functional abdominal pain disorder

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:炎症性肠病(IBD),嗜酸性粒细胞性胃肠道疾病(EGID),和功能性腹痛障碍(FAPD)在临床上表现出非特异性胃肠道(GI)症状,并且在与嗜酸性粒细胞相关的发病机制方面也有一些相似之处。因此,我们旨在通过研究外周血和胃肠道组织中的嗜酸性粒细胞以及嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP),来评估嗜酸性粒细胞在IBD中的作用,而非EGID和FAPD.
    方法:纳入患有慢性胃肠道症状且接受内镜活检的儿科患者。全血细胞计数,炎症标志物,免疫球蛋白E(IgE),血清ECP水平,对内镜和组织病理学检查结果进行回顾性分析.
    结果:共包括387例患者:179例EGID,107与IBD,和82与FAPD。外周绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数(AEC),总IgE,IBD和EGID的血清ECP均明显高于FAPD(均p<0.05)。除食道外,三组胃肠道各段组织嗜酸性粒细胞计数差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在上升的组织嗜酸性粒细胞计数中观察到显着差异,乙状结肠,直肠在EGID和IBD之间(p<0.05)。胃和十二指肠的外周和组织嗜酸性粒细胞在EGID和IBD中均显示出正相关(均p<0.001)。
    结论:嗜酸性粒细胞相关标志物升高,与FAPD相比,IBD和EGID中胃肠道受影响区域的组织嗜酸性粒细胞浸润增加,提示嗜酸性粒细胞可能在两种疾病的发病机制中起着共同的重要作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID), and functional abdominal pain disorder (FAPD) present with nonspecific gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms clinically and also have some similarities in pathogeneses associated with eosinophils. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the role of eosinophils in IBD compared to EGID and FAPD by investigating eosinophils in peripheral blood and GI tissue and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP).
    METHODS: Pediatric patients with chronic GI symptoms who underwent endoscopic biopsies were enrolled. Complete blood cell counts, inflammatory markers, immunoglobulin E (IgE), serum ECP levels, and endoscopic and histopathologic findings were retrospectively reviewed.
    RESULTS: A total of 387 patients were included: 179 with EGID, 107 with IBDs, and 82 with FAPD. Peripheral absolute eosinophil count (AEC), total IgE, and serum ECP were significantly higher in both IBD and EGID than in FAPD (all p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were noted among the three groups in tissue eosinophil counts in each segment of GI tract except for the esophagus (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in tissue eosinophil counts in the ascending, sigmoid colon, and rectum between EGID and IBD (p < 0.05). Peripheral and tissue eosinophils in the stomach and duodenum revealed positive correlation in both EGID and IBD (both p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Elevated eosinophil-related markers, as well as increased tissue eosinophilic infiltration in the affected areas of the GI tract in both IBD and EGID compared to FAPD, suggest that eosinophils might play a common important role in the pathogeneses of both diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童睡眠问题的发生率正在增加,它们被认为有助于功能性腹痛障碍(FAPD)的疼痛。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估FAPD患儿的睡眠障碍模式并确定相关因素.我们回顾性分析了根据罗马IV标准诊断为FAPD的12-18岁患者。为了评估睡眠问题,我们使用了韩国版本的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI-K)。为了评估与睡眠障碍相关的因素,我们使用逻辑回归模型中估计的比值比(OR).在接受评估的66名患者中,57.6%(38/66)的PSQI-K总分>5分,表明睡眠有明显的紊乱,52.6%(20/38)患有肠易激综合征(IBS),和47.4%(18/38)有功能性腹痛-未另作说明。所有患者的平均PSQI-K评分为7.2±6.0,与健康对照组相比,睡眠发作潜伏期更长(26.33±19.44分钟)。IBS患者几乎所有PSQI-K分量表得分均升高。在单变量分析中,腹痛评分>7分和IBS与睡眠质量差相关.在多变量分析中,只有IBS与睡眠障碍有关。相对较大比例的FAPD患者有睡眠问题,这些在IBS患者中更为常见。因此,对于有严重腹痛和IBS的FAPD患者,还应考虑采取改善睡眠质量的干预措施.
    The incidence of sleep problems is increasing in children, and they are thought to contribute to pain in functional abdominal pain disorder (FAPD). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the pattern of sleep disturbance in children with FAPD and identify the associated factors. We retrospectively analyzed patients aged 12-18 years who were diagnosed with FAPD based on the Rome IV criteria. To assess sleep problems, we used the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-K). To evaluate factors associated with sleep disturbances, we used the odds ratios (OR) estimated in logistic regression models. Among the 66 patients evaluated, 57.6% (38/66) had a total PSQI-K score > 5, indicating a significant disturbance in sleep, 52.6% (20/38) had irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and 47.4% (18/38) had functional abdominal pain-not otherwise specified. The mean PSQI-K score was 7.2 ± 6.0, and longer sleep onset latency was noted (26.33 ± 19.44 min) in all patients than healthy controls. Almost all PSQI-K subscales scores were elevated in patients with IBS. In univariate analysis, abdominal pain score > 7 and IBS were associated with poor sleep quality. In multivariate analysis, only IBS was associated with sleep disturbance. A relatively large proportion of patients with FAPD had sleep problems and these were more common in patients with IBS. Thus, interventions for improving sleep quality should also be considered in patients with FAPD with severe abdominal pain and IBS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肠脑相互作用(DGBIs)障碍占小儿胃肠道(GI)咨询的50%。患有DGBIs的儿童的生活质量(QoL)比患有器质性胃肠道疾病(例如炎症性肠病和胃食管反流病)的儿童差。儿童DGBIs患者,尤其是那些患有慢性腹痛(AP)的人,QoL受损,焦虑和抑郁形式的心理困扰增加。经皮神经电场刺激(PENFS)治疗已被证明可有效改善DGBIs儿童的症状和功能。治疗对这些患者QoL的影响尚不清楚。
    这项前瞻性研究评估了QoL的变化,胃肠道症状,功能性残疾,躯体化,全球健康,焦虑,接受PENFS治疗的11-18岁患者的抑郁症(IB-stim,NeurAxis,凡尔赛,IN)用于治疗疼痛相关的DGBIs,每周一次,连续四周。
    这项研究包括31名患者,平均年龄为15.7岁(SD=2);80.6%为女性。PENFS治疗后,患者报告腹痛显著减轻,恶心的严重程度,功能性残疾,躯体化,从基线到第4周的焦虑(p<0.05)。父母报告说,他们孩子的QoL在身体功能方面有显著改善,社会心理功能,和通用核心量表评分(p<0.05)。父母还注意到腹痛减轻,功能性残疾,和躯体化。根据患者和家长报告,患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)全球健康量表的平均得分显着提高(p<0.05)。我们的患者在基线和治疗后的QoL显著低于健康对照组(p<0.05)。
    我们的研究表明,PENFS显著提高患有疼痛相关DGBIs的儿童的QoL,除了改善胃肠道症状,日常运作,躯体化,全球健康,和心理合并症。这些发现证明了PENFS的有效性及其减轻无数儿童痛苦的潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: Disorders of the Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBIs) account for 50% of pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) consultations. Children with DGBIs have worse quality of life (QoL) than those with organic GI disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pediatric DGBIs patients, especially those with chronic abdominal pain (AP), have impaired QoL and increased psychological distress in the form of anxiety and depression. Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) therapy has been shown to be effective in improving symptoms and functioning in children with DGBIs. The treatment\'s impact on these patients\' QoL is unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective study evaluated changes in QoL, gastrointestinal symptoms, functional disability, somatization, global health, anxiety, and depression in patients aged 11-18 years who received PENFS therapy (IB-stim, NeurAxis, Versailles, IN) for treatment of pain related DGBIs, once a week for four consecutive weeks.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 31 patients with an average age of 15.7 years (SD = 2); 80.6% were female. After PENFS therapy, patients reported significant reductions in abdominal pain, nausea severity, functional disability, somatization, and anxiety from baseline to week 4 (p < 0.05). Parents reported significant improvement in their child\'s QoL regarding physical function, psychosocial function, and generic core scale scores (p < 0.05). Parents also noted reduced abdominal pain, functional disability, and somatization. Average scores on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health scale significantly improved based on both patient and parent reports (p < 0.05). Our patients\' QoL was significantly lower than healthy controls at baseline and after treatment (p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Our research demonstrates that PENFS significantly enhances the QoL of children suffering from pain-related DGBIs, in addition to improvement in GI symptoms, daily functioning, somatization, global health, and psychological comorbidities. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of PENFS and its potential to alleviate the suffering of countless children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于患有功能性胃肠病(FGID)的成年人,对疾病特异性刺激的认知偏见对于症状的发展和维持至关重要。功能性腹痛障碍(FAPD),FGID的子类型,在儿童和青少年中很常见,但认知偏见的影响是稀疏地研究。本研究旨在(1)开发一种新的实验设计,用于评估儿童和青少年(8至17岁)对胃肠道刺激的认知偏见;(2)使用健康的“规范”样本得出对胃肠道刺激偏见的比较数据。在线实验设计BY-GIS(青少年对胃肠道相关刺激的偏见)包括单词任务和图片任务。两项任务的刺激都与一般症状和胃肠道症状有关,设计包括三个阶段:(1)编码,(2)免费召回,(3)识别。数据是在2022年4月至2023年4月期间从96名健康参与者(Mage=12.32,47.92%为女性)收集的。青少年在回忆单词方面明显优于儿童(p=0.03),而在回忆图片方面没有显著的性别和年龄差异(p>0.05)。跨越年龄和性别,参与者在两项任务的识别阶段的表现均高于机会水平。结果支持该设计在年龄跨度内是合适的。
    Cognitive biases toward disorder-specific stimuli are suggested as crucial to the development and maintenance of symptoms in adults with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPD), a subtype of FGID, are common in children and adolescents, but the influence of cognitive biases is sparsely examined. This study aimed to (1) develop a new experimental design for assessing cognitive biases toward gastrointestinal stimuli in children and adolescents (aged 8 to 17 years) and (2) derive comparative data on bias toward gastrointestinal stimuli using a healthy \"normative\" sample. The online experimental design-BY-GIS (Bias in Youth toward GastroIntestinal-related Stimuli)-includes a word task and a picture task. Stimuli in both tasks are related to general and gastrointestinal symptoms, and the design includes three phases: (1) encoding, (2) free recall, and (3) recognition. Data were collected between April 2022 and April 2023 from 96 healthy participants (Mage = 12.32, 47.92% female). Adolescents were significantly better at recalling words than children (p = 0.03), whereas there were no significant gender or age differences with regard to recalling pictures (p > 0.05). Across age and gender, participants performed above chance level in the recognition phases of both tasks. The results support that the design is suitable within the age span.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在儿科实践中,慢性腹痛最常见的原因是功能性腹痛疾病,罗马IV分类下的功能性胃肠病亚组。便秘通常与排便疼痛有关,但是腹痛作为功能性便秘(FC)的主要或表现症状尚未得到很好的认识。我们进行了这项研究,以确定慢性疼痛腹部中FC的患病率以及表现出腹部疼痛的FC儿童的比例。在我们医院的4岁以上的儿童中,分别确定了FC和功能性腹痛的患病率。记录了FC出现腹痛的儿童人数。在FC组中记录腹痛部位和持续时间,并与功能性腹痛组进行比较,以找出任何意义。诊断基于罗马IV标准,但只要有临床指征,就会进行排除器质性病理学的相关调查。在我们的胃肠病学服务中,腹痛的患病率为22%,而FC的患病率为27%。在患有慢性腹痛的儿童中,10%的患者出现FC,34%的患者出现功能性腹痛。在出现便秘的儿童中,12%有疼痛作为唯一的主诉。然而,以某种形式的疼痛或疼痛为症状之一的患者占47.5%。FC是儿童腹部疼痛的主要原因,经常被忽视。不将疼痛归因于便秘可能会延迟诊断,可能预后不良。
    The most common causes for chronic pain abdomen in pediatric practice are functional abdominal pain disorders, a subgroup of functional gastrointestinal disorders under the Rome IV classification. Constipation is usually associated with painful defecation, but abdominal pain as a predominant or presenting symptom of functional constipation (FC) is not very well recognized. We conducted this study to ascertain the prevalence of FC in chronic pain abdomen and proportion of FC children presenting with predominant complaints of pain abdomen. Prevalence of FC and functional abdominal pain was ascertained separately over a 1-year in children > 4 years of age in our hospital. The number of children with FC presenting with abdominal pain was noted. Abdominal pain site and duration were noted in the FC group and were compared with those in the functional abdominal pain group to find out any significance. Diagnosis was based on Rome IV criteria, but relevant investigations to rule out organic pathology were done whenever clinically indicated. The prevalence of abdominal pain was 22% in our gastroenterology service and that of FC was 27%. Among the children presenting with chronic abdominal pain, FC was seen in 10% of the patients and functional abdominal pain disorders in 34%. Among children presenting with constipation, 12% had pain as the sole complaint. However, some form of pain or pain as one of the symptoms was seen in 47.5%.  FC is a major cause for abdomen pain in children and is often overlooked. Not attributing pain to constipation may delay the diagnosis, which may have poor prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管有证据表明,与一般人群相比,炎症性肠病(IBD)成人中肠易激综合征(IBS)的患病率增加,IBS在IBD患儿中的患病率尚不清楚.在这次审查中,我们旨在确定IBS或功能性腹痛障碍(FAPDs)在IBD缓解期儿童中的报告患病率.搜索三个数据库(MEDLINE,Embase,和PubMed)进行了研究,以确定报告IBS或FAPDs在缓解期IBD的儿科患者中的患病率。总共确定了60项研究,抽象筛选后仍有四项符合条件的研究。在IBD缓解期儿童中,IBS的总体患病率在3.9%至16.1%之间,FAPDs的总体患病率介于9.6%和29.5%之间.FAPDs在基于生物标志物的缓解患者中的患病率通常高于临床缓解患者(范围16-22.5%vs9.6-16.7%,分别)。很少有文献报道IBS或FAPDs在IBD缓解期儿童中的患病率。尽管在纳入的文章中定义IBD缓解的标准存在差异,在IBD患儿中,IBS或FAPDs的总体患病率似乎增加.
    Despite evidence of an increased prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) compared with the general population, the prevalence of IBS in children with IBD is unclear. In this review, we aimed to identify the reported prevalence of IBS or functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) in children with IBD in remission. A search of three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed) was performed to identify studies reporting the prevalence of IBS or FAPDs in pediatric patients with IBD in remission. A total of 60 studies were identified, with four eligible studies remaining following abstract screening. In children with IBD in remission, the overall prevalence of IBS ranged between 3.9 and 16.1%, and the overall prevalence of FAPDs ranged between 9.6 and 29.5%. The prevalence of FAPDs in patients in biomarker-based remission was generally higher than those in clinical remission (range 16-22.5% vs 9.6-16.7%, respectively). There is a paucity of literature reporting on the prevalence of IBS or FAPDs in children with IBD in remission. Despite the differences in criteria used to define IBD remission in the included articles, there seems to be an increased overall prevalence of IBS or FAPDs in children with IBD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大约90%的慢性腹痛儿童被诊断为功能性腹痛障碍(FAPD)。荷兰指南“功能性腹痛”提供了一种逐步治疗FAPD的方法。这项调查的目的是双重的,首先,为了确定是否遵守荷兰的指导方针,第二,确定FAPDs在临床实践中的当前管理。
    方法:设计了多中心调查。该调查于2020年12月发送给儿科医生和儿科居民。该研究从2020年10月到2021年3月进行。邀请荷兰西部地区十家医院的参与者完成这项调查。表示不治疗FAPD儿童的受访者或完成调查少于3个步骤的受访者被排除在外。
    结果:总计,85/174(48.9%)受访者完成了调查。我们包括80名受访者,68名儿科医生和12名儿科住院医师,用于分析。总的来说,自我报告的指南依从性为85%.自我报告的依从性高于实际依从性。所有受访者中只有50%遵循了该指南的前三个步骤。报道的非药物和药物治疗在不同年龄段之间是不同的。平均随访2~6个月,最经常使用的结果指标是上学,生活质量,和足够的疼痛缓解/保证。
    结论:据报道,我们观察到FAPDs患儿的管理存在很大差异,由于临床医生的指南依从性低。改进的指南依从性可以通过用每个亚型的具体建议更新指南来实现。后续和成果措施以及改进指南执行的措施。
    BACKGROUND: Approximately 90% of the children with chronic abdominal pain are diagnosed as having functional abdominal pain disorder (FAPD). The Dutch guideline \"functional abdominal pain\" provides a stepwise approach to treat FAPD. The aim of this survey was twofold first, to determine adherence to the Dutch guideline, and second to determine current management of FAPDs in clinical practice.
    METHODS: A multicenter survey was designed. The survey was sent to pediatricians and pediatric residents in December 2020. The study ran from October 2020 until March 2021. Participants in ten hospitals in the western region of The Netherlands were invited to complete this survey. Respondents who indicated not to treat children with FAPDs or respondents who completed less than 3 steps of the survey were excluded.
    RESULTS: In total, 85/174 (48.9%) respondents completed the survey. We included 80 respondents, 68 pediatricians and 12 pediatric residents, for analysis. Overall, self-reported guideline adherence was 85%. Self-reported adherence was higher than actual adherence. Only 50% of all respondents followed the first three steps of the guideline. The reported non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments were diverse and varied between different age groups. The average follow-up duration was between 2 and 6 months, and the most regularly used outcome measures were attendance at school, quality of life, and adequate pain relief/reassurance.
    CONCLUSIONS: We reportedly observed a large variation in the management of children with FAPDs, due to low guideline adherence among clinicians. Improved guideline adherence may be accomplished by updating the guideline with specific recommendations per subtype, follow-up and outcome measures as well measures to improve guideline implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    功能性腹痛障碍(FAPDs)是儿童功能性胃肠病的重要和普遍原因,包括功能性消化不良的诊断,肠易激综合征,腹部偏头痛,和以前没有出现在罗马三世的那个,功能性腹痛未另作说明。在缺乏足够有效和安全的药物治疗这个公共问题,非药物疗法成为治疗这些患者的可行手段,不仅避免可能的副作用,但也是不必要的处方,因为与安慰剂相比,许多处方的药物治疗效果不佳。因此,本研究对FAPDs的非药物治疗的当前和相关证据进行了综述,涵盖最常见的治疗方法,从认知行为疗法到冥想,针灸,瑜伽,按摩,脊柱操纵,艾灸,和体育活动。此外,本文还分析了该地区出版物的质量,评估是否有可能说明非药物疗法是否可行,安全,和足够好的基础为这些治疗的适当和有效的处方。最后,有可能观察到,不仅近年来关于FAPDs非药物治疗的出版物数量有所增加,但也提高了这些出版物的质量。最后,在这些研究中选择令人满意的年龄组的样本,可以为该年龄组制定具体的指导方针,从而避免了对最初为成人开出的处方进行调整的需要,但对于儿童使用。
    Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) are an important and prevalent cause of functional gastrointestinal disorders among children, encompassing the diagnoses of functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, abdominal migraine, and the one not previously present in Rome III, functional abdominal pain not otherwise specified. In the absence of sufficiently effective and safe pharmacological treatments for this public problem, non-pharmacological therapies emerge as a viable means of treating these patients, avoiding not only possible side effects, but also unnecessary prescription, since many of the pharmacological treatments prescribed do not have good efficacy when compared to placebo. Thus, the present study provides a review of current and relevant evidence on non-pharmacological management of FAPDs, covering the most commonly indicated treatments, from cognitive behavioral therapy to meditation, acupuncture, yoga, massage, spinal manipulation, moxibustion, and physical activities. In addition, this article also analyzes the quality of publications in the area, assessing whether it is possible to state if non-pharmacological therapies are viable, safe, and sufficiently well-based for an appropriate and effective prescription of these treatments. Finally, it is possible to observe an increase not only in the number of publications on the non-pharmacological treatments for FAPDs in recent years, but also an increase in the quality of these publications. Finally, the sample selection of satisfactory age groups in these studies enables the formulation of specific guidelines for this age group, thus avoiding the need for adaptation of prescriptions initially made for adults, but for children use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    功能性腹痛障碍(FAPDs)和功能性便秘(FC)是青少年常见的功能性胃肠病。我们旨在使用儿童胃肠道症状的罗马IV问卷以及与这两种功能性胃肠道疾病相关的因素来确定青少年中FAPDs和FC的患病率。
    在两所高中对青少年中FAPD和FC的患病率进行了调查。使用经翻译和验证的泰语版本的小儿胃肠道症状罗马IV问卷。还收集了潜在的相关因素。使用优势和困难问卷评估心理社会问题。
    共纳入1700名青少年(55.5%为女性),平均年龄(SD)为16.1(0.9)岁。FAPDs和FC的患病率分别为5.3%和8.1%,分别。FAPDs的亚型为功能性消化不良(4.7%;餐后窘迫综合征3.9%和上腹痛综合征0.8%),肠易激综合征(0.6%),腹部偏头痛(0.4%)和功能性腹痛(0.3%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示FAPDs与女性性别相关(比值比(OR)3.3,95%置信区间(CI):1.7-6.4),潜在的过敏性疾病(OR3.2,95%CI:1.6-6.6)和伴随的情绪问题(OR2.7,95%CI:1.2-5.9)。未发现与FC显著相关的因素。
    FAPD和FC在青少年中很常见。餐后窘迫综合征是最常见的FAPD亚型。FAPDs的相关因素可能提示荷尔蒙,免疫相关和心理参与疾病的发病机制。
    Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) and functional constipation (FC) are the common functional gastrointestinal disorders in adolescents. We aimed to determine the prevalence of FAPDs and FC in adolescents using the Rome IV Questionnaire of Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms and the factors associated with these two functional gastrointestinal disorders.
    A survey for the prevalence of FAPDs and FC in adolescents was carried out at two high schools. A translated and validated Thai version of Rome IV Questionnaire of Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms was used. Potential associated factors were also collected. Psychosocial problems were evaluated by using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
    A total of 1700 adolescents (55.5% females) with a mean age (SD) of 16.1 (0.9) years were enrolled. The prevalence of FAPDs and FC was 5.3% and 8.1%, respectively. The subtypes of FAPDs were functional dyspepsia (4.7%; postprandial distress syndrome 3.9% and epigastric pain syndrome 0.8%), irritable bowel syndrome (0.6%), abdominal migraine (0.4%) and functional abdominal pain not otherwise specified (0.3%). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that FAPDs were associated with female gender (odds ratio (OR) 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-6.4), underlying allergic diseases (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.6-6.6) and concomitant emotional problem (OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2-5.9). No significant associated factors with FC were found.
    FAPDs and FC are common in adolescents. Postprandial distress syndrome is the most common subtype of FAPD. Associated factors for FAPDs may suggest hormonal, immune-related and psychological involvement in the disease pathogenesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心身技术,如冥想改善儿童和成人IBS症状。典型课程,然而,时间长,难以管理。我们报告了PrekshaDhyana(PD)短期课程的经验,适合儿童的瑜伽冥想。方法:医生提供专注的冥想,而医疗助理教授瑜伽。每两周进行三次会议,并提出每日实践建议。疼痛严重程度将Likert评分与照常治疗(TAU)历史对照进行比较。从基线比较PD组的焦虑评分。结果:30例年龄在9-17岁的PD患者(20名女性)和52例年龄在5-17岁的连续TAU组(33名女性)。每两周一次的会议完成率很高(71%)。尽管增加了会话,但PD的利用率与TAU相似。PD组的平均随访时间为8.9±9.4,而不是TAU组6.0±3.9个月(p=0.522)。疼痛评分相对于基线的变化显示PD组改善,0.67±0.13vs.TAU1.39±0.11(p=0.0003)。在PD组,焦虑评分较基线显着改善(0.5vs.1,P<0.001)。疼痛改善了93%(28/30),缓解了47%(14/30)。结论:在繁忙的儿科办公室中成功地嵌入了短期PD课程,而无需额外的人员配备。该方法在不增加整体医疗保健利用率的情况下具有成本效益,并且比TAU具有显着的优势。待RCT确认,这提供了一种经济有效的方法,将身心技术纳入儿科诊所。
    Introduction: Mind body techniques such as meditation improve symptoms in children and adults with IBS. Typical courses, however, are lengthy and difficult to administer. We report our experience with a short course of Preksha Dhyana (PD), a child-friendly focused meditation with yoga. Method: Physicians deliver focused meditation while medical assistants taught yoga. Three sessions were administered biweekly with recommendations for daily practice. Pain severity Likert scores were compared with a treatment as usual (TAU) historical control. Anxiety scores were compared from baseline in the PD group. Results: Thirty PD patients aged 9-17 (20 female) and 52 consecutive TAU group aged 5-17 (33 female) were reviewed. The biweekly sessions had high (71%) completion rates. Utilization rates of PD were similar to TAU despite added sessions. The PD group had an average time of follow-up of 8.9 ± 9.4 vs. 6.0 ± 3.9 months in the TAU group (p = 0.522). Changes in pain scores from baseline showed improvement in the PD group, 0.67 ± 0.13 vs. TAU 1.39 ± 0.11 (p = 0.0003). In the PD group, anxiety scores improved significantly from baseline (0.5 vs. 1, P < 0.001). Pain improved in 93% (28/30) and resolved in 47% (14/30). Conclusion: A short course of PD was successfully embedded in a busy pediatric office without additional staffing. The approach proved cost-effective without increasing overall healthcare utilization and showed significant benefits over TAU. Pending RCT confirmation, this offers a cost-effective method to incorporate mind-body techniques into a pediatric office practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号