DNA aptamers have attracted attention as an alternative modality for biomolecules due to their excellent target binding specificity and thermal stability, and they are also expected to be applied as artificial agonists for receptor proteins. DNA aptamer agonist TD0 targeting the receptor of fibroblast growth factor (FGFR), which plays an important role in the fields of wound healing and regenerative medicine, has been reported to induce cellular responses as well as its native ligands. However, it was also noted that there were some different responses upon long-term stimulation, suggesting that the intracellular signals induced by DNA aptamer agonist TD0 are different from those of natural ligands. In this paper, we comprehensively analyzed the intracellular signals induced by DNA aptamer agonist TD0 targeting FGFR1, and compared them with those by natural protein ligand FGF2. It was found that the intracellular signals were highly similar for short-term stimulation. On the other hand, the receptor and the downstream cellular signals showed different activation behaviors for long-time stimulation. Evaluating the stability and sustained activity of DNA aptamer agonist TD0 and FGF2 in the medium suggested that ligand stability may be important in properly regulating cellular responses.

Rationale: Reconstruction of hair follicles (HFs) and eccrine sweat glands (ESGs) is essential for functional skin regeneration. In skin reconstruction research, we found that foreskin-derived epidermal cells reconstructed HF organoids unidirectionally, but not ESG organoids. Methods: To investigate key genes and pathways influencing the fate of ESG and HF, a transcriptome profiling of ESG placode-containing skin and HF placode-containing skin was employed, and key DEGs were identified and validated by RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence staining in mice and rats. Subsequently, adult human epidermal cell-derived organoids were reconstructed to probe functional roles and mechanisms of FGF7 and FGF10 by series of approaches integrating RT-qPCR, immunofluorescence-staining, WB, apoptosis assay, and pathway interference assay. Results: All members of FGF7 subfamily were among the key DEGs screened, the differential expression of FGF7 and FGF10 and their receptors FGFR1/FGFR2 was verified between ESG placode-containing skin and HF placode-containing skin. In vivo and in vitro Matrigel plug models showed that both FGF7 and FGF10 promoted fate transition of human epidermal cell-derived organoids to ESG phenotype organoids, FGF7 and FGF10 had a synergistic effect, and mainly function through the FGFR1/2-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway. Conclusions: Adult epidermal cells can be manipulated to reconstruct personalized HF and ESG to meet different needs.

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) are emerging as key factors involved in tumorigenesis, tumor microenvironment remodeling and acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Pemigatinib is a Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor that selectively targets aberrant FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3. Pemigatinib is now approved for advanced-stage cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) but data suggests that other tumor histotypes exhibit FGFR alterations, thus hypothesizing its potential efficacy in other cancer settings. The present systematic review, based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to synthetize and critically interpret the results of all available preclinical and clinical evidence regarding Pemigatinib use in cancer. In April 2024, an extensive search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases using the keyword \"Pemigatinib\". Twenty-seven studies finally met all inclusion criteria. The promising results emerging from Pemigatinib preclinical and clinical studies pave the way for Pemigatinib extension to multiple solid cancer settings.

BACKGROUND: In the THOR trial (NCT03390504) Cohort 1, erdafitinib demonstrated significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (median 12.1 versus 7.8 months) and reduced risk of death by 36% (hazard ratio 0.64, P = 0.005) compared with chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients with FGFR alterations who progressed after ≥ 1 prior treatments, including anti-PD-(L)1. There have been no reports of the Japanese subgroup results yet.
METHODS: THOR Cohort 1 randomized patients to erdafitinib once daily or docetaxel/vinflunine once every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). No specific statistical power was set for this Japanese subgroup analysis.
RESULTS: Of 266 patients randomized, 27 (14 erdafitinib; 13 chemotherapy) were Japanese. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatments and to the overall population, except for more males, lower body weight, and more upper tract primary tumors among Japanese patients. Compared with chemotherapy, erdafitinib showed improved OS (median 25.4 versus 12.4 months), PFS (median 8.4 versus 2.9 months) and ORR (57.1% versus 15.4%). Any grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients from both arms but Grade 3/4 AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were lower in the erdafitinib arm. No new safety signals were observed in the Japanese subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: In the Japanese subgroup, erdafitinib showed improved survival and response compared to chemotherapy, with no new safety concerns. These results support erdafitinib as a treatment option for Japanese mUC patients with FGFR alterations, and early FGFR testing after diagnosis of mUC should be considered.

BACKGROUND: Pemigatinib is an oral, potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor. FIGHT-101, a three-part, open-label, first-in-human, phase I/II study (NCT02393248), evaluated pemigatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. In parts 1 and 2, pemigatinib monotherapy had a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in FGFR-altered tumors. Part 3 (pemigatinib combination therapies) results are presented here.
METHODS: Patients received 9, 13.5, or 20 mg oral once-daily pemigatinib on continuous or intermittent schedules with gemcitabine and cisplatin (pemi/gem/cis), docetaxel (pemi/doc), trastuzumab (pemi/tras), pembrolizumab (pemi/pembro), or retifanlimab (pemi/reti) irrespective of whether the tumor was confirmed as FGFR altered. Primary endpoints were safety and pharmacodynamics. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed tumor objective response rates (ORRs) and pharmacokinetics (PK).
RESULTS: Of 65 enrolled patients (pemi/gem/cis, n = 8; pemi/doc, n = 7; pemi/tras, n = 6; pemi/pembro, n = 26; pemi/reti, n = 18), all discontinued. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally consistent with individual drug AEs. Serious and grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 0%-85.7% and 33.3%-100.0% of patients across treatment groups, respectively. All pemigatinib combinations demonstrated steady-state PK comparable to monotherapy. Pharmacodynamic effects in all pemigatinib combinations, except pemi/gem/cis, were consistent with monotherapy. Less inhibition of FGFR2α phosphorylation was observed with this combination. ORRs (95% confidence interval) were 37.5% [8.5% to 75.5% (pemi/gem/cis)], 14.3% [0.4% to 57.9% (pemi/doc)], 0% (pemi/tras), 26.9% [11.6% to 47.8% (pemi/pembro)], and 11.1% [1.4% to 34.7% (pemi/reti)]. All groups had instances of tumor shrinkage. ORRs in assessable patients with FGFR rearrangements and mutations were 50% and 33%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pemigatinib combination therapy showed no unexpected toxicities. PK and pharmacodynamics were mostly consistent with pemigatinib monotherapy. Pemi/gem/cis (37.5%) and pemi/pembro (26.9%) had the highest ORR; most responders had FGFR alterations.

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are a versatile family of peptide growth factors that are involved in various biological functions, including cell growth and differentiation, embryonic development, angiogenesis, and metabolism. Abnormal FGF/FGF receptor (FGFR) signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple diseases such as cancer, metabolic diseases, and inflammatory diseases. It is worth noting that macrophage polarization, which involves distinct functional phenotypes, plays a crucial role in tissue repair, homeostasis maintenance, and immune responses. Recent evidence suggests that FGF/FGFR signaling closely participates in the polarization of macrophages, indicating that they could be potential targets for therapeutic manipulation of diseases associated with dysfunctional macrophages. In this article, we provide an overview of the structure, function, and downstream regulatory pathways of FGFs, as well as crosstalk between FGF signaling and macrophage polarization. Additionally, we summarize the potential application of harnessing FGF signaling to modulate macrophage polarization.

Fibroblast growth factors and their receptors (FGFR) have major roles in both human growth and oncogenesis. In adults, therapeutic FGFR inhibitors have been successful against tumors that carry somatic FGFR mutations. In pediatric patients, trials testing these anti-tumor FGFR inhibitor therapeutics are underway, with several recent reports suggesting modest positive responses. Herein, we report an unforeseen outcome in a pre-pubescent child with an FGFR1-mutated glioma who was successfully treated with FDA-approved erdafitinib, a pan-FGFR inhibitor approved for treatment of Bladder tumors. While on treatment with erdafitinib, the patient experienced rapid skeletal and long bone overgrowth resulting in kyphoscoliosis, reminiscent of patients with congenital loss-of-function FGFR3 mutations. We utilized normal dermal fibroblast cells established from the patient as a surrogate model to demonstrate that insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), a factor important for developmental growth of bones and tissues, can activate the PI3K/AKT pathway in erdafitinib-treated cells but not the MAPK/ERK pathway. The IGF-I-activated PI3K/AKT signaling rescued normal fibroblasts from the cytotoxic effects of erdafitinib by promoting cell survival. We, therefore, postulate that IGF-I-activated P13K/AKT signaling likely continues to promote bone elongation in the growing child, but not in adults, treated with therapeutic pan-FGFR inhibitors. Importantly, since activated MAPK signaling counters bone elongation, we further postulate that prolonged blockage of the MAPK pathway with pan-FGFR inhibitors, together with actions of growth-promoting factors including IGF-1, could explain the abnormal skeletal and axial growth suffered by our pre-pubertal patient during systemic therapeutic use of pan-FGFR inhibitors. Further studies to find more targeted, and/or appropriate dosing, of pan-FGFR inhibitor therapeutics for children are essential to avoid unexpected off-target effects as was observed in our young patient.

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions and rearrangements are clinically actionable genomic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Pemigatinib is a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1-3 and demonstrated efficacy in patients with previously treated, advanced/metastatic CCA with FGFR2 alterations in FIGHT-202 (NCT02924376). We report final outcomes from the extended follow-up period.
METHODS: The multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II FIGHT-202 study enrolled patients ≥18 years old with previously treated advanced/metastatic CCA with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements (cohort A), other FGF/FGFR alterations (cohort B), or no FGF/FGFR alterations (cohort C). Patients received once-daily oral pemigatinib 13.5 mg in 21-day cycles (2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in cohort A assessed as per RECIST v1.1 by an independent review committee; secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
RESULTS: FIGHT-202 enrolled 147 patients (cohort A, 108; cohort B, 20; cohort C, 17; unconfirmed FGF/FGFR alterations, 2). By final analysis, 145 (98.6%) had discontinued treatment due to progressive disease (71.4%), withdrawal by patient (8.2%), or adverse events (AEs; 6.8%). Median follow-up was 45.4 months. The ORR in cohort A was 37.0% (95% confidence interval 27.9% to 46.9%); complete and partial responses were observed in 3 and 37 patients, respectively. Median DOR was 9.1 (6.0-14.5) months; median PFS and OS were 7.0 (6.1-10.5) months and 17.5 (14.4-22.9) months, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (58.5%), alopecia (49.7%), and diarrhea (47.6%). Overall, 15 (10.2%) patients experienced TEAEs leading to pemigatinib discontinuation; intestinal obstruction and acute kidney injury (n = 2 each) occurred most frequently.
CONCLUSIONS: Pemigatinib demonstrated durable response and prolonged OS with manageable AEs in patients with previously treated, advanced/metastatic CCA with FGFR2 alterations in the extended follow-up period of FIGHT-202.

OBJECTIVE: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive tumor with limited treatment options especially in 2nd line or later treatments. Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 has recently emerged as a promising treatment option for patients with CCA harboring FGFR2-fusion. This study investigated the antitumor activities of tasurgratinib as an orally available FGFR1-3 inhibitor, in preclinical FGFR2-driven CCA models.
METHODS: Antitumor activities of tasurgratinib were examined in vitro and in vivo using NIH/3T3 cells expressing FGFR2-fusion as FGFR2-driven CCA models, and in vivo using a CCA patient-derived xenograft model. The molecular mechanism of action of tasurgratinib was elucidated through co-crystal structure analysis with FGFR1, manual complex model analysis with FGFR2, and binding kinetics analysis with FGFR2. Furthermore, the cell-based inhibitory activities against acquired resistant FGFR2 mutations in patients with CCA treated with FGFR inhibitors were evaluated.
RESULTS: Tasurgratinib showed antitumor activity in preclinical FGFR2-driven CCA models by inhibiting the FGFR signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, cell-based target engagement assays indicated that tasurgratinib had potent inhibitory activities against FGFR2 mutations, such as N549H/K, which are the major acquired mutations in CCA. We also confirmed that tasurgratinib exhibited fast association and slow dissociation kinetics with FGFR2, binding to the ATP-binding site and the neighboring region, and adopting an Asp-Phe-Gly (DFG)-\"in\" conformation.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the therapeutic potential of tasurgratinib in FGFR2-driven CCA and provide molecular mechanistic insights into its unique inhibitory profile against secondary FGFR2 resistance mutations in patients with CCA treated with FGFR inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential for urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations, as common oncogenic drivers in UC, have been reported to drive T cell depletion of UC immune microenvironment via up-regulating FGFR signaling, which indicated FGFR alterations potentially result in reduced response to ICIs. In addition, the selective pan-FGFR inhibitor showed better clinical benefit in clinical trials, indicating FGFR has emerged as critical therapeutic target via inhibiting FGFR signaling. The present study aims to evaluate prognosis and response to ICIs between FGFR-altered UC patients and FGFR-wildtype UC patients via 1963 UC patients and offers new insights into personalized precision therapy and combination therapy for UC.