者进行了睡眠DBS。两组在基线特征方面具有可比性。随访3~60个月。两种DBS技术在运动症状改善和左旋多巴等效日剂量方面具有可比性。然而,睡眠技术在马蒂斯痴呆评定量表和帕金森病问卷评分方面显示出略好的改善。此外,睡眠技术与更多的手术不良事件相关,而气颅和心理障碍,如情绪,影响,认知障碍在清醒技术中更为常见。亚组分析显示,当按靶向脑核分类时,睡眠和清醒DBS之间的结果没有显着差异。术中或术前成像的使用,以及是否使用微电极记录。
    结论:这些发现表明两种DBS方法的临床结局相当。两种方法在铅通过和特定不良事件方面存在显着差异。进行清醒或睡眠DBS的决定应基于患者的偏好,外科医生的经验,先进的术中成像的可用性,以及患者对特定不良事件的耐受性。
    OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become an effective and safe treatment in patients with Parkinson\'s disease (PD) not responding to conventional treatments. With the growing body of literature regarding the use of DBS in different movement disorders, there remain controversies regarding performing awake or asleep DBS. This systematic review provides the most comprehensive review of the literature comparing the two techniques from various aspects in detail.
    METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. All studies comparing any aspects of asleep and awake DBS were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Meta-analysis was conducted with consideration of baseline characteristics.
    RESULTS: Thirty-one studies with 2563 PD patients were included. A total of 1423 patients underwent asleep DBS. The two groups were comparable regarding their baseline characteristics. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 60 months. The two DBS techniques were comparable in terms of motor symptom improvements and levodopa equivalent daily doses. However, the asleep technique showed slightly better improvements in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and Parkinson\'s Disease Questionnaire scores. Moreover, the asleep technique was associated with more surgical adverse events, whereas pneumocephalus and psychological disorders such as mood, affect, and cognitive disorders were more common in the awake technique. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in outcomes between asleep and awake DBS when categorized by targeted brain nuclei, use of intraoperative or preoperative imaging, and whether microelectrode recordings were used.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest comparable clinical outcomes between the two DBS approaches. The two methods had their salient differences in terms of lead passes and specific adverse events. The decision to perform awake or asleep DBS should be based on the patient\'s preference, the surgeon\'s experience, the availability of advanced intraoperative imaging, and the patient\'s tolerance for specific adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇叙述性综述探讨了非洲功能性神经外科的现状,关注该领域面临的挑战和机遇。借鉴现有文献和专家见解,审查强调了资源的稀缺性,包括训练有素的人员,基础设施,和专用设备,作为阻碍广泛采用先进神经外科技术的主要障碍。尽管面临这些挑战,该综述表明,人们越来越认识到功能性神经外科在解决非洲大陆普遍存在的神经系统疾病方面的重要性.努力加强培训计划,与国际合作伙伴建立合作关系,和杠杆技术被讨论为克服后勤障碍的有希望的策略。此外,该审查强调了解决围绕神经系统疾病的文化信仰和污名的重要性,以确保公平获得护理并促进接受神经外科干预措施。通过驾驭这些挑战,拥抱新出现的机遇,非洲的功能性神经外科手术有可能显著影响神经系统健康结果并提高整体幸福感.
    This narrative review explores the current landscape of functional neurosurgery in Africa, focusing on the challenges and opportunities facing the field. Drawing upon existing literature and expert insights, the review highlights the scarcity of resources, including trained personnel, infrastructure, and specialized equipment, as major hurdles impeding the widespread adoption of advanced neurosurgical techniques. Despite these challenges, the review identifies a growing recognition of the importance of functional neurosurgery in addressing neurological disorders prevalent across the continent. Efforts to enhance training programs, establish collaborations with international partners, and leverage technology are discussed as promising strategies to overcome logistical barriers. Moreover, the review underscores the significance of addressing cultural beliefs and stigmas surrounding neurological conditions to ensure equitable access to care and promote acceptance of neurosurgical interventions. By navigating these challenges and embracing emerging opportunities, functional neurosurgery in Africa holds the potential to significantly impact neurological health outcomes and enhance overall well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:中央中核(CM)的深部脑刺激(DBS)用于治疗包括癫痫在内的多种脑部疾病,Tourette综合征,和意识障碍。然而,CM在常规MRI上可视化是具有挑战性的。许多外科医生使用基于已建立的立体定向坐标的间接靶向方法。作者旨在量化使用这种方法在CM内放置DBS电极触点的频率,并识别更准确的替代间接坐标。
    方法:对健康成人获得的100张MR图像进行了CM的间接靶向,得到的坐标被扭曲成一个共同的大脑模板。要估计DBS触点沿此轨迹的位置,作者开发了一种可能的电极定位(PEL)掩模,从先前的临床病例中获得的轨迹角度建模。欧几里得和x,y,测量PEL掩模和基于图集的CM掩模的质心之间的z距离并将其定义为误差。确定PEL掩模和附近丘脑核之间的重叠百分比。为了评估这种方法的临床实用性,使用在全身性癫痫患者中获得的20张MR图像验证了该分析,CM-DBS的常见临床指征。
    结果:使用标准间接坐标,作者发现平均欧氏误差为4.40±1.05mm,x,y,z误差为4.19±0.97mm,0.73±0.65mm,和0.66±0.69毫米,分别。PEL面罩与CM重叠为52%,与腹后内侧核重叠为65%。第三心室宽度的变化是这些错误的主要原因(r=-0.71)。为了克服这种变化,作者开发了替代间接坐标:后连合水平第三脑室后外侧角外侧4.5mm.有了这个细化,平均欧氏误差降低到1.24±0.5mm,在CM内使用84%的PEL面罩。
    结论:无法直接靶向的高级MRI限制了在资源受限的神经外科计划中获得CM-DBS。标准间接坐标不能提供CM的最佳目标,大多数接触横向放置在感觉丘脑中。因此,所提出的间接方法可以提高CM-DBS的准确性和可用性,同时减少副作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian nucleus (CM) is used to treat diverse brain diseases including epilepsy, Tourette syndrome, and disorders of consciousness. However, the CM is challenging to visualize on routine MRI. Many surgeons use an indirect targeting method based on established stereotactic coordinates. The authors aimed to quantify how often a DBS electrode\'s contacts were positioned within the CM using this approach, and to identify alternative indirect coordinates that are more accurate.
    METHODS: Indirect targeting of the CM was performed on 100 MR images obtained in healthy adults, and the resulting coordinates were warped to a common brain template. To estimate positions of DBS contacts along this trajectory, the authors developed a probable electrode location (PEL) mask, modeled on trajectory angles obtained from prior clinical cases. Euclidean and x, y, and z distances between the centroids of the PEL mask and an atlas-based CM mask were measured and defined as error. The percentage of overlaps between the PEL mask and nearby thalamic nuclei was determined. To assess the clinical utility of this methodology, the analysis was validated using 20 MR images obtained in patients with generalized epilepsy, a common clinical indication for CM-DBS.
    RESULTS: Using standard indirect coordinates, the authors found the average Euclidean error to be 4.40 ± 1.05 mm, and the x, y, and z errors were 4.19 ± 0.97 mm, 0.73 ± 0.65 mm, and 0.66 ± 0.69 mm, respectively. The PEL mask overlap was 52% with the CM and 65% with the ventral posteromedial nucleus. Variation in third ventricular width was the dominant contributor to these errors (r = -0.71). To overcome this variation, the authors developed alternative indirect coordinates: 4.5 mm lateral to the posterolateral corner of the third ventricle at the level of the posterior commissure. With this refinement, the average Euclidean error was reduced to 1.24 ± 0.5 mm, with 84% of the PEL mask within the CM.
    CONCLUSIONS: The unavailability of advanced MRI for direct targeting limits access to CM-DBS in resource-constrained neurosurgical programs. Standard indirect coordinates do not provide optimal targeting of the CM, with most contacts laterally placed in the sensory thalamus. The proposed indirect approach may therefore increase the accuracy and availability of CM-DBS, while reducing side effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:功能神经外科(FNS)是一种非侵入性且高效的神经外科亚专业,但中低收入国家(LMICs)在FNS的获取和可用性方面处于不利地位。通过这项研究,我们试图评估可用性,暴露,利用率,以及五种主要FNS模式的感知障碍,包括深部脑刺激(DBS),迷走神经刺激(VNS),立体定向放射外科(SRS),MRI引导的聚焦超声(MRgfUS)和LMICs的经皮神经切断术。
    方法:我们在遵循CHERRIES指南的同时,使用谷歌表格设计了一项调查。反应是从神经外科医生那里收集的,神经外科研究员,和LMICs的居民。使用SPSS软件26.0进行统计学分析。结果:总共记录了100个应答,其中96%为男性。68%的人在教育机构工作。受访者对SRS的暴露最多(36%),其次是DBS(28%),而MRgFUS的暴露方式最少(4%)(p<0.001)。对于除MRgFUS之外的所有模式,大多数受访者“相当自信”(p<0.001)。在模式的可用性与工作设置类型之间没有观察到统计学上的显着关联。大多数受访者不认为法律问题(p=0.003)和患者偏好(p=0.007)是任何方式的障碍。可访问性,负担能力,除DBS外,缺乏培训不是任何模式的重要因素(52%,p<0.001;55%,p<0.001和53%,p=0.002)结论:包括国际合作在内的综合方法,旅行奖学金,必须采取新的政策,以增加FNS对LMIC的影响,以分担广泛的神经外科负担并减轻神经外科决策。
    BACKGROUND: Functional Neurosurgery (FNS) is a non-invasive and highly efficacious neurosurgical subspecialty but lower middle-income countries (LMICs) are disadvantaged in terms of access and availability of FNS. Through this study we have tried to assess the availability, exposure, utilization, and perceived barriers to five major FNS modalities including deep brain stimulation (DBS), vagal nerve stimulation (VNS), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgfUS) and percutaneous rhizotomy in LMICs.
    METHODS: We designed a survey using google forms while following the CHERRIES guidelines. Responses were collected from practicing neurosurgeons, neurosurgical fellows, and residents in LMICs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software 26.0 RESULTS: A total of 100 responses were recorded of which 96 % were males. 68 % worked in an educational setup. Respondents had the most exposure to SRS (36 %) followed by DBS (28 %) while MRgFUS was the least exposed modality (4 %) (p<0.001). For all modalities except MRgFUS, majority of the respondents were \'Fairly confident\' (p<0.001). No statistically significant association was observed in the availability of the modalities with the type of working setup. Majority of the respondents did not consider legal issues (p=0.003) and patient preferences (p=0.007) to be perceived barriers for any modality. Accessibility, affordability, Lack of training were not significant factors for any modality except DBS (52 %, p<0.001; 55 %, p<0.001 and 53 %, p=0.002 respectively) CONCLUSION: An integrated approach including international collaborations, traveling fellowships, novel policies must be adopted to enhance the reach of FNS to LMICs to share the extensive neurosurgical burden and to ease the neurosurgical decision making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是开发和评估一种新型的经轴手术方法的可行性和安全性,该方法用于使用非人灵长类动物和与人类临床翻译相关的手术技术和工具将人诱导性多能干细胞衍生的多巴胺能神经祖细胞(DANPCs)传递到壳核中。
    方法:九种免疫抑制,未释放的成年食蟹猴(4只雌性,5名男性)在实时术中MRI指导下接受了媒介物或DANPC(0.9×105至1.1×105细胞/µL)的静脉内注射。将输注液与1-mMgadoteridol(用于术中MRI可视化)结合,并使用经轴入路通过每个半球的两个轨道(腹侧和背侧)输送。左右壳核的输注总体积分别为25微升和50微升,分别(输注速率2.5微升/分钟)。用一系列临床和行为结果测量评价动物,并在手术后7或30天安乐死;由董事会认证的兽医病理学家进行完整的尸检。收集脑组织并进行免疫组化处理,包括针对人类特异性标记STEM121。
    结果:优化的手术技术和工具通过经轴入路成功靶向壳核。术中MR图像证实了所有动物的目标内注射。所有动物存活至预定终止,没有神经缺陷的临床证据。前4只接受手术的动物在手术结束时出现轻度脑肿胀,其中3例出现短暂性视力下降;在手术过程中给予甘露醇治疗和减少静脉输液可解决这些并发症.针对STEM121的免疫染色证实了在DANPC处理的动物的靶向壳核区域内沿着注射轨迹存在移植细胞。所有不良组织学发现范围有限,与手术操作一致。注射程序,以及由插管插入引起的机械破坏的术后炎症反应。
    结论:输送系统,注射程序,和DANPCs在所有动物中均有良好的耐受性。通过甘露醇给药和减少手术期间的静脉输液来预防轻度脑肿胀可以避免视觉效果。研究结果确定,这种新颖的跨轴方法可用于正确,安全地将细胞注射到连合后壳核并支持临床研究。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel transaxial surgical approach for the delivery of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic neuroprogenitor cells (DANPCs) into the putamen nucleus using nonhuman primates and surgical techniques and tools relevant to human clinical translation.
    METHODS: Nine immunosuppressed, unlesioned adult cynomolgus macaques (4 females, 5 males) received intraputaminal injections of vehicle or DANPCs (0.9 × 105 to 1.1 × 105 cells/µL) under real-time intraoperative MRI guidance. The infusates were combined with 1-mM gadoteridol (for intraoperative MRI visualization) and delivered via two tracks per hemisphere (ventral and dorsal) using a transaxial approach. The total volumes of infusion were 25 µL and 50 µL for the right and left putamen, respectively (infusion rate 2.5 µL/min). Animals were evaluated with a battery of clinical and behavioral outcome measures and euthanized 7 or 30 days postsurgery; full necropsies were performed by a board-certified veterinary pathologist. Brain tissues were collected and processed for immunohistochemistry, including against the human-specific marker STEM121.
    RESULTS: The optimized surgical technique and tools produced successful targeting of the putamen via the transaxial approach. Intraoperative MR images confirmed on-target intraputaminal injections in all animals. All animals survived to scheduled termination without clinical evidence of neurological deficits. The first 4 animals to undergo surgery had mild brain swelling noted at the end of surgery, of which 3 had transient reduced vision; administration of mannitol therapy and reduced intravenous fluid during the surgical procedure addressed these complications. Immunostaining against STEM121 confirmed the presence of grafted cells along the injection track within the targeted putamen area of DANPC-treated animals. All adverse histological findings were limited in scope and consistent with surgical manipulation, injection procedure, and postsurgical inflammatory response to the mechanical disruption caused by the cannula insertion.
    CONCLUSIONS: The delivery system, injection procedure, and DANPCs were well tolerated in all animals. Prevention of mild brain swelling by mannitol dosing and reduction of intravenous fluids during surgery allowed visual effects to be avoided. The results of the study established that this novel transaxial approach can be used to correctly and safely target cell injections to the postcommissural putamen and support clinical investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:舌下神经-面神经吻合术(HFA)是对保守治疗无反应的严重面神经麻痹最常用的外科治疗方法。HFA的主要并发症是舌功能的丧失。作者旨在评估使用下颌下颌神经吻合切断舌下神经是否可以防止接受HFA的患者的舌头偏离和功能障碍。
    方法:在这项随机试验中,对至少6个月的保守治疗无反应的重度周围性面神经麻痹(House-BrackmannV级或VI级)的成年患者以1∶1的比例随机分组,分别接受HFA单独治疗(对照组)或HFA加舌下神经间吻合术和舌下神经下降(干预组).主要终点为12个月时的舌偏角。关键的次要终点包括舌头残疾(咀嚼困难,吞咽缺陷,和关节缺陷),舌残疾指数(TDI;范围1-4,得分越高表示残疾越严重),和面部神经功能。
    结果:纳入20例患者(每组10例)。12个月时,干预组的舌偏角明显低于对照组(7.8°±5.1°vs23.6°±9.6°,p<0.001)。虽然没有统计学意义,干预组咀嚼困难率较低(1/10vs3/10,p=0.58),吞咽缺陷(1/10对5/10,p=0.14),关节缺损(2/10vs6/10,p=0.17)。干预组TDI显著降低(1.5±0.6vs2.5±0.3,p<0.001)。每组达到House-BrackmannII级或III级的患者百分比为80%。
    结论:在接受HFA治疗的面神经麻痹患者中,下行舌下神经与舌下神经的吻合减轻了舌偏,不损害面神经功能.临床试验登记号:ChiCTR2000034372(中国临床试验注册中心)。
    OBJECTIVE: Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis (HFA) is the most commonly used surgical treatment for severe facial palsy that does not respond to conservative treatments. A major complication of HFA is the loss of tongue function. The authors aimed to evaluate whether anastomosing the transected hypoglossal nerve using the ramus descendens hypoglossi could prevent tongue deviation and dysfunction in patients undergoing HFA.
    METHODS: In this randomized trial, adult patients with severe peripheral facial palsy (House-Brackmann grade V or VI) who did not respond to at least 6 months of conservative treatment were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to undergo either HFA alone (control group) or HFA plus anastomosis between the hypoglossal nerve and descendens hypoglossi (intervention group). The primary endpoint was tongue deviation angle at 12 months. Key secondary endpoints included tongue disability (chewing difficulty, swallowing defect, and articulation defect), tongue disability index (TDI; range 1-4, with a higher score indicating more severe disability), and facial nerve function.
    RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled (10 in each group). At 12 months, the tongue deviation angle was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (7.8° ± 5.1° vs 23.6° ± 9.6°, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, the intervention group had lower rates of chewing difficulty (1/10 vs 3/10, p = 0.58), swallowing defect (1/10 vs 5/10, p = 0.14), and articulation defect (2/10 vs 6/10, p = 0.17). TDI was significantly lower in the intervention group (1.5 ± 0.6 vs 2.5 ± 0.3, p < 0.001). The percentage of the patients achieving House-Brackmann grade II or III was 80% in each group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Anastomosis of the descendens hypoglossi to the transected hypoglossal nerve attenuated tongue deviation in patients undergoing HFA for facial palsy, without compromising facial nerve function. Clinical trial registration no: ChiCTR2000034372 (Chinese Clinical Trials Registry).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:接受深部脑刺激(DBS)的帕金森病(PD)患者的术前MR图像通常显示偶然的影像学异常(RA)。这些发现范围从微小的变化到严重的病理。这些发现对患者临床结局的影响尚不清楚。作者对接受DBS的PD患者的RA进行了表征,并评估了临床结果。
    方法:回顾了作者机构从2010年到2022年接受DBS电极植入MRI检查的PD患者的记录。从官方术前MRI报告中确定了RA。RA分为四个一般类别(缺血变化,萎缩或退行性变化[ADC],结构异常,和肿瘤)并与临床结果(包括主观临床反应,左旋多巴等效剂量[LED],和统一的帕金森病评定量表第三部分[UPDRS]评分)在1年和最后一次可用的随访中。
    结果:在这篇综述中,160名患者被确定为初步分析,135个呈现≥1个RA。在这135名患者中,69.4%(111/160)有缺血性血管改变,39.4%(63/160)有ADC,16.9%(27/160)发生结构变化,1.9%(3/160)有肿瘤。这些组之间的术前LED或UPDRS评分没有差异。在DBS之后,在1年和最后一次随访时间点,有RA的患者和没有RA的患者之间的结局没有差异。包括死亡率和时间。结构性病变与较低的死亡率相关(OR0.1,p=0.04)。ADC与1年(OR0.50,p=0.04)和最后(OR0.49,p=0.03)随访时主观临床反应较差相关,但是主观上较差的反应与较差的客观结果指标无关。
    结论:大多数RA对接受DBS的PD患者的临床结局没有显著影响。广义ADC可能与较差的主观反应相关,如果在术前MRI诊断,可能需要与患者进一步讨论。
    OBJECTIVE: Preoperative MR images obtained in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) often reveal incidental radiographic abnormalities (RAs). These findings range from small changes to gross pathologies. The effect of these findings on patients\' clinical outcomes is unknown. The authors characterized RAs in patients with PD who underwent DBS and assessed clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: Records of patients at the authors\' institution with PD who underwent MRI for DBS electrode implantation from 2010 through 2022 were reviewed. RAs were identified from the official preoperative MRI reports. RAs were grouped into four general categories (ischemic changes, atrophy or degenerative changes [ADCs], structural abnormalities, and tumors) and correlated with clinical outcomes (including subjective clinical response, levodopa equivalent dose [LED], and Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale Part III [UPDRS] score) at the 1-year and last available follow-ups.
    RESULTS: In this review, 160 patients were identified for initial analysis, with 135 presenting with ≥ 1 RAs. Of these 135 patients, 69.4% (111/160) had ischemic vascular changes, 39.4% (63/160) had ADCs, 16.9% (27/160) had structural changes, and 1.9% (3/160) had tumors. No differences in preoperative LED or UPDRS score were observed between these groups. After DBS, no differences in outcomes were observed between patients with RAs and those without RAs for both the 1-year and last follow-up time points, including mortality rates and times. Structural lesions were associated with lower mortality rates (OR 0.1, p = 0.04). ADCs were associated with a worse subjective clinical response at the 1-year (OR 0.50, p = 0.04) and last (OR 0.49, p = 0.03) follow-ups, but subjectively worse responses were not correlated with worse objective outcome measures.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most RAs have no significant effect on clinical outcomes in PD patients undergoing DBS. Generalized ADCs may be associated with poorer subjective responses and may warrant further discussion with the patient if diagnosed on preoperative MRI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是提供拉丁美洲与美国和欧洲在主要适应症方面的深部脑刺激(DBS)程序的地理比较,人口统计信息,临床和设备相关不良事件,使用的技术,使用截至2021年7月31日的美敦力产品监测注册数据和患者结果。
    方法:两千九百十二名患者被纳入登记(2782人接受DBS,1580人目前正在活动)。14个国家为注册提供了44,100年的设备经验。拉丁美洲的DBS中心位于哥伦比亚(n=3),阿根廷(n=1),巴西(n=1),墨西哥(n=1)。Fisher精确检验用于比较地区之间分类变量比例的差异。Wilcoxon符号秩检验用于从基线到随访的EQ-5D指数得分变化。
    结果:DBS最常见的适应症是所有地区的帕金森病。在拉丁美洲,肌张力障碍是第二常见的适应症,与其他地区的特发性震颤相比。关于拉丁美洲DBS植入的年龄患者平均年轻10岁,有一个惊人的发现。这种差异很可能是由于接受装置植入物的肌张力障碍患者数量增加。术中技术非常相似,显示出相同的质量水平,并涵盖了手术的主要原则,但框架品牌有所变化,规划软件,和微记录系统。可充电电池在拉丁美洲(72.37%)明显比美国(6.44%)和欧洲(9.9%)更为普遍。DBS程序的分期不同,拉丁美洲只有11.84%的人进行了手术,而美国和欧洲的这一比例为97.58%和34.86%,分别。EQ-5D评分显示在前6-12个月中所有地区均有显着改善(p<0.0001)。然而,24个月的随访仅显示拉丁美洲的量表有所改善(p<0.0001).
    结论:DBS在拉丁美洲进行,适应症相似,技术,以及美国和欧洲的技术。发现了重要的差异,随着拉丁美洲实施更经常使用可充电设备,包括手术时的年轻患者,并在24个月的随访中显示出更持续的生活质量改善。作者假设,这些差异源于地区之间资源的差异。然而,需要更多的研究来规范世界各地的DBS实践,以改善患者的生活质量并提供高质量的护理。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide geographic comparisons of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures in Latin America with the US and Europe regarding primary indications, demographic information, clinical and device-related adverse events, technology used, and patient outcomes using the Medtronic Product Surveillance Registry data as of July 31, 2021.
    METHODS: Two thousand nine hundred twelve patients were enrolled in the registry (2782 received DBS and 1580 are currently active). Fourteen countries contributed 44,100 years of device experience to the registry. DBS centers in Latin America are located in Colombia (n = 3), Argentina (n = 1), Brazil (n = 1), and Mexico (n = 1). Fisher\'s exact test was used to compare the difference in proportions of categorical variables between regions. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the EQ-5D index score change from baseline to follow-up.
    RESULTS: The most common indication for DBS was Parkinson\'s disease across all regions. In Latin America, dystonia was the second most common indication, compared to essential tremor in other regions. There was a striking finding with respect to age-patients were an average of 10 years younger at DBS implantation in Latin America. This difference was most likely due to the greater number of patients with dystonia receiving the device implants. The intraoperative techniques were quite similar, showing the same level of quality and covering the main principles of the surgeries with some variations in the brand of frames, planning software, and microrecording systems. Rechargeable batteries were significantly more common in Latin America (72.37%) than in the US (6.44%) and Europe (9.9%). Staging of the DBS procedure differed, with only 11.84% in Latin America staging the procedure compared with 97.58% and 34.86% in the US and Europe, respectively. The EQ-5D score showed significant improvements in all regions during the first 6-12 months (p < 0.0001). However, the 24-month follow-up only showed an improvement in the scale for Latin America (p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: DBS was performed in Latin America with similar indications, techniques, and technology as in the US and Europe. Important differences were found, with Latin America implementing more regular use of rechargeable devices, including younger patients at the time of surgery, and showing more sustained quality of life improvements at 24 months of follow-up. The authors hypothesize that these disparities stem from differences in resources among regions. However, more studies are needed to standardize DBS practice across the world to improve patients\' quality of life and provide high-quality care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号