技术设计通常植根于虚弱衰老身体的缺陷想象,很少考虑老年人日常生活的社会性,由复杂的社会塑造,政治,历史文化力量。虽然共同设计方法在某种程度上支持了老年人的参与,很少有人关注设计过程如何响应老年人的日常生活中超过人类的生活物质。更一般地说,还需要与塑造共同设计的政治和实践的比人类更深刻的道德参与。作为回应,这篇文章勾勒出了一个女权主义的后人类实践——全面的共同设计,将其根植于我们的工作中,与生活在多个不平等轴线上的老年人共同设计数字文化体验。借鉴后人类女权主义的彻底解构和重建承诺,讨论暂时提出了三个相互关联的小心-全面共同设计线程。这些线程探索了我们在“厚礼物”中设计的尝试,老年人日常生活中的地面设计,并在集体设计中协商充分(重新)安排。线程需要对扩展时间尺度和结构不公正的反应能力,以及老年人的位置知识和多感官生活世界。设计被理解为专注实验和调整的紧急过程,以找到合适的身体布置,知识,技术,情感,语言,设计网站和对象。我们专注于特定的实践,在我们谈判我们的全面关怀实践时出现的紧张和挑战。
Gerontechnology design is often rooted in deficit imaginaries of frail ageing bodies, with little consideration given to the sociomateriality of older adults\' everyday lives, as shaped by complex social, political, historical and cultural forces. While co-design approaches have gone some way in supporting the participation of older adults, little attention has been given to how design processes can be responsive to the more-than-human lived materialities of older adults\' everyday lives. More generally, there is also a need for deeper ethical engagement with the more-than-human assemblages that shape the politics and practices of co-design. In response, this article sketches out a feminist posthuman praxis of care-full co-design, grounding it in our work co-designing digital cultural experiences with older adults who live along multiple axes of inequality. Drawing on the radically deconstructive and reconstructive commitments of posthuman
feminism, the discussion tentatively presents three interconnected threads of care-full co-design. These threads explore our attempts to design in the \'thick present\', ground design in older adults\' more-than-human everyday lives, and negotiate care-full (re)arrangements in the collective doing of design. The threads call for response-ability to expansive timescales and structural injustices, and to the situated knowledges and multi-sensual lifeworlds of older adults. Design is understood as an emergent process of attentive experimentation and adjustment in a bid to find a suitable arrangement of bodies, knowledges, technologies, emotions, languages, design sites and objects. We focus on particular practice-ings, tensions and challenges that emerged as we negotiated our care-full praxis.