OBJECTIVE: Fetal anomalies occur in approximately 3% of pregnancies and receiving the diagnosis may be a potentially traumatic experience for families. The mental health of mothers receiving diagnoses and what predicts resilience or poor mental health is understudied. Emotion regulation is an important, modifiable, transdiagnostic factor of mental health, and may be protective post-diagnosis. Evaluating biomarkers of stress, including IL-6 and Allostatic Load (AL), can also serve as early indicators of risk, indicative of early intervention. This study assessed whether reappraisal, suppression, IL-6, and AL was associated with mental health outcomes and resilience in women after receiving a fetal anomaly diagnosis.
METHODS: Pregnant women (N=108) presenting to a fetal concerns clinic for initial consultation completed measures of emotion regulation (i.e., reappraisal and suppression), depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and resilience between 2019-2022. A blood draw was used to assess IL-6 and create composite allostatic load measure including: IL-6, blood pressure, heart rate, glucose, cortisol, and body mass index.
RESULTS: Linear regressions controlling for age, gestational age, and perceived fetal diagnosis severity, demonstrated that IL-6 was negatively associated with resilience and positively associated with depression. Reappraisal was positively associated to resilience and negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and PTSD, whereas state insurance status was positively associated to anxiety and PTS symptoms. Suppression and allostatic load were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Women experiencing fetal anomaly diagnosis represent an understudied population with unaddressed mental health needs. Reappraisal serves as not only a protective factor, but one that can be enhanced to promote maternal resilience and mental health. Furthermore, elevated IL-6 may be a critical early indicator of potential intervention needs among women who are pregnant, to mitigate negative psychological states and enhance resilience.

OBJECTIVE: To examine maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by major fetal anomalies.
METHODS: A 10 year retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university hospital compared maternal and obstetrical outcomes between women with singleton pregnancies complicated by major fetal anomalies, and a control group with non-anomalous fetuses.
RESULTS: For the study compared to the control group, the median gestational age at delivery was lower: 37.0 vs. 39.4 weeks (p < 0.001); and the preterm delivery rates were higher, both at < 37 weeks (46.2 vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001) and < 32 weeks (15.4 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). For the study compared to the control group, the placental abruption rate was higher (6.8 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.002); 87.5 vs. 100% occurred before labor. For the respective groups, the mean gestational ages at abruption were 32.8 ± 1.3 and 39.9 ± 1.7 weeks (p = 0.024); and cesarean section and postpartum hemorrhage rates were: 53.8 vs. 28.3% (p < 0.001) and 11.3 vs. 2.8% (p = 0.001), respectively. For the respective groups, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy rates were 9.5 vs. 2.1% (p = 0.004), stillbirth rates were 17.1 vs. 0.3% (p < 0.001), and neonatal death rates 12.5 vs. 0.0% (p < 0.001). Major fetal anomalies were found to be associated with adverse maternal outcomes (OR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.50-4.09, p < 0.001). Polyhydramnios was identified as an independent risk factor in a multivariate analysis that adjusted for fetal anomalies, conception by IVF, and primiparity for adverse maternal outcomes (OR = 4.7, 95% CI 1.7-13.6, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancies with major fetal anomalies should be treated as high-risk due to the increased likelihood of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Antenatal screening with ultrasound identifies fetal structural anomalies in 3-6% of pregnancies. Identification of anomalies during pregnancy provides an opportunity for counselling, targeted imaging, genetic testing, fetal intervention and delivery planning. Ultrasound is the primary modality for imaging the fetus in pregnancy, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is evolving as an adjunctive tool providing additional structural and functional information. Screening should start from the first trimester when more than 50% of severe defects can be detected. The mid-trimester ultrasound balances the benefits of increased fetal growth and development to improve detection rates, whilst still providing timely management options. A routine third trimester ultrasound may detect acquired anomalies or those missed earlier in pregnancy but may not be available in all settings. Targeted imaging by fetal medicine experts improves detection in high-risk pregnancies or when an anomaly has been detected, allowing accurate phenotyping, access to advanced genetic testing and expert counselling.

UNASSIGNED: To determine the distribution of major fetal congenital heart diseases (CHDs) diagnosed antenatally during routine second-trimester obstetric anatomical scans in an unselected population at a single tertiary centre and to characterise and stratify risk factors, genetic diagnosis and long-term health at 4 years old.
UNASSIGNED: A single-centre cohort study of all major fetal CHDs detected on routine obstetric fetal anatomical ultrasound scans between January 2014 and December 2017 was performed in an unselected population. Demographic details, fetal echocardiogram reports, genetic test results, delivery outcomes and postnatal progress were stratified by CHD subtype.
UNASSIGNED: Of 20,031 screened pregnancies, 109 pregnancies (0.53%) had major fetal CHDs. The most common subtypes were coarctation of aorta (17.4%), transposition of great arteries (16.5%), and tetralogy of Fallot and univentricular hearts (13.8% each). Of the 60.5% that underwent confirmatory genetic testing-mostly conventional karyotyping and testing for 22q11 microdeletion-about a quarter had abnormalities, of which 22q microdeletion was the most common. We had complete obstetric data in 85 pregnancies (78%), of which 76.5% progressed to live birth. Among these, 92.1% of postnatal echocardiograms concurred with antenatal ones. At 4 years old, 43.2% of offspring had no medical or developmental issues, 20.0% had mild medical or developmental issues, 21.5% had major medical or developmental issues, and 12.3% had deceased.
UNASSIGNED: Fetal echocardiograms accurately diagnose CHDs. Future studies should evaluate the roles of chromosomal microarray and next-generation sequencing in diagnosing CHD.

OBJECTIVE: Exome or genome sequencing (ES or GS) can identify genetic causes of otherwise unexplained congenital anomaly and perinatal death (PND) but is not routine practice. The evidence base for \"genomic autopsy\" after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) and PND has been synthesized to determine the value of this investigation.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria and containing ≥10 cases of TOPFA or PND (with or without major congenital abnormality), in which ES or GS was conducted. We determined test performance, including diagnostic yield, accuracy, and reliability. We also reported outcomes associated with clinical utility and harms, where described.
RESULTS: From 2245 potentially eligible studies, 32 publications were eligible and had data extracted, representing 2120 cases that could be meta-analyzed. No diagnostic accuracy or comparative studies were identified, although some analysis of concordance between different ES/GS methodologies could be performed. Studies reporting parent-related outcomes or long-term follow-up did not do so in a systematic or quantifiable manner.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that approximately one-fourth to one-third of fetal losses associated with TOPFA or unexplained PND are associated with a genetic cause identifiable on ES or GS-albeit this estimate varies depending on phenotypic and background risk factors. Despite the large body of evidence on ES and GS, little research has attempted to validate the accuracy of testing, nor measure the clinical or societal outcomes in families that follow the diagnostic investigation in this context.

Multiple pregnancies are infrequently encountered, with the incidence of spontaneous triplet pregnancies estimated at approximately 1 in 7000 pregnancies. Triplet gestations are recognized for their propensity to bring about a spectrum of pregnancy related complexities, encompassing fetal structural abnormalities, neurological anomalies, disturbances in amniotic fluid levels, preterm labor, and suboptimal neonatal outcomes. Anencephaly is a serious congenital defect where the brain and skull do not fully develop, often leading to a poor prognosis. It\'s a preventable neural tube defect (NTD) with timely intake of folic acid, is caused by the incomplete closure of the neural tube during fetal development, resulting in the absence of the cerebrum (responsible for thinking and coordination) and the front part of the brain (forebrain) in affected infants. While anencephaly in a triplet is scarcely reported, spontaneous reabsorption of an anencephalic fetus in utero is a rare and unexpected event, with no documented cases in triplet pregnancies until now. We report a case of anencephaly in a triplet pregnancy where the mother presented late during her third trimester, the reabsorption of the anencephalic fetus in utero is an unprecedented event, highlighting the unique nature of this triplet pregnancy.

UNASSIGNED: With the advancement of prenatal diagnosis technology, the detection rate of fetal abnormalities continues to increase, imposing a significant burden on both society and families. A retrospective analysis of essential information about pregnant women, such as their pregnancy history and delivery details, is crucial for understanding the primary factors that influence pregnancy outcomes in women with fetal abnormalities. This analysis is of great significance for improving the level of pregnancy management and outcomes in pregnant women with fetal abnormalities.
UNASSIGNED: To retrospectively analyze the pregnancy outcomes of women with fetal abnormalities and explore the factors that influence these outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Pregnant women\'s pregnancy outcomes were collected from the medical information system and through telephone follow-ups. The chi-square test and logistic regression were used to analyze the factors influencing pregnancy outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Among 265 pregnant women diagnosed with fetal abnormalities, 190 chose to continue the pregnancy, while 75 chose to terminate it. Pregnant women with multiple fetal abnormalities (OR = 3.774, 95% CI [1.640-8.683]) were more likely to choose termination of pregnancy (TOP), and pregnant women who were advised to terminate their pregnancy or make a careful choice were more likely to terminate the pregnancy (OR = 41.113, 95% CI [11.028-153.267]).
UNASSIGNED: The number of organs involved in fetal abnormalities and treatment recommendations were identified as the primary factors influencing pregnancy outcomes. Improving awareness of maternal health care during pregnancy, early pregnancy screening technology, and a multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment approach are of great significance in assisting pregnant women in making informed decisions and improving fetal prognosis.

Pregnancies complicated by severe polyhydramnios are associated with a high rate of underlying fetal anomaly. Amnioreduction may be offered to alleviate maternal symptoms. This is a retrospective study of amnioreductions performed on singleton and twin gestations complicated by symptomatic polyhydramnios between 2010 and 2023 at our tertiary referral center. The indications, procedural techniques and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were retrieved from an archive database and reviewed with the use of the maternal and child medical record chart, the hospital electronic clinical discharge report and telephone recalls. Our study comprised 86 pregnancies, 65 singletons and 21 twin pregnancies. Fetal anomalies were identified in 79% of cases, mainly gastrointestinal obstructive anomalies; 9.3% of cases were idiopathic. The median gestational age at first amnioreduction was 32.5 weeks, and peri-procedural complications were rare (1 case of placental abruption and 2 cases of preterm delivery). The median gestational age at delivery was 36.5 weeks, with a median prolongation of the pregnancy from the time of first drain until birth of 30 days. Preterm labor < 37 weeks occurred in 48.8% of procedures, with 26.7% of patients delivering before 34 weeks and pPROM < 36 weeks recorded in 23.2% of cases. In conclusion, amnioreduction offered to alleviate maternal symptoms is a reasonably safe procedure with a low complication rate. These pregnancies necessitate management in a tertiary referral center because of their need for a multidisciplinary approach both prenatally and postnatally.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this narrative review was to assess the limited literature on fetal anomalies diagnosed in the second trimester of pregnancy and parental decision-making and identify sources of information deemed as facilitators and barriers to medical decisions.
METHODS: This was a literature review of source material and information about fetal anomalies diagnosed in the second trimester of pregnancy, decision-making, decision tools or aids, and sources of information for anomalies. The search string used explored related peer-reviewed publications and systematic reviews between 2007 and 2024. We also reviewed references from publications meeting inclusion criteria. The search was conducted between June 2022 and February 2024. Exclusion criteria included conference abstracts, non-peer reviewed literature, and articles not available in English language. A total of 77 publications were identified by searching multiple databases using a predefined search string. The search encompassed full text articles from 2007 to 2024 and 11 full-text publications were ultimately included in the review. A list of 45 co-occurring keywords was generated from the included texts, with each keyword having a minimum of two co-occurrences.
RESULTS: Key themes identified included (1) the role of the clinician and need for development of professional knowledge and empathy surrounding discussion of fetal anomalies with patients; (2) information gathering, with individuals reporting use of multiple strategies to obtain information; while the majority found information satisfying, they preferred more details on diagnosis, long-term outcomes of the fetus/child and management of the pregnancy or termination process; and (3) decision-making, the path and process of how individuals made decisions about the pregnancy including quality of life, future fertility, and seeking other people\'s experiences.
CONCLUSIONS: Many factors contribute to an individual\'s decision-making after a diagnosis of a fetal anomalies diagnosed in the second trimester of pregnancy, ranging from personal beliefs and goals to shared experiences of others and access to care. Understanding how sources of information may be deemed both as facilitators and barriers to different individuals during the decision-making process is important for healthcare providers in order to understand how to most effectively support patients. There is a dearth of information on training healthcare professionals to provide support to patients facing these decisions.

OBJECTIVE: A recent randomized controlled trial of first-trimester anatomy ultrasound in obese women found some advantages to using this technique in this population, but some aspects of feasibility were not clear, such as whether first-trimester ultrasound can be brought outside of a research setting. The learning curve for first-trimester anatomy has been described in the general population, but a learning curve has not been described for this technique in obese patients. This study sought to describe a learning curve for first-trimester anatomy ultrasounds in obese patients with an operator familiar with the basics of first-trimester imaging.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the EASE-O pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04639973), which recruited 128 women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 and randomized them into two groups based on the timing of the first evaluation of fetal anatomy, to compare the completion rate of first- and second-trimester anatomy ultrasound.
METHODS: Pregnant women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 participated in the study.
METHODS: Between January 2021 and February 2022, the study was conducted at maternal-fetal medicine clinics in Houston, TX, USA.
METHODS: This secondary analysis evaluated data on the completion rate of first-trimester scans from the parent trial. Scans were grouped into bin sizes of 3, and prop_model for R version 4.2.0 for Windows was used to generate a learning curve across the first 60 scans.
RESULTS: The parent study included 60 scans performed by one imager who had previously only done first-trimester scans in lean patients for limited anatomy. The probability of a complete scan increased over 60 scans from 0.38 to 0.69; 29 scans were required to reach the final probability, after which only marginal improvement followed.
CONCLUSIONS: The major limitation is the inclusion of only one operator for this curve.
CONCLUSIONS: For an ultrasound operator with basic familiarity in first-trimester imaging, approximately 30 scans are needed to acquire a completion rate of 70% for detailed first-trimester anatomy in women with BMI ≥35 kg/m2. This can be used in education and training programs focused on imaging in the first trimester.