Uterine rupture is a rare but critical obstetric complication that demands a swift and decisive intervention to ensure the well-being of the mother and fetus. We present a case report detailing the surgical management of a bizarre uterine rupture in a multigravida female with two previous vaginal deliveries and a previously unscarred uterus. This case highlights the challenges of treating and diagnosing, particularly in the Indian setting, an antenatally unregistered patient with rare obstetrical complications. Emphasizing the clinical challenges faced and the multidisciplinary approach employed for optimal outcomes, this report underscores the importance of a high degree of suspicion, early diagnosis, timely intervention, and comprehensive intraoperative and postoperative care in addressing this rare obstetric catastrophic event. This article\'s main focus is multicentric, aiming to showcase the obstacles to maintaining low maternal mortality and morbidity, the presence of inadequate awareness in society, and the importance of multimodal treatment and planning.

Introduction Emergency obstetric hysterectomy (EOH) is a lifesaving procedure that plays a critical role in managing life-threatening obstetric emergencies. In our study, we sought to evaluate the incidence, indications, risk factors and maternal as well as fetal outcomes associated with EOH. Also, the study was conducted to review the operative experiences and trend of emergency hysterectomies done for various indications over a period of two years in our tertiary care center. Methods The present hospital-based retrospective analytical study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, L.L.R.M. Medical College, Meerut, between March 2021 to February 2023. All women who delivered within or outside the institute undergoing obstetric hysterectomy were included in our study. Out of a total of 7743 deliveries, 46 EOH cases were found. The data of these 46 EOH deliveries were collected and analyzed after issuing ethical clearance by the Institutional Ethical Committee of L.L.R.M. Medical College, Meerut. Results During the two-year study period, 46 EOH were performed out of 7743 deliveries making an incidence of 0.504 EOH per 100 deliveries. Most of the cases were of multiparous women in the age group of 25 to 35 years (78%). The majority, 43.5% cases belonged to placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), followed by ruptured uterus (30.5%) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (26%). The most frequent preoperative complication seen in EOH was severe anemia (29, 63%). Intraoperative bladder injury was seen in four cases, along with one case of ureteric injury. Postoperatively, cases were shown to have acute hemorrhagic shock (54.3%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), septicemia, wound infection, acute renal failure (ARF), hepatic encephalopathy and psychosis. Four maternal mortalities were observed in our study. Conclusion EOH is a necessary operative procedure in many obstetric emergencies including PAS and PPH. Despite intra-operative risk and possible postoperative complications, it remains a potentially life-saving procedure. Thus various surgeries for PAS and PPH should be the integral part of postgraduate trainings to save the lives of mothers and to reduce the maternal mortality.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Obstetric Hysterectomy (EOH) is removal of the uterus due to life threatening conditions within the puerperium. This life saving intervention is associated with life threatening complications. In our setting, little is known on EOH.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, indications and outcomes of emergency obstetric hysterectomy while comparing both postpartum hysterectomy and caesarean hysterectomy.
METHODS: A 5-year hospital-based retrospective cohort study involving medical records of patients who underwent emergency obstetric hysterectomies between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2019, was carried out at the Bafoussam Regional Hospital (BRH) from 1st February 2020 to 30th April 2020. Cases were classified as caesarean hysterectomy (CH) or postpartum hysterectomy (PH). Epidemiological data, indications, and complications of EOH were collected and analyzed in EPI-INFO 7.2.2.1. The chi-squared test was used to compare the two groups, and bivariate analysis was used to identify indicators of adverse outcomes of EOH. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: There were 30 cases of emergency obstetric hysterectomy (24 caesarean hysterectomies and 6 postpartum hysterectomies), giving a prevalence rate of 3.75 per 1000 deliveries. The most common indication for CH, was intractable postpartum haemorrhage and uterine rupture (33.33% each), while abnormal placentation (50%) was commonly indicated for PH. Anaemia (both groups) (p = 0.013) and sepsis (PH group only, 33.33%) (p = 0.03) were the most statistically significant complications of EOH respectively. Absence of blood transfusion prior to surgery (p = 0.013) and prolonged surgery lasting 2 or more hours (p = 0.04), were significantly associated with a negative clinical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of EOH is high. There were no differences in the sociodemographic profile, risk factors and indications of both groups. PH group was more likely to develop sepsis as complication. Lack of blood transfusion prior to surgery and prolonged surgeries were significantly associated to complication. Meticulous care and timely recognition of negative prognostic factors of delivery as well as those of EOH will help improve maternal outcomes of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, etiology and complications of emergency obstetric hysterectomy (EOH) at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study which was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Unit II, Civil Hospital Karachi from March 2015 to March 2017. All patients undergoing EOH were included in the study. Data was collected from medical files and labor room registers in accordance with ethical guidelines. Information included demographic characteristics, reasons for EOH, procedure associated morbidity and mortality. Data was recorded on a predesigned pro forma and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 18.0.
RESULTS: Out of 7,968 deliveries in two years, 32 patients under went EOH, (prevalence 4.01 per 1,000 deliveries). The mean age was 30.0 ± 5.2 years. Most women (75%) were multipara. The main mode of delivery was caesarean section (80%), mostly done as an emergency procedure (81%). In 10(30%) patients EOH was performed for uncontrollable hemorrhage due to uterine atony, followed by a morbidly adherent placenta (28%). Morbidity included disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in four patients(19%) and three patients underwent repeat laparotomy for uncontrollable hemorrhage. There were three maternal deaths, giving a case-fatality index of 9.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Uterine atony and morbidly adherent placenta were the main reasons for emergency obstetric hysterectomy (EOH) in our set up.

BACKGROUND: Emergency obstetric hysterectomy (EOH) is a life-saving procedure which is often performed to treat some obstetric complications, as a last resort, to prevent maternal mortality.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the rate, indications, and complications of the EOH procedure at Usmanu Danfodito University Teaching Hospital (UDUTH), Sokoto.
METHODS: This retrospective study involved all the patients who had EOH at UDUTH, Sokoto, Nigeria, between January 2005 and December 2010. The case records of these patients were retrieved from the medical record library and information relating to age, parity, booking status, indications, type of hysterectomy, cadre of the surgeon, type of anesthesia, and complications of the procedure were extracted. The data were processed via SPSS version 11.5 and the χ(2) test was used to analyze some of the results with the confidence limit set at 95%.
RESULTS: During the 6-year period, 83 EOH were performed out of 16,249 deliveries giving the rate of the former as 0.51%, i.e. 1 in 196 deliveries. However, the case records of only 74 patients (82.9%) were available for the study. The rate of EOH increased with advancing maternal age and increasing parity. The majority of the patients (89.2%) were unbooked for antenatal care, and the rate of the procedure among these patients (1.82%) was significantly higher than 0.07% observed amongst booked subjects (P<0.001). The main indication for the procedure was ruptured uterus (93.2%) and the majority of the patients (95.9%) had subtotal hysterectomy. Anemia (66.2%), excessive hemorrhage (35.5%), septicemia (18.9%), and wound infection (16.2%) were the leading complications. Excessive hemorrhage was significantly higher in the procedure performed by the senior registrars (51.2%) compared to those undertaken by consultants (16.2%); P=0.03. The case fatality rate of the EOH procedure was 12.1%. However, the case fatality rates in the procedure performed by consultants and senior registrars were 6.5% and 16.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of EOH in the centre is relatively high and ruptured uterus is responsible for the majority of the procedure. Prevention of prolonged obstructed labor, and therefore uterine rupture, through antenatal care and supervision of labor will reduce the rate of EOH whereas performance of the procedure by the most experienced surgeon will minimize the maternal morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review incidence, indications, complications, and the anesthetic management of emergency obstetric hysterectomies.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the cases of emergency obstetric hysterectomies performed at the Woman\'s Hospital over a 3 year period between January 2008 and December 2010. The indication for surgery, anesthetic management, operating time, estimated blood loss, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values, need for blood transfusion, and perioperative complications were obtained.
RESULTS: During the study period there were 46 emergency obstetric hysterectomies for 20147 deliveries, giving an incidence of 2.28/1000 deliveries. The number of emergency hysterectomies was significantly higher with the cesarean deliveries than with the vaginal deliveries. The most common indication for emergency obstetric hysterectomy was placenta accreta. Postoperatively, Dissemimated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) was the most common complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal placenta has been an main indication of emergency hysterectomy. Anesthesiologists should be eligible to aware of high risk of emergency hysterectomy and deal with massive hemorrhage.