frontline maintenance

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:巩固治疗可改善原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)患者的反应持续时间。来那度胺维持治疗在老年PCNSL患者中显示出令人鼓舞的结果。在这里,我们做了一个回顾,单中心分析评估来那度胺维持治疗对新诊断PCNSL患者缓解持续时间的影响。
    方法:纳入69名在诱导治疗后达到完全缓解或部分缓解(PR)的PCNSL成年患者。患者的中位年龄为58.0岁。维持组(n=35)口服来那度胺(25mg/天),持续21天,每28天一次,共24个月;观察组未接受任何进一步治疗。
    结果:中位随访32.6个月后,维持组复发事件较少.然而,组间中位无进展生存期(PFS)相似(36.1vs.30.6个月;危险比,0.78;95%置信区间,0.446)。来那度胺维持治疗仅在诱导后经历PR的患者中显着改善了PFS和总体生存率(OS)。来那度胺维持的中位持续时间为18个月;来那度胺耐受性良好,对生活质量的影响最小。
    结论:本研究首次评估来那度胺维持作为PCNSL患者的一线治疗,PFS和OS没有改善,尽管安全性令人满意。
    BACKGROUND: Consolidation therapy improves the duration of response among patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Lenalidomide maintenance has shown encouraging results in older patients with PCNSL. Herein, we performed a retrospective, single-center analysis to evaluate the effect of lenalidomide maintenance on the duration of response in patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL.
    METHODS: Sixty-nine adult patients with PCNSL who achieved complete remission or partial remission (PR) after induction therapy were enrolled. The median age of patients was 58.0 years. The maintenance group (n = 35) received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day) for 21 days, every 28 days for 24 months; the observation group did not undergo any further treatment.
    RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 32.6 months, the maintenance group experienced fewer relapse events. However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between groups (36.1 vs. 30.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.446). Lenalidomide maintenance significantly improved PFS and overall survival (OS) only among patients who experienced PR after induction. The median duration of lenalidomide maintenance was 18 months; lenalidomide was well tolerated and minimally impacted the quality of life.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study was the first to evaluate lenalidomide maintenance as a frontline treatment among patients with PCNSL, PFS and OS did not improve, although the safety profile was satisfactory.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管对基于铂的化疗的初始反应率高,但卵巢癌的治疗仍然是临床挑战。患者通常在晚期被诊断为具有重大疾病负担,这预示着更糟糕的生存结果。在卵巢癌中发现了同源重组(HRD)DNA损伤修复(DDR)途径的缺陷和BRCA1/2基因的突变。此外,具有这些特定分子畸变的患者已证明对聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)治疗的敏感性,因此改善了对PARPi的反应.探索在不同卵巢癌患者人群中使用PARPi的各种临床试验的结果显示了令人印象深刻的生存和反应结果。随着适应症的扩大,因此,PARPi的使用改变了卵巢癌治疗的前景.在这一章中,我们将描述PARPi治疗的不同设置-一线维持治疗,复发性铂敏感疾病患者的维持治疗,以及在复发性环境中的治疗-并讨论治疗注意事项和毒性管理,以及对未来方向的思考。
    The treatment of ovarian cancer has remained a clinical challenge despite high rates of initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients are generally diagnosed at an advanced stage with significant disease burden, which portends to worse survival outcomes. Deficiencies in the homologous recombination (HRD) DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway and mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes have been found in ovarian carcinomas. Moreover, patients with these specific molecular aberrations have demonstrated sensitivity and thus improved response to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) treatment. The results of various clinical trials exploring the use of PARPi in different populations of ovarian cancer patients have shown impressive survival and response outcomes. With expanding indications, the use of PARPi has thus changed the landscape of ovarian cancer treatment. In this chapter, we will describe the different settings of PARPi treatment-frontline maintenance therapy, maintenance therapy for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive disease, and treatment in the recurrent setting-and discuss treatment considerations and management of toxicities, as well as offer thoughts on future directions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号