The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) reviewed the quality of care provided to adult patients undergoing surgery for Crohn\'s disease. The study reviewed elective, and emergency surgical pathways and the report highlighted clinical and organisational changes that should be made to improve patient care and outcomes.

The Trauma Center, Hub, is a highly specialized hospital indicated for complex major trauma management after stabilization at a 1st level hospital, Spoke. Although in the United States this organization demonstrated its effectiveness in mortality, in the Italian context, data available are limited. On 30 September 2018, the University Hospital of Pisa formalized the introduction of the Trauma Center, optimizing Emergency Department (ED) organization to guarantee the highest standard of care. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that the new model led better outcomes. We conducted a comparative retrospective study on 1154 major traumas over 24 months: the first 12 months (576 patients) correspond to the period before Trauma Center introduction, and the following 12 (457 patients) to the subsequent period. Results showed increase in greater dynamics and primary centralization by helicopter (p < 0.001, p 0.006). A systematic assessment with ABCDE algorithm was performed in a higher number of patients in the most recent period, from 38.4% to 80.3% (p < 0.001). Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) performed by the emergency doctor increased after Trauma Center introduction, p value < 0.001. The data show an increase of ATLS certification among staff from 51.9 to 71.4% and a reduction in early and late mortality after the Trauma Center introduction (p value 0.05 and < 0.01). Fewer patients required intensive and surgical treatments, with a shorter hospital stay. The results demonstrate the advantage in terms of outcomes in the organization of the Trauma Center in the Italian context.

In this case report, we discuss a rare incident of avulsion-type renal injury in a 24-year-old male with no significant medical history. The injury occurred during a traffic accident, where he was involved in a direct impact collision between a motorcycle and a vehicle, leading to altered corticomedullary differentiation in the right kidney, a retroperitoneal hematoma, and free fluid in the cavity. The patient underwent successful emergency abdominal surgery, which involved the removal of the damaged kidney due to the severity of the injury. During his postoperative recovery in the ICU, he received extensive care, including sedation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor support. Ultimately, he made a successful recovery and was discharged after rehabilitation. This case highlights the complexities involved in managing patients with renal injuries resulting from high-energy impact accidents. It emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment, the challenges associated with deciding on surgical intervention, and the significance of rehabilitation in patient recovery. The uniqueness of this case, characterized by its distinct mechanism of injury and the severity of the trauma, contributes to our broader understanding of renal trauma management in the field of trauma medicine. It underscores the need for personalized patient care strategies and emphasizes the effectiveness of surgical interventions in severe cases of renal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is increasingly prevalent both nationwide and in the emergency general surgery (EGS) population. While previous studies have shown that obesity may be protective against mortality following EGS procedures, the association between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative outcomes, as well as intraoperative decision-making, remains understudied.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2015-2019 database was used to identify all adult patients undergoing an open abdominal or abdominal wall procedure for EGS conditions. Our outcomes included 30-d postoperative mortality, composite 30-d morbidity, delayed fascial closure, reoperation, operative time, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore the association between BMI and each outcome of interest while adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, preoperative and intraoperative variables.
RESULTS: We identified 78,578 patients, of which 3121 (4%) were categorized as underweight, 23,661 (30.1%) as normal weight, 22,072 (28.1%) as overweight, 14,287 (18.2%) with class I obesity, 7370 (9.4%) with class II obesity, and 8067 (10.3%) with class III obesity. Class III obesity was identified as a risk factor for 30-d postoperative morbidity (adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI, 1.03-1.26, P < 0.01). An increase in obesity class was also associated with a stepwise increase in the risk of undergoing delayed fascial closure, experiencing a prolonged operative time, and having an extended LOS.
CONCLUSIONS: Obesity class was associated with an increase in delayed fascial closure, longer operative time, higher reoperation rates, and extended hospital LOS. Further studies are needed to explore how a patient\'s BMI impacts intraoperative factors, influences surgical decision-making, and contributes to hospital costs.

UNASSIGNED: In emergency situations, patients and their next of kin must make complex medical and ethical decisions in a quick and timely way.
UNASSIGNED: To describe the decision-making process during informed consent for emergency surgery among patients and the next of kin of patients who have undergone emergency surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Consecutive sampling of 39 participants and in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted at two tertiary teaching hospitals in Uganda. There were 22 patients and 17 next of kin of patients who had undergone emergency surgery within 24-72 h. Responses about decision-making were coded into themes using the social constructivist theory and phenomenological approach.
UNASSIGNED: There were four emergent themes; decision-makers, people consulted, documentation of the consent and factors influencing decision-making. Most patients and next of kin made decisions on their own and documented the consent for themselves. Other family members and doctors were consulted during the decision-making process. Decision-making was influenced by reassurance of good outcomes of surgery and disclosure by the doctors.
UNASSIGNED: Decisions were made collaboratively with the patient at the center but with input of health personnel, the next of kin and other family members. A communitarian approach combined with shared decision-making between the doctor and the patient and next of kin with adequate discussion and disclosure of information in simple language would improve decision-making for patients and their next of kin.

A 41-year-old woman presented with acute, severe left-sided abdominal pain and vomiting at 37 weeks\' gestation. Her symptoms were attributed to renal colic, and she was admitted for supportive treatment. During her admission, she went into spontaneous labour. Due to other obstetric indications, the team proceeded with delivery by emergency caesarean section. Intra-operatively, a necrotic left fallopian tube and ovary were identified, and a diagnosis of adnexal torsion (AT) was recognised. There was no return of tissue perfusion on de-torsion, and a left salpingo-oopherectomy was performed. AT in pregnancy is unusual, with only a minority of cases occurring in the third trimester. This is a challenging diagnosis to establish and requires a high index of suspicion. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging can be helpful in establishing a diagnosis but should not delay definitive treatment. Prompt surgical intervention is paramount to prevent irreversible damage to ovarian tissue.

BACKGROUND: Emergencies and emergency surgeries are a central part of everyday surgical care in Germany. However, it is unclear how emergency surgery is practically trained in clinics on a daily basis and what training concept is underlying. Therefore, the aim of this survey study was to capture the status quo of emergency surgical training of German general and visceral surgeons.
METHODS: The members of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery were surveyed online (n = 5281). The questionnaire included demographic data and expertise in surgery and assistance in emergency surgery regarding common emergency surgical operations. In addition, further training measures in emergency surgery and their support by employers were queried.
RESULTS: Only complete questionnaires (n = 184, response rate 3.5%) were included in the analysis. Most participants were in training (n = 69; 38%), followed by senior physicians (n = 52; 29%), specialists (n = 31; 17%) and chief physicians (n = 30; 17%). 64% of the participants were employed at university hospitals or maximum care hospitals. Regarding further training opportunities, in-clinic shock room training was most frequently used. Outside of their own clinic, the ATLS course was most frequently mentioned. Operations for cholecystitis and appendicitis as well as emergency stoma procedures are the most common emergency procedures. There was a strong difference in the frequency of operated cases depending on the level of training. For operations to treat acute abdominal traumas (hemostasis of liver and spleen, packing) as well as outside of visceral surgery, only low competence was reported. Over 90% of survey participants consider emergency surgery to be an indispensable core competence. Neither in the old (76%) nor in the new training regulations (47%) is emergency surgery adequately represented according to the participants\' assessment. There was a significantly lower prevalence of the \"sub-steps concept\" in emergency surgery at 38% compared to elective surgery (44%). Important elements of imparting skills in emergency surgery are simulation and courses as well as operative sub-steps, according to the majority of survey participants.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that general and visceral surgeons in Germany are introduced to emergency surgery too little structured during further training and at specialist level. The survey participants had, as expected, hardly any experience in emergency surgery outside of visceral surgery but surprisingly also little experience in visceral surgical trauma care. There is a need to discuss the future organization of emergency surgical training. Adequate simulation structures and extracurricular courses could contribute to an improvement in this respect.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a multidimensional concept used to examine the impact of patient-perceived health status on quality of life. Patients\' perception of illness affects outcomes in both medical and elective surgical patients; however, not much is known about how HRQoL effects outcomes in the emergency surgical setting. This study aimed to examine if patient-reported HRQoL was a predictor of unplanned readmission after emergency laparotomy.
METHODS: This study included 215 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy at the Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, between August 1, 2021, and July 31, 2022. Patient-reported HRQoL was assessed with the EuroQol group EQ5D index (EQ5D5L descriptive system and EQ-VAS). The population was followed from 0 to 180 days after discharge, and readmissions and days alive and out of hospital were registered. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine HRQoL and the risk of readmission within 30 and 180 days.
RESULTS: Within 30 days, 28.4% of patients were readmitted; within 180 days, the number accumulated to 45.1%. Low self-evaluated HRQoL predicted 180-day readmission and was significantly associated with fewer days out of hospital within both 90 and 180 days. Low HRQoL and discharge with rehabilitation were independent risk factors for short- (30-day) and long-term (180-day) emergency readmission.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-perceived quality of life is an independent predictor of 180-day readmission, and the number of days out of hospital was correlated to self-reported HRQoL.

BACKGROUND: Major emergency abdominal surgery is associated with severe postoperative complications and high short- and long-term mortality. Despite recent advancements in standardizing multidisciplinary care bundles, a subgroup of patients continues to face a heightened risk of short-term mortality. This study aimed to identify and describe the high-risk surgical patients and risk factors for short-term postoperative mortality.
METHODS: In this study, we included all patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery over 2 years and collected data on demographics, intraoperative variables, and short-term outcomes. The primary outcome measure was short-term mortality and secondary outcome measures were pre, intra, and postoperative risk factors for premature death. Multivariable binary regression analysis was performed to determine possible risk factors for short-term mortality.
RESULTS: Short-term mortality within 14 days of surgery in this cohort of 754 consecutive patients was 8%. Multivariable analysis identified various independent risk factors for short-term mortality throughout different phases of patient care. These factors included advanced age, preoperative history of myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, and vascular bowel ischemia or perforation of the stomach or duodenum during the primary surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk of early mortality following major emergency abdominal surgery exhibited distinct perioperative risk factors. This study underscores the importance of clinicians identifying and managing these factors in high-risk patients to ensure optimal care.

BACKGROUND: Fewer than 200 cases of Perforated Duodenal Diverticulum (\"PDD\") have been reported in the literature. The percentage of caused by trauma is generally very low and similar to rates recorded for duodenal injuries caused by trauma in the absence of diverticula (3 %-5 %). As a rare cause of abdominal pain after trauma, perforated duodenal diverticula are seldom diagnosed preoperatively. Despite preoperative CT scan demonstrating duodenal perforation, a diverticular origin is often only identified intraoperatively.
METHODS: A 36-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with severe upper abdominal pain that began after blunt trauma by a kick to his upper abdomen during a fight. A duodenal injury was identified by CT. Exploratory laparotomy then revealed a retroperitoneal perforation of a diverticulum located at the second segment of the duodenum.
CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature found few cases reporting perforated duodenal diverticulum secondary to trauma. Most cases identified the diverticulum at intraoperative exploration, with most approaches being through open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Perforation of a duodenal diverticulum secondary to trauma is an extremely rare event, which is why it is often overlooked in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen. As the presenting signs are often suggestive of duodenal perforation without a clear notion of duodenal diverticula at CT scan, a surgical approach and exploration is most frequently described. In our experience, the management of traumatic PDD aligns with the literature favoring the open surgical approach.