OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the validity of external quality assessment (EQA) laboratory results across various cultural and environmental contexts and to identify potential improvement areas.
METHODS: The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Task Force on Global Laboratory Quality (TF-GLQ) conducted a 2-year study (2022 and 2023) in which EQA materials, related software and online training was provided by a commercial vendor to 100 laboratories in ten IFCC member society countries. The results were analysed on a monthly basis by the TF-GLQ, to show the number of submissions per country, tests per lab, acceptability rates, random failures and to get a measure of which analytes performed poorly.
RESULTS: The EQA material was dispatched on a quarterly basis. Some countries had problems with customs releasing the material in a timely manner, resulting in laboratories not receiving them on time leading to no submission. We report here the results for the second year of the survey. The number of examinations varied between laboratories, ranging from seven to 84 analytes. Of the ten countries surveyed, six averaged greater than 90 % acceptable results over the whole 12-months cycle, one had unacceptable results for two of the nine months they returned results and the other four were considered to not perform to an acceptable standard.
CONCLUSIONS: All 100 participating laboratories indicated satisfaction with the EQA survey and related services, including on-site training, and report handling. However, specimen receiving issues, suggest benefits in dispatching materials for a full 12-month cycle. Significant discrepancies in EQA performance indicate that four countries require long-term assistance, training and guidance. To ensure reliable patient results, promoting EQA in certain countries is essential to achieve the required level of quality.

OBJECTIVE: Testing for coagulation factors VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) plays significant importance in the diagnostic and treatment of hemophilia A and B. External quality assessment (EQA) scheme aimed to assess the participants\' performance of testing for coagulation factors and identify shortcomings in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the performance trends of the participating laboratories in China national external quality assessment Scheme (China NEQAS) for FVIII and FIX over a five-year period (2019-2023).
METHODS: A total of ten external quality assessment (EQA) rounds were conducted from 2019 to 2023 in the China NEQAS for FVIII and FIX. The distribution of method, reagent and instrument were calculated. The trends of method- specific inter-laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) and pass rates were analyzed over 5 years. The dilutions for coagulation factor testing were also investigated.
RESULTS: All laboratories use one-stage assays to detect FVIII and FIX activity. The inter-laboratory overall CV decreased year by year (10.9 % to 9.3 % for FVIII and 13.5 % to 10.2 % for FIX), and the laboratory pass rate steadily increased (88.0 % to 93.4 % for FVIII and 81.3 % to 92.7 % for FIX). The majority of laboratories employed a single dilution methodology for the assessment of FVIII and FIX activity. The interlaboratory CV was elevated for the Siemens reagent (Actin FSL) during analysis of moderately abnormal FIX concentrations of EQA samples in most batches.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the external quality assessment has contributed to facilitate the enhancement of testing quality. Chromogenic assay is a supplement to accurate determination when necessary. Laboratories may choose to perform dilution tests or direct assays to identify the presence of inhibitors, particularly when they are suspected.

More than 100 laboratories in the World Health Organization Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (GMRLN) perform nucleic acid-based methods for case confirmation of measles or rubella infections and/or strain surveillance (genotyping). The quality of laboratory data is critical to ensure that diagnostic results and country reports to regional verification committees are based on accurate data. A molecular External Quality Assurance (mEQA) program was initiated by the US-CDC in 2014 to evaluate the performance of laboratories in the network. The inclusion of testing for measles and rubella viruses, with a focus on detection and genotyping, plus the diversity of assays and platforms employed required a flexible and comprehensive proficiency testing program. A stepwise introduction of new evaluation criteria gradually increased the stringency of the proficiency testing program, while giving laboratories time to implement the required changes. The mEQA program plays an important role in many processes in the GMRLN, including informing plans for the training of laboratory staff, access to reagents, and the submission of sequence data to global databases. The EQA program for Local Public Health Institutes in Japan is described as an example for national mEQA programs. As more laboratories initiate molecular testing, the mEQA will need to continue to expand and to adapt to the changing landscape for molecular testing.

BACKGROUND: As one of the most requested profiles of blood tests, there is a need for standardization among liver function tests (LFT). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are key markers of hepatocellular injury. ALT and AST are used to calculate a Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score for assessing liver fibrosis. Despite recommendations by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) to include pyridoxal-5-phosphate in ALT and AST assay methodologies, most laboratories continue to omit this.
METHODS: Data from the UK NEQAS for Clinical Chemistry Scheme, Distribution 1160 (November 2023), was reviewed to investigate variation in practice regarding liver blood tests in relation to ALT, AST and FIB-4. In addition, a series of questions audited laboratory practice in relation to liver enzymes.
RESULTS: Wide variation was seen in LFT profiles offered by laboratories, with 32 different combinations of tests used. The IFCC-recommended methods for ALT and AST are used by one-third of laboratories and give significantly higher results than non-IFCC methods. Laboratories using IFCC methods also reported significantly higher FIB-4 scores. Reference ranges and cut-offs for these tests also varied, and did not account for method-related differences in results.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of standardization of LFTs can have a significant impact on patient care. The difference in results for ALT, AST and FIB-4 in laboratories not using IFCC-recommended methods may lead to misdiagnosis. This issue should be addressed by laboratories using methods including pyridoxal-5-phosphate. Until then, method-related reference ranges and cut-offs for ALT, AST and FIB-4 are required.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate performance of D-dimer assays in China and address analytical quality issues.
METHODS: D-dimer assays data were collected from China National External Quality Assessment Scheme (China NEQAS) from 2014 to 2022. We analyzed reagents, assay results, reporting unit and cutoffs in 2022 China NEQAS. Interlaboratory coefficient variations (CVs) and influence of modified/unmodified test systems on CVs were investigated over 9 years.
RESULTS: There were 82 reagent brands in China NEQAS, but 55 reagent instructions did not indicate expression unit (DDU or FEU). Up to 7-fold of the ratio of max-to-min mean results was shown among different assays with same unit on the same sample. A prevalence of FEU (63.4%) over DDU (17.1%) was observed. Although 669 laboratories (37.9%) among 1766 laboratories used reagents without VTE exclusion claim, they also reported cutoffs. The CVs of only two assays were decreasing over years. CVs of modified test systems were higher than those of unmodified systems before improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Expression unit should be required to label in package inserts by regulatory authority. Laboratory professionals should follow instructions for use and prefer unmodified test systems for clinical safely application. Harmonization of reporting units through collaborative efforts is the promising step.

OBJECTIVE: This article defines analytical performance specifications (APS) for evaluating laboratory proficiency through an external quality assessment scheme.
METHODS: Standard deviations for proficiency assessment were derived from Thompson\'s characteristic function applied to robust data calculated from participants\' submissions in the Occupational and Environmental Laboratory Medicine (OELM) external quality assurance scheme for trace elements in serum, whole blood and urine. Characteristic function was based on two parameters: (1) β - the average coefficient of variation (CV) at high sample concentrations; (2) α - the average standard deviation (SD) at low sample concentrations. APSs were defined as 1.65 standard deviations calculated by Thompson\'s approach. Comparison between OELM robust data and characteristic function were used to validate the model.
RESULTS: Application of the characteristic function allowed calculated APS for 18 elements across three matrices. Some limitations were noted, particularly for elements (1) with no sample concentrations near analytical technique limit of detection; (2) exhibiting high robust CV at high concentration; (3) exhibiting high analytical variability such as whole blood Tl and urine Pb; (4) with an unbalanced number of robust SD above and under the characteristic function such as whole blood Mn and serum Al and Zn.
CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic function was a useful means of deriving APS for trace elements in biological fluids where biological variation data or outcome studies were not available. However, OELM external quality assurance scheme data suggests that the characteristic functions are not appropriate for all elements.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to maintain low interlaboratory variation and bias in international normalized ratio (INR) results following a network change in instrumentation and reagents, using a process of ongoing standardization and harmonization.
METHODS: Network-wide standardization to new common instrument and reagent platforms followed by network-wide application of a simple novel process of verification of international sensitive index and mean normal prothrombin time values for each new lot of prothrombin time (PT) reagent that does not require use of World Health Organization reference thromboplastin or INR calibration/certified plasma.
RESULTS: The network transitioned from mechanical hemostasis detection instruments with associated PT reagent (Diagnostica Stago; NeoPTimal) to optical detection (ACL TOPs) with associated PT reagent (Werfen; RecombiPlasTin 2G). Comparing 3 years of data for each situation, the network (n = 27 laboratories) maintained low INR variability and bias relative to general mechanical and optical groups and other laboratories.
CONCLUSIONS: Harmonized support for patient management of vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin was continuously maintained in our geography, with potentially positive implications for other coagulation laboratories and geographies. For the United States in particular, paucity of US Food and Drug Administration-cleared INR certified plasmas potentially compromises INR test accuracy; our novel approach may provide workable alternatives for other laboratories/networks.

Introduction: This study presents a longitudinal analysis of external quality assessment (EQA) results for erythropoietin (EPO) determinations conducted between 2017 and 2022 with a continuously increasing number of participating laboratories. The aim of this work was to evaluate participant performance and methodological aspects. Methods: In each of the eleven EQA surveys, a blinded sample set of lyophilized human serum containing one sample with lower EPO concentrations (L) and one with higher EPO concentrations (H) was sent to the participating laboratories. Results: A total of 1,256 measurements were included. The median (interquartile range) fraction of participants not meeting the criteria of acceptance set at 20% around the robust mean of the respective survey was 9.5% (6.1%-10.7%) (sample L) and 9.1% (5.8%-11.8%) (sample H) but lacked a clear trend in the observed period. Some surveys exhibited unusually high interlaboratory variation, suggesting interfering components in the EQA samples. Different immunological methods and reagent manufacturers also showed variability in measurement outcomes to some extent. Conclusion: These findings highlight the need for continuous quality assessment in EPO measurements to ensure patient safety and identify areas for further research and investigation.

UNASSIGNED: Tumor markers are established laboratory tools that help to diagnose, estimate prognosis, and monitor the course of cancer. For meaningful decision-making in patient care, it is essential that methods and analytical platforms demonstrate high sensitivity, specificity, precision, and comparability. Regular participation at external quality assessment (EQA) schemes is mandatory for laboratories. Here, a longitudinal evaluation of EQA data was performed to assess the performance of tumor marker assays over time.
UNASSIGNED: Longitudinal data of the cancer antigens (CA) 15-3 (n = 5,492), CA 19-9 (n = 6,802), and CA 125 (n = 5,362) from 14 INSTAND EQAs conducted between 2019 and 2023 were evaluated. A median of 197, 244 and 191 laboratories participated at the EQAs for CA 15-3, CA 19-9 and CA 125, respectively. Data evaluation encompasses intra- and inter-manufacturer specific variations over time, assay precision, and adherence to the EQA limits of ±24% for CA 15-3, ±27% for CA 19-9 and ±36% for CA 125.
UNASSIGNED: The study showed median manufacturer-dependent differences of up to 107% for CA 15-3, 99% for CA 125, and even 549% for CA 19-9 between the highest and the lowest methods over the studied period. Regarding the normalized median of all methods, the values of the most deviant methods were 0.42 for CA 15-3, 7.61 for CA 19-9, and 1.82 for CA 125. Intra-manufacturer variability was generally low, with median coefficients of variation (CV) below 10%. As the methods were evaluated according to method-specific consensus values, most participants passed the EQAs within the acceptance criteria. When the criteria were consistently set at 24%, the central 90% of participants passed the EQAs in 78.6%-100% for CA 15-3 (with exception of AX), 89.3%-100% for CA 125, and 64.3%-100% for CA 19-9.
UNASSIGNED: While intra-method precision of most analytical platforms is acceptable for all three tumor markers, considerable inter-method variability was observed over the whole studied period demonstrating the necessity for better standardization and harmonization of the methods, development of international reference materials, and comprehensive commutability studies with patient samples.

UNASSIGNED: The accurate measurement of α-fetoprotein (AFP) is critical for clinical diagnosis. However, different AFP immunoassays may yield different results. Appropriate AFP reference materials (RMs) were selected and assigned accurate values for applications with external quality assessment (EQA) programs to standardize AFP measurements.
UNASSIGNED: Forty individual clinical samples and six different concentrations of candidate RMs (Can-RMs, L1-L6) were prepared by the Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories. The Can-RMs were assigned target values by performing five immunoassays, using WHO International Standard 72/225 as a calibrator, and sent to 45 clinical laboratories in Beijing for AFP measurements. The commutability of all RMs was assessed based on CLSI and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) approaches. Analytical performance was assessed for compliance based on accuracy (total error, TE), trueness (bias), and precision (CV).
UNASSIGNED: The Can-RMs were commutable for all immunoassays using the CLSI approach and for 6 of 10 assay combinations using the IFCC approach. RMs diluted in WHO RM 72/225 were commutable among all assays with the CLSI approach, except for serum matrix (Autolumo vs. Roche analyzer) and diluted water matrix (Abbott vs. Roche/Mindray analyzer), whereas some inconclusive and non-commutable results were found using the IFCC approach. The average pass rates based on the TE, bias, and CV were 91%, 81%, and 95%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: The commutability of the RMs differed between both evaluation approaches. The Can-RMs exhibited good commutability with the CLSI approach, suggesting their suitability for use with that approach as commutable EQA materials with assigned values and for monitoring the performance of AFP measurements.