electrical storm

电风暴
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:导管消融(CA)是室性心动过速和适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗患者的公认治疗方法。方法:我们招募了57名接受CA治疗的ICD连续携带者进行电风暴(ES)。我们的目的是调查临床上的差异,设备相关,在ES之前有适当ICD干预史的患者与没有适当ICD干预史的患者的电解剖特征.主要终点是由任何原因导致的死亡和持续性室性心动过速复发组成的复合终点,心室纤颤,适当的ICD治疗,或ES。结果:在39个月的中位随访中,28例患者(49%)达到主要终点。以前接受ICD干预的患者在电解剖标测时,晚期电位的患病率更高,单极低压区域更大。符合主要终点的患者在ES事件之前ATP/休克发作的患病率较高。在Cox回归分析中,非缺血性扩张型心肌病(NIDCM),QRS持续时间,ES之前的ATP和/或休克与心律失常复发和/或死亡相关。在多变量分析中,NIDCM和先前的休克与心律失常复发和/或死亡有关。结论:当由于ES而需要CA时,复发ICD治疗的病史预示着较差的结果。尽管需要更多的研究来明确解决这个问题,我们的数据支持早期转诊ES的CA.
    Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment in patients with ventricular tachycardia and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Methods: We enrolled 57 consecutive carriers of ICD undergoing CA for electrical storm (ES). Our aim was to investigate differences in clinical, device-related, and electroanatomic features among patients who had history of appropriate ICD interventions before the ES compared to those who had not. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause and recurrences of sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation, appropriate ICD therapy, or ES. Results: During a median follow up of 39 months, 28 patients (49%) met the primary endpoint. Those with previous ICD interventions had a higher prevalence of late potentials and a greater unipolar low-voltage area at electroanatomic mapping. Patients who met the primary endpoint had a higher prevalence of ATP/shock episodes preceding the ES event. At Cox regression analysis, non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM), QRS duration, and previous ATP and/or shock before the ES were associated with arrhythmic recurrences and/or death. At multivariate analysis, NIDCM and previous shock were associated with arrhythmic recurrences and/or death. Conclusions: A history of recurrent ICD therapies predicts worse outcomes when CA is needed because of ES. Although more studies are needed to definitively address this question, our data speak in support of an early referral for CA of ES.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结构性心脏病或功能性电异常可导致电风暴。
    方法:我们介绍了一个患有电风暴的小男孩,他没有心脏危险因素,有心脏猝死的阳性家族史。逐步诊断方法在确定先前已知的原因作为电风暴的起源方面无效。然而,全外显子组测序(使用下一代Illumina测序)揭示了GJB2中的突变(NM_004004:外显子2:c。G71A:p.W24X)基因。
    结论:GJB2基因突变,形成连接蛋白26的蛋白质,肌细胞间间隙连接复合体的插入盘的重要组成部分,导致异常的细胞电导,and,最终,心室风暴。全身麻醉被用来控制风暴,心内起搏在阻止随后的VT风暴方面取得了丰硕的成果。
    BACKGROUND: A structural heart disease or functional electrical abnormalities can cause an electrical storm.
    METHODS: We present a young boy with an electrical storm who had no cardiac risk factors and a positive family history of sudden cardiac death. The stepwise diagnostic approach was ineffective in determining previously known causes as the origin of the electrical storm. However, whole-exome sequencing (with Next Generation Illumina Sequencing) revealed a mutation in the GJB2 (NM_004004:exon2:c.G71A:p.W24X) gene.
    CONCLUSIONS: A mutation in the GJB2 gene, which forms the connexin 26 protein, a crucial component of the myocytes\' intercalated disc of gap junction complex between the myocytes, results in an abnormal electrical cell-by-cell conductance, and, eventually, ventricular storm. General anesthesia was used to control the storm, and intracardiac pacing was fruitful in ceasing the subsequent VT storms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:电风暴(电子风暴),定义为短时间内多次致命的室性心律失常,对接受植入式心律转复除颤器或心脏再同步除颤器(ICD/CRT-D)治疗的患者的预后产生负面影响.然而,反复E风暴的预后影响尚未得到很好的阐明。
    结果:我们使用来自日本风暴研究的1,274名参与者的数据,分析了E风暴复发与死亡率之间的关联。一项在日本48个ICD/CRT-D中心进行的前瞻性观察性研究.使用平均累积函数(MCF)评估患者特征的E风暴复发差异,这是每位患者的累计电子风暴发作次数作为时间的函数。患有多次E风暴的患者的死亡风险比没有E风暴的患者高3.39倍(95%置信区间1.82-6.28;P<0.01)。然而,单一E风暴患者和无E风暴患者的死亡风险无显著差异.与接受二级预防ICD/CRT-D的患者相比,接受一级预防ICD/CRT-D的患者的MCF曲线上升较慢。然而,当只分析电子风暴患者时,MCF曲线显示两组的运动轨迹具有可比性.
    结论:电子风暴复发可能对预后产生负面影响。一旦接受一级预防的患者经历了电子风暴发作,与接受二级预防的患者相比,他们面临类似的后续E风暴复发风险.
    BACKGROUND: Electrical storms (E-storms), defined as multiple fatal ventricular arrhythmias over a short period, negatively affect the prognosis of patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D). However, the prognostic impact of recurrent E-storms has not been well elucidated.
    RESULTS: We analyzed the association between E-storm recurrences and mortality using data from 1,274 participants in the Nippon Storm Study, a prospective observational study conducted at 48 ICD/CRT-D centers in Japan. Differences in E-storm recurrences by patient characteristics were evaluated using the mean cumulative function (MCF), which is the cumulative number of E-storm episodes per patient as a function of time. Patients with multiple E-storms had a 3.39-fold higher mortality risk than those without E-storms (95% confidence interval 1.82-6.28; P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between patients with a single E-storm and those without E-storms. The MCF curve exhibited a slower ascent in patients who received primary prevention ICD/CRT-D than in those who received secondary prevention ICD/CRT-D. However, when analyzing only patients with E-storms, the MCF curves demonstrated comparable trajectories in both groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: E-storm recurrences may have a negative impact on prognosis. Once patients with primary prevention experience an E-storm episode, they face a similar risk of subsequent recurrent E-storms as patients with secondary prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:电风暴(ES)是一种威胁生命的疾病,与大量早期和亚急性死亡率相关。导管消融(CA)是一种公认的ES疗法。然而,关于CA对ES患者短期和中期生存率影响的数据尚不清楚.
    目的:这项多中心研究旨在调查ES的CA对生存结局的影响,同时考虑与治疗选择相关的关键患者特征。
    方法:对4个三级中心的780例连续住院ES患者进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。根据与使用CA或单独药物治疗相关的主要特征进行PSM(1:1),产生2组288例患者。
    结果:PSM后,接受CA的患者(n=288)和仅接受药物治疗的患者(n=288)在主要人口统计学特征上没有任何显着差异。ES介绍,和管理。与单纯的药物治疗相比,CA与1年时ES复发率显著降低相关(5%vs26%;P<0.001)。同样,CA与出院后较高的1年生存率(91%vs81%;P<0.001)和3年生存率(78%vs71%;P=0.017)相关。在亚组分析中,70岁以上患者的消融治疗效果保持一致(HR:0.39;95%CI:0.24-0.66),在LVEF<35%的患者中具有实质性疗效(HR:0.39;95%CI:0.27-0.59)。
    结论:在倾向匹配分析中,这项大型研究表明,与药物治疗相比,基于CA的ES患者管理与死亡率降低相关。尤其是低射血分数的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition, associated with substantial early and subacute mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established therapy for ES. However, data regarding the impact of CA on the short-term and midterm survival of patients admitted for ES remain unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: This multicenter study aimed to investigate the impact of CA of ES on survival outcomes, while accounting for key patient characteristics associated with treatment selection.
    METHODS: A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed on 780 consecutive patients admitted for ES in 4 tertiary centers. PSM (1:1) based on the main characteristics associated with the use of CA or medical therapy alone was performed, resulting in 2 groups of 288 patients.
    RESULTS: After PSM, patients who underwent CA (n = 288) and those treated with medical therapy alone (n = 288) did not present any significant differences in the main demographic characteristics, ES presentation, and management. Compared with medical therapy alone, CA was associated with a significantly lower rate of ES recurrence at 1 year (5% vs 26%; P < 0.001). Similarly, CA was associated with a higher 1-year (91% vs 81%; P < 0.001) and 3-year (78% vs 71%; P = 0.017) survival after discharge. In subgroup analyses, effect of ablation therapy remained consistent in patients older than 70 years of age (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.66), with substantial efficacy in patients with a LVEF <35% (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.27-0.59).
    CONCLUSIONS: In propensity-matched analyses, this large study shows that CA-based management of patients admitted for ES is associated with a reduction in mortality compared with medical treatment, particularly in patients with a low ejection fraction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在等待心脏移植(HT)和导管消融(CA)的患者中,电风暴(ES)是最可怕的事件之一,被证明可有效减轻心律失常负担。然而,在这一特定人群中CA适用性的选择标准以前从未得到解决.我们回顾性招募了36例患者(平均年龄51±8岁;83%的男性),等待HT转诊至我们部门,以治疗抗心律失常药物和经皮星状神经节阻滞的ES。根据特定标准,包括容量超负荷和血流动力学代偿失调继发的心律失常负担增加,20例患者被判定为适合VT消融;由于心肌病的病因,预期的CA结局有利,不需要冠状动脉血运重建和手术的技术可行性。讨论了将PAINESD评分与其他临床和血液动力学参数相结合的机械循环支持(MCS)的抢先使用。急性手术成功率占病例的85%,仅有两种主要并发症。CA组报告CA适宜性评估后住院时间较短(56±17vs.131±64天,p=.004)。此外,平均随访703±145天,该组显示室性心律失常(VA)复发减少,导致植入式心律转复除颤器休克(4vs.8,p=.051),并以较低的紧急程度(0与6名患者需要进行UNOS1状态升级)。分别,CA组1例患者和保守组2例患者死亡(p=.839).在后续行动结束时,8例患者接受了心脏移植(p=.964),4例患者接受了左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入(p=.440)。这项初步研究应该是进一步研究探索VACA作为HT可能的桥接疗法的证据。
    Electrical storm (ES) is among the most fearsome events in patients in waiting list for heart transplantation (HT) and catheter ablation (CA) demonstrated to be effective in reduce the arrhythmic burden. However, selection criteria for CA suitability in this specific population have never been addressed before. We retrospectively enrolled 36 patients (mean age 51 ± 8 years; 83% men) waiting HT referred to our department for ES resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs and percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade. Twenty patients were judged suitable for VT ablation according to specific criteria including absence of increased arrhythmic burden secondary to volume overload and hemodynamic decompensation; expected CA outcome favorable due to etiology of the cardiomyopathy, no need for coronary revascularization and technical feasibility of the procedure. The pre-emptive use of mechanical circulatory supports (MCS) were discussed integrating the PAINESD score with additional clinical and hemodynamic parameters. Acute procedural success was accounted in 85% of cases with only two major complications. The CA group reported lower length of in-hospital stay after CA suitability evaluation (56 ± 17 vs. 131 ± 64 days, p = .004). Furthermore, at a mean follow-up of 703 ± 145 days, this group showed reduction of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) recurrence leading to implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock (4 vs. 8, p = .051) and underwent HT with a lower level of urgency (0 vs. 6 patients needed for UNOS1 status upgrade). Respectively, one patient of the CA group and two patients of the conservative group died (p = .839). At the end of follow-up, eight patients underwent heart transplantation (p = .964) while four patients underwent Left Ventricular Assist device (LVAD) implantation (p = .440). This pilot study should be a proof for further studies exploring CA of VAs as a possible bridge therapy to HT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)并发难治性室颤(VF)与不良预后相关。β-1受体选择性阻断可能克服难治性VF并提高生存率。该试验研究了院前兰地洛尔在OHCA和难治性VF中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:在本随机分组中,双盲,安慰剂对照试点试验,OHCA和复发性或难治性VF患者(至少3次除颤尝试和最后一次节律可电击),用肾上腺素和胺碘酮预处理,被分配接受兰地洛尔或安慰剂的附加治疗。兰地洛尔以20mg推注的形式给予。主要疗效结果是从试验药物输注到持续恢复自主循环(ROSC)的时间。安全性结果包括心动过缓和心搏停止的发作。
    结果:共纳入36例患者,将19个分配给兰地洛尔组,将17个分配给安慰剂组。从试验药物输注到持续ROSC的时间在治疗组之间相似(39分钟[兰地洛尔]对41分钟[安慰剂])。与安慰剂组相比,兰地洛尔组的持续ROSC在数值上较低(7例患者[36.8%]与11例患者[64.7%],分别)。与安慰剂组相比,兰地洛尔组的试验药物输注后15分钟内的心搏停止发生率明显更高(7例患者[36.8%]和0例患者[0.0%],分别)。
    结论:在接受肾上腺素和胺碘酮预处理的OHCA和难治性VF患者中,与安慰剂相比,连续推注兰地洛尔20mg并没有缩短维持ROSC的时间.兰地洛尔可能与心动过缓和心搏停止有关。
    BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) complicated by refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) is associated with poor outcome. Beta-1-receptor selective blockade might overcome refractory VF and improve survival. This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of prehospital landiolol in OHCA and refractory VF.
    METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial, patients with OHCA and recurrent or refractory VF (at least 3 defibrillation attempts and last rhythm shockable), pretreated with epinephrine and amiodarone, were allocated to receive add-on treatment with landiolol or placebo. Landiolol was given as a 20 mg bolus infusion. The primary efficacy outcome was time from trial drug infusion to sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Safety outcomes included the onset of bradycardia and asystole.
    RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled, 19 were allocated to the landiolol group and 17 to the placebo group. Time from trial drug infusion to sustained ROSC was similar between treatment groups (39 min [landiolol] versus 41 min [placebo]). Sustained ROSC was numerically lower in the landiolol group compared with the placebo group (7 patients [36.8%] versus 11 patients [64.7%], respectively). Asystole within 15 min of trial drug infusion occurred significantly more often in the landiolol group than in the placebo group (7 patients [36.8%] and 0 patients [0.0%], respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with OHCA and refractory VF who are pretreated with epinephrine and amiodarone, add-on bolus infusion of landiolol 20 mg did not lead to a shorter time to sustained ROSC compared with placebo. Landiolol might be associated with bradycardia and asystole.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    左心室(LV)峰顶性心律失常占LV心律失常的14%。LV峰顶性心律失常的消融具有挑战性,正如射频(RF)导管消融失败频繁的事实所证明的那样。已提出逆行冠状静脉乙醇输注作为消融LV峰顶性心律失常的替代方法。
    一名患有LaminA/C心肌病的47岁男子接受了多形性室性心动过速(VT)风暴的消融治疗,具有与LV峰顶起源兼容的优势形态。他首先接受了心内和心外膜射频联合消融,并消除了三个临床相关的VT。然而,由于冠状血管和膈神经的接近,主导室性心动过速无法消融,并保持可诱导.因此,我们进行了一项紧急抢救重做手术,包括逆行冠状静脉乙醇消融术.基于最佳节奏匹配和早熟,第一个间隔,肺后分支和第一个对角分支注入乙醇,立即停止心动过速和不可诱导性。停用抗心律失常药物,而指南指导的心力衰竭药物治疗仍在继续.无并发症发生。三个月后,病人没有任何心律失常。
    LV峰顶病的消融具有挑战性,特别是在电风暴或结构性心脏病患者的情况下。在这种情况下,逆行冠状静脉乙醇输注的抢救消融是一种有吸引力的替代消融方式。
    UNASSIGNED: Left ventricular (LV) summit arrhythmias account for up to 14% of LV arrhythmias. The ablation of LV summit arrhythmias is challenging, as testified by the fact that radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation failure is frequent. Retrograde coronary venous ethanol infusion has been proposed as an alternative approach for the ablation of LV summit arrhythmias.
    UNASSIGNED: A 47-year-old man with Lamin A/C cardiomyopathy was referred for the ablation of a pleiomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm, with dominant morphology compatible with LV summit origin. He first received a combined endo- and epicardial RF ablation with the elimination of three clinically relevant VTs. However, the dominant VT could not be ablated due to the proximity of the coronary vasculature and phrenic nerve and remained inducible. Accordingly, an urgent rescue redo procedure consisting of retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation was performed. Based on the best pace-match and precocity, the first septal, retro-pulmonary branch and the first diagonal branch were infused with ethanol with immediate cessation of the tachycardia and non-inducibility. Anti-arrhythmic drugs were withdrawn, while guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure was continued. No complications occurred. After 3 months, the patient remained free from any arrythmias.
    UNASSIGNED: Ablation of LV summit arrythmias is challenging, especially in the context of an electrical storm or in patients with structural heart disease. In such a situation, rescue ablation with retrograde coronary venous ethanol infusion represents an attractive alternative ablation modality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号