edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:受功能性二尖瓣反流影响的患者代表了越来越多的高危人群。边缘对边缘二尖瓣修复术(TEER)已成为这些患者的有希望的治疗选择。然而,关于TEER与外科二尖瓣修复术(SMVr)的比较结果的研究有限.这项研究旨在比较人口统计学,并发症,TEER和SMVr的结果基于对国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库的实际分析。
    结果:在NIS数据库中,从2016年到2018年,共选择了6233名和2524名接受SMVr和TEER的患者,分别。患者的平均年龄为65.68岁(SMVr)和78.40岁(TEER)(p<0.01)。接受SMVr的患者的死亡率与接受TEER治疗的患者的死亡率相似(1.7%vs.1.9%,p=0.603)。接受SMVr的患者更有可能发生围手术期并发症,包括心源性休克(2.3%vs.0.4%,p<0.001),心脏骤停(1.7%vs.1.1%,p=0.025),和脑血管梗塞(0.9%vs.0.4%,p=0.013)。平均住院时间更长(8.59vs.4.13天,与TEER相比,SMVr的p<0.001);然而,平均治疗费用较高($218728.25vs.与SMVr相比,TEER为215071.74美元,p=0.031)。多因素logistic回归分析显示SMVr与更差的调整心源性休克(OR,7.347[95%CI,3.574-15.105];p<0.01)和急性肾损伤(OR,2.793[95%CI,2.356-3.311];p<0.01)。
    结论:与接受SMVr的患者相比,接受TEER的患者术后并发症显著减少,住院时间更短。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients affected by functional mitral regurgitation represent an increasingly high-risk population. Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) has emerged as a promising treatment option for these patients. However, there is limited research on the comparative outcomes of TEER versus surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr). This study seeks to compare the demographics, complications, and outcomes of TEER and SMVr based on a real-world analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.
    RESULTS: In the NIS database, from the years 2016 to 2018, a total of 6233 and 2524 patients who underwent SMVr and TEER were selected, respectively. The mean ages of the patients were 65.68 years (SMVr) and 78.40 years (TEER) (p < 0.01). The mortality rate of patients who received SMVr was similar to that of patients who were treated with TEER (1.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.603). Patients who underwent SMVr more likely suffered from perioperative complications including cardiogenic shock (2.3% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (1.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.025), and cerebrovascular infarction (0.9% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.013). The average length of hospital stay was longer (8.59 vs. 4.13 days, p < 0.001) for SMVr compared to TEER; however, the average cost of treatment was higher ($218 728.25 vs. $215 071.74, p = 0.031) for TEER compared to SMVr. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that SMVr was associated with worse adjusted cardiogenic shock (OR, 7.347 [95% CI, 3.574-15.105]; p < 0.01) and acute kidney injury (OR, 2.793 [95% CI, 2.356-3.311]; p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent TEER demonstrated a notable decrease in postoperative complications and a shorter hospitalization period when compared to those who underwent SMVr.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,性别对经导管边缘对边缘二尖瓣修复术(TEER)后的短期和长期生存率无明显影响,尽管没有关于术后预期寿命的数据.我们的目的是评估TEER治疗的二尖瓣反流(MR)患者的性别特异性差异。
    结果:在2011年至2018年期间接受TEER的男性和女性的短期和5年结果,多中心,对真实世界的MitraSwiss注册表进行了分析。根据性别和MR原因(主要与次要)对结果进行分层比较。通过相对生存分析估计TEER对术后预期寿命的影响。在1142名60至89岁的患者中,39.8%是女性。他们年纪大了,与男性相比,心血管危险因素较少,功能能力较低。男性30天死亡率高于女性(3.3%对1.1%;比值比,3.16[95%CI,1.16-10.7];P=0.020)。男女5年生存率相当(男性5年死亡率的调整风险比,1.14[95%CI,0.90-1.44],P=0.275)。随着时间的推移,患有原发性或继发性MR的男性和女性均显示出相似的临床疗效。TEER在所有群体中提供了较高的相对生存估计,并完全恢复了原发性MR女性的预期寿命(5年相对生存估计,97.4%[95%CI,85.5-107.0])。
    结论:TEER与女性短期死亡率增加无关,而5年结局在性别之间具有可比性。此外,TEER完全恢复了原发性MR女性的正常预期寿命。在继发性MR中仍然存在剩余的超额死亡率,与性无关。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, no clear impact of sex on short- and long-term survival following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) is evident, although no data are available on postprocedural life expectancy. Our aim was to assess sex-specific differences in outcomes of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated by TEER.
    RESULTS: Short-term and 5-year outcomes in men and women undergoing TEER between 2011 and 2018 who were included in the large, multicenter, real-world MitraSwiss registry were analyzed. Outcomes were compared stratified by sex and according to MR cause (primary versus secondary). The impact of TEER on postprocedural life expectancy was estimated by relative survival analysis. Among 1142 patients aged 60 to 89 years, 39.8% were women. They were older, with fewer cardiovascular risk factors and lower functional capacity compared with men. Thirty-day mortality was higher in men than in women (3.3% versus 1.1%; odds ratio, 3.16 [95% CI, 1.16-10.7]; P=0.020). Five-year survival was comparable in both sexes (adjusted hazard ratio for 5-year mortality in men, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.90-1.44], P=0.275). Both men and women with either primary or secondary MR showed similar clinical efficacy over time. TEER provided high relative survival estimates among all groups, and fully restored predicted life expectancy in women with primary MR (5-year relative survival estimate, 97.4% [95% CI, 85.5-107.0]).
    CONCLUSIONS: TEER is not associated with increased short-term mortality in women, whereas 5-year outcomes are comparable between sexes. Moreover, TEER completely restored normal life expectancy in women with primary MR. A residual excess mortality persists in secondary MR, independently of sex.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号