emergency physician

急诊医师
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们的调查旨在确定急诊医师(Eps)的不同背景和医学专业如何影响诊断的准确性以及临床前MI症状患者的后续治疗途径。通过审查EP的专业和他们的病人护理方法之间的关系,我们旨在揭示诊断准确性和治疗选择方面的潜在差异.
    方法:在本回顾性研究中,单中心队列研究,我们利用机器学习技术分析了2328例疑似MI患者的综合数据集,包括临床前诊断,心电图(ECG)解释,以及随后通过参加EP的治疗策略。
    结果:我们证明了不同专业的诊断和治疗模式足够独特,机器学习(ML)能够区分不同的专业(接收器工作特性下的最大面积=一般医学为0.80,手术为0.80)。在我们的研究中,内科医生在临床前识别STEMI方面表现出最高的准确性(0.96),而外科医生在识别NSTEMI方面表现出最高的准确性.我们的发现强调了EP专科与疑似MI患者的临床前诊断和后续治疗途径的准确性之间的显着相关性。
    结论:我们的研究结果为EP的不同背景和专业如何影响急诊患者护理的优化提供了有价值的见解。了解这些模式可以帮助制定量身定制的培训计划和协议,以提高紧急心脏护理的诊断准确性和治疗效果。最终优化患者治疗并改善预后。
    BACKGROUND: Our investigation aimed to determine how the diverse backgrounds and medical specialties of emergency physicians (Eps) influence the accuracy of diagnoses and the subsequent treatment pathways for patients presenting preclinically with MI symptoms. By scrutinizing the relationships between EPs\' specialties and their approaches to patient care, we aimed to unveil potential variances in diagnostic accuracy and treatment choices.
    METHODS: In this retrospective, monocenter cohort study, we leveraged machine learning techniques to analyze a comprehensive dataset of 2328 patients with suspected MI, encompassing preclinical diagnoses, electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretations, and subsequent treatment strategies by attending EPs.
    RESULTS: We demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment patterns of different specialties were distinct enough, that machine learning (ML) was able to differentiate between specialties (maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic = 0.80 for general medicine and 0.80 for surgery). In our study, internist demonstrated the highest accuracy for preclinical identification of STEMI (0.96) whereas surgeons showed the highest accuracy for identifying NSTEMI. Our findings highlight significant correlations between EP specialties and the accuracy of both preclinical diagnoses and subsequent treatment pathways for patients with suspected MI.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results offer valuable insights into how the diverse backgrounds and specialties of EPs can influence the optimization of patient care in emergency settings. Understanding these patterns can help in the development of tailored training programs and protocols to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy in emergency cardiac care, ultimately optimizing patient treatment and improving outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    每天有相当比例的紧急呼叫是针对疗养院居民的。随着整个欧洲人口的老龄化,预计疗养院(NH)的紧急呼叫和干预措施将增加。这些干预措施和医院转移的一部分可能是可以预防的,院前急救医务人员可能认为是不合适的。该研究旨在了解比利时急诊医师和急诊护士对NHs紧急呼叫和干预措施的看法,并调查导致他们对不当行为的看法的因素。
    在比利时急诊医师和急诊护士中进行了一项探索性非干预性前瞻性研究,目前在院前急救医学工作。电子问卷于九月发出,2023年10月和11月。描述性统计用于分析总体结果,以及比较急诊医生和急诊护士对某些主题的答案。
    共有114名急诊医生和78名护士对调查做出了回应。平均年龄为38岁,平均院前医疗保健工作经验为10年。疗养院工作人员被认为人手不足,缺乏能力,对病人护理的影响,尤其是在晚上和周末。全科医生被认为没有充分参与患者的护理,以及在需要的时候经常不可用,导致紧急医疗服务(EMS)的激活,并将疗养院居民转移到急诊科(ED)。在EMS干预中几乎从来没有预先指示,转移往往不符合患者的意愿。姑息治疗和疼痛治疗被认为是不够的。急诊医生和护士大多感到失望和沮丧。此外,急诊医师和护士在某些主题上的看法存在差异.急诊护士更加坚信,疗养院的医生应该全天候可用,如果疗养院的工作人员对医疗干预有更多的权力,则可以避免转移。急诊护士的印象也更多的是疼痛管理不足,急诊医生比急诊护士更害怕干预期间做得太少的医学影响。减少EMS干预次数的建议是更多的全科医生参与(82%),更好的疗养院员工教育/能力(77%),更多的养老院工作人员(67%),流动姑息治疗支持团队(65%)和流动老年护理干预团队(52%).
    护理院的EMS干预措施几乎从未被急诊医生和护士视为必要或指示,与适当的EMS水平几乎从未被激活。发现了以下关键问题:养老院工作人员的数量和能力不足,由于全科医生的缺乏以及缺乏对患者护理的参与,初级保健不足,缺乏现成的预先指令。全科医生应更多地参与致电紧急医疗服务(EMS)并将疗养院居民转移到急诊科的决定。医护人员应努力对患者的意愿保持警惕。决定可避免的养老院居民入院的情感负担,也许是出于对医疗法律后果的恐惧,如果做得太少,让急诊医生和护士感到沮丧和失望。疗养院人员配备的改善,更多的急性和慢性全科医生咨询,和移动老年和姑息治疗支持团队是潜在的解决方案。进一步的研究应着眼于上述缺陷的结构改进。
    UNASSIGNED: A considerable percentage of daily emergency calls are for nursing home residents. With the ageing of the overall European population, an increase in emergency calls and interventions in nursing homes (NH) is to be expected. A proportion of these interventions and hospital transfers may be preventable and could be considered as inappropriate by prehospital emergency medical personnel. The study aimed to understand Belgian emergency physicians\' and emergency nurses\' perspectives on emergency calls and interventions in NHs and investigate factors contributing to their perception of inappropriateness.
    UNASSIGNED: An exploratory non-interventional prospective study was conducted in Belgium among emergency physicians and emergency nurses, currently working in prehospital emergency medicine. Electronic questionnaires were sent out in September, October and November 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the overall results, as well as to compare the answers between emergency physicians and emergency nurses about certain topics.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 114 emergency physicians and 78 nurses responded to the survey. The mean age was 38 years with a mean working experience of 10 years in prehospital healthcare. Nursing home staff were perceived as understaffed and lacking in competence, with an impact on patient care especially during nights and weekends. General practitioners were perceived as insufficiently involved in the patient\'s care, as well as often unavailable in times of need, leading to activation of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and transfers of nursing home residents to the Emergency Department (ED). Advance directives were almost never available at EMS interventions and transfers were often not in accordance with the patient\'s wishes. Palliative care and pain treatment were perceived as insufficient. Emergency physicians and nurses felt mostly disappointed and frustrated. Additionally, differences in perception were noted between emergency physicians and nurses regarding certain topics. Emergency nurses were more convinced that the nursing home physician should be available 24/7 and that transfers could be avoided if nursing home staff had more authority regarding medical interventions. Emergency nurses were also more under the impression that pain management was inadequate, and emergency physicians were more afraid of the medical implications of doing too little during interventions than emergency nurses. Suggestions to reduce the number of EMS interventions were more general practitioner involvement (82%), better nursing home staff education/competences (77%), more nursing home staff (67%), mobile palliative care support teams (65%) and mobile geriatric nursing intervention teams (52%).
    UNASSIGNED: EMS interventions in nursing homes were almost never seen as necessary or indicated by emergency physicians and nurses, with the appropriate EMS level almost never being activated. The following key issues were found: shortages in numbers and competence of nursing home staff, insufficient primary care due to the unavailability of the general practitioner as well as a lack of involvement in patient care, and an absence of readily available advance directives. General practitioners should be more involved in the decision to call the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and to transfer nursing home residents to the Emergency Department. Healthcare workers should strive for vigilance regarding the patients\' wishes. The emotional burden of deciding on an avoidable hospital admission of nursing home residents, perhaps out of fear for medico-legal consequences if doing too little, leaves the emergency physicians and nurses frustrated and disappointed. Improvements in nursing home staffing, more acute and chronic general practitioner consultations, and mobile geriatric and palliative care support teams are potential solutions. Further research should focus on the structural improvement of the above-mentioned shortcomings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人工智能,特别是聊天机器人系统,正在成为医疗保健的工具,帮助临床决策和患者参与。
    目的:本研究旨在分析ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4在解决复杂的临床和伦理困境方面的表现,并说明他们在医疗保健决策中的潜在作用,同时比较老年人和居民的评级,和特定的问题类型。
    方法:共有4名专业医师提出了176个现实世界的临床问题。共有8位资深医生和居民以1-5的量表评估了GPT-3.5和GPT-4的5个类别的回答:准确性,相关性,清晰度,实用程序,和全面性。在内科进行评估,急诊医学,和道德。在全球范围内进行了比较,在老年人和居民之间,跨分类。
    结果:两种GPT模型均获得较高的平均得分(GPT-4为4.4,SD0.8,GPT-3.5为4.1,SD1.0)。GPT-4在所有评级维度上都优于GPT-3.5,老年人对这两种模式的反应始终高于居民。具体来说,老年人将GPT-4评为更有益和更完整(分别为4.6vs4.0和4.6vs4.1;P<.001),和GPT-3.5相似(分别为4.1vs3.7和3.9vs3.5;P<.001)。道德查询在这两种模型中都获得了最高的评价,平均分数反映了准确性和完整性标准的一致性。问题类型之间的区别是显著的,特别是对于整个紧急情况下的GPT-4完整性平均分数,内部,和伦理问题(分别为4.2,SD1.0;4.3,SD0.8;和4.5,SD0.7;P<.001),对于GPT-3.5的准确性,有益的,和完整性尺寸。
    结论:ChatGPT帮助医生解决医疗问题的潜力是有希望的,具有增强诊断能力的前景,治疗,和道德。虽然整合到临床工作流程可能很有价值,它必须补充,不替换,人类的专业知识。持续的研究对于确保在临床环境中安全有效的实施至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence, particularly chatbot systems, is becoming an instrumental tool in health care, aiding clinical decision-making and patient engagement.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 in addressing complex clinical and ethical dilemmas, and to illustrate their potential role in health care decision-making while comparing seniors\' and residents\' ratings, and specific question types.
    METHODS: A total of 4 specialized physicians formulated 176 real-world clinical questions. A total of 8 senior physicians and residents assessed responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a 1-5 scale across 5 categories: accuracy, relevance, clarity, utility, and comprehensiveness. Evaluations were conducted within internal medicine, emergency medicine, and ethics. Comparisons were made globally, between seniors and residents, and across classifications.
    RESULTS: Both GPT models received high mean scores (4.4, SD 0.8 for GPT-4 and 4.1, SD 1.0 for GPT-3.5). GPT-4 outperformed GPT-3.5 across all rating dimensions, with seniors consistently rating responses higher than residents for both models. Specifically, seniors rated GPT-4 as more beneficial and complete (mean 4.6 vs 4.0 and 4.6 vs 4.1, respectively; P<.001), and GPT-3.5 similarly (mean 4.1 vs 3.7 and 3.9 vs 3.5, respectively; P<.001). Ethical queries received the highest ratings for both models, with mean scores reflecting consistency across accuracy and completeness criteria. Distinctions among question types were significant, particularly for the GPT-4 mean scores in completeness across emergency, internal, and ethical questions (4.2, SD 1.0; 4.3, SD 0.8; and 4.5, SD 0.7, respectively; P<.001), and for GPT-3.5\'s accuracy, beneficial, and completeness dimensions.
    CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT\'s potential to assist physicians with medical issues is promising, with prospects to enhance diagnostics, treatments, and ethics. While integration into clinical workflows may be valuable, it must complement, not replace, human expertise. Continued research is essential to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical environments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过开发新知识和对住院医师进行临床培训,学术急诊医学(EM)是EM专业的基础。尽管最近对新兴市场劳动力的未来越来越关注,没有任何评估对美国学术EM劳动力进行了具体描述。我们试图估算确定为学术的急诊医师(EP)的全国比例以及在学术地点进行的急诊科(ED)访问的比例。
    方法:我们使用美国医院协会的数据对EP和ED进行了横断面分析,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心,和Doximity的居留导航员。如果EP与至少一个被确定为学术的设施有关联,则被确定为“学术”,定义为由研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)正式指定为认可的EM住院医师计划的临床培训地点的ED。我们的主要结果是估计确定为学术性EP的全国比例以及在学术地点进行ED访问的比例。
    结果:我们的分析样本包括在4920例ED中进行临床实习的26,937例EP,并在130,471,386例ED访视期间提供护理。在EP中,11,720(43.5%)被确定为学术性的,在ED中,635(12.9%)被确定为学术网站,包括585个成人/一般网站,45个儿科特定部位,和10个附属于退伍军人事务部的网站。2021年,学术ED为42,794,106例ED就诊提供护理,占全国所有ED就诊的32.8%。
    结论:在至少一个与ACGME认可的EM住院医师计划相关的临床培训站点中,大约有十分之四的EPs练习,全国大约三分之一的ED访问发生在这些学术ED中。我们鼓励使用学术EP和ED的替代定义进行进一步的工作,同时进行纵向研究,以确定劳动力构成的趋势。
    BACKGROUND: Academic emergency medicine (EM) is foundational to the EM specialty through the development of new knowledge and clinical training of resident physicians. Despite recent increased attention to the future of the EM workforce, no evaluations have specifically characterized the U.S. academic EM workforce. We sought to estimate the national proportion of emergency physicians (EPs) identified as academic and the proportion of emergency department (ED) visits that take place at academic sites.
    METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of EPs and EDs using data from the American Hospital Association, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and Doximity\'s Residency Navigator. EPs were identified as \"academic\" if they were affiliated with at least one facility determined to be academic, defined as EDs officially designated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) as clinical training sites at accredited EM residency programs. Our primary outcomes were to estimate the national proportion of EPs identified as academic and the proportion of ED visits performed at academic sites.
    RESULTS: Our analytic sample included 26,937 EPs practicing clinically across 4920 EDs and providing care during 130,471,386 ED visits. Among EPs, 11,720 (43.5%) were identified as academic, and among EDs, 635 (12.9%) were identified as academic sites, including 585 adult/general sites, 45 pediatric-specific sites, and 10 sites affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs. In 2021, academic EDs provided care for 42,794,106 ED visits or 32.8% of all ED visits nationally.
    CONCLUSIONS: Approximately four in 10 EPs practice in at least one clinical training site affiliated with an ACGME-accredited EM residency program, and approximately one in three ED visits nationally occur in these academic EDs. We encourage further work using alternative definitions of an academic EPs and EDs, along with longitudinal research to identify trends in the workforce\'s composition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    马尾综合症(CES)是多种病因的结果。CES最常见的原因是巨大的椎间盘突出症压迫了鞘囊和神经根。然而,它很少出现继发于主动脉闭塞。主动脉闭塞性疾病通常与慢性跛行有关,勃起功能障碍,下肢脉搏减少。急性主动脉闭塞,然而,与脊髓梗塞和缺血等严重并发症有关。它还与发病率和死亡率的高风险相关。此外,它提出了诊断挑战,可能会被忽视。本报告强调考虑血管病因作为CES鉴别诊断的重要性。
    本病例报告描述了一名56岁女性患者模仿CES的主动脉闭塞的独特病例。
    对于出现马尾神经症状的患者,考虑血管病因至关重要,尤其是那些有心血管危险因素的人。脊柱外科医生和急诊医师应保持对血管病因的高度怀疑,并考虑进行适当的影像学检查以促进早期诊断和干预,以防止随后的神经系统和危及生命的后果。
    UNASSIGNED: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a consequence of a variety of etiologies. CES is most commonly due to compression of the thecal sac and nerve roots by a massive disc herniation. However, it rarely presents secondary to aortic occlusion. Aortoiliac occlusive disorder is usually associated with chronic claudication, erectile dysfunction, and diminished lower limb pulses. Acute aortic occlusion, however, is associated with serious complications such as spinal cord infarction and ischemia. It is also associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Moreover, it poses a diagnostic challenge and may be overlooked. This report emphasizes the importance of considering vascular etiology as a differential diagnosis for CES.
    UNASSIGNED: This case report describes a unique case of aortic occlusion mimicking CES in a 56-year-old female patient.
    UNASSIGNED: For patients presenting with cauda equina symptomatology, it is critical to consider vascular etiology, especially for those with cardiovascular risk factors. Spine surgeons and emergency physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for vascular etiologies and consider appropriate imaging studies to promote early diagnosis and intervention to prevent subsequent neurological and life-threatening consequences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医生与医疗保健行业之间的财务关系在美国很普遍。然而,自2014年开放支付数据库启动以来,向急诊医生支付的数据有限。
    目的:分析2014年至2022年向美国急诊医师支付的行业趋势和特征。
    方法:这项回顾性研究使用开放支付数据库来检查对所有在职急诊医生的所有一般和研究支付。采用描述性统计和广义估计方程。
    结果:在2014年至2022年之间,50.1%(33,021)的急诊医生收到了6.401亿美元的付款。其中,50.1%收到一般付款,1.2%的人获得了研究经费。一般付款占整个行业付款的18.7%(1.197亿美元)。一般和研究费用的中位数为149美元(49-401美元)和72,083美元(13,903-370,142美元),分别。与其他专业相比,更少的急诊医生接受一般付款,金额较低。排名前1%的急诊医生获得了80.5%的一般付款。从2014年到2019年,没有观察到支付金额的显著趋势,但由于COVID-19大流行,2020年这两种类型的支付都大幅下降。
    结论:大多数急诊医生从医疗保健行业获得了付款,尽管与其他专业相比,这些费用通常很少。从2014年到2019年,支付趋势保持一致,由于大流行,2020年的支付趋势显着下降。
    BACKGROUND: Financial relationships between physicians and the health care industry are common in the United States. Yet, there are limited data on payments to emergency physicians since the 2014 launch of the Open Payments Database.
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the trends and characteristics of industry payments to U.S. emergency physicians from 2014 to 2022.
    METHODS: This retrospective study used the Open Payments Database to examine all general and research payments to all active emergency physicians. Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations were employed.
    RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2022, 50.1% (33,021) of emergency physicians received $640.1 million in payments. Of these, 50.1% received general payments, and 1.2% received research payments. General payments constituted 18.7% ($119.7 million) of the overall industry payments. Median general and research payments were $149 ($49-$401) and $72,083 ($13,903-$370,142), respectively. Compared with other specialties, fewer emergency physicians received general payments, and the amounts were lower. The top 1% of emergency physicians received 80.5% of the general payments. No significant trends in payment amounts were observed from 2014 to 2019, but there was a significant decrease in both types of payments in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    CONCLUSIONS: The majority of emergency physicians received payments from the health care industry, although these payments were typically minimal compared with other specialties. Payment trends remained consistent from 2014 to 2019, with a notable decrease in 2020 due to the pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术终末器官衰竭的唯一治疗方法是移植。不幸的是,器官捐献者比病人少。目前,大多数器官捐赠来自活的或脑死亡的捐赠者。为了扩大潜在的器官捐献者,急诊科应该得到有效利用。目标本研究的主要目标是确定急诊医师的知识,意识,以及对器官捐赠的态度。方法在沙特阿拉伯的不同医院进行了一项横断面研究。它包括成人急诊科的106名医生。结果大多数(84.9%)的参与者从未在急诊科报告过任何可能的器官捐献病例。此外,54.8%的参与者报告对器官捐赠的伦理问题知之甚少。此外,66.1%的受访者声称对SCOT(沙特器官移植中心)的目标和职责知之甚少。有趣的是,96.2%的参与者报告说,他们的组织没有关于器官捐赠的任何政策或程序。关于教育,99名(93.4%)医生没有参加任何器官捐赠课程,培训,或者关于器官捐赠的教学计划。同时,67名(63.2%)医生同意参加培训计划至关重要。此外,68名(64.2%)的医生认为器官捐赠应该是每一个生命终结案例的一部分。为了改善急诊科的捐赠流程,88(83%)的医生希望有一个完善的计划,并规定了政策和程序。结论根据我们的发现,急诊医生在器官捐赠规则和程序方面缺乏专业知识和信息,这导致错过了招募更多潜在捐助者的机会。我们建议制定明确的政策和程序,并教育医生和所有急诊医务人员获得更好的结果。
    Background The only cure for end-organ failure is transplantation. Unfortunately, there are fewer organ donors than patients. Currently, the majority of organ donations come from live or brain-dead donors. In order to expand the pool of potential organ donors, the emergency department should be utilized effectively. Objectives The primary goal of this research is to determine emergency physicians\' knowledge, awareness, and attitude about organ donation. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted through different hospitals in Saudi Arabia. It includes 106 physicians in the adult emergency departments. Results The majority (84.9%) of the participants never reported any case in the emergency department as a potential case for organ donation. In addition, 54.8% of the participants report having little to no knowledge of the ethical issues of organ donation. Furthermore, 66.1% of respondents claim to have little to no knowledge of the goals and duties of the SCOT (Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation). It was interesting to see that 96.2% of the participants reported that their organizations do not have any policies or procedures in place regarding organ donations. Regarding education, 99 (93.4%) physicians did not participate in any organ donation course, training, or teaching program about organ donation. At the same time, 67 (63.2%) physicians concurred that participation in a training program is essential. Moreover, 68 (64.2%) physicians believed that organ donation should be a part of every end-of-life case. In order to improve the donation process in the emergency department, 88 (83%) physicians would want a well-established program with defined policies and procedures. Conclusion According to our findings, the emergency physician has inadequate expertise and information on organ donation rules and procedures, which has resulted in a missed opportunity to recruit more potential donors. We recommend instituting clear policy and procedures and educating the physicians and all emergency medicine staff to have better outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:与衰老相关的生理变化可能会对急性护理医师的危机资源管理技能产生负面影响。这项研究旨在确定医生年龄是否会影响危机资源管理技能,和危机资源管理技能学习和保留使用全身人体模型模拟训练在急性护理医师。
    方法:加拿大两所大学的急性护理医生参与了三个8分钟模拟危机(无脉电活动)场景。在最初的危机情景(测试前)之后,与训练有素的主持人进行了汇报,然后进行了第二次危机情景(测试后立即进行)。参与者在3-6个月后返回第三个危机情景(保留后测试)。
    结果:对于最终分析中包含的48名参与者,年龄与基线总体评定量表(GRS;r=-0.30,P<0.05)和技术检查表得分(r=-0.44,P<0.01)呈负相关。然而,只有几年的实践和先前的模拟经验,但不是年龄,在随后的逐步回归分析中具有显著性。从基于模拟的教育中学习,从测试前到立即测试后的GRS得分平均差异为2.28(P<0.001),技术清单正确得分为1.69(P<0.001);学习保留3-6个月。只有先前的模拟经验与学习变化的减少显着相关(r=-0.30,P<0.05)。
    结论:减少了先前的模拟训练,增加了实践年限,但不是自己的年龄,是低基线危机资源管理绩效的重要预测因子。基于模拟的教育导致危机资源管理学习,可以保留3-6个月,无论年龄或年龄在实践中。
    BACKGROUND: Physiological changes associated with ageing could negatively impact the crisis resource management skills of acute care physicians. This study was designed to determine whether physician age impacts crisis resource management skills, and crisis resource management skills learning and retention using full-body manikin simulation training in acute care physicians.
    METHODS: Acute care physicians at two Canadian universities participated in three 8-min simulated crisis (pulseless electrical activity) scenarios. An initial crisis scenario (pre-test) was followed by debriefing with a trained facilitator and a second crisis scenario (immediate post-test). Participants returned for a third crisis scenario 3-6 months later (retention post-test).
    RESULTS: For the 48 participants included in the final analysis, age negatively correlated with baseline Global Rating Scale (GRS; r=-0.30, P<0.05) and technical checklist scores (r=-0.44, P<0.01). However, only years in practice and prior simulation experience, but not age, were significant in a subsequent stepwise regression analysis. Learning from simulation-based education was shown with a mean difference in scores from pre-test to immediate post-test of 2.28 for GRS score (P<0.001) and 1.69 for technical checklist correct score (P<0.001); learning was retained for 3-6 months. Only prior simulation experience was significantly correlated with a decreased change in learning (r=-0.30, P<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: A reduced amount of prior simulation training and increased years in practice, but not age on its own, were significant predictors of low baseline crisis resource management performance. Simulation-based education leads to crisis resource management learning that is well retained for 3-6 months, regardless of age or years in practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:超声(US)诊断急性胆囊炎(AC)的最新概述仍然缺乏。进行了系统评价,以评估US对AC的诊断性能。
    方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。我们精心筛选了MEDLINE的文章,Embase,还有Cochrane图书馆,从成立到2023年8月。我们采用了结合关键词“床边美国”的搜索策略,带有“AC”的“紧急美国”或“即时美国”。两名审稿人独立筛选了检索到的文章的标题和摘要,以确定合适的研究。纳入标准包括调查US对AC的诊断性能的文章。有关诊断性能的数据,超声波检查者,和超声检查结果,包括胆结石的存在,胆囊(GB)壁厚,超GB流体,或者超声波检查墨菲标志被提取出来,并进行了荟萃分析。病例报告,社论,和评论文章被排除在外,以及针对非结石性胆囊炎的研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)工具评估研究质量。
    结果:纳入40项研究,8,652例患者。大多数研究具有较低的偏倚风险和适用性问题。美国的合并敏感性为71%(95%CI,69-72%),特异性为85%(95%CI,84-86%),诊断AC的准确度为0.83(95%CI,0.82-0.83)。急诊医师(EP)的合并敏感性和特异性分别为71%(95%CI,67-74%)和92%(95%CI,90-93%),79%(95%CI,71-85%)和76%(95%CI,69-81%)由外科医生执行,放射科医生执行的68%(95%CI66-71%)和87%(95%CI,86-88%),分别。三组间差异无统计学意义。
    结论:US是诊断AC的良好影像学方法。EP执行的US具有与放射科医师执行的US相似的诊断性能。需要进一步的调查来调查美国对加快管理过程和改善以患者为中心的结果的影响。
    An updated overview of ultrasound (US) for diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (AC) remains lacking. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of US for AC.
    A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We meticulously screened articles from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, spanning from inception to August 2023. We employed the search strategy combining the keywords \"bedside US\", \"emergency US\" or \"point-of-care US\" with \"AC\". Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles to identify suitable studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed articles investigating the diagnostic performance of US for AC. Data regarding diagnostic performance, sonographers, and sonographic findings including the presence of gallstone, gallbladder (GB) wall thickness, peri-GB fluid, or sonographic Murphy sign were extracted, and a meta-analysis was executed. Case reports, editorials, and review articles were excluded, as well as studies focused on acalculous cholecystitis. The study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
    Forty studies with 8,652 patients were included. The majority of studies had a low risk of bias and applicability concerns. US had a pooled sensitivity of 71% (95% CI, 69-72%), a specificity of 85% (95% CI, 84-86%), and an accuracy of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.82-0.83) for the diagnosis of AC. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 71% (95% CI, 67-74%) and 92% (95% CI, 90-93%) performed by emergency physicians (EPs), 79% (95% CI, 71-85%) and 76% (95% CI, 69-81%) performed by surgeons, and 68% (95% CI 66-71%) and 87% (95% CI, 86-88%) performed by radiologists, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups.
    US is a good imaging modality for the diagnosis of AC. EP-performed US has a similar diagnostic performance to radiologist-performed US. Further investigations would be needed to investigate the impact of US on expediting the management process and improving patient-centered outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    如何引用这篇文章:NasaP,MajeedNA.急诊医师的决策疲劳:现实还是神话。印度JCritCareMed2023;27(9):609-610。
    How to cite this article: Nasa P, Majeed NA. Decision Fatigue among Emergency Physicians: Reality or Myth. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(9):609-610.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号