RNA editing, a unique post-transcriptional modification, is observed in trypanosomatid parasites as a crucial procedure for the maturation of mitochondrial mRNAs. The editosome protein complex, involving multiple protein components, plays a key role in this process. In Trypanosoma brucei, a putative Z-DNA binding protein known as RBP7910 is associated with the editosome. However, the specific Z-DNA/Z-RNA binding activity and the interacting interface of RBP7910 have yet to be determined. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the binding behavior of RBP7910 with different potential ligands using microscale thermophoresis (MST). Additionally, we generated a 3D model of the protein, revealing potential Z-α and Z-β nucleic acid-binding domains of RBP7910. RBP7910 belongs to the winged-helix-turn-helix (HTH) superfamily of proteins with an α1α2α3β1β2 topology. Finally, using docking techniques, potential interacting surface regions of RBP7910 with notable oligonucleotide ligands were identified. Our findings indicate that RBP7910 exhibits a notable affinity for (CG)n Z-DNA, both in single-stranded and double-stranded forms. Moreover, we observed a broader interacting interface across its Z-α domain when bound to Z-DNA/Z-RNA compared to when bound to non-Z-form nucleic acid ligands.

Identifying the PPR-E+-NUWA-DYW2 editosome improves our understanding of the C-to-U RNA editing in plant organelles. However, the mechanism of RNA editing remains to be elucidated. Here, we report that GLUTAMINE-RICH PROTEIN23 (GRP23), a previously identified nuclear transcription regulator, plays an essential role in mitochondrial RNA editing through interacting with MORF (multiple organellar RNA-editing factor) proteins and atypical DYW-type pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins. GRP23 is targeted to mitochondria, plastids, and nuclei. Analysis of the grp23 mutants rescued by embryo-specific complementation shows decreased editing efficiency at 352 sites in mitochondria and 6 sites in plastids, with a predominant specificity for sites edited by the PPR-E and PPR-DYW proteins. GRP23 interacts with atypical PPR-DYW proteins (MEF8, MEF8S, DYW2, and DYW4) and MORF proteins (MORF1 and MORF8), whereas the four PPR-DYWs interact with the two MORFs. These interactions may increase the stability of the GRP23-MORF-atypical PPR-DYW complex. Furthermore, analysis of mef8N△64aamef8s double mutants shows that MEF8/MEF8S are required for the editing of the PPR-E protein-targeted sites in mitochondria. GRP23 could enhance the interaction between PPR-E and MEF8/MEF8S and form a homodimer or heterodimer with NUWA. Genetic complementation analysis shows that the C-terminal domains of GRP23 and NUWA possess a similar function, probably in the interaction with the MORFs. NUWA also interacts with atypical PPR-DYWs in yeast. Both GRP23 and NUWA interact with the atypical PPR-DYWs, suggesting that the PPR-E proteins recruit MEF8/MEF8S, whereas the PPR-E+ proteins specifically recruit DYW2 as the trans deaminase, and then GRP23, NUWA, and MORFs facilitate and/or stabilize the E or E+-type editosome formation.

Gene expression within the mitochondria of African trypanosomes and other protozoan organisms relies on a nucleotide-specific RNA-editing reaction. In the process exclusively uridine (U)-nucleotides are site-specifically inserted into and deleted from sequence-deficient primary transcripts to convert them into translatable mRNAs. The reaction is catalyzed by a 0.8 MDa multiprotein complex termed the editosome. Here we describe an improved in vitro test to quantitatively explore the catalytic activity of the editosome. The assay uses synthetic, fluorophore-derivatized oligoribonucleotides as editing substrates, which enable the automated electrophoretic separation of the reaction products by capillary electrophoresis (CE) coupled to laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) detection systems. The assay is robust, it requires only nanogram amounts of materials and by using multicapillary CE/LIF-instruments it can be executed in a highly parallel layout. Further improvements include the usage of phosphorothioate-modified and thus RNase-resistant substrate RNAs as well as multiplex-type fluorophore labeling strategies to monitor the U-insertion and U-deletion reaction simultaneously. The assay is useful for investigating the mechanism and enzymology of the editosome. However, it can also be executed in high-throughput to screen for RNA editing-specific inhibitors. Graphic abstract: Characteristics of the fluorescence-based in vitro U-insertion/U-deletion RNA-editing (FIDE) assay.

Trypanosome U-insertion/deletion RNA editing in mitochondrial mRNAs involves guide RNAs (gRNAs) and the auxiliary RNA editing substrate binding complex (RESC) and RNA editing helicase 2 complex (REH2C). RESC and REH2C stably copurify with editing mRNAs but the functional interplay between these complexes remains unclear. Most steady-state mRNAs are partially edited and include misedited \"junction\" regions that match neither pre-mRNA nor fully edited transcripts. Editing specificity is central to mitochondrial RNA maturation and function, but its basic control mechanisms remain unclear. Here we applied a novel nucleotide-resolution RNA-seq approach to examine ribosomal protein subunit 12 (RPS12) and ATPase subunit 6 (A6) mRNA transcripts. We directly compared transcripts associated with RESC and REH2C to those found in total mitochondrial RNA. RESC-associated transcripts exhibited site-preferential enrichments in total and accurate edits. REH2C loss-of-function induced similar substrate-specific and site-specific editing effects in total and RESC-associated RNA. It decreased total editing primarily at RPS12 5\' positions but increased total editing at examined A6 3\' positions. REH2C loss-of-function caused site-preferential loss of accurate editing in both transcripts. However, changes in total or accurate edits did not necessarily involve common sites. A few 5\' nucleotides of the initiating gRNA (gRNA-1) directed accurate editing in both transcripts. However, in RPS12, two conserved 3\'-terminal adenines in gRNA-1 could direct a noncanonical 2U-insertion that causes major pausing in 3\'-5\' progression. In A6, a noncanonical sequence element that depends on REH2C in a region normally targeted by the 3\' half of gRNA-1 may hinder early editing progression. Overall, we defined transcript-specific effects of REH2C loss.

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins were identified as site-specific recognition factors for RNA editing in plant mitochondria and plastids. In this study, we characterized maize (Zea mays) kernel mutant defective kernel 53 (dek53), which has an embryo lethal and collapsed endosperm phenotype. Dek53 encodes an E-subgroup PPR protein, which possesses a short PLS repeat region of only seven repeats. Subcellular localization analysis indicated that DEK53 is localized in the mitochondrion. Strand- and transcript-specific RNA-seq analysis showed that the dek53 mutation affected C-to-U RNA editing at more than 60 mitochondrial C targets. Biochemical analysis of mitochondrial protein complexes revealed a significant reduction in the assembly of mitochondrial complex III in dek53. Transmission electron microscopic examination showed severe morphological defects of mitochondria in dek53 endosperm cells. In addition, yeast two-hybrid and luciferase complementation imaging assays indicated that DEK53 can interact with the mitochondrion-targeted non-PPR RNA editing factor ZmMORF1, suggesting that DEK53 might be a functional component of the organellar RNA editosome.

Mitochondrial pre-mRNAs in African trypanosomes adopt intricately folded, highly stable 2D and 3D structures. The RNA molecules are substrates of a U-nucleotide-specific insertion/deletion-type RNA editing reaction, which is catalyzed by a 0.8 MDa protein complex known as the editosome. RNA binding to the editosome is followed by a chaperone-mediated RNA remodeling reaction. The reaction increases the dynamic of specifically U-nucleotides to lower their base-pairing probability and as a consequence generates a simplified RNA folding landscape that is critical for the progression of the editing reaction cycle. Here we describe a chemical mapping method to quantitatively monitor the chaperone-driven structural changes of pre-edited mRNAs upon editosome binding. The method is known as selective 2\'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE). SHAPE is based on the differential electrophilic modification of ribose 2\'-hydroxyl groups in structurally constraint (double-stranded) versus structurally unconstrained (single-stranded) nucleotides. Electrophilic anhydrides such as 1-methyl-7-nitroisatoic anhydride are used as probing reagents, and the ribose 2\'-modified nucleotides are mapped as abortive cDNA synthesis products. As a result, SHAPE allows the identification of all single-stranded and base-paired regions in a given RNA, and the data are used to compute experimentally derived RNA 2D structures. A side-by-side comparison of the RNA 2D folds in the pre- and post-chaperone states finally maps the chaperone-induced dynamic of the different pre-mRNAs with single-nucleotide resolution.

RNA editing in chloroplasts and mitochondria is performed by hypothetical editosomes. The MORF family proteins are essential components of these editosomes. In Arabidopsis, MORF2 and MORF9 are involved in the editing of most sites in chloroplasts. In this work, we performed immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry assays of transgenic lines expressing MORF2-4xMYC and MORF9-4xMYC to identify interacting proteins. We found that MORF2 and MORF9 are present in the same complex. Blue-Native PAGE analysis of chloroplast protein complexes also revealed that both MORF2 and MORF9 are part of a complex of approximately 140 kDa, suggesting the existence of tight MORF2-MORF9 interaction in chloroplasts. The editing of ndhD-1 (ndhD-C2) site was reported to be blocked in both morf2 and morf9. RNA immunoprecipitation assays showed that MORF2 and MORF9 are tightly associated with the editing site of ndhD-1. However, in an RNA-EMSA assay MORF2 and MORF9 could not directly bind to transcripts harboring the editing site of ndhD-1. Taken together, these results indicate that the MORF2-MORF9 heterodimer is the core members of editosomes in chloroplasts, while they are not responsible for RNA editing site recognition.

RNA editing causes massive remodeling of the mitochondrial mRNA transcriptome in trypanosomes and related kinetoplastid protozoa. This type of editing involves the specific insertion or deletion of uridylates (U) directed by small noncoding guide RNAs (gRNAs). Because U-insertion exceeds U-deletion by a factor of 10, editing increases the nascent mRNA size by up to 55%. In Trypanosoma brucei, the editing apparatus uses ~40 proteins and >1,200 gRNAs to create the functional open reading frame in 12 mRNAs. Thousands of sites are specifically recognized in the pre-edited mRNAs and a myriad of partially edited transcript intermediates accumulates in mitochondria. The control of editing is poorly understood, but past work suggests that it occurs during substrate recognition, the initiation and progression of editing, and during the life-cycle in different hosts. The growing understanding of the editing proteins offers clues about editing control. Most editing proteins reside in the \"RNA-free\" RNA editing core complex (RECC) and in the accessory RNA editing substrate complex (RESC) that contains gRNA. Two accessory RNA helicases are known, including one in the RNA editing helicase 2 complex (REH2C). Both the RESC and the REH2C associate with mRNA, providing a rationale for the assembly of mRNA or its mRNPs, RESC, and the RECC enzyme. Identified variants of the canonical editing complexes further complicate the model of RNA editing. We examine specific examples of complex variants, differential effects of editing proteins on the mRNAs within and between T. brucei life stages, and possible control points in RNA holo-editosomes. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

Editosomes are the multiprotein complexes that catalyze the insertion and deletion of uridines to create translatable mRNAs in the mitochondria of kinetoplastids. Recognition and cleavage of a broad diversity of RNA substrates in vivo require three functionally distinct RNase III-type endonucleases, as well as five additional editosome proteins that contain noncatalytic RNase III domains. RNase III domains have recently been identified in the editosome accessory proteins KREPB9 and KREPB10, suggesting a role related to editing endonuclease function. In this report, we definitively show that KREPB9 and KREPB10 are not essential in either bloodstream-form parasites (BF) or procyclic-form parasites (PF) by creating null or conditional null cell lines. While preedited and edited transcripts are largely unaffected by the loss of KREPB9 in both PF and BF, loss of KREPB10 produces distinct responses in BF and PF. BF cells lacking KREPB10 also lack edited CYb, while PF cells have increased edited A6, RPS12, ND3, and COII after loss of KREPB10. We also demonstrate that mutation of the RNase III domain of either KREPB9 or KREPB10 results in decreased association with ~20S editosomes. Editosome interactions with KREPB9 and KREPB10 are therefore mediated by the noncatalytic RNase III domain, consistent with a role in endonuclease specialization in Trypanosoma brucei. IMPORTANCETrypanosoma brucei is a protozoan parasite that causes African sleeping sickness. U insertion/deletion RNA editing in T. brucei generates mature mitochondrial mRNAs. Editing is essential for survival in mammalian hosts and tsetse fly vectors and is differentially regulated during the parasite life cycle. Three multiprotein \"editosomes,\" typified by exclusive RNase III endonucleases that act at distinct sites, catalyze editing. Here, we show that editosome accessory proteins KREPB9 and KREPB10 are not essential for mammalian blood- or insect-form parasite survival but have specific and differential effects on edited RNA abundance in different stages. We also characterize KREPB9 and KREPB10 noncatalytic RNase III domains and show they are essential for editosome association, potentially via dimerization with RNase III domains in other editosome proteins. This work enhances the understanding of distinct editosome and accessory protein functions, and thus differential editing, during the parasite life cycle and highlights the importance of RNase III domain interactions to editosome architecture.

RNA editing is a type of post-transcriptional modification that includes nucleotide insertion/deletion or conversion. Different categories of RNA editing have been widely observed in distinct RNAs from divergent organisms. In flowering plants, RNA editing usually alters cytidine to uridine in plastids and mitochondria, playing important roles in various plant developmental processes, including organelle biogenesis, adaptation to environmental changes, and signal transduction. Numerous studies have demonstrated that a number of factors are involved in plant RNA editing, such as pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, multiple organelle RNA editing factors (MORF, also known as RIP), organelle RNA recognition motif (ORRM) containing proteins, protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase 1 (PPO1) and organelle zinc finger 1 (OZ1). These factors play diverse roles in plant RNA editing due to their distinct characteristics. In this review, we discuss the functional roles of the individual editing factors and their associations in plant RNA editing.