Zebrafish are one of the most used animal models in biological research and a cost-effective alternative to rodents. Despite this, nutritional requirements and standardized feeding protocols have not yet been established for this species. This is important to avoid nutritional effects on experimental outcomes, and especially when zebrafish models are used in preclinical studies, as many diseases have nutritional confounding factors. A key aspect of zebrafish nutrition is related to feed intake, the amount of feed ingested by each fish daily. With the goal of standardizing feeding protocols among the zebrafish community, this paper systematically reviews the available data from 73 studies on zebrafish feed intake, feeding regimes (levels), and diet composition. Great variability was observed regarding diet composition, especially regarding crude protein (mean 44.98 ± 9.87%) and lipid content (9.91 ± 5.40%). Interestingly, the gross energy levels of the zebrafish diets were similar across the reviewed studies (20.39 ± 2.10 kilojoules/g of feed). In most of the reviewed papers, fish received a predetermined quantity of feed (feed supplied). The authors fed the fish according to the voluntary intake and then calculated feed intake (FI) in only 17 papers. From a quantitative point of view, FI was higher than when a fixed quantity (pre-defined) of feed was supplied. Also, the literature showed that many biotic and abiotic factors may affect zebrafish FI. Finally, based on the FI data gathered from the literature, a new feeding protocol is proposed. In summary, a daily feeding rate of 9-10% of body weight is proposed for larvae, whereas these values are equal to 6-8% for juveniles and 5% for adults when a dry feed with a proper protein and energy content is used.

Evaluating effects of different macronutrient diets in randomized trials requires well defined infrastructure and rigorous methods to ensure intervention fidelity and adherence.
This controlled feeding study comprised two phases. During a Run-in phase (14-15 weeks), study participants (18-50 years, BMI, ≥27 kg/m2) consumed a very-low-carbohydrate (VLC) diet, with home delivery of prepared meals, at an energy level to promote 15 ± 3% weight loss. During a Residential phase (13 weeks), participants resided at a conference center. They received a eucaloric VLC diet for three weeks and then were randomized to isocaloric test diets for 10 weeks: VLC (5% energy from carbohydrate, 77% from fat), high-carbohydrate (HC)-Starch (57%, 25%; including 20% energy from refined grains), or HC-Sugar (57%, 25%; including 20% sugar). Outcomes included measures of body composition and energy expenditure, chronic disease risk factors, and variables pertaining to physiological mechanisms. Six cores provided infrastructure for implementing standardized protocols: Recruitment, Diet and Meal Production, Participant Support, Assessments, Regulatory Affairs and Data Management, and Statistics. The first participants were enrolled in May 2018. Participants residing at the conference center at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic completed the study, with each core implementing mitigation plans.
Before early shutdown, 77 participants were randomized, and 70 completed the trial (65% of planned completion). Process measures indicated integrity to protocols for weighing menu items, within narrow tolerance limits, and participant adherence, assessed by direct observation and continuous glucose monitoring.
Available data will inform future research, albeit with less statistical power than originally planned.

Daily caloric and protein intake is crucial for the management of critically ill children. The benefit of feeding protocols in improving daily nutritional intake in children remains controversial. This study aimed to assess whether the introduction of an enteral feeding protocol in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) improves daily caloric and protein delivery on day 5 after admission and the accuracy of the medical prescription.
Children admitted to our PICU for a minimum of 5 days who received enteral feeding were included. Daily caloric and protein intake were recorded and retrospectively compared before and after the introduction of the feeding protocol.
Caloric and protein intake was similar before and after introduction of the feeding protocol. The prescribed caloric target was significantly lower than the theoretical target. The children who received less than 50% of the caloric and protein targets were significantly heavier and taller than those who received more than 50%; the patients who received more than 100% of the caloric and protein aims on day 5 after admission had a decreased PICU length of stay and decreased duration of invasive ventilation.
The introduction of a physician-driven feeding protocol was not associated with an increase in the daily caloric or protein intake in our cohort. Other methods of improving nutritional delivery and patient outcomes need to be explored.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians may be reluctant to feed patients on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy, despite studies suggesting it is beneficial and safe. We describe the implementation of a feeding protocol for patients with bronchiolitis on HFNC and determine its effect on nutrition goals.
METHODS: Prospective bedside data on enteral volume, feed interruptions, and aspiration events were collected on patients with bronchiolitis who were <24 months of age, treated with HFNC, and fed per a developed protocol. Exclusion criteria included history of prematurity <32 weeks, congenital heart disease, or positive-pressure ventilation before feeding. Length of intensive care unit and hospital stay was compared with both a concurrent cohort (CC) of patients not fed per the protocol and a retrospective cohort (RC) admitted prior to protocol creation.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients met the criteria for the prospective study arm: 24 patients were included in the CC, and 74 were included in the RC. Seventy-one percent of prospective patients received enteral nutrition (EN) on HFNC day 1 vs 42% of the CC. In the prospective cohort, feed interruption occurred in 23% of patients and was associated with higher flow rates; however, no aspiration events occurred. Patients fed per protocol were fed 8-10 h sooner and discharged 1 day earlier than those in the RC.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a feeding protocol for patients with bronchiolitis on HFNC was safe and associated with shorter time to initiate EN and shorter length of hospital stay.

BACKGROUND: Improved post-operative outcomes following gastroschisis repair are attributed to advancement in perioperative and post-operative care and early enteral feeding. This study evaluates the role of standardized postoperative feeding protocols in gastroschisis.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from January 2000 to April 2019 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases and Google Scholar was conducted. Primary outcomes were duration to full enteral feeding and cessation of parenteral nutrition. Secondary outcomes included days to first enteral feeding, length of stay, compliance, complication and mortality rates. Meta-analysis was done using the RevMan Analysis Statistical Package in Review Manager (Version 5.3) using a random effects model and reported as pooled Risk Ratio and Mean Difference. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Eight observational cohort studies were identified and their data analyzed. Significant heterogeneity was noted for some outcomes. Standardized feeding protocols resulted in fewer days to first enteral feeding by 3.19 days (95% CI: -4.73, -1.66, p < 0.0001) than non-protocolized feeding, less complication rates, reduced mortality and better compliance to care. The duration of parenteral nutrition and time to full enteral feeding were not significantly affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Protocolized feeding post-gastroschisis repair is associated with early initiation of enteral feeding. There is a likelihood of reduced rates of sepsis; shorter duration of parenteral nutrition, length of hospital stay and time to full enteral feeding. However, the latter trends are not statistically significant and will require further studies best accomplished with a prospective randomized trial or more cohort studies.

The influence of diurnal and nocturnal feeding on daily rhythms of gut levels of cholecystokinin (CCK) and the activity of two key pancreatic proteases, trypsin and chymotrypsin, were examined in juveniles of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis), a species with nocturnal habits. Four feeding protocols were performed: P1) One morning meal; P2) Six meals during the light period; P3) Six meals during the dark period; and P4) 12 meals during 24 h. Daily activity patterns of both proteases were remarkably similar and showed a high correlation in all the experimental protocols. In P1, daily patterns of CCK and digestive enzymes showed a single maximum. In P2, CCK levels exhibited two peaks. Digestive enzymes activities showed slightly delayed peaks compared to CCK, although their daily fluctuations were not significant. In P3, intestinal CCK concentration exhibited two peaks at the end of light and dark periods, but only the second one was significant. The first maximum level of chymotrypsin activity occurred 4 h after the first CCK peak, while the second one coincided with the second CCK peak. Fluctuations of trypsin activity were not significant. In P4, CCK concentration showed three small peaks. Digestive enzymes daily fluctuations were not significant, although they showed an inverted trend with respect to CCK. The daily pattern of the gut CCK content in our study is in agreement with the anorexigenic function of this hormone. Our results support the existence of a negative feedback regulatory loop between CCK and pancreatic proteolytic enzymes in Senegalese sole juveniles.

Limited guidance exists regarding appropriate timing for feed initiation and advancement in gastroschisis. We hypothesized that implementation of a gastroschisis management protocol would allow for standardization of antibiotic and nutritional treatment for these patients.
We conducted a retrospective comparison of patients with simple gastroschisis at two pediatric hospitals before and after initiation of our gastroschisis care protocol. Complicated gastroschisis and early mortality were excluded. The control group extended from January 2012 to January 2014 and the protocol group from July 2014 to July 2016. Variables of interest included time to feed initiation, time to goal feeds, length of stay, and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-defined complications. We performed a subgroup analysis for primary versus delayed gastroschisis closure. Statistical analyses, including F-tests for variance, were conducted in Prism.
Forty-seven patients with simple gastroschisis were included (control = 22, protocol = 25). Protocol compliance was 76% with no increase in complication rates. There was no difference in length of stay or time from initiation to full feeds overall between the control and protocol groups. However, neonates who underwent delayed closure reached full feeds significantly earlier, averaging 9 d versus 15 d previously (P = 0.04).
For infants undergoing delayed closure, the time to full feeds in this group now appears to match that of patients undergoing primary closure, indicating that delayed closure should not be a reason for slower advancement. Additional studies are needed to assess the impact of earlier full enteral nutrition on rare complications and rates of necrotizing enterocolitis.

BACKGROUND: The development of the endoscopic technique has resulted in an increasing number of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion; however, the protocols for increasing the volume of feeding formula after PEG insertion have not been established. Therefore, we compared the clinical outcomes of patients receiving low- and high-volume increase in enteral feeding formula.
METHODS: A total of 215 patients who underwent PEG insertion between January 2016 and March 2019 were included. They were divided into 2 groups according to the increase in volume of feeding formula: the low-volume group (n = 135) received ≤150 mL/d, and the high-volume group (n = 80) received ≥300 mL/d. Patient characteristics, procedure, and feeding-related clinical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed using medical records.
RESULTS: The adverse events of the feeding protocol did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The number of days needed to attain the calorie targets was significantly lower in the high-volume group than in the low-volume group (5.4 ± 3.0 vs 2.4 ± 1.5; P < .001). The duration of supplemental parenteral nutrition and the length of hospitalization were also significantly lower in the high-volume group (3.9 ± 3.3 vs 1.2 ± 2.2; P < .001 and 5.8 ± 2.7 vs 4.6 ± 2.6; P = .007, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: To rapidly attain the calorie targets in appropriately selected patients with PEG insertion, a high-volume increase in daily feeding can safely be recommended given the favorable outcomes.

Monitoring gastric residual volume (GRV) and titrating enteral nutrition (EN) towards goal rate are common practices in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite limited supportive evidence. We investigated the effect of removal of GRV monitoring and commencing EN at goal rate had on EN provision in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
We conducted a single-centre, pre-post implementation study, in a 10-bed ICU comprising 181 patients with ventilation ≥48 h and given EN within 24 h of intubation. EN adequacy, expressed as the proportion of patients receiving ≥90% of the prescribed volume during the first 24 h of feeding, was compared before and after implementation. Secondary outcomes included EN adequacy over entire ICU stay; incidence of gastrointestinal intolerance in terms of vomiting, abdominal distension, and GRV >200 ml; prokinetic use; onset of a ventilator-associated condition; ventilation duration; length of stay; and mortality.
After intervention, the proportion of patients meeting ≥90% of their prescribed EN volume within the first 24 h of feeding increased by 38.1% (pre: 46.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.7-56.3; post: 84.5%, 95% CI: 75.8-91.2; p < 0.001). Over their entire ICU stay, the proportion of patients meeting ≥90% of their prescribed EN volume increased by 21.4% (pre: 61.9%, 95% CI: 52.0-71.1; post: 83.3%, 95% CI: 74.4-90.2; p = 0.001). Gastrointestinal intolerance reduced by 34.0% (pre: 80.4%, 95% CI: 71.8-87.5; post: 46.4%, 95% CI: 36.0-57.1; p < 0.001) and fewer prescribed prokinetic agents (pre: 57.7%, 95% CI: 47.8-67.3; post: 23.8%, 95% CI: 15.6-33.6; p < 0.001).
Removal of GRV monitoring and commencing EN at goal resulted in significantly increased EN provision during the first 24 h of feeding and entire ICU stay with reduced prokinetic use and gastrointestinal complications.

We assessed the impact of a standardized nutrition initiative for very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants on their nutrition and clinical outcomes.
This was a prospective analysis of VLBW infants born before and after the initiation of a nutrition protocol. This protocol included trophic feeds, feeding advancement, fortification guidelines, parameters on the concentration of parenteral nutrition (PN), and the discontinuation of PN and central lines. Gastric residual monitoring was discontinued. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher\'s exact and Student\'s t-tests. Primary outcome measures were days receiving PN, days made nil per os (NPO) after feeding initiation, necrotizing enterocolitis, and growth parameters. Secondary outcome measures were central-line days, sepsis, blood transfusions, cholestasis, osteopenia, chronic lung disease, and retinopathy of prematurity.
136 VLBW infants were analyzed, including 77 in the preprotocol group and 59 in the postprotocol group. Infants postprotocol were found to have reduced PN days (26.1 versus [vs] 18.4, P < .01), fewer days made NPO after feeding initiation (7.2 vs 4.0, P = .02), NEC (7.8% vs 0%, P = 0.038), central-line days (26.5 vs 18.6, P < .01), cholestasis (16% vs 3%, P = .02), and blood transfusions (5.3 vs 3.1, P = .028). Growth, defined by change in z-score from birth to discharge, improved for weight (-1.3 vs -0.8, P < .01), length (-1.5 vs -1.0, P = .033), and head (-1.1 vs -0.6, P = .024).
Initiation of a standardized nutrition initiative for VLBW infants significantly improved growth, reduced PN use, and improved patient outcomes.