external treatment

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于生活习惯的改变,失眠的年发病率持续增加,工作压力加大,增加了环境污染。近年来,越来越多的外用疗法已被证明对治疗失眠有效,并已被广泛使用。然而,外部治疗的相对益处和危害仍然不确定,最佳治疗策略尚未确定。
    进行了网络荟萃分析,以评估和比较多种外用疗法对失眠患者的疗效和安全性。
    从成立到2023年6月,对八个电子数据库进行了全面搜索,以获取相关文献。我们还搜索了灰色文献,并回顾了相关系统综述的参考文献列表。两名独立的审核员进行了研究选择,数据提取,使用Cochrane审阅者手册对纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)进行偏倚评估,使用Stata和RevMan软件进行网络荟萃分析。
    总共,确定了14,826项研究。其中,83项研究,包括9个外部疗法和6100个病人,被认为符合本网络荟萃分析的条件。除了SL结果,在改善睡眠质量方面,每种外用疗法均优于常规药物和假干预(SI)。在改善失眠患者心理状态指标方面,每种外用疗法均优于SI;每种外用疗法对单胺类神经递质的调节均有较好的效果。推拿可能是提高总有效率最有效的干预措施,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数得分,和SL。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可能导致总睡眠时间和觉醒时间的最佳改善(累积排序曲线下的表面[SUCRA]=78.3和75.4%,分别);艾灸(MB)和高压氧(HBO)在降低焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表评分方面最有效。在提高单胺神经递质5-羟色胺方面,去甲肾上腺素,还有多巴胺,最好的干预措施是穴位埋线,电针,和推拿(SUCRA=82.0、69.9和90.3%,分别)。安全性结果表明,三种最安全的干预措施是SI,推拿,和足浴。所有研究均未报告严重不良事件,最常见的轻微不良事件包括嗜睡,疼痛,过度口渴,还有血肿.
    推拿和rTMS都对改善睡眠质量有显著作用,但rTMS的安全性较低。因此,推拿可以推荐作为改善睡眠质量的第一线治疗。如果患者的焦虑和抑郁症状明显,可根据实际情况选择MB或HBO进行治疗。改善睡眠质量的外治法可能与单胺类神经递质的调节有关,这可能是一种潜在的作用机制。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/display_record。php?RecordID=440882。
    UNASSIGNED: The annual incidence of insomnia continues to increase owing to changes in lifestyle habits, increased work pressure, and increased environmental pollution. In recent years, an increasing number of external therapies have been proven effective in treating insomnia and have been widely used. However, the relative benefits and harms of external therapies remain uncertain, and an optimal treatment strategy has not yet been determined.
    UNASSIGNED: A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of multiple external therapies for patients with insomnia.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight electronic databases were comprehensively searched from their inception to June 2023 for relevant literature. We also searched the grey literature and reviewed the reference lists of related systematic reviews. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, data extraction, and bias assessment of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the Cochrane Reviewers\' Handbook, and a network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata and RevMan software.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 14,826 studies were identified. Of these, 83 studies, including 9 external therapies and 6,100 patients, were deemed eligible for the present network meta-analysis. Except for the SL outcome, each external therapy was better than conventional medicine and the sham intervention (SI) in improving sleep quality. In terms of improving the psychological state indices of insomnia patients, each external therapy was superior to the SI; each external therapy had a better effect on the regulation of monoamine neurotransmitters. Tuina may be the most effective intervention in improving the total effective rate, Pittsburgh sleep quality index score, and SL. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) perhaps resulted in the best improvement in total sleep time and awakening time (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 78.3 and 75.4%, respectively); and moxibustion (MB) and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) were the most effective in reducing Self-rating Anxiety Scale and Self-rating Depression Scale scores. In terms of improving the monoamine neurotransmitters 5-hydroxytryptamine, norepinephrine, and dopamine, the best interventions were acupoint catgut embedding, electroacupuncture, and Tuina (SUCRA = 82.0, 69.9 and 90.3%, respectively). Safety results showed that the three safest interventions were the SI, Tuina, and foot bath. No serious adverse events were reported across the studies, and the most common minor adverse events included drowsiness, pain, excessive thirst, and hematoma.
    UNASSIGNED: Both Tuina and rTMS have significant effects on improving sleep quality, but the safety of rTMS is low. Therefore, Tuina can be recommended as the first line of treatment to improve sleep quality. If a patient\'s anxiety and depression symptoms are evident, MB or HBO can be selected for treatment based on the actual situation. External therapy to improve sleep quality may be related to the regulation of monoamine neurotransmitters, which may be a potential mechanism of action.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=440882.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在中国,2~3级免疫相关皮疹可能导致免疫治疗中断.皮质类固醇(CS)是主要的治疗方法,但并不总是有效的。清热祛湿的外部应用,以清-Re-Li-Shi公式(QRLSF)表示,在过去的5年中,我们医院一直用于治疗免疫相关的皮肤不良事件(ircAE)。目的探讨其治疗2~3级皮疹的疗效和安全性。
    对我院2019年12月至2022年12月的2至3级免疫相关性皮疹患者进行了回顾性研究。这些患者接受QRLSF治疗。临床特征,治疗结果,并对健康相关生活质量(HrQoL)进行分析。
    纳入30例2-3级皮疹患者(中位发病时间:64.5天)。24例(80%)的皮肤病变恢复到1级,中位时间为8天。伴随症状也得到改善,中位时间为3至4天。添加抗组胺药(AH)并没有增加QRLSF的疗效(AH+QRLSF:75.00%vsQRLSF:83.33%,P=.66)。无论患者以前是否接受过CS治疗,QRLSF治疗的疗效均无明显差异(未治疗人群:88.24%与治疗人群:69.23%,P=.36)。在1个月的随访中,2例(8.33%)复发。就HrQoL而言,QRLSF治疗可显着降低Skindex-16所有领域的中位数得分,包括症状(39.58vs8.33,P<0.0001),情绪(58.33vs15.48,P<0.0001),功能(46.67vs13.33,P<.0001)和复合(52.60vs14.06,P<.0001)。
    外部应用清热除湿被证明是对此类患者的有效且安全的治疗方法。在未来,需要高质量的试验来确定其在ircAE领域的临床应用。
    UNASSIGNED: In China, grade 2 to 3 immune-related rash will probably lead to the interruption of immunotherapy. Corticosteroid (CS) is the main treatment, but not always effective. The external application of clearing heat and removing dampness, which is represented by Qing-Re-Li-Shi Formula (QRLSF), has been used in our hospital to treat immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs) for the last 5 years. The purpose of this study was to discuss its efficacy and safety in the treatment of grade 2 to 3 rash.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study of patients with grade 2 to 3 immune-related rash in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2022 was conducted. These patients received QRLSF treatment. Clinical characteristics, treatment outcome, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty patients with grade 2 to 3 rash (median onset time: 64.5 days) were included. The skin lesions of 24 cases (80%) returned to grade 1 with a median time of 8 days. The accompanying symptoms were also improved with median time of 3 to 4 days. The addition of antihistamine (AH) drug didn\'t increase the efficacy of QRLSF (AH + QRLSF: 75.00% vs QRLSF: 83.33%, P = .66). No significant difference was observed in the efficacy of QRLSF treatment regardless of whether patients had previously received CS therapy (untreated population: 88.24% vs treated population: 69.23%, P = .36). During 1-month follow-up, 2 cases (8.33%) underwent relapses. In terms of HrQoL, QRLSF treatment could significantly reduce the median scores of all domains of Skindex-16, including symptoms (39.58 vs 8.33, P < .0001), emotions (58.33 vs 15.48, P < .0001), functioning (46.67 vs 13.33, P < .0001) and composite (52.60 vs 14.06, P < .0001).
    UNASSIGNED: External application of clearing heat and removing dampness was proven to be an effective and safe treatment for such patients. In the future, high-quality trials are required to determine its clinical application in the field of ircAEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌肉骨骼创伤是一种常见类型的损伤,可导致肌肉或骨骼系统的损伤,并已被公认为世界范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因。本研究旨在分析青藤外敷治疗肌肉骨骼创伤的疗效。
    评估Pyritum对各种类型的肌肉骨骼外伤的外部治疗效果的随机对照试验将在从开始到2023年2月的八个数据库的搜索中被考虑和确定。对发布状态没有限制,语言,或国家。实验干预组将单独或与其他疗法联合外用Pyritum进行治疗,比较干预组将包括所有类型的对照干预措施。主要结果将以治疗有效率来衡量,次要结果将包括疼痛减轻,疼痛消失时间,肿胀,联合功能,和恢复期。本研究的方法学质量评估将使用Cochrane合作组织推荐的偏倚风险评估来完成。如果每组有足够数量的研究来比较Pyrium单独和联合外部治疗组的治疗效果,我们将考虑子群分析。
    本系统审查将按照PRISMA-P声明进行。
    我们将在现有文献中对提议的主题进行广泛的搜索,并为Pyritum外用对所有类型的肌肉骨骼创伤的有效性和安全性提供系统的证据。产生的证据将有助于为该患者组设计外部使用Pyritum的干预措施。
    UNASSIGNED: Musculoskeletal trauma is a common type of injury that can result from damage to the muscular or skeletal system and has been recognized as a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. This study aims to analyze the efficacy of Pyritum external treatment for musculoskeletal trauma.
    UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trials evaluating the external treatment effect of Pyritum on various types of musculoskeletal traumatic injuries will be considered and identified in the searches of eight databases from their inception to Feb 2023. There will be no restrictions with respect to the publication status, language, or country. The experimental intervention group will be treated with external application of Pyritum alone or in combination with other therapies, and the comparator intervention group will include all types of control interventions. The primary outcome will be measured as treatment efficacy rate, and secondary outcomes will include pain reduction, pain disappearance time, swelling, joint function, and recovery period. Assessment of the methodological quality of this study will be concluded using the risk of bias assessment recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. If there are sufficient numbers of studies per group in terms of specific rating scales to compare the treatment effects of Pyrium alone and combined external treatment groups, we will consider subgroup analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review will be conducted in compliance with the PRISMA-P statement.
    UNASSIGNED: We will conduct an extensive search on the proposed topic within the available literature and provide systematic evidence for the efficacy and safety of external application of Pyritum for all types of musculoskeletal trauma. The evidence generated will help design interventions for the external use of Pyritum for this patient group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the external application of internal expulsion pus-expelling decoction (IEPED) combined with surgery in the treatment of granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM).
    METHODS: A total of 110 patients in our hospital with sepsis GLM were randomly divided into two groups: treatment group (n=60, the wound was treated with IEPED) and control group (n=50, the wound was not treated with IEPED). We assessed the recurrence, contra lateral breast form, and aesthetic evaluation of the patients in the two groups.
    RESULTS: The total effective rates in the patients in the treatment group and the control group were 90% and 68%, respectively, after the preoperative pretreatment and before radical surgery (P<0.05). After 10 days of receiving the debridement treatment, the two groups were compared in term of physical signs scores and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Within one year of the regular follow-up after treatment, 0 case recurred in the treatment group and 1 case recurred in the control group (P>0.05). In the treatment group, 30 cases showed excellent results in the aesthetic evaluation of breast appearance, 18 cases were good, and the overall excellent and good rate was up to 80%. In the control group, 12 cases showed excellent results and 16 cases showed good results, with the overall excellent and good rate reaching 56% (P<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with abscess debridement of GLM, the external application of IEPED can significantly reduce the primary lesion of patients with abscess GLM, reduce the surgical resection area, and maximize the preservation of the patients\' breast appearance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of the Weitan Waifu patch on the postsurgical gastroparesis syndrome (PGS) of gastrointestinal cancer. Methods: The multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with superiority design. Patients with PGS of gastrointestinal cancer diagnosed in 4 AAA hospitals and the abdominal symptom manifested as cold syndrome by Chinese local syndrome differentiation were recruited. These patients were randomly divided into two groups according to 1∶1 proportion. Placebo or Weitan Waifu patch was applied in control group or intervention group, respectively, based on the basic treatments, including nutrition support, gastrointestinal decompression, promoting gastric dynamics medicine.Two acupuncture points (Zhongwan and Shenque) were stuck with placebo in control group or patch in treatment group. The intervention course was 14 days or reached the effective standard. Results: From July 15, 2013 to Jun 3, 2015, 128 participants were recruited and 120 eligible cases were included in the full analysis set (FAS), and 60 cases in each group. 88 cases were included in the per-protocol set (PPS), including 45 cases in the treatment group and 43 cases in the control group. In the FAS, the clinical effective rate in the treatment group was 68.3%, significantly superior than 41.7% of the control group (P=0.003). The medium time of effective therapy in the treatment group was 8 days, significantly shorter than 10 days in the control group (P=0.017). In the FAS, 3 adverse events occurred in the treatment group, including mild to moderate decrustation, pruritus and nausea. The incidence rate of adverse events was 5.0% (3/60) and these symptoms were spontaneously remitted after drug withdrawal. No severe adverse events were observed in the control group. There was no significant difference between these two groups (P=0.244). Conclusion: Weitan Waifu patch is a safely and effectively therapeutic method for patients with PGS (cold syndrome) of gastroenterological cancer. Trial registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register, ISRCTN18291857.
    目的: 探讨胃瘫外敷方治疗消化系统肿瘤患者术后胃瘫(寒证)患者的疗效。 方法: 采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂平行对照临床试验,以优效性设计,收集北京4家三级甲等医院确诊的消化系统肿瘤术后胃瘫、且腹部症状中医局部辨证为寒证的患者入组。区组随机化将患者按1∶1比例分组,在常规治疗(营养支持、胃肠减压、促胃动力药)的基础上,治疗组和对照组患者分别给予胃瘫外敷方或安慰剂穴位(中脘、神阙穴)贴敷,治疗14 d或达到有效标准。 结果: 2013年7月15日至2015年6月3日,共招募患者128例,最终120例患者入组进入全分析集(FAS),其中治疗组60例,对照组60例。88例患者进入符合方案数据分析集(PPS),其中治疗组45例,对照组43例。FAS中治疗组患者的临床有效率为68.3%,明显优于对照组(41.7%,P=0.003)。治疗组达到治疗有效所需的中位时间为8 d,明显短于对照组(10 d,P=0.017)。FAS中治疗组有3例患者出现不良事件,发生率为5.0%(3/60),分别为轻中度脱皮、瘙痒、恶心,停药后自行缓解;对照组患者未出现不良反应,两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.244)。 结论: 胃瘫外敷方是消化系统肿瘤术后胃瘫(寒证)患者的一种新的治疗选择。 临床试验注册: 英国国际标准随机对照试验号注册库,ISRCTN18291857.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是大多数恶性肿瘤的常见并发症。尽管它经常发生,目前对MPE的了解仍然有限,管理的效果仍然不令人满意。中医外治法具有独特的优势,如更快的疗效和更少的副作用。
    观察康艾消水软膏(中药软膏)在MPE中的疗效和安全性。
    这是安慰剂对照的双盲随机研究。共纳入80例患者,其中72例随机接受康艾消水软膏或安慰剂,分配比例为1:1。每天将康艾消水软膏或安慰剂涂在胸壁上8小时。干预持续2周。康艾消水软膏由黄芪()组成,精液(),决明子树枝(),桔梗(),姜黄zedoary(),冰片(),和其他物质。在这两组中,根据需要使用利尿和引流。结果包括胸腔积液的数量评估,中医症状量表,Karnofsky性能量表,以及血常规等安全指标,血液生化检查,和皮肤刺激反应表。
    72例随机接受康艾消水软膏或安慰剂以及对症治疗的患者,治疗组缓解率为42.4%,安慰剂组为25.0%(P=.138).至于中医症状量表,治疗组显示胸闷改善(P=0.003),丰满和膨胀(P=.042),呼吸急促(P<.001),心悸无统计学意义(P=0.237),和疼痛(P=.063),而安慰剂组在5种症状中的任何一种均无统计学意义。与治疗相关的主要不良事件,主要是皮肤刺激,平均分配。
    康艾消水软膏显示出降低MPE的潜力,它可以缓解呼吸困难的症状。因此,作为MPE的补充干预可能是合适的。研究设计中存在一些缺陷。提倡更大的规模和更好的设计试验。
    Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication in most malignancies. Despite its frequent occurrence, current knowledge of MPE remains limited and the effect of the management is still unsatisfying. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) external treatment has unique advantages, such as quicker efficacy and fewer side effects.
    To observe the effects and safety of Kang\'ai Xiaoshui ointment (TCM herbal ointment) in MPE.
    This was a placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized study. A total of 80 patients were enrolled, of which 72 were randomized to receive Kang\'ai Xiaoshui ointment or placebo at an allocation ratio of 1:1. Kang\'ai Xiaoshui ointment or placebo was applied on the thorax wall for 8 hours daily. The intervention lasted 2 weeks. Kang\'ai Xiaoshui ointment consisted of Astragalus membranaces (), Semen pharbitidis (), Cassia twig (), Pericarpium arecae (), Curcuma zedoary (), Borneol (), and other substances. In both groups, diuresis and drainages were used as needed. Outcomes covered the quantity of pleural effusion evaluation, TCM Symptom Scale, Karnofsky Performance Scale, and safety indicators such as routine blood test, blood biochemistry test, and response table of skin irritation.
    Of 72 patients randomized to receive Kang\'ai Xiaoshui ointment or placebo along with symptomatic treatment, the response rate was documented as 42.4% for the treatment group and 25.0% for the placebo group ( P = .138). As for the TCM symptom scale, the treatment group showed improvement in chest distress ( P = .003), fullness and distention ( P = .042), shortness of breath ( P < .001), no statistical significance in palpitation ( P = .237), and pain ( P = .063), whereas the placebo group did not show statistical significance in any of the 5 symptoms. Major adverse events related to the treatment, mainly skin irritation, were distributed equally.
    Kang\'ai Xiaoshui ointment showed a potential of reducing MPE, and it could alleviate symptoms of dyspnea. Thus, it may be appropriate as a supplementary intervention for MPE. There were some flaws in the study design. A larger scale and better designed trial is advocated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号