OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of keratinized mucosa (KM) augmentation with different techniques for the treatment of dental implants based on risk assessment.
METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who underwent KM augmentation at implant sites in the posterior mandible were included. Three techniques were used based on anatomy-guided risk assessment: an apically positioned flap (APF) alone, an APF plus a free gingival graft (APF plus FGG), and an APF plus a collagen matrix (APF plus CM). Clinically effective KM augmentation was defined as remaining KM ≥ 2 mm after the intervention. The effective rate, implant/prosthesis survival rates, and bone/soft tissue parameters were analyzed. The correlation between local anatomical characteristics and different techniques was also determined. The associations between the effectiveness of KM augmentation and related factors were analyzed using a linear model.
RESULTS: Overall, 74 sites received KM augmentation in the posterior mandible, for an effective rate of 94.6% at the 1-year follow-up and 93.2% at the 5-year follow-up. The KM width in the APF plus FGG group (3.85 ± 1.22 mm) was greater than that in the APF alone (3.05 ± 0.90 mm) (P = 0.016) and APF plus CM (3.21 ± 1.17 mm) groups (P = 0.038) at 5 years post-surgery. There was no significant difference in the effective/ineffective outcomes at the 1-year or 5-year follow-up among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparable effective outcomes were achieved with three KM augmentation techniques following the decision-making criterion based on risk assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the clinical, radiological, and histological outcomes of socket seal surgery between two protocols: deproteinized demineralized tooth matrix (dpDTM) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) each covered with a free gingival graft.
METHODS: Twenty extraction sockets in the anterior or premolar region were randomly allocated to either the dpDTM or FDBA protocol (n = 10 per group). Measurements of the alveolar ridge changes were obtained using an intraoral scanner and cone-beam computed tomography at 3 months post-operation. Three-month post surgery, the dental implant was installed (n = 5 per group), bone biopsies were obtained for histomorphometrical and micro-computed tomography analyses. Implant stability quotients (ISQs) were determined and compared at 3 months post-implant.
RESULTS: Lower significant reductions in buccal alveolar ridge height and hard tissue volume were observed in dpDTM group compared to FDBA group at 3 months (0.25 ± 0.35 mm vs. 1.60 ± 0.66 mm [p = .000] and 9.64 ± 15.39% mm3 vs. 31.45 ± 18.11% mm3 [p = .010], respectively). At the same time, lower soft tissue volume reduction was detected in the dpDTM group compared to FDBA group (4.21 ± 5.25% mm3 vs. 5.25 ± 5.79% mm3). No statistically significant difference in the percentage of mineralized tissue formation was found between dpDTM group (53.39 ± 11.16%) and FDBA group (49.90 ± 3.27%). Even though the ISQ in the dpDTM group showed a higher value than the FDBA group at 3 months post-implant, the results were without statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar ridge preservation using dpDTM is an efficacious procedure for providing the conditions for the development of functional and esthetic implants.

Failures of soft tissue grafting are relatively common and can be stressful when encountered for both the clinicians and patients. Soft tissue grafting has predictable success most of the time when proper selection and implementation of surgical procedure is done. This case report describes management of soft-tissue surgery failure after multiple mucogingival grafting for enhancing the soft-tissue quality, quantity, and aesthetic outcomes. Augmentation by free gingival graft using periodontal microsurgical principle resulted complete coverage of the defect suggesting that careful treatment planning, immaculate execution by skillful technique definitely helped to achieve a successful result. Simultaneous use of photobiomodulation (PBM) helped in faster and better healing of the grafted area.

Innovations in surgical techniques have improved the esthetic outcome and predictability of root coverage procedures in recent years. A free gingival graft (FGG) augments the attached gingiva, but the compromised blood supply precludes its use in root coverage. In the surgical technique described in this case report, the FGG kept over a laterally placed periosteal flap enhanced the outcome. A laterally flipped periosteal flap was adapted over the root surface using resorbable sutures. The free graft was secured at the recipient site with cyanoacrylate adhesive, and adaptation was ensured with suspensory sutures. Satisfactory root coverage was appreciated and maintained at 6 months with excellent functional outcomes. Adequate width of the attached gingiva and vestibular depth were also noticed at the recipient site. The patient was highly satisfied with the obtained results, which were maintained until the 1-year postoperative period.

OBJECTIVE: The present randomised controlled trial is based on the null hypothesis that there is no difference in crestal bone levels (CBLs) following socket preservation (SP) using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and free gingival graft (FGG). The aim was to evaluate CBLs following SP using PRF and FGG.
METHODS: This study is a parallel-arm randomised controlled trial. Patients in the test and control groups underwent SP using PRF and FGG, respectively. Intraoral visual examination was performed to clinically assess signs of swelling, pus/abscess, and stability of sutures and graft. Self-rated postoperative pain was assessed after 1 week and 6 months using the visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 6-month follow-up, cone-beam computed tomography was performed to evaluate CBL in mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions. The preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic images were superimposed with those taken at the 6-month follow-up to compare CBLs. Statistical comparisons were performed and level of significance was set at P < .05.
RESULTS: The test and control groups each comprised 13 individuals with comparable ages. All teeth included in the test and control groups were located in the maxillary aesthetic zone. At the 1-week follow-up, VAS scores were higher in the control than in the test group (P < .01). At the 6-month follow-up, none of the participants reported self-rated pain. The change in buccolingual dimension was greater in the control group than in the test group (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both FGG and PRF are effective techniques for SP; however, the latter technique is more effcacious in maintaining buccolingual dimensions of the extraction socket.

Keratinized tissue augmentation around implants guarantees long-term success and maintenance of implant rehabilitations. Free gingival grafting is often described as the gold standard, especially when dealing with limited residual keratinized tissue height. Traditionally, an epithelio-conjunctive graft is harvested, either on the palate or the tuberosity, to reconstruct the missing keratinized soft tissues. This article introduces an innovative approach to increase keratinized tissue around implants, benefiting from second-intention gingival healing. This original surgical approach is interesting because it does not involve autogenous grafting or biomaterials. Its main goals are to enhance predictability while reducing the numerous per and post-operative risks related to autogenous harvesting. The success of this technique depends on the observance of fundamental principles: protection against bacterial contamination (immunocompetence of the patient), phenotypic induction (preoperative presence of keratinized tissue), space maintenance, and stabilization of flaps.

OBJECTIVE: There is a growing evidence to suggest augmenting peri-implant keratinized mucosa in the presence of ≤ 2 mm of keratinized mucosa. However, the most appropriate surgical technique and augmentation materials have yet to be defined. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants using free gingival graft (FGG) versus xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) before commencing prosthetic implant treatment.
METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify observational studies comparing implant sites augmented with FGG to those augmented with XCM. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration\'s Risk of Bias tool.
RESULTS: Six studies with 174 participants were included in the present review. Of these, 87 participants had FGG, whereas the remaining participants had XCM. At 6 months, sites augmented with FGG were associated with less changes in the gained width of peri-implant keratinized mucosa compared to those augmented with XCM (mean difference 1.06; 95% confidence interval -0.01 to 2.13; p = 0.05). The difference, however, was marginally significant. The difference between the two groups in changes in thickness of peri-implant keratinized mucosa at 6 months was statistically significantly in favor of FGG. On the other hand, XCM had significantly shorter surgical time, lower postoperative pain score, and higher color match compared to FGG.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of this review, the augmentation of keratinized mucosa using FGG before the placement of the final prosthesis may have short-term positive effects on soft tissue thickness. XCM might be considered in aesthetically demanding implant sites and where patient comfort or shorter surgical time is a priority. The evidence support, however, is of low to moderate certainty; therefore, further studies are needed to support the findings of the present review.

Background/Objectives: Implant treatment in patients who require teeth extraction due to periodontitis presents a significant challenge. The consideration of peri-implantitis is crucial when planning the placement of dental implants. The predictability of implant treatment relies on the suitability of both hard and soft tissue quality. The aim of this article is to present a case report demonstrating a secure treatment protocol for implant procedures in patients with periodontitis requiring the extraction of all teeth, soft tissue management targeted at increasing the keratinized mucosa zone, and the provision of a reliable prosthetic solution. The secondary objective is to review the relevant literature regarding the significance of keratinized mucosa surrounding dental implants and its association with the occurrence of peri-implantitis. Case presentation: A 65-year-old female with generalized periodontitis, stage IV grade C and very poor oral hygiene came for treatment and rehabilitation of the lower jaw. CBCT revealed periodontal lesions and labio-lingual ridge dimensions in the region of teeth 34-44 from 8.0 to 10.2 mm. The first surgery included teeth extraction and periodontal lesions enucleation with simultaneous placement of four implants in the positions of teeth 32, 34, 42, 44. The second-stage surgery involved increasing the keratinized mucosa using two free gingival grafts. Conclusions: The present case report described the treatment process of the patient with periodontitis, including immediate implantation in the infected region, soft tissue augmentation using free gingival grafts and the ultimate placement of a bar-retained overdenture for final restoration. After two years of observation, despite questionable hygiene, no symptoms of gingival inflammation were detected. Furthermore, there is limited information in the literature regarding the correlation between inadequate keratinized gingiva and the occurrence of peri-implantitis.

BACKGROUND: Free gingival graft is commonly used to augment the keratinized mucosa and vestibular depth around dental implants. The proper suturing technique is fundamental to achieve a successful result following free gingival graft. However, there are limited studies that focus on the details of the suturing methods to optimize graft adaptation. The purpose of this technical note is to describe a new suturing technique for optimal approximation and stabilization of free gingival graft around dental implants.
METHODS: Here, we present a 53-year-old Persian female with peri-implantitis and lack of keratinized mucosa around mandibular implants who was a candidate for free gingival graft. A new suturing technique, double vertical interrupted suture, was conducted in the interimplant areas. In addition, the suspensory cross-mattress sutures were added to ensure the adaptation of the graft over the implants. The proposed suturing technique is useful for soft tissue augmentation around multiple implants with concave or uneven recipient bed.
CONCLUSIONS: The present article describes a novel suturing technique for good adaptation and fixation of free gingival graft around dental implants.

BACKGROUND: The presence of adequate keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants and natural dentition is pivotal for the long-term success of dental restorations. Despite various techniques to augment KM, challenges persist in achieving stable, keratinized, and adherent mucosa, especially in the context of significant muscle pull or compromised tissue conditions. This study introduces a novel application of titanium pins for the fixation of free gingival grafts (FGG) and apically repositioned flaps (APF) during vestibuloplasty, aiming to overcome important limitations associated with traditional suturing methods and shorten the treatment time and patient morbidity.
METHODS: Three patients with insufficient KM width, presenting discomfort during oral hygiene and inflammation around implant restorations and natural teeth, underwent soft tissue augmentation using titanium pins traditionally used in guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the stabilization of FGGs and APFs. This method ensures intimate contact between the graft and the periosteum, facilitating proper graft perfusion and revascularization, minimizing shrinkage and the risk for necrosis of the graft.
RESULTS: Postoperative follow-up revealed successful integration of the grafts, with minimal shrinkage and increased width and depth of KM. The use of titanium pins allowed for reliable fixation in challenging surgical sites, where traditional suturing methods were impractical due to the presence of extensive muscle pull and an unstable recipient bed.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of titanium pins for the fixation of FGGs and APFs during vestibuloplasty provides a promising alternative to traditional suturing techniques, particularly in complex cases where the recipient bed is suboptimal for suturing. This method simplifies and shortens the procedure, offering a predictable outcome with increased mechanical stability and minimal shrinkage of the graft. Randomized clinical trials are recommended to further evaluate the efficacy of this technique.