OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of the routinely planned six-week outpatient visit and x-ray in patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures including clavicle, proximal humerus, humeral shaft, olecranon, radial shaft and distal radius.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures between 2019 and 2022 in a level 1 trauma center. The first outcome of interest was the incidence of abnormalities found on the x-ray made at the 6-week outpatient visit. Abnormalities were defined as all differences between the intra-operative (or direct postoperative) and 6-week x-ray. In case an abnormality was detected, the hospital records were screened to determine its clinical consequence. The clinical consequences were categorized into requiring either additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing or allowed range of motion (ROM). The second outcome of interest was the incidence of deviations from the local standard post operative treatment and follow-up protocol based on the 6-week outpatient visit as a whole. Deviations were also categorized into either requiring additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing or allowed range of motion.
RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were included. Abnormalities on x-ray at 6 weeks postoperatively were found in only 10 (3.7%) patients of which only 4 (1.5%) had clinical implications (in three patients extra imaging was required and in one patient it was necessary to deviate from standard weightbearing/ROM limitation regime). The clinical/radiological findings during the 6-week outpatient visit led to a deviation from standard in only 8 (3.0%) patients. Notably, the majority of these patients experienced symptoms suggestive for complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The routine 6-week outpatient visit and x-ray, after surgery for common upper extremity fractures, rarely has clinical consequences. It should be questioned whether these routine visits are necessary and whether a more selective approach should be considered.
METHODS: Level IV; Case Series; Prognosis Study.

BACKGROUND: By gaining insight into the Quality of Life (QoL) status and occurrence of complications, critical facets in the care for patients with Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) can be mitigated and measures can be taken to improve their outcome. Therefore, the aims of this study were to 1) determine the QoL in FRI patients in comparison to non-FRI patients and 2) describe the occurrence of other complications in both FRI and non-FRI patients.
METHODS: An ambidirectional cohort study was conducted in a level 1 trauma centre between January 1st 2016 and November 1st 2021. All patients who underwent surgical stabilisation of an isolated long bone fracture were eligible for inclusion. To avoid confounding, only patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) <16 were included. Data regarding patient demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, follow-up and complications were collected of both non-FRI and FRI patients. QoL was assessed through the use of five-level EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires twelve months post-injury.
RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were included in this study, of whom 38 (28%) FRI patients and 96 (72%) non-FRI patients. In comparison to non-FRI patients, FRI patients scored significantly worse on the QoL assessment regarding the index value (p = 0.012) and the domains mobility (p<0.001), usual activities (p = 0.010) and pain/discomfort (p = 0.009). Other postoperative complications were more often reported (p<0.001) in FRI patients (66%, n = 25/38) compared to non-FRI patients (27%, n = 26/96). During the median follow-up of 14.5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 9.5-26.5), 25 FRI patients developed a total of 49 distinctive complications besides FRI. The complications nonunion (18%, n = 9/49), infection other than FRI (e.g. line infection, urinary tract infection, pneumonia) (18%, n = 9/49) and implant failure (14%, n = 7/49) were the most frequently described in the FRI group.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who suffered from an FRI have a decreased QoL in comparison to those without an FRI. Moreover, patients with an FRI have a higher rate of additional complications. These findings can help in patient counselling regarding the potential physical and mental consequences of having a complicated course of recovery due to an infection.

Operative management of fractures and malunions can be challenging when restoring native anatomy is not straightforward. Comminuted fractures and managing deformity correction in the setting of osteolysis, callus, and even complete fracture healing must include careful planning. Preoperative planning has been popularized and taught as an integral part of a surgeon\'s skill set, with critical evaluation and assessment of the implemented plan being the final step in the process. We present a robust, reproducible, and cost-effective technique for intraoperative fracture fixation assessment with case examples, used routinely at our institution.

Long-term care residents with suspected fractures as a result of a fall typically transfer to the emergency department (ED) for diagnostic imaging and care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, transfer to the hospital increased the risk of COVID-19 exposure and resulted in extended isolation days for the resident. A fracture care pathway was developed and implemented to provide rapid diagnostic imaging results and stabilization in the care home, reducing transportation and exposure risk to COVID-19. Eligible residents with a stable fracture would receive a referral to a designated fracture clinic for consultation; fracture care is provided in the care home by long-term care staff. Evaluation of the pathway was completed and demonstrated that 100% of residents did not transfer to the ED and 47% of the residents did not transfer to a fracture clinic for additional care.

Fracture related infection remains a challenging complication that creates a heavy burden for orthopaedic trauma patients, their families, treating physicians and healthcare systems. Even current curative approaches (radical debridement, revision surgery and long-term antibiotics) often result in significant socioeconomic costs and the risk of life-long functional impairment to the patient. The prevalence of osteomyelitis due to trauma and surgical complications does not seem to be diminishing in our society and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance is a major health related concern with global relevance. Despite multi-drug resistant bacteria being on the rise universally, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma care has only slightly changed in the last 25 years. Staphylococcus infections remain an increasing global concern, partially due to the resistance mechanisms developed by staphylococci to evade the host immune system and antibiotic treatment, and as such antibiotics are becoming increasingly ineffective. This paper will address fracture related infections in trauma patients, looking at the bacteriology of these infections, its clinical implications and evolving nature.

BACKGROUND: Fixation of major fractures plays a pivotal role in the surgical treatment of polytrauma patients. In addition to ongoing discussions regarding the optimal timing in level I trauma centers, it appears that the respective trauma systems impact the implementation of both, damage control and safe definitive surgery strategies. This study aimed to assess current standards of polytrauma treatment in a Europe-wide survey.
METHODS: A survey, developed by members of the polytrauma section of ESTES, was sent online via SurveyMonkey®, between July and November 2020, to 450 members of ESTES (European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery). Participation was voluntary and anonymity was granted. The questionnaire consisted of demographic data and included questions about the definition of \"polytrauma\" and the local standards for the timing of fracture fixation.
RESULTS: In total, questionnaires of 87 participants (19.3% response rate) were included. The majority of participants were senior consultants (50.57%). The mean work experience was 19 years, and on average, 17 multiple-injured patients were treated monthly. Most of the participants stated that a polytrauma patient is defined by ISS ≥ 16 (44.16%), followed by the \"Berlin Definition\" (25.97%). Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, tachycardia or vasopressor administration (86.84%), pH deviation, base excess shift (48.68%), and lactate > 4 mmol (40.79%) or coagulopathy defined by ROTEM (40.79%) were the three most often stated indicators for shock. Local guidelines (33.77%) and the S-3 Guideline by the DGU® (23.38%) were mostly stated as a reference for the treatment of polytrauma patients. Normal coagulation (79.69%), missing administration of vasopressors (62.50%), and missing clinical signs of \"SIRS\" (67.19%) were stated as criteria for safe definite secondary surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Different definitions of polytrauma are used in the clinical setting. Indication for and the extent of secondary (definitive) surgery are mainly dependent on the polytrauma patient`s physiology. The «Window of Opportunity» plays a less important role in decision making.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has the potential to evoke lasting changes in the delivery of care, and the utilization of telehealth. We sought associations between surgeon personal factors and greater use of telehealth to treat fractures relative to in-person care.
METHODS: Seventy-five fracture surgeons participated in a survey-based experiment. All surgeons were asked about their preferences regarding remote compared to in-person communication. Participants rated the following items on slider scales: their degree of introversion, the importance of a hands-on/physical exam and surgeon preferences regarding telehealth. We identified factors associated with the use of, and comfort with, telehealth.
RESULTS: The use of telehealth during the pandemic was associated with comfort evaluating wounds via telehealth. A greater proportion of remote visits was associated with comfort evaluating wounds and confidence teaching exercises via telehealth. There was consensus that telehealth did not alter utilization rates of radiographs or offer of discretionary surgery. The use of absorbable sutures to limit in-person visits was associated with a preference for working from home and greater comfort with evaluating wounds remotely. The use of 2- and 6-week post-operative telehealth visits and plans to use telehealth after the pandemic (52%) were associated with greater comfort in evaluating wounds through telehealth and greater confidence with video instruction of exercises.
CONCLUSIONS: The finding that personal factors are associated with utilization of telehealth helps target strategies for increased use of telehealth and other technologies as the pandemic wanes. Given that telehealth adds convenience for people with ambulatory difficulties or in remote areas, such efforts are warranted.
METHODS: Not applicable.

OBJECTIVE: Nonsurgical distal radius fracture treatment requires immobilization and classical teaching suggests varying cast positions. We investigated the effect of cast position on the force and pressure experienced by the articular cartilage in the scaphoid and lunate fossae.
METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used. A standardized extra-articular distal radius fracture was made. Force sensors were affixed to the articular cartilage of the scaphoid and lunate fossae. Baseline data were obtained. Specimens were then placed into a short arm cast with the wrist either neutrally aligned or flexed and ulnarly deviated (FUD). Specimens had a standard load applied, and a force profile was obtained. The cast was removed and the other cast type was placed and measurements were repeated. Overall force and pressure values were compared between baseline data and the 2 cast types. Additionally, differences in volar and dorsal scaphoid and lunate fossa forces and pressures were compared pairwise within the 2 cast types. The relative force and pressure values across cast types were also compared.
RESULTS: Both cast types significantly reduced the median force and pressure experienced by the radiocarpal joint compared with no cast. In the FUD cast, the volar and dorsal lunate fossa experienced significantly greater force, and the dorsal lunate fossa experienced significantly greater pressure compared with the dorsal scaphoid fossa. There were no differences for any fossae in the neutral cast. When comparing between casts, the volar lunate fossa experienced a significantly greater relative force in the FUD cast compared with the neutral cast.
CONCLUSIONS: Casting a distal radius fracture decreases the forces and pressures in the radiocarpal joint. Placing the wrist in a FUD position results in greater forces and pressures on the lunate fossa compared with the scaphoid fossa.
CONCLUSIONS: When immobilization is needed, we advocate for the placement of patients in a relatively neutral short-arm cast with minimal FUD to avoid this increased pressure.

UNASSIGNED: To analyze a series of claims from a large national malpractice insurer associated with fracture care to understand what parameters are associated with claims, defense costs, and paid indemnity.
UNASSIGNED: Review of claims in fracture care settings from a national database; case series.
UNASSIGNED: Database draws from insured pool of 400,000 medical malpractice cases from 400 healthcare entities across the country, representing 165,000 physicians; both academic and private.
UNASSIGNED: Fracture care patients bringing legal suit.
UNASSIGNED: Cost of legal proceedings and indemnity, ICD-9 codes, and contributing causes toward claims.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 756 fracture claims were asserted between 2005 and 2014 regarding fracture care within the database; 70% were brought for inaccurate, missed, or delayed diagnosis, while 22% addressed medical treatment and 8% were for surgical management. Orthopaedics was the primary service in 22%. Total cost (expenses and indemnity) to orthopaedic providers totaled $13.1MM (million). The most common claim against orthopaedics was for fractures of the tibia and fibula (11.4%). Impact factor (IF) analysis (as described by Matsen) of indemnity in these cases reveals 3 fracture regions of highest indemnity burden: fractures of the tibia and fibula (IF: 1.86, 11.4%), pelvis (IF: 1.77, 6.6%), and spine (IF 1.33, 6.6%). Analysis of contributing factors identifies the category of clinical judgement as the most common category (62%). Other common factors include patient noncompliance (31%), communication (28%), technical skill (17%), clinical systems (11%), and documentation (10%). The single most common specific cause of a claim in orthopaedic fracture care was misinterpretation of diagnostic imaging (25%).
UNASSIGNED: This study is the first of its kind to identify fractures of the tibia and fibula as high risk for litigation against orthopaedic providers and provides general counseling of legal pitfalls in fracture care. Finally, we are able to identify the act of patient assessment as a key issue in over half of all fracture-related claims against orthopaedic providers. Providers in general and specialty settings can use this information to help guide their treatment and care ownership decisions in the care of patients with fractures.
UNASSIGNED: Economic - Level III.

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity fractures requiring cast immobilization are exceedingly common, especially in the pediatric population. Studies have shown improved outcomes when patients can participate in water-based activities while casted. However, waterproof cast material is not feasible in all clinical settings and wet cast complications remain a source of morbidity and expense. External cast protectors play an important role in preventing wet casts, but the efficacy of various commercially available brands during relevant water-based activity remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are differences in the rate and extent of moisture exposure for four commercially available cast protectors using a mechanized cast arm model and human volunteers.
METHODS: A mechanized arm model was developed with four implanted humidity sensors. Cast protectors were applied over the arm, the model was submerged in water, and moved back and forth, simulating cast-wearers\' motion. Data regarding humidity was recorded for successive 10-minute trials. Trials were analyzed using a mixed effects linear model to determine change in humidity over time. The top and bottom performing cast protectors were then applied to four adult volunteers prior to thirty minutes of swimming. Questionnaires regarding comfort and a qualitative assessment of cast wetness using a chemical color indicator were completed.
RESULTS: 372 instances of sensor data from 96 10-minute trials was collected. The CVS, SealTight and Walgreens brands showed significant increases in humidity beginning at 10, 20 and 20 minutes, respectively. DryPro showed no significant increase in moisture level up to 50 minutes. In successive trials up to 120 minutes, DryPro showed only a 2% increase in moisture. In human subjects testing, 3/4 casts underneath CVS protectors had some degree of wetness-related color change that would require cast change as compared to 0/4 casts underneath DryPro protectors.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist between commercially available cast protectors. Vacuum-sealed protectors performed best in both mechanical and human subject portions of this study and allowed minimal change in humidity for extended periods of sequential water immersion. Their cost is notably less than management of a wet cast. Lower-performing products may expose cast-wearers to an increased risk of wet cast complications.