free tissue transfer

自由组织转移
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景本研究旨在确定GEM微血管耦合器系统(GEMCoupler)在一系列接受头颈部缺损游离皮瓣重建的患者中的预后预测因子。方法在这篇回顾性图表中,回顾了在学术三级护理中心对204例患者进行的218例连续微血管手术,人口统计,合并症,手术数据,并检索结果。分析的终点是微血管翻修手术和皮瓣存活。结果男性142例(70.2%),女性62例(29.8%),平均年龄为56岁,主要治疗恶性肿瘤(76%)。股前外侧和腓骨是最常用的皮瓣(40.4%和27.1%,分别)。在21例(9.6%)中,进行了双静脉吻合.有9例皮瓣失败,需要进行微血管翻修手术;在其中4例中,皮瓣得到了挽救,总成功率为97.7%。与皮瓣完全丢失相关的因素包括血栓或栓塞事件的病史(p=0.017),旋髂深动脉皮瓣(p<0.001),和没有监测皮肤桨(p<0.001)。结论血栓形成的条件,掩埋襟翼,和皮瓣类型是使用GEMCoupler进行微血管重建的患者的预后预测因素。
    Background This study aimed to identify outcome predictors with the GEM microvascular coupler system (GEM Coupler) in a series of patients undergoing free flap reconstruction for head and neck defects. Methodology In this retrospective chart review of 218 consecutive microvascular procedures performed on 204 patients at an academic tertiary care center, demographics, comorbidities, surgical data, and outcomes were retrieved. The endpoints for the analysis were microvascular revision surgery and flap survival. Results The study included 142 (70.2%) males and 62 (29.8%) females, with a mean age of 56 years, primarily treated for malignancy (76%). The anterolateral thigh and fibula were the most commonly used flaps (40.4% and 27.1%, respectively). In 21 (9.6%) cases, a double venous anastomosis was performed. There were nine flap failures requiring microvascular revision surgery; the flap was salvaged in four of these cases yielding an overall success rate of 97.7%. Factors associated with total flap loss included a history of a thrombotic or embolic event (p = 0.017), deep circumflex iliac artery flap (p < 0.001), and absence of monitoring skin paddle (p < 0.001). Conclusions Prothrombotic conditions, buried flaps, and flap type are outcome predictors in patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction with GEM Coupler.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估功能状态和患者因素对辅助治疗延迟的影响。
    方法:在单个三级转诊中心进行了回顾性图表审查(2020-2022年)。数据收集于2020年1月至2022年10月之间,63例患者由于癌症的存在而接受了头颈部游离皮瓣重建手术,并接受了辅助放射治疗(RT)。测量的主要结果是面积剥夺指数(ADI),Beale得分,到辐射中心的距离,功能状态,患者人口统计学,性别,以及从手术到开始RT的长度。
    结果:在接受检查的63例患者中,平均年龄65.5岁,男性占63.8%。平均ADI状态评分为5.6,全国百分位数为77.1。Beale的平均得分为3.7。平均行驶距离为101.1英里。35名患者独立生活,16人生活在辅助生活或接受家庭护理,15人依赖或住在疗养院。Mann-WhitneyU分析显示,与按时治疗相比,治疗延迟的依赖性水平显着相关(p=0.002)。依赖性水平每增加一次,治疗延迟的几率增加近10倍(OR=9.87,95%CI=1.42-68.83)。
    结论:头颈部癌游离组织转移患者术后辅助放疗延迟与功能状态依赖程度相关。术前风险分层允许医生在延迟之前解决辅助治疗的障碍。
    方法:三级喉镜,2024.
    OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of functional status and patient factors on delays in treatment with adjuvant therapy.
    METHODS: Retrospective chart review (2020-2022) was conducted at a single tertiary referral center. Data were collected between January 2020 and October 2022, and 63 patients underwent free flap reconstructive surgery of the head and neck due to the presence of cancer and received adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). The main outcomes measured were Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Beale scores, distance to radiation center, functional status, patient demographics, gender, and length from surgery to initiation of RT.
    RESULTS: Of the 63 patients who were reviewed, the average age was 65.5 years old and 63.8% were male. The average ADI state score was 5.6 and the national percentile of 77.1. The average Beale score was 3.7. The average distance traveled was 101.1 miles. Thirty-five patients were living independently, 16 were living in assisted living or received home care, and 15 were dependent or lived in a nursing home. Mann-Whitney U analysis revealed a significant association of increasing levels of dependence to delays in treatment compared to on-time treatment (p = 0.002). The odds of treatment delay were increased almost 10-fold for every additional increase in dependency level (OR = 9.87, 95% CI = 1.42-68.83).
    CONCLUSIONS: Degree of dependent functional status correlates with delays in postoperative adjuvant RT in patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck cancer. Preoperative risk stratification allows for physicians to address barriers to adjuvant therapy prior to delay.
    METHODS: Level 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言管理开放性下肢骨折具有挑战性,潜在的并发症,如截肢和感染。该研究的目的是确定在非专科医院接受治疗的患者在转移到专门的I级创伤中心之前的时间延迟和初始治疗是否会导致更差的结果。方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2022年12月行游离组织转移治疗下肢开放性骨折患者44例(男37例,女7例)的临床资料。A组接受外部初级护理,后来被转移到确定性治疗(n=17,38.6%),而B组在I级创伤中心接受初始护理(n=27,61.4%)。手术结果,并发症,住院时间,和评估时间进行了比较。各种人口统计学变量,合并症,先前的干预措施,并对皮瓣类型进行了分析。结果平均年龄(A:55.1±16.7;B:38.7±19.8;p=0.041),总住院(A:55.7±22.8;B:42.8±21.3天;p=0.041),两组之间的软组织重建时间存在显着差异(A:30.7±12.2;B:18.9±9.3天;p=0.013)。总的来说,31.8%的患者有多处损伤,A组和B组之间无统计学差异(29.4%vs.33.3%;p>0.05)。两组之间在主要和次要并发症以及骨愈合特征方面没有统计学差异。肢体抢救总体成功率为93.2%(A:94.1%;B:92.6%;P>0.05)。主要并发症发生率为9.1%;3例患者接受了大截肢(A:n=2;B:n=1)。在43.2%的患者中观察到较小的并发症(部分皮瓣坏死,伤口开裂和不愈合;A:41.2%;B:44.4%;p>0.05)。总的来说,65.9%的患者(A:64.7%;B:66.7%;p>0.05)经历了平稳的骨愈合,而18.2%的患者(A:23.5%;B:14.8%;p>0.05)经历了延迟愈合。使用的皮瓣主要是肌肉皮肤(71.7%)。各种评估的人口统计学特征,包括年龄和多发性创伤的存在,对并发症无明显影响(p>0.05)。结论虽然开放性骨折患者的外治时间有显著差异,长期治疗与较高的并发症发生率或受损的骨愈合结果无关.尽管有这些发现,重要的是要避免延误,争取跨学科合作。
    Introduction Managing open lower extremity fractures is challenging, with potential complications such as amputation and infection. The aim of the study was to determine whether the time delay and initial treatment of the patients treated in a non-specialized hospital before being transferred to a dedicated level I trauma center led to a worse outcome. Methods Retrospective data from 44 patients (37 males and seven females) undergoing free tissue transfer for lower extremity open fractures from January 2017 to December 2022 were analyzed. Group A received primary care externally and was later transferred for definitive treatment (n=17, 38.6%), while group B received initial care at a level I trauma center (n=27, 61.4%). Surgical outcomes, complications, the duration of the hospital stay, and assessment times were compared. Various demographic variables, co-morbidities, prior interventions, and flap types were analyzed.  Results Average age (A: 55.1±16.7; B: 38.7±19.8 years; p=0.041), overall hospitalization (A: 55.7±22.8; B: 42.8±21.3 days; p=0.041), and time to soft tissue reconstruction differed significantly between groups (A: 30.7±12.2; B: 18.9±9.3 days; p=0.013). Overall, 31.8% had multiple injuries without statistical differences between groups A and B (29.4% vs. 33.3%; p>0.05). There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of major and minor complications and bone healing characteristics. Limb salvage was successful overall in 93.2% (A: 94.1%; B: 92.6%; P>0.05). Major complications occurred in 9.1%; three patients underwent major amputation (A: n=2; B: n=1). Minor complications were observed in 43.2% of patients (partial flap necrosis, wound dehiscence and non-union; A: 41.2%; B: 44.4%; p>0.05). Overall, 65.9% of patients (A: 64.7%; B: 66.7%; p>0.05) experienced uneventful bone healing, while 18.2% of patients (A: 23.5%; B: 14.8%; p>0.05) experienced delayed healing. Flaps used were mostly musculocutaneous (71.7%). Various assessed demographic characteristics, including age and presence of polytrauma, showed no significant influence on complications (p>0.05). Conclusion  Although there is a significant difference in the time course of externally treated patients with open fractures, prolonged treatment is not associated with a higher complication rate or compromised bone healing outcome. Despite the findings, it is important to avoid delays and strive for interdisciplinary collaboration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高达42%的乳腺癌患者接受乳房切除术后重建,然而,重建技术尚未在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者中得到广泛研究.重建并发症可能会延迟辅助治疗;在TNBC中,这本身就增加了局部复发的风险,这可能会极大地影响肿瘤学结果.因此,我们评估了影响TNBC患者乳房切除术后重建技术选择的因素,并评估了手术和肿瘤安全性结局.
    单机构回顾性图表审查确定了在2010年至2020年间接受乳房切除术后重建的TNBC患者。收集的临床特征包括人口统计学,癌症史,重建技术[自体重建(ABR)与基于植入物的重建(IBR)]和手术和肿瘤学结果,如并发症,复发,和死亡率。评估了影响患者是否接受ABR和IBR的因素,以及两个程序之间结果的差异。统计学显著性定义为P<0.05。
    在10年期间,所有乳房切除术后TNBC患者(n=240)的52.9%(n=127)接受了乳房再造,最常见的乳房切除术后立即(97.0%)。与ABR相比,大多数患者接受IBR(82.4%vs.14.5%)。接受ABR的患者年龄大于IBR患者(54.3vs.46.4岁;P=0.040),体重指数较高(BMI;30.0vs.26.1kg/m2;P=0.007)。如果患者有乳腺癌病史,他们更经常追求ABR(36.8%vs.16.7%;P=0.041)或经历了TNBC复发(26.3%vs.9.3%;P=0.034),而原发性TNBC患者更常选择IBR。重建类型不影响并发症(ABR31.6%vs.IBR16.8%,P=0.131),复发率(ABR15.8%vs.IBR13.0%,P=0.719),或死亡率(ABR0.0%vs.IBR6.5%,P=0.593)率。
    年龄等因素,BMI,乳腺癌病史影响了TNBC女性重建技术的选择。并发症没有差异,复发,或死亡发生在这些高风险的患者,无论重建技术,强调ABR和IBR在乳房切除术后TNBC患者的手术和肿瘤学安全性方面均不优越。
    UNASSIGNED: Up to 42% of all breast cancer patients undergo post-mastectomy reconstruction, however reconstructive techniques have not been widely studied in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Reconstructive complications may delay adjuvant treatments; in TNBC, which inherently carries an increased risk of locoregional recurrence, this can greatly affect oncological outcomes. Therefore, we evaluate factors influencing choice of reconstructive techniques following mastectomy in TNBC patients and assess operative and oncologic safety outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: A single institution retrospective chart review identified TNBC patients who underwent post-mastectomy reconstruction between 2010 to 2020. Clinical characteristics collected included demographics, cancer history, reconstructive techniques [autologous-based reconstruction (ABR) vs. implant-based reconstruction (IBR)] and surgical and oncologic outcomes such as complications, recurrence, and mortality. Factors impacting whether patients underwent ABR versus IBR were assessed, as well as differences in outcomes between the two procedures. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.
    UNASSIGNED: During the 10-year period, 52.9% (n=127) of all post-mastectomy TNBC patients (n=240) underwent breast reconstruction, most frequently immediately after mastectomy (97.0%). Most patients underwent IBR compared to ABR (82.4% vs. 14.5%). Patients undergoing ABR were older than IBR patients (54.3 vs. 46.4 years; P=0.040) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; 30.0 vs. 26.1 kg/m2; P=0.007). Patients more often pursued ABR if they had a prior breast cancer history (36.8% vs. 16.7%; P=0.041) or experienced TNBC recurrence (26.3% vs. 9.3%; P=0.034), while primary TNBC patients more often opted for IBR. Reconstructive type did not impact complications (ABR 31.6% vs. IBR 16.8%, P=0.131), recurrence (ABR 15.8% vs. IBR 13.0%, P=0.719), or mortality (ABR 0.0% vs. IBR 6.5%, P=0.593) rates.
    UNASSIGNED: Factors such as age, BMI, and breast cancer history impacted choice of reconstructive technique among TNBC women. No differences in complications, recurrence, or mortality occur in these high-risk patients regardless of reconstructive technique, highlighting that neither ABR nor IBR is superior in regard to surgical and oncologic safety in post-mastectomy TNBC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:管理下枪伤变得越来越普遍,需要复杂的手术决定。目标:比较the下枪伤后早期和确定的重建技术的结果。方法:回顾性图表回顾评估了遭受自伤精神下枪击的受试者。需要非计划手术的并发症的发生率被比较为皮肤/软组织的早期管理技术,骨头,使用Fisher或Pearson卡方精确检验,p≤0.05的粘膜衬里和确定的重建技术被认为具有统计学意义。结果:共纳入27例患者。早期技术包括皮肤=原发性软组织闭合(n=19)与伤口真空辅助闭合(n=8);下颌骨=切开复位内固定(ORIF)(n=19)与外固定(n=8);口腔粘膜内衬=原发性粘膜闭合(n=20)与真皮替代物(n=7)。明确的管理包括ORIF(n=10,37%),ORIF与植骨(n=8,30%),和微血管游离皮瓣(n=9,33%)。使用真皮替代品进行粘膜衬里管理时,需要进行非计划手术的并发症发生率在统计学上高于初次闭合(p<0.001);否则,手术技术的并发症发生率相当。结论:在早期和确定治疗the下枪伤时,可以使用几种手术决策和技术。仅将真皮替代品用于粘膜衬里与计划外手术率明显较高有关。
    Background: Management of submental gunshot wounds is becoming more common and requires complex surgical decisions. Objective: Compare outcomes of early and definitive reconstructive techniques following submental gunshot wounds. Methods: Retrospective chart review evaluated subjects who sustained a self-inflicted submental gunshot. The incidence of complications requiring unplanned operations was compared for early management techniques of skin/soft tissue, bone, and mucosal lining and definitive reconstructive techniques using Fisher\'s or Pearson Chi-square exact test with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The total of 27 patients were included. Early techniques included skin = primary soft tissue closure (n = 19) versus wound vacuum-assisted closure (n = 8); mandible = open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (n = 19) versus external fixation (n = 8); and oral mucosal lining = primary mucosal closure (n = 20) versus dermal substitute (n = 7). Definitive management included ORIF (n = 10, 37%), ORIF with bone grafting (n = 8, 30%), and microvascular free-flap (n = 9, 33%). The incidence of complications requiring unplanned operation when using dermal substitutes for mucosal lining management was statistically higher than primary closure (p < 0.001); otherwise the complication rates of surgical techniques were equivalent. Conclusion: Several surgical decisions and techniques can be utilized at the time of early and definitive management of submental gunshot wounds. Only the use of dermal substitutes for mucosal lining is associated with a significantly higher rate of unplanned operation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小儿颅颌面重建必须通过晶状体的生长和耐久性来处理。将缺陷匹配到供体组织的系统方法驱动了自体供体材料的选择。用于重建的可用技术菜单可以组织在一个梯子中,和成年人一样,额外的考虑。重建外科医生有机会促进和维持年轻患者在心理社会发展过程中的认同感。
    Pediatric craniomaxillofacial reconstruction must be approached through the lens of growth and durability. A systematic approach of matching defects to donor tissue drives the selection of autologous reconstructive technique. The menu of available methods for reconstruction can be organized in a manner similar to adults, with special considerations for growth and development. Reconstructive surgeons have the opprtunity to promote and maintain young patients\' sense of identity during psychosocial development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号