Femoral version (FV) is more widely adopted with the definition as the angle between the long axis of the femoral neck and the tangent line of the posterior femoral condyles on the axial plane, and the normal range between 5 and 20°. FV can be measured by imaging and functional tests. Cross-sectional CT including both the hip and the knee is the typically used imaging technique, yet variation exists according to the different landmarks used. As MRI investigations are routinely performed preoperatively, and protocols can be easily adopted to include version measurement, they are frequently used as an alternative to CT and offers several advantages. Abnormal FV has adverse effects on the biomechanics and musculoskeletal health of the whole lower limb. It affects the lever arm of muscles and the forces that the hip and patellofemoral joints suffer, and can lead to disorders such as osteoarthritis and impingement. In adult hip preservation surgery for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), abnormal FV is sometimes accompanied by other morphological abnormities of the hip, a more severe DDH, and can help predict postoperative range of motion (ROM), and postoperative impingement. Currently, the most frequently used surgical technique for abnormal FV is femoral derotational osteotomy. Many controversies are left to be solved, including the specific origin of FV, the indication for femoral derotational osteotomy, especially in patients with combined DDH and abnormal FV, and the explicit compensation mechanism of abnormal FV by tibial torsion.

Understanding the implications of decreased femoral torsion on gait and running in children and adolescents might help orthopedic surgeons optimize treatment decisions. To date, there is limited evidence regarding the kinematic gait deviations between children with decreased femoral torsion and typically developing children, as well as the implications of the same on the adaptation of walking to running. A three-dimensional gait analysis study was undertaken to compare gait deviations during running and walking among patients with decreased femoral torsion (n = 15) and typically developing children (n = 11). Linear mixed models were utilized to establish comparisons within and between the two groups and investigate the relationship between clinical examination, spatial parameters, and the difference in hip rotation between running and walking. Patients exhibited increased external hip rotation during walking in comparison to controls, accompanied by higher peaks for the same as well as for knee valgus and external foot progression angle. A similar kinematic gait pattern was observed during running, with significant differences noted in peak knee valgus. In terms of variations from running to walking, patients internally rotated their initially externally rotated hip by 4°, whereas controls maintained the same internal hip rotation. Patients and controls displayed comparable kinematic gait deviations during running compared to walking. The passive hip range of motion, torsions, and velocity did not notably influence the variation in mean hip rotation from running to walking. This study underlines the potential of 3D gait kinematics to elucidate the functional implications of decreased FT and, hence, may contribute to clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to find out whether the torsions of the femur and tibia are dependent on the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) type.
METHODS: Five hundred patients (1000 legs) were included, who received a whole leg standing three-dimensional (3D) radiograph using EOS imaging (EOS Imaging, Paris, France). SterEOS software was used for digital reconstruction. Femoral and tibial torsions were determined by analysing 3D reconstructions of each leg. Femoral torsion was defined as the angle between the femoral neck axis (FNA) and the posterior condylar axis (PCA). Tibial torsion was defined as the angle between the axis tangent to the posterior part of the tibia plateau and the transmalleolar axis. Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint-line obliquity (JLO) were also determined, allowing each leg to be assigned one of nine possible phenotypes according to CPAK.
RESULTS: The mean femoral torsion in CPAK type 1 was significantly higher (+ 2.6° ± 0.8°) than in CPAK type 4 (p = 0.02). All other CPAK types did not differ in the degree of femoral torsions. No differences could be demonstrated for the tibial torsion.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between the coronal alignment of the lower limb and femoral torsion. This may provide the basis for extending the CPAK classification beyond the coronal plane.
METHODS: Level III.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of derotational femoral osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar dislocation and the effect of the distribution of femoral torsion at different segments on postoperative function.
METHODS: Forty-two patients with patellar dislocation who underwent derotational femoral osteotomy from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively analysed. All patients received computed tomography scans from the hip to the knee to evaluate correction of the femoral anteversion (FA) angle, patellar tilt angle (PTA) and congruence angle (CA) after derotational femoral osteotomy. Subjective scores, such as the Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, were used to evaluate knee function before and after the operation. Patients with supracondylar torsion > distal torsion were categorized into the supracondylar torsion group and patients with distal torsion > supracondylar torsion were categorized into the distal torsion group. Subgroup analyses were performed.
RESULTS: No presentation of redislocation occurred in these patients at the minimum 2-year follow-up visit. The mean preoperative FA angle in the supracondylar torsion group was 30.2° ± 4.2°, and the mean postoperative FA angle was 14.5° ± 2.5° (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative FA angle was 26.7° ± 1.4° and the mean postoperative FA angle was 14.1° ± 1.4° in the distal torsion group. In addition, postoperative PTA and CA were significantly corrected in both groups (p < 0.001). The postoperative Kujala, Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner and VAS scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed a higher preoperative FA in the supracondylar torsion group and a higher occurrence of high-grade trochlear dysplasia in the distal torsion group. However, there was no significant difference in their postoperative clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Through a minimum of 2-year follow-up visits of patients with patellar dislocation and increased FA, it was found that derotational femoral osteotomy could significantly reduce FA and improve subjective knee function. The pattern of torsion distribution did not significantly affect the clinical outcomes of derotational femoral osteotomy. These findings readvised orthopaedic surgeons that derotational femoral osteotomy remains the preferred procedure for correcting rotational malalignment, but that they should be more cautious about its indications.
METHODS: Level IV.

OBJECTIVE: There is high variability in femoral torsion, measured on two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study was to find a reliable three-dimensional (3D) femoral torsion measurement method, assess the influence of CAM deformity on femoral torsion measurement, and to promote awareness for the used measurement method.
METHODS: 3D models of 102 dry femur specimens were divided into a CAM and non-CAM group. Femoral torsion was measured by one 2D-CT method described by Murphy et al. (method 0) and five 3D methods. The 3D methods differed in strategies to define the femoral neck axis. Method 1 is based on an elliptical least-square fit at the middle of the femoral neck. Methods 2 and 3 defined the centre of mass of the entire femoral neck and of the most cylindrical part, respectively. Methods 4 and 5 were based on the intersection of the femoral neck with a 25% and 40% enlarged best fit sphere of the femoral head.
RESULTS: 3D methods resulted in higher femoral torsion measures than the 2D method; the mean torsion for method 0 was 8.12° ± 7.30°, compared to 9.93° ± 8.24° (p < 0.001), 13.21° ± 8.60° (p < 0.001), 8.21° ± 7.64° (p = 1.00), 9.53° ± 7.87° (p < 0.001) and 10.46° ± 7.83° (p < 0.001) for methods 1 to 5 respectively. In the presence of a CAM, torsion measured with method 4 is consistently smaller than measured with method 5.
CONCLUSIONS: 2D measurement might underestimate true femoral torsion and there is a difference up to 5°. There is a tendency for a higher mean torsion in hips with a CAM deformity. Methods 4 and 5 are the most robust techniques. However, method 4 might underestimate femoral torsion if a CAM deformity is present. Since method 5 is independent of a CAM deformity, it is the preferred technique to define expected values of torsion.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of femoral torsion in patients with different segmental torsion types and to evaluate the correlations between segmental torsion and the morphology of the femoral condyles and trochlea in patients with patellar dislocation and increased femoral torsion.
METHODS: Between January 2021 and March 2023, 69 patients were included and classified into two groups according to the femoral segment contributing the most to total torsion: 32 patients in Group A (femoral neck and shaft torsion) and 37 patients in Group B (distal torsion). Trochlear dysplasia was evaluated using Dejour\'s classification and sulcus angle. The morphology of the femoral condyles was evaluated using the lengths and ratios of the medial and lateral condyles. Correlations between femoral torsion and morphology were evaluated.
RESULTS: Total torsion was significantly correlated with femoral neck and shaft torsion (r = 0.882, P < 0.001) and distal torsion (r  = 0.262, P = 0.030). Femoral neck and shaft torsion was significantly increased with increasing total torsion. The trochlear sulcus was flatter and more dysplastic, and the anterior condyles were shorter in Group B. Distal torsion was significantly correlated with the lengths of the medial and lateral anterior condyles (r  = - 0.567, P < 0.001; r = -0.701, P < 0.001), sulcus angle (r  = 0.611, P < 0.001) and Dejour trochlea type (r  = 0.512, P = 0.001), while femoral neck and shaft torsion showed no correlations.
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral torsion is a complex of femoral neck and shaft torsion and distal torsion, especially femoral neck and shaft torsion. Distal torsion was significantly correlated with a flatter trochlear sulcus, higher-grade trochlear dysplasia, and shorter anterior condyles. The new findings highlighted the importance of the segmental evaluation of femoral torsion, which would facilitate understanding of the anatomical characteristics of femoral torsion in patients with patellar dislocation and increased femoral torsion and may lead to improvement in the surgical options regarding femoral torsion.
METHODS: Level III.

Quantifying femoral version is crucial in diagnosing femoral version abnormalities and for accurate pre-surgical planning. There are numerous methods for measuring femoral version, however, reliability studies for most of these methods excluded children with hip deformities.
To propose a method of measuring femoral version based on a virtual 3D femur model, and systematically compare its reliability to the widely used Murphy\'s 2D axial slice technique.
We searched our imaging database to identify hip/femur CTs performed on children (<18 years old) with a clinical indication of femoral version measurement (September 2021-August 2022). Exclusion criteria were prior hip surgery, and inadequate image quality or field-of-view. Two blinded radiologists independently measured femoral version using the virtual 3D femur model and Murphy\'s 2D axial slice method. To assess intrareader variability, we randomly selected 20% of the study sample for re-measurements by the two radiologists >2 weeks later. We analyzed the reliability and correlation of these techniques via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and deformity subgroup analysis.
Our study sample consisted of 142 femurs from 71 patients (10.6±4.4 years, male=31). Intra- and inter-reader correlations for both techniques were excellent (ICC≥0.91). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the standard deviation (SD) of the absolute difference between the two radiologists for the Murphy method (mean 13.7°) was larger than that of the 3D femur model technique (mean 4.8°), indicating higher reader variability. In femurs with hip flexion deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 17°, compared to 6.5° for the 3D femur model technique. In femurs with apparent coxa valga deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 10.4°, compared to 5.2° for the 3D femur model technique.
The 3D femur model technique is more reliable than the Murphy\'s 2D axial slice technique in measuring femoral version, especially in children with hip flexion and apparent coxa valga deformities.

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is caused by a repetitive mechanical conflict between the acetabulum and the proximal femur, occurring in flexion and internal rotation. In cam impingement, bony prominences of the femoral head-neck junction induce chondrolabral damage. The acetabular type of FAIS, termed pincer FAIS, may be either due to focal or global retroversion and/or acetabular overcoverage. Combinations of cam and pincer morphology are common. Pathological femoral torsion may aggravate or decrease the mechanical conflict in FAI but can also occur in isolation. Of note, a high percentage of adolescents with FAI-like shape changes remain asymptomatic. The diagnosis of FAIS is therefore made clinically, whereas imaging reveals the underlying morphology. X‑rays in two planes remain the primary imaging modality, the exact evaluation of the osseous deformities of the femur and chondrolabral damage is assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Acetabular coverage and version are primarily assessed on radiographs. Evaluation of the entire circumference of the proximal femur warrants MRI which is further used in the assessment of chondrolabral lesions, and also bone marrow and adjacent soft tissue abnormalities. The MRI protocol should routinely include measurements of femoral torsion. Fluid-sensitive sequences should be acquired to rule out degenerative or inflammatory extra-articular changes.
UNASSIGNED: Das femoroazetabuläre Impingement-Syndrom (FAIS) wird durch einen repetitiven mechanischen Konflikt zwischen Azetabulum und proximalem Femur insbesondere bei Flexion und Innenrotation hervorgerufen. Beim femoroazetabulären Impingement (FAI) vom Cam-Typ bewirkt eine Asphärizität am femoralen Kopf-Hals-Übergang die Induktion von Scherkräften am Azetabulum. Beim Pincer-Typ kann eine Retroversion der Pfanne und/oder eine vermehrte Überdachung vorliegen. Ein wichtiger mechanischer Einflussfaktor, welcher ein Impingement oder auch Hüftinstabilität verstärken oder kompensieren kann, ist die Femurtorsion. Meistens treten Torsionsstörungen kombiniert mit anderen ossären Deformitäten auf. Zu beachten ist, dass ein hoher Prozentsatz der Adoleszenten mit knöchernen FAI-Morphologien asymptomatisch bleibt. Die Diagnose des FAIS wird daher klinisch gestellt, die Bildgebung zeigt die zugrundeliegende Morphologie. Primäre Bildgebung ist das Röntgenbild in 2 Ebenen zur Beurteilung der Hüftgelenküberdachung und der azetabulären Version. Die vollständige Zirkumferenz des Femurs ist jedoch nur in der Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) beurteilbar, ebenso Läsionen des Labrums und Knorpels sowie des Knochenmarks und der umgebenden Weichteile. Das MRT-Protokoll sollte routinemäßig eine Bestimmung der Rotation des Femurs beinhalten. Zudem sollten flüssigkeitssensitive Sequenzen des Beckens zum groben Ausschluss degenerativer oder entzündlicher extraartikulärer Veränderungen akquiriert werden.

UNASSIGNED: Increased femoral anteversion (FA) is reportedly associated with patellar dislocation (PD) and trochlear dysplasia (TD), and the increase in FA may occur at different segments of the femur. In addition, TD is associated with dysplasia of the posterior femoral condyle. Among patients with PD, whether FA is greater with or without TD remains unclear.
UNASSIGNED: To explore differences in FA and torsion distribution at different femoral sections among patients with PD and TD, patients with PD and no TD, and sex- and age-matched controls and to investigate the association between FA and distal femoral morphology.
UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
UNASSIGNED: This study involved 132 knees: 44 knees with PD and TD, 44 knees with PD but no TD, and 44 control knees. FA, proximal torsion (PT), middle torsion (MT), distal torsion (DT), and distal femoral morphology were measured. Differences were investigated by 1-way analysis of variance. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to explore the association between FA and each parameter.
UNASSIGNED: FA was significantly larger in the PD with TD group (25.4° ± 4.7°) than in the other groups (controls: 18.9° ± 5.6°; PD without TD: 19.9° ± 4.8°) (P < .01). DT was significantly larger in the PD with TD group (15.8° ± 2.9°) than in the other groups (controls: 9.0° ± 4.3°; PD without TD: 8.8° ± 3.9°) (P < .01). In all 3 groups, FA was strongly positively correlated with DT (control, PD without TD, and PD with TD, respectively: r = 0.76, 0.80, and 0.88; P < .01), strongly positively correlated with the posteromedial condylar length (r = 0.48, 0.48, and 0.70; P < .01) and negatively correlated with the posterolateral condylar length (r = -0.30, -0.35, and -0.78, respectively; P < .05).
UNASSIGNED: The increased FA in knees with TD was due mainly to DT rather than PT or MT, which may provide a reference for choosing the optimal position for femoral derotation osteotomy.

UNASSIGNED: The location of posterior hip impingement at maximal extension in patients with posterior femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is unclear.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate the frequency and area of impingement at maximal hip extension and at 10° and 20° of extension in female patients with increased femoral version (FV) and posterior hip pain.
UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
UNASSIGNED: Osseous patient-specific 3-dimensional (3D) models were generated of 50 hips (37 female patients, 3D computed tomography) with a positive posterior impingement test and increased FV (defined as >35°). The McKibbin index (combined version) was calculated as the sum of FV and acetabular version (AV). Subgroups of patients with an increased McKibbin index >70° (24 hips) and FV >50° (20 hips) were analyzed. A control group of female participants (10 hips) had normal FV, normal AV, and no valgus deformity (neck-shaft angle, <139°). Validated 3D collision detection software was used for simulation of osseous impingement-free hip extension (no rotation).
UNASSIGNED: The mean impingement-free maximal hip extension was significantly lower in patients with FV >35° compared with the control group (15° ± 15° vs 55° ± 19°; P < .001). At maximal hip extension, 78% of patients with FV >35° had osseous posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral hip impingement. At 20° of extension, the frequency of posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral impingement was significantly higher for patients with a McKibbin index >70° (83%) and for patients with FV >35° (76%) than for controls (0%) (P < .001 for both). There was a significant correlation between maximal extension (no rotation) and FV (r = 0.46; P < .001) as well as between impingement area at 20° of extension (external rotation [ER], 0°) and McKibbin index (0.61; P < .001). Impingement area at 20° of extension (ER, 0°) was significantly larger for patients with McKibbin index >70° versus <70° (251 vs 44 mm2; P = .001).
UNASSIGNED: The limited hip extension found in our study could theoretically affect the performance of sports activities such as running, ballet dancing, or lunges. Therefore, although not examined directly in this study, these activities are not advisable for these patients. Preoperative evaluation of FV and the McKibbin index is important in female patients with posterior hip pain before hip preservation surgery (eg, hip arthroscopy).