evidence-based nursing

循证护理
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    起泡剂的浸润,叫做外渗,会导致严重的病人受伤。识别起泡剂及其相对损伤风险对于预防外渗至关重要。早期识别,和适当的治疗。在这篇文章中,Vesicant特别工作组(VTF)从2017年起更新了先前发布的输液护士协会(INS)vesicant列表.2024INS列表与早期的vesicant列表不同,例如2017年VTF列表,通过采用基于记录的患者结果的风险分层方法,与依赖专家共识或仅替代风险指标相反,如pH和渗透压。解释了用于创建更新列表的方法,并定义了高和中风险的起泡剂和警示性起泡剂的标准。
    Infiltration of a vesicant, called extravasation, can result in severe patient injuries. Recognition of vesicants and their relative risk of injury is essential to extravasation prevention, early recognition, and appropriate treatment. In this article, the Vesicant Task Force (VTF) updates the previously published Infusion Nurses Society (INS) vesicant list from 2017. The 2024 INS list diverges from earlier vesicant lists, such as the 2017 VTF list, by adopting a risk stratification approach based upon documented patient outcomes, in contrast to the reliance on expert consensus or only surrogate risk indicators, such as pH and osmolarity. The methodology used to create the updated list is explained, and the criteria for high- and moderate-risk vesicants and cautionary vesicants are defined.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在护理方面,专业人士应该以循证知识为基础,然而,这些知识在护理实践中的成功实施并不总是有保证。临床决策支持系统(CDSS)被认为可以弥合这一证据与实践的差距。
    方法:本研究检查了循证护理(EBN)实践对CDSS使用的影响程度,并确定了接受理论中的其他因素(如UTAUT)发挥作用。
    结论:我们从三个回归模型的发现表明,采用循证实践的护理专业人员和护理专业学生并不更有可能使用循证CDSS。EBN综合得分(模型1)或个体维度(模型2)与CDSS使用之间的关系不显着。然而,更全面的模型(模型3),纳入来自UTAUT的项目,如社会影响力,便利条件,业绩预期,和努力期望,补充满意度证明了解释的显着差异(R2=0.279)。绩效期望和满意度与CDSS利用率显著相关。
    结论:这强调了用户友好性和CDSS实用性的重要性。尽管在普适性和有限的样本量方面存在潜在的限制,结果提供了对CDSS的见解,首先是与其他卫生IT系统相同的使用机制。
    BACKGROUND: In nursing, professionals are expected to base their practice on evidence-based knowledge, however the successful implementation of this knowledge into nursing practice is not always assured. Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are considered to bridge this evidence-practice gap.
    METHODS: This study examines the extent to which evidence-based nursing (EBN) practices influence the use of CDSS and identifies what additional factors from acceptance theories such as UTAUT play a role.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings from three regression models revealed that nursing professionals and nursing students who employ evidence-based practices are not more likely to use an evidence-based CDSS. The relationship between an EBN composite score (model 1) or is individual dimensions (model 2) and CDSS use was not significant. However, a more comprehensive model (model 3), incorporating items from the UTAUT such as Social Influences, Facilitating Conditions, Performance Expectancy, and Effort Expectancy, supplemented by Satisfaction demonstrated a significant variance explained (R2 = 0.279). Performance Expectancy and Satisfaction were found to be significantly associated with CDSS utilization.
    CONCLUSIONS: This underscores the importance of user-friendliness and practical utility of a CDSS. Despite potential limitations in generalizability and a limited sample size, the results provide insights into that CDSS first and foremost underly the same mechanisms of use as other health IT systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:运用知识到行动框架(KTA)探讨无创正压通气(NPPV)患者鼻、面部压力损伤的预防和护理的循证实践。探索其有效性。
    方法:使用循证护理方法,成立了一个循证实践小组来制定一个临床问题,对国内外数据库中的文献进行了相关证据研究,证据被引入临床场景,制定了基于证据的实践计划,通过对医疗保健专业人员和NPPV患者进行基线审查,构建了应用最佳证据的策略,分析障碍和促进因素,并在组织层面改变临床实践,从业者级别,和患者水平。目的抽样法选取山东第一医科大学附属山东省立医院心脏外科重症监护病房(CSICU)的医护人员,以及2023年10月1日至11月15日(基于证据前的实践)和11月16日至12月31日(基于证据后的实践)收治的NPPV患者,作为研究对象。通过问卷调查分析,NPPV患者鼻腔和面部压力损伤的发生率,医务人员评审指标执行率,知识的分数,医务人员的信念和行为,并比较循证实践前后患者的依从性和舒适度。
    结果:共包括52名医务人员,年龄(28.54±6.50)岁,具有3.00(1.00,12.75)年的工作经验;2名博士学位持有人(3.85%),4个硕士学位持有者(7.69%),学士学位46人(88.46%);高级职称2人(3.85%),中级职称17人(32.69%),和33个初级职称(63.46%)。收集循证护理实践前后50份患者问卷;循证护理实践前后的性别差异,年龄,体重,呼吸机使用的持续时间,24小时出血和总出血无统计学意义,具有可比性。与基于前证据的实践相比,在开展了相应的循证护理实践后,NPPV患者的鼻和面部压力损伤发生率从16.00%(8/50)下降到4.00%(2/50,P<0.05),医务人员复查指标总执行率由79.73%提高到94.08%(P<0.01),和知识的总分,信念和行为显著改善(141.96±13.88vs.114.65±19.72,P<0.05),患者的依从性和舒适度明显提高(依从性评分:4.60±0.99vs.5.82±1.42,舒适度评分:4.10±1.63vs.6.92±2.33,均P<0.05)。
    结论:应用循证护理方法获取NPPV患者预防鼻面部压力损伤的相关证据,可用于指导临床实践,显着降低此类患者的鼻和面部压力损伤的发生率,提高审查指标和知识的执行率,信念,并对医务人员进行评分,提高NPPV患者的依从性和舒适度。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the evidence-based practice of prevention and care of nasal and facial pressure injuries in patients with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) using the knowledge to action framework (KTA), and to explore its effectiveness.
    METHODS: Using an evidence-based nursing approach, an evidence-based practice group was established to formulate a clinical problem, the literature from domestic and international databases were researched for relevant evidence, the evidence was introduced into clinical scenarios, an evidence-based practice plan was developed, and a strategy for applying the best evidence was constructed by conducting a baseline review of healthcare professionals and patients with NPPV, analyzing barriers and promoting factors, and making changes in clinical practice at the organizational level, the practitioner level, and the patient level. Purposive sampling method was used to select the healthcare staff of the cardiac surgical intensive care unit (CSICU) of the Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, as well as the patients with NPPV admitted from October 1 to November 15, 2023 (pre-evidence-based practice) and November 16 to December 31 (post-evidence-based practice), as the subjects of the study. Through questionnaire analysis, the incidence of nasal and facial pressure injury of NPPV patients, the implementation rate of review indicators of medical staff, the score of the knowledge, belief and conduct of medical staff, and the compliance and comfort of patients before and after evidence-based practice were compared.
    RESULTS: A total of 52 medical staff were included, aged (28.54±6.50) years old, with 3.00 (1.00, 12.75) years of working experience; 2 doctoral degree holders (3.85%), 4 master degree holders (7.69%), 46 bachelor degree holders (88.46%); 2 with senior title (3.85%), 17 with intermediate title (32.69%), and 33 junior titles (63.46%). Fifty patient questionnaires were collected before and after evidence-based nursing practice; the differences between before and after evidence-based practice in terms of gender, age, body weight, duration of ventilator usage, 24-hour bleeding and total bleeding were not statistically significant and were comparable. Compared with the pre-evidence-based practice, after carrying out the corresponding evidence-based nursing practice, the incidence of nasal and facial pressure injuries of NPPV patients decreased from 16.00% (8/50) to 4.00% (2/50, P < 0.05), the total implementation rate of review indicators of medical staff increased from 79.73% to 94.08% (P < 0.01), and the total scores of knowledge, belief and conduct were significantly improved (141.96±13.88 vs. 114.65±19.72, P < 0.05), and compliance and comfort of patients were significantly improved (compliance score: 4.60±0.99 vs. 5.82±1.42, comfort score: 4.10±1.63 vs. 6.92±2.33, both P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The application of an evidence-based nursing approach to obtain evidence related to the prevention of nasal and facial pressure injuries in patients with NPPV can be used to guide clinical practice, significantly reducing the incidence of nasal and facial pressure injuries in such patients, improving the implementation rate of review indicators and the knowledge, belief, and conduct scores of medical staff, and enhancing compliance and comfort of NPPV patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    应用循证医学可以防止医疗错误,这凸显了应用临床指南(CGs)改善护士对患者护理的必要性。然而,由于患者的特定需求,护士在使用CGs时经常面临挑战。开发临床决策支持系统(CDSS)可以提供实时上下文敏感的基于CG的建议。因此,需要以机器适用的方式获取和表示CG。此外,有必要能够提供额外的建议,只有在被要求时,而不是连续的,并在连续尺度上评估基于证据的行动的先前部分表现。这项研究评估了获取和代表主要护理CG的可行性,以机器适用的方式进行偶发性使用。使用以色列老年中心的数据,结果提示,片面性CDSS能有效地支持形式化护理知识的应用.
    Applying evidence-based medicine prevents medical errors highlighting the need for applying Clinical Guidelines (CGs) to improve patient care by nurses. However, nurses often face challenges in utilizing CGs due to patient-specific needs. Developing a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) can provide real-time context-sensitive CG-based recommendations. Therefore, there is a need to acquire and represent CGs in a machine-applicable manner. Also, there is a need to be able to provide recommendations episodically, only when requested, and not continuously, and to assess previous partial performance of evidence-based actions on a continuous scale. This study evaluated the feasibility of acquiring and representing major nursing CGs, in a machine-applicable manner for episodic use. Using data from an Israeli geriatric center, the results suggest that an episodic CDSS effectively supports the application of formalized nursing knowledge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号