UNASSIGNED: Formative assessments have overall been shown to improve summative evaluations in medical education. However, it remains unclear if utilizing them for course credit in an integrated curriculum over multiple subspecialties is beneficial for student acquisition of knowledge. We set out to determine if grading formative quizzes had an effect on student acquisition of knowledge via summative assessments.
UNASSIGNED: In 2020, quizzes remained mandatory, but were not graded for course credit. We collected and compared formative (quiz) and summative (unit exam) score data from student cohorts when quizzes were graded versus not graded. Medical college admission test (MCAT) score, gender, and underrepresented in medicine (URM) status data were utilized to determine if they had effects on outcomes. We used a predefined region of indifference (± 5%) and second-generation p-values to determine if there were meaningful differences in average summative exam scores.
UNASSIGNED: Despite a drop in quiz scores after removing course credit, differences in average summative exam scores fully resided within the region of indifference for three of five course blocks, indicating no meaningful differences in summative exam scores existed for those blocks. In other blocks, the difference was not fully nested within the region of indifference; however, all data overlapped with this region, implying exam score differences were inconclusive for these blocks.
UNASSIGNED: Our study demonstrates that there is either no meaningful effect on summative assessments or no conclusive detrimental effects when mandatory quizzes are not graded for course credit.

Assessment is an essential component for all educational programs and must check competence acquirement while foster and promote learning. Progress Test (PT) is well recognized to assess cognitive knowledge, clinical reasoning and decision making in the clinical context, offering important information about the individual performance and program quality. It is widely used in Brazilian and international medical schools; however, it still has little role in assessing medical residents in Brazil. We present the experience of a PT pilot implementation in an Infectious Diseases residency program over two years. The first, second and third-year residents did four serial exams with 40 multiple choice questions (item)/each. Preceptors were trained on best practices on item writing. All the items were reviewed by a panel of experts and, after approval, included in the item bank. All participants answered a survey on their perceptions about the experience. The final score was higher for the third-year residents in all exam applications. The level of satisfaction was high among the participants, who mentioned the learning opportunity with the exam and the feedback. PT can improve residents\' assessment along the training period and residents\' performance should guide review and improvement of the programs.

The effective implementation of evidence-based teaching (EBT) in large college courses benefits from the successful use of instructional teams. An instructional team\'s feedback allows instructors to act based on evidence of student learning, addressing students\' needs. This feedback may be particularly important for novice instructors or experienced instructors teaching a class for the first time. This study sought to characterize the nature of an instructional team\'s feedback as well as its influence on the decisions and actions of a seasoned instructor teaching a new class. Instructional team members provided feedback in the form of anticipations, noticings, and suggestions. Anticipations and suggestions seemed to have the largest impact on the instructor\'s decisions and actions, while noticings, despite providing insights into student thinking, had a smaller effect. Our findings indicate that an instructional team can provide valuable feedback to instructors when team members have an opportunity to meaningfully participate in the planning and teaching processes.

UNASSIGNED: Team-based learning (TBL) is an evidence-based approach to promote teamwork. Peer evaluation (PE) is an essential component to shape future team engagement and promote reflection. As PEs vary in use, implementation, and assessment, this study establishes the content and construct validity of a formative PE tool for a TBL course.
UNASSIGNED: A ten-item instrument was developed based on a comprehensive review of PE literature and was critically edited by a team of experienced educators. Each student in a graduate histology course rated peers at two timepoints on a scale from Never to Always (0-3). The instrument\'s factor structure was analyzed by dividing the response set (D1 and D2); with D1 utilized for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and D2 for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach\'s alpha assessed internal consistency.
UNASSIGNED: Data from 158 students across four cohorts were included in the analyses (D1, D2 = 972). A three-factor solution had good overall internal consistency (alpha = 0.82), and within the subscales ranged from 0.67 to 0.81. The factor structures were resonant with existing literature on (1) preparation, (2) providing feedback, and (3) feedback receptivity and attitude.
UNASSIGNED: This study establishes evidence of content and construct validity of a formative PE instrument for a TBL course.

UNASSIGNED: Formative assessment with feedback is part of the assessment program in medical education to improve students\' learning. Limited research has focused on its application and impact on practical anatomy education.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to examine medical students\' perceptions of formative assessment in practical anatomy sessions of body systems-based educational units and explore its influence on final practical exam performance. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. Data was collected from 173 Year 2 medical students through a survey that addressed their perception of process and importance of formative assessment and feedback. The survey employed a 5-point Likert scale. Two open-ended questions were appended at the end of the survey. Students\' performance in Unit 3 (where formative assessment was conducted) was compared to their performance in Unit 2 (where no formative assessment was conducted) and with the performance of the previous academic year\'s students in Unit 3 (where no formative assessment was conducted). Descriptive statistics were used. The level of statistical significance was set at p-value < 0.05. Responses to open-ended questions (qualitative data) were counted, categorized as themes, and presented as frequencies and percentages.
UNASSIGNED: The survey showed high internal consistency, and its validity was established through exploratory factor analysis. Results showed that the mean mark for the unit with formative assessment and feedback was significantly higher than for the units without formative assessment and feedback. Students showed positive perception of formative assessment and feedback conducted after practical anatomy sessions. They reported useful insights regarding the benefits they gained from formative assessment and feedback as well as constructive suggestions for future improvements.
UNASSIGNED: The study indicates that students positively perceived formative assessment and feedback sessions after practical anatomy sessions. Findings also refer to a positive effect of formative assessment on students\' performance in summative practical assessment in anatomy.

UNASSIGNED: Mini-CEX assesses clinical competency and is mainly used as a formative assessment tool. Its use in postgraduate training is well documented. However, Mini-CEX would play a significant role in training undergraduate medical students, especially with the commencement of competency-based medical education in India. This work reports the situational analysis of the Mini-CEX implementation in the department of ENT.
UNASSIGNED: The Department of ENT is using Mini-CEX for formative assessment of students\' clinical competence since 2017. Each student had to complete a minimum of five Mini-CEX encounters before the summative assessment. We reviewed the Mini-CEX assessment records of 149 undergraduate medical students who appeared for the summative exam in 2018.
UNASSIGNED: We analysed the records of 874 Mini-CEX encounters. Each Mini-CEX encounter took 11 min on average. Each student completed five such assessments, which accounted for 55 min of one-to-one teacher-student interaction focused on clinical skills learning. The feedback time varied from 1 to 30 min. Feedback was focused on the cognitive (46%) and psychomotor (42%) domains. However, the majority of students reflected that they learned psychomotor skills during the Mini-CEX. Students selected only a few skills for the Mini-CEX, ignoring many must-know skills.
UNASSIGNED: Mini-CEX is feasible as a formative assessment tool for medical undergraduates\' ENT training. It improves the assessor-student interaction, provides effective feedback, and develops the practice of reflection among students. However, regular review and training of the assessors and students are needed as a quality assurance measure.

Introduction: Learning expert communication skills is a core educational goal within palliative care training, yet there are few communication-based educational tools specifically designed for specialty-trained palliative care providers. Objective: To develop and implement a tool to facilitate effective learning of serious illness communication for hospice and palliative medicine fellows. Methods: A novel formative assessment tool was developed within the UCLA Palliative Care Fellowship program, and utilized throughout the academic year on a weekly basis. Focus groups were held for fellows and faculty separately at the end of the academic year in order to gain insight into the experience and effectiveness of the tool. Focus group transcripts were analyzed through thematic analysis. Results: There was a 47% participation rate in the focus groups (n = 7). Qualitative analysis demonstrated positive impact of the tool in identifying learning goals, improving quality of feedback, and in standardizing language around advanced communication skills, with most value in the first half of the fellowship year. Some aspects of the tool were found to increase feedback anxiety, including the competency scoring component, frequency of use, and utilization with individual patient encounters. Conclusion: This novel communication tool provides an important addition to serious illness communication training of specialist palliative care providers, in creating a shared mental model for naming and organizing skills, as well as generating specific high quality learning goals and feedback. Preliminary feedback from our pilot implementation phase provided important information about how to refine the tool and remove components that unnecessarily added to feedback anxiety.

Assessment of learners in the anatomical sciences is a complex task as it not only tests students\' fact knowledge, but also the analysis of visual information. Sometimes, novice histology learners must acquire image recognition skills of microscopic structures in a short time frame. This paper describes a strategy of offering first year dental students at the University of Michigan a short, non-grade contributing, formative assessment quiz in order to better prepare them for a high-stakes, final summative histology examination. Data collected over 7 years indicate that students, who made use of this formative assessment opportunity, performed significantly better in their summative examination than students, who did not. Especially early practice quiz users profited most. Students, who used the practice quiz until they achieved a perfect score, also had statistically higher final examination scores. Students, who did not use the practice quiz, had a significantly lower cumulative D1-year Grade Point Average (D1-GPA) than students, who did, indicating that academically weaker students often underuse supporting learning resources. In general, scores from the Dental Admission Test (DAT) were weak predictors of learning success in the DENT 510 histology course. In contrast, the D1-GPA values had a medium strength positive correlation with final histology examination scores. The major problem that was encountered with this practice quiz strategy was that many students waited until close to the day of the final examination before taking advantage of this feedback opportunity, thereby reducing its potential benefit for improving their overall learning strategy for histology.

BACKGROUND: The long case is used to assess medical students\' proficiency in performing clinical tasks. As a formative assessment, the purpose is to offer feedback on performance, aiming to enhance and expedite clinical learning. The long case stands out as one of the primary formative assessment methods for clinical clerkship in low-resource settings but has received little attention in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of medical students and faculty regarding the use of the Long Case Study as a formative assessment method at a tertiary care teaching hospital in a low-resource setting.
METHODS: A qualitative study design was used. The study was conducted at Makerere University, a low-resource setting. The study participants were third- and fifth-year medical students as well as lecturers. Purposive sampling was utilized to recruit participants. Data collection comprised six Focus Group Discussions with students and five Key Informant Interviews with lecturers. The qualitative data were analyzed by inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the study: ward placement, case presentation, and case assessment and feedback. The findings revealed that students conduct their long cases at patients\' bedside within specific wards/units assigned for the entire clerkship. Effective supervision, feedback, and marks were highlighted as crucial practices that positively impact the learning process. However, challenges such as insufficient orientation to the long case, the super-specialization of the hospital wards, pressure to hunt for marks, and inadequate feedback practices were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: The long case offers students exposure to real patients in a clinical setting. However, in tertiary care teaching hospitals, it\'s crucial to ensure proper design and implementation of this practice to enable students\' exposure to a variety of cases. Adequate and effective supervision and feedback create valuable opportunities for each learner to present cases and receive corrections.

Traditional academic lectures have long been criticized as providing a passive learning environment to students. Often, they do not capture the audience\'s attention, resulting in learners being distracted or bored and thereby reducing their learning efficacy. Consequently, they are being abandoned by many schools and universities as an educational modus or modified into more learner-centered experiences. This descriptive article outlines a strategy of inserting active learning PowerPoint slides into traditional histology lectures. Suggestions and advice for adding or improving existing active learning slides are being offered to readers, who are planning to modify their own lecture presentations. The author\'s experience of using this formative assessment strategy with different types of histology learners is also discussed.