framingham risk score

弗雷明汉风险评分
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多发性硬化症(MS)与心血管疾病之间的关系,来自流行病学研究,近年来引起了很多关注。
    方法:本研究采用单中心,观察,回顾性队列设计。该研究的主要目的是描述我们定期随访的复发缓解型MS患者队列的横断面分析中的Framingham风险评分(FRS)率,如果适用,以确定与患者的患者确定的疾病步骤(PDDS)的任何关联。心血管风险分类如下:如果FRS小于10%,则低,如果是10%到19%,适度,和高,如果它是20%或更高。
    结果:共纳入229例患者队列。该样本由163名女性(71.2%)组成。FRS类别分布如下:97例(42.3%)患者FRS较低,84例(36.7%)患者有中度FRS,48例(21%)患者有高FRS。在单变量序数回归分析中,PDDS量表增加1分与高FRS的24%风险相关(与低)(比例优势比[OR]=2.426,95%置信区间[CI]1.660-3.545;p<.0001)。结果也得到了EDSS评分的证实,EDSS评分增加一点,与19%的高FRS风险相关(与低)(比例OR=1.953,95%CI1.429-2.669-1.04;p<0.0001)。
    结论:FRS显示与患者的“疾病感知”相关,如PDDS所示。需要对更大的队列进行进一步的研究,以充分解决危及生命的疾病中的心血管风险。如女士
    BACKGROUND: The associations between Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and cardiovascular diseases, drawn from epidemiological studies, have attracted much attention in recent years.
    METHODS: The present study employed a monocentric, observational, retrospective cohort design. The primary objective of the study was to describe the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) rate in a cross-sectional analysis of our cohort of relapsing-remitting MS patients who are regularly followed up and, if applicable, to identify any association with the patient\'s Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Cardiovascular risk was classified as follows: low if the FRS is less than 10%, moderate if it is 10% to 19%, and high if it is 20% or higher.
    RESULTS: A total cohort of 229 patients was enrolled. The sample consists of 163 women (71.2%). FRS categories were distributed as follows: 97 (42.3%) patients had low FRS, 84 (36.7%) patients had moderate FRS, and 48 (21%) patients had high FRS. In the univariable ordinal regression analysis, one one-point increase in the PDDS scale was associated with a 24% risk of high FRS (vs. low) (proportional odds ratio [OR] =2.426, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.660-3.545; p <.0001). The results were also confirmed by the EDSS score, with a point increase in the EDSS score associated with a 19% risk of high FRS (vs. low) (proportional OR =1.953, 95% CI 1.429-2.669-1.04; p <.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The FRS demonstrated an association with the patient\'s \"perception of the disease\" as indicated by the PDDS. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to adequately address cardiovascular risk in life-threatening conditions, such as MS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    PREVENT(预测心血管疾病风险EVENT风险算法的开发是为了更好地反映代谢因素对心血管风险的影响。
    这项研究的目的是比较PREVENT与标准比较器算法的相对性能(Framingham风险评分,汇集队列方程,SCORE2[系统性冠状动脉风险评估2])用于风险分层,强调权衡慢性肾脏疾病的含义。
    一个模拟队列由40至75岁的男性和女性组成,有或没有其他传统危险因素,并且估计肾小球滤过率正常(eGFR90或60ml/min/1.73m2)或eGFR异常(45或30ml/min/1.73m2)。计算每个风险类别的一致性和重新分类率,重点是通过标准比较算法表征为中等风险的受试者。
    预防显示风险随着eGFR的逐渐降低而增加。当标准比较算法识别出中等风险时,在6%至88%的模拟中,“预防”是一致的。在具有正常eGFR的模拟中,PREVENT在18%至88%的模拟中发现了较低的风险,在0%至12%的模拟中发现了较高的风险。相反,eGFR异常,PREVENT在0%至26%的模拟中发现了较低的风险,在4%至94%的模拟中发现了较高的风险。
    预防实质上重新分类风险,并有可能改变预防实践模式。当eGFR正常时,与标准算法相比,分配较低风险的趋势可能会减少预防性治疗的实施。国家卫生保健系统需要监测这种变化是否改善了整体公共卫生。
    UNASSIGNED: The PREVENT (Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs risk algorithm was developed to better reflect the impact of metabolic factors on cardiovascular risk.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to compare the relative performance of PREVENT with standard comparator algorithms (Framingham risk score, pooled cohort equation, SCORE2 [Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation2]) for risk stratification emphasizing the implications of weighing chronic kidney disease.
    UNASSIGNED: A simulated cohort was created of males and females aged 40 to 75 years with and without other traditional risk factors and either normal estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR 90 or 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) or abnormal eGFR (45 or 30 ml/min/1.73 m2). The concordance and reclassification rates were calculated for each category of risk with emphasis on subjects characterized as moderate risk by the standard comparator algorithms.
    UNASSIGNED: PREVENT demonstrated increased risk with progressive decreases in eGFR. When the standard comparator algorithms identified moderate risk, PREVENT was concordant in 6% to 88% of simulations. In simulations with normal eGFR, PREVENT identified a lower risk in 18% to 88% and a higher risk in 0% to 12% of simulations. Conversely, with abnormal eGFR, PREVENT identified lower risk in 0% to 26% and higher risk in 4% to 94% of simulations.
    UNASSIGNED: PREVENT substantially reclassifies risk and has the potential to alter prevention practice patterns. The tendency to assign a lower risk compared to standard algorithms when eGFR is normal may diminish implementation of preventive therapy. National health care systems need to monitor whether such changes improve overall public health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心臂脉搏波速度(hbPWV)是包括近端主动脉在内的动脉僵硬度的有前途的量度。为了表征与年龄相关的变化和HBPWV的临床效用,我们从横截面(N=7868)和纵向(N=3710,其次是9.1±2.0年)评估了年龄和心血管疾病(CVD)风险对hbPWV的影响.使用两个经过验证的动脉路径长度方程(考虑和不考虑年龄相关的主动脉伸长)获得hbPWV。使用臂踝脉搏波速度(baPWV)作为比较措施。使用重复测量相关性(rmcorr)和回归分析来表征PWV与年龄和Framingham的一般CVD风险评分(FRS)的关联。在横断面研究中,两个方程得出的hbPWV与年龄(r=0.746~0.796)和FRS(r=0.714~0.749)的相关性强于baPWV(r=0.554和r=0.643)。此外,即使控制了年龄,hbPWV也与FRS相关(r=0.260〜0.269,P<0.0001)。在纵向研究中,随着年龄的增长,hbPWV的rmcorr系数显着高于baPWV(rrm=0.439-0.511vs.0.307,P<0.0001)。在整个成人寿命中,HBPWV与年龄相关的增长几乎是一致的,从年轻人开始,而baPWV显示随年龄加速增加。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,与baPWV相比,hbPWV对一般CVD风险进行分层的能力更强(AUC=0.896-0.913vs.0.833,P<0.0001)。随访研究的结果与横断面调查的结果一致。我们的研究结果表明,hbPWV随着年龄的增长而线性增加,从早期成人生活阶段开始,使其成为辨别CVD风险的潜在标记。
    Heart-brachium pulse wave velocity (hbPWV) is a promising measure of arterial stiffness including the proximal aorta. To characterize age-associated changes and the clinical utilities of hbPWV, we evaluated the impacts of age and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks on hbPWV cross-sectionally (N = 7868) and longitudinally (N = 3710, followed by 9.1 ± 2.0 years). hbPWV were obtained using two validated equations for arterial path length (with and without considering age-related aortic elongations). Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) was used as a comparative measure. Repeated-measures correlation (rmcorr) and regression analyses were used to characterize associations of PWVs with age and Framingham\'s general CVD risk score (FRS). In the cross-sectional study, hbPWVs derived by both equations showed stronger correlation with age (r = 0.746 ~ 0.796) and FRS (r = 0.714-0.749) than baPWV (r = 0.554 and r = 0.643). Furthermore, hbPWVs correlated with FRS even after controlling for age (r = 0.260 ~ 0.269, P < 0.0001). In the longitudinal study, hbPWVs demonstrated significantly higher rmcorr coefficient with age than baPWV (rrm=0.439-0.511 vs. 0.307, P < 0.0001). Across the adult lifespan, age-related increases in hbPWVs were almost consistent, starting from young adults, while baPWV displayed accelerated increases with age. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that hbPWVs depicted more robust ability to stratify general CVD risk compared with baPWV (AUC = 0.896-0.913 vs. 0.833, P < 0.0001). The results of the follow-up study were consistent with the findings of the cross-sectional investigation. Our findings suggest that hbPWV undergoes a linear augmentation with age, commencing from an early adult life stage onward, rendering it a potential marker for discerning CVD risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病(CVD)可能无法通过常规临床方法及时发现。异常步态模式已经与病理状况相关联,并且可以通过步态视频连续地监测。我们的目标是测试非接触,基于视频的步态信息和一般CVD状态。
    接受证实性CVD评估的个体被纳入前瞻性,横断面研究。用Kinect相机记录步态视频。从步态视频中提取步态特征,以与CVD的复合成分和单个成分相关联。包括冠状动脉疾病,外周动脉疾病,心力衰竭,和脑血管事件。还评估了将步态信息与传统CVD临床变量相结合的增量值。最终分析中包括了三百52名参与者[平均(标准差)年龄,59.4(9.8)岁;25.3%为女性]。与基线临床变量模型[受试者工作曲线下面积(AUC)0.717,(0.690-0.743)]相比,步态特征模型在预测复合CVD方面表现出统计学上更好的性能[AUC0.753,(0.726-0.780)],当与临床变量结合[AUC0.764,(0.741-0.786)]时,具有进一步的增量值。值得注意的是,步态特征与不同的CVD成分条件表现出不同的关联,特别是对于外周动脉疾病[AUC0.752,(0.728-0.775)]和心力衰竭[0.733,(0.707-0.758)]。其他分析还揭示了步态信息与CVD风险因素和已建立的CVD风险评分的关联。
    我们证明了非接触的关联和预测价值,一般CVD状态的基于视频的步态信息。基于步态视频的日常生活CVD监测的进一步研究是有希望的。
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) may not be detected in time with conventional clinical approaches. Abnormal gait patterns have been associated with pathological conditions and can be monitored continuously by gait video. We aim to test the association between non-contact, video-based gait information and general CVD status.
    UNASSIGNED: Individuals undergoing confirmatory CVD evaluation were included in a prospective, cross-sectional study. Gait videos were recorded with a Kinect camera. Gait features were extracted from gait videos to correlate with the composite and individual components of CVD, including coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, and cerebrovascular events. The incremental value of incorporating gait information with traditional CVD clinical variables was also evaluated. Three hundred fifty-two participants were included in the final analysis [mean (standard deviation) age, 59.4 (9.8) years; 25.3% were female]. Compared with the baseline clinical variable model [area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) 0.717, (0.690-0.743)], the gait feature model demonstrated statistically better performance [AUC 0.753, (0.726-0.780)] in predicting the composite CVD, with further incremental value when incorporated with the clinical variables [AUC 0.764, (0.741-0.786)]. Notably, gait features exhibited varied association with different CVD component conditions, especially for peripheral artery disease [AUC 0.752, (0.728-0.775)] and heart failure [0.733, (0.707-0.758)]. Additional analyses also revealed association of gait information with CVD risk factors and the established CVD risk score.
    UNASSIGNED: We demonstrated the association and predictive value of non-contact, video-based gait information for general CVD status. Further studies for gait video-based daily living CVD monitoring are promising.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生长分化因子-15(GDF-15)在预测冠心病(CHD)患者长期不良结局中的预后价值仍然有限。我们的研究检查了GDF-15与冠心病患者长期不良结局之间的关系,并首先评估了将GDF-15纳入基于Framingham风险评分(FRS)的模型的增量预后效果。这项单中心前瞻性队列研究包括3,321例冠心病患者,分为2,479例急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)(74.6%)和842例非ACS(25.4%)组。中位年龄为61.0岁(范围:53.0-70.0),女性917人(27.6%)。死亡率和主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)包括心血管死亡率,心肌梗死(MI),中风,和心力衰竭(HF)(包括需要门诊治疗和/或住院的HF发作)。Cox回归模型评估了GDF-15与全因死亡率和MACE发生率之间的关联。根据GDF-15水平将患者分为三组:第一组(<1,370ng/L),第二组(1,370-2,556纳克/升),和第三组(>2,556ng/L)。C指数,综合歧视改进(IDI),净重新分类改进(NRI),和决策曲线分析(DCA)用于评估增量值。超过9.4年的中位随访时间,759名患者(22.9%)死亡,和1291(38.9%)经历了MACEs。多变量Cox模型表明GDF-15与全因死亡率显著相关(每单位增加,HR=1.49,95%CI:1.36-1.64)和MACE(每单位增加,HR=1.29,95%CI:1.20-1.38)。当GDF-15作为序数变量分析时,这些关联持续存在(趋势p<0.05)。ACS和非ACS的亚组分析分别显示GDF-15与心血管死亡率和HF之间的显著关联。但在ACS和非ACS患者中均未观察到GDF-15与MI/卒中之间的关联.将GDF-15添加到基于FRS的模型中,增强了对全因死亡率的辨别能力(取决于C指数=0.009,95%CI:0.005-0.014;IDI=0.030,95%CI:0.015-0.047;连续NRI=0.631,95%CI:0.569-0.652)和MACE(取决于C指数=0.009,95%CI:0.006-0.012;0.626I=DCA表明,与仅基于FRS的模型相比,将GDF-15纳入基于FRS的模型显示出更高的净收益(全因死亡率:基于FRS的模型:DCA曲线下面积(AUDC)=0.0903,基于FRS的模型GDF-15:AUDC=0.0908;MACE:基于FRS的模型:AUDC=0.1806,基于FRS的模型+GDF-15:=0.GDF-15与冠心病患者全因死亡率和MACEs的长期预后显著相关,并显著提高了基于FRS的模型对两种结果的预后准确性。
    The prognostic value of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in predicting long-term adverse outcomes in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients remains limited. Our study examines the association between GDF-15 and adverse outcomes over an extended period in CHD patients and firstly assesses the incremental prognostic effect of incorporating GDF-15 into the Framingham risk score (FRS)-based model. This single-center prospective cohort study included 3,321 patients with CHD categorized into 2,479 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (74.6%) and 842 non-ACS (25.4%) groups. The median age was 61.0 years (range: 53.0-70.0), and 917 (27.6%) were females. Mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) included cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and heart failure (HF) (inclusive of HF episodes requiring outpatient treatment and/or hospital admission). Cox regression models assessed the associations between GDF-15 and the incidence of all-cause mortality and MACEs. Patients were stratified into three groups based on GDF-15 levels: the first tertile group (< 1,370 ng/L), the second tertile group (1,370-2,556 ng/L), and the third tertile group (> 2,556 ng/L). The C-index, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess incremental value. Over a median 9.4-year follow-up, 759 patients (22.9%) died, and 1,291 (38.9%) experienced MACEs. The multivariate Cox model indicated that GDF-15 was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (per ln unit increase, HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.36-1.64) and MACEs (per ln unit increase, HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.20-1.38). These associations persisted when GDF-15 was analyzed as an ordinal variable (p for trend < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of ACS and non-ACS for the components of MACEs separately showed a significant association between GDF-15 and both cardiovascular mortality and HF, but no association was observed between GDF-15 and MI /stroke in both ACS and non-ACS patients. The addition of GDF-15 to the FRS-based model enhanced the discrimination for both all-cause mortality (∆ C-index = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.005-0.014; IDI = 0.030, 95% CI: 0.015-0.047; continuous NRI = 0.631, 95% CI: 0.569-0.652) and MACEs (∆ C-index = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.006-0.012; IDI = 0.026, 95% CI: 0.009-0.042; continuous NRI = 0.593, 95% CI: 0.478-0.682). DCA suggested that incorporating GDF-15 into the FRS-based model demonstrated higher net benefits compared to FRS-based models alone (All-cause mortality: FRS-based model: area under the curve of DCA (AUDC) = 0.0903, FRS-based model + GDF-15: AUDC = 0.0908; MACEs: FRS-based model: AUDC = 0.1806, FRS-based model + GDF-15: AUDC = 0.1833). GDF-15 significantly associates with the long-term prognosis of all-cause mortality and MACEs in CHD patients and significantly improves the prognostic accuracy of the FRS-based model for both outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:准确的风险分层对于心血管疾病(CVD)的一级预防至关重要。然而,传统工具,如弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS),在不同的中等风险群体中可能表现不佳,其中包括需要不同管理策略的个人。
    目的:本研究旨在建立脂质增强风险评分(LRS),专门针对中间组中的风险预测和重新分类,以FRS为基准。
    方法:LRS是通过机器学习工作流程开发的,使用了澳大利亚糖尿病的岭回归,肥胖,和生活方式研究(AusDiab;n=10,339)。通过Busselton健康研究(n=4,492)进行了外部验证,在BioHEART队列(n=994)中独立验证了其对基于冠状动脉钙评分(CACS)的结局的预测效用.
    结果:在AusDiab和Busselton健康研究队列中,LRS显著改善了中等风险组的歧视指标(所有P<0.001),将CVD事件的曲线下面积增加0.114(95%CI:0.123-0.157)和0.077(95%CI:0.0755-0.0785),净重新分类改善为0.36(95%CI:0.21-0.51)和0.33(95%CI:0.15-0.49),分别。对于BioHEART中基于CACS的结果,与FRS相比,LRS的曲线下面积显着提高了0.02(0.76vs0.74;P<1.0×10-5)。一个简化的,还创建了临床适用版本的LRS,其性能与原始LRS相当.
    结论:LRS,增强FRS,提出了改善中等风险分层和预测动脉粥样硬化标志物使用简单的血液测试的潜力,适合临床应用。这可以促进对患者进行非侵入性成像的分诊,例如CACS,在心血管疾病预防和管理中促进精准医学。
    BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification is vital for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, traditional tools such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) may underperform within the diverse intermediate-risk group, which includes individuals requiring distinct management strategies.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a lipidomic-enhanced risk score (LRS), specifically targeting risk prediction and reclassification within the intermediate group, benchmarked against the FRS.
    METHODS: The LRS was developed via a machine learning workflow using ridge regression on the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab; n = 10,339). It was externally validated with the Busselton Health Study (n = 4,492), and its predictive utility for coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS)-based outcomes was independently validated in the BioHEART cohort (n = 994).
    RESULTS: LRS significantly improved discrimination metrics for the intermediate-risk group in both AusDiab and Busselton Health Study cohorts (all P < 0.001), increasing the area under the curve for CVD events by 0.114 (95% CI: 0.1123-0.1157) and 0.077 (95% CI: 0.0755-0.0785), with a net reclassification improvement of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.21-0.51) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.15-0.49), respectively. For CACS-based outcomes in BioHEART, LRS achieved a significant area under the curve improvement of 0.02 over the FRS (0.76 vs 0.74; P < 1.0 × 10-5). A simplified, clinically applicable version of LRS was also created that had comparable performance to the original LRS.
    CONCLUSIONS: LRS, augmenting the FRS, presents potential to improve intermediate-risk stratification and to predict atherosclerotic markers using a simple blood test, suitable for clinical application. This could facilitate the triage of individuals for noninvasive imaging such as CACS, fostering precision medicine in CVD prevention and management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:据报道,不良的心血管健康(CVH)和身体虚弱会增加死亡风险,但是它们的联合作用尚未完全阐明。
    目的:我们旨在基于生命基础8(LE8)和弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)两个视角,探讨CVH和虚弱对死亡率的单独和联合影响。
    方法:2007年至2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的21.062名参与者参与了这项研究。通过LE8和FRS评估CVH,并分类为低,中度和高度CVH组。Cox比例风险模型用于估计CVH和虚弱指数(FI)与全因的单独和联合关联,心血管疾病(CVD)和癌症死亡率。
    结果:中位随访时间为87个月(95%CI:86.0-88.0),2036人死亡。CVH之间的单独线性剂量反应关系,观察到虚弱和死亡率(非线性P>.05)。低CVH/虚弱的组合与全因死亡率呈负相关[危险比(HR)和95CI:低LE8*FI,5.30(3.74,7.52);高FRS*FI,4.34(3.20,5.88)],CVD死亡率[低LE8*FI,6.57(3.54,12.22);高FRS*FI,7.29(3.92,13.55)]和癌症死亡率[低LE8*FI,1.99(1.14,3.25);高FRS*FI,2.32(1.30,4.15)],以高CVH/拟合组为参考。进一步的分层分析表明,在年轻人和女性中,因虚弱和低CVH而导致的死亡综合负担更大。
    结论:低CVH和虚弱与更大的全因风险相关,心血管疾病和癌症死亡,尤其是年轻人和女性。
    BACKGROUND: Poor cardiovascular health (CVH) and physical frailty were reported to increase mortality risk, but their joint effects have not been fully elucidated.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the separate and joint effects of CVH and frailty on mortality based on two perspectives of Life\'s Essential 8 (LE8) and Framingham Risk Score (FRS).
    METHODS: 21 062 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2018 were involved in this study. CVH was evaluated by the LE8 and FRS, and categorized into low, moderate and high CVH groups. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to estimate the separate and joint associations of CVH and frailty index (FI) with all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality.
    RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 87 months (95% CI: 86.0-88.0), 2036 deaths occurred. The separate linear dose-response relationships between CVH, frailty and mortality were observed (nonlinear P > .05). The combination of low CVH/frailty was negatively associated with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) and 95%CI: low LE8*FI, 5.30 (3.74, 7.52); high FRS*FI, 4.34 (3.20, 5.88)], CVD mortality [low LE8*FI, 6.57 (3.54, 12.22); high FRS*FI, 7.29 (3.92, 13.55)] and cancer mortality [low LE8*FI, 1.99 (1.14, 3.25); high FRS*FI, 2.32 (1.30, 4.15)], with high CVH/fit group as reference. Further stratified analyses showed that the combined burden of mortality from frailty and low CVH was greater among the young and females.
    CONCLUSIONS: Low CVH and frailty were independently and jointly correlated with greater risk of all-cause, CVD and cancer deaths, especially among the young and females.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行与全球发病率和死亡率的增加有关。SARS-CoV-2如何引起心血管(CV)并发症的机制正在研究中。该研究的目的是评估COVID-19大流行对CV风险的影响。
    方法:这些是单中心BialystokPLUS(波兰)基于人群和病例对照的研究。这项调查是在2018年至2022年期间对中欧一个大城市的居民(n=1507)和感染COVID-19后6-9个月的患者(n=126)进行的。系统冠状动脉风险估计2(SCORE2),系统冠状动脉风险估计2-老年人(SCORE2-OP),使用了心血管疾病Framingham心脏研究和LIFEtime透视模型,用于在明显健康的人群中个体化心血管疾病预防策略(LIFE-CVD).随后,根据2021年ESC临床实践中心血管疾病预防指南,将研究人群分为CV风险等级.
    结果:研究人群由4组组成:以前检查过的普通人群(I,n=691)和COVID-19大流行期间(II,n=816);一组126名COVID-19感染后的患者(III);对照组与从COVID-19大流行前选择的受试者相匹配(IV)。第二组的特点是血压较低,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-c)值比第一组低。对普通人群的CV风险没有影响,但是在COVID-19感染后的人群中,使用FS-脂质,CV风险较低,与前流行人群相比,FS-BMI和LIFE-CVD10年风险评分。在所有分析的亚组中,CV风险等级的发生频率无统计学差异.
    结论:COVID-19大流行并未增加一级预防计算的CV风险。相反,它促使人们关注他们的健康状况,一些心血管危险因素得到了更好的控制。随着COVID-19大流行引起人们对健康的关注,值得利用这个机会,通过设计广泛的宣传运动来提高公共卫生知识。
    BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is associated with increases in morbidity and mortality worldwide. The mechanisms of how SARS-CoV-2 may cause cardiovascular (CV) complications are under investigation. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CV risk.
    METHODS: These are single-centre Bialystok PLUS (Poland) population-based and case‒control studies. The survey was conducted between 2018 and 2022 on a sample of residents (n = 1507) of a large city in central Europe and patients 6-9 months post-COVID-19 infection (n = 126). The Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation 2 (SCORE2), the Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation 2-Older Persons (SCORE2-OP), the Cardiovascular Disease Framingham Heart Study and the LIFEtime-perspective model for individualizing CardioVascular Disease prevention strategies in apparently healthy people (LIFE-CVD) were used. Subsequently, the study populations were divided into CV risk classes according to the 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.
    RESULTS: The study population consisted of 4 groups: a general population examined before (I, n = 691) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (II, n = 816); a group of 126 patients post-COVID-19 infection (III); and a control group matched subjects chosen from the pre-COVID-19 pandemic (IV). Group II was characterized by lower blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) values than group I. Group III differed from the control group in terms of lower LDL-c level. There was no effect on CV risk in the general population, but in the population post-COVID-19 infection, CV risk was lower using FS-lipids, FS-BMI and LIFE-CVD 10-year risk scores compared to the prepandemic population. In all subgroups analysed, no statistically significant difference was found in the frequency of CV risk classes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic did not increase the CV risk calculated for primary prevention. Instead, it prompted people to pay attention to their health status, as evidenced by better control of some CV risk factors. As the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn people\'s attention to health, it is worth exploiting this opportunity to improve public health knowledge through the design of wide-ranging information campaigns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病(CVDs)是全球死亡的主要原因。预测心血管事件(CVE)的10年风险可以通过及时干预挽救生命。弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)可以有效地预测这种风险。
    本研究旨在使用FRS估计CVE的10年风险,并估计印度西Tripura区成年人中CVD危险因素的患病率及其与FRS的关联。
    这项基于社区的横断面研究于2019年11月1日至2021年11月30日在印度西Tripura区进行,在通过多阶段抽样选择的290名年龄≥30岁的个体中使用FRS2008和预先测试的访谈时间表。
    大多数,这是61.7%,研究对象的风险较低,18.6%有中度风险,19.7%有10年内CVE的高风险。高血压患病率为55.6%;糖尿病,55.9%;吸烟,96.2%;血脂异常,34.3%;饮酒,96.2%;缺乏体力活动,54%;肥胖,64.6%。双变量分析检测到FRS与年龄显著相关,性别,residence,识字,婚姻状况,肥胖,吸烟,酗酒,血压(BP),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和研究对象的血糖状态。逻辑回归分析发现年龄>50岁,男性,高血压,吸烟和糖尿病是高FRS的重要决定因素。
    居住在印度西Tripura区的成年人患CVD危险因素的患病率很高。该人群中约有五分之一的人在10年内患CVE的风险很高。控制高血压,吸烟和糖尿病可能有助于降低这种风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Predicting the 10-year risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) may save lives through timely intervention. Framingham risk scoring (FRS) can effectively predict this risk.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to estimate the 10-year risk of CVE using FRS and to estimate the prevalence of CVD risk factors and their associations with FRS among adults in the West Tripura District of India.
    UNASSIGNED: This community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 November 2019 to 30 November 2021 in the West Tripura District of India, using FRS 2008 and a pretested interview schedule among 290 individuals aged ≥ 30 years chosen by multistage sampling.
    UNASSIGNED: The majority, that is 61.7%, of the study subjects had low risk, 18.6% had intermediate risk and 19.7% had high risk of CVE within 10 years. The prevalence of hypertension was 55.6%; diabetes mellitus, 55.9%; smoking, 96.2%; dyslipidaemia, 34.3%; alcohol consumption, 96.2%; physical inactivity, 54%; and obesity, 64.6%. The bivariate analysis detected a significant association of FRS with age, sex, residence, literacy, marital status, obesity, smoking, alcoholism, blood pressure (BP), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and glycaemic status of the study subjects. The logistic regression analysis has identified age >50 years, male sex, hypertension, smoking and diabetes mellitus as significant determinants of high FRS.
    UNASSIGNED: Adults living in the West Tripura District of India have a high prevalence of CVD risk factors. About one-fifth of this population has a high risk of CVE in 10 years. Controlling hypertension, smoking and diabetes mellitus may help reduce this risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号