early glottic cancer

早期声门癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经口激光显微手术(TLMS)和放射治疗(XRT)是早期声门型喉癌(EGC)的主要治疗手段。这里,我们调查了病例依赖提供者的治疗偏好,并确定了影响EGC决策的因素.
    方法:这项对喉科医师的横断面调查,头颈外科医生,放射肿瘤学家介绍了5例逐渐进展的EGC(T1/2,N0)。受访者表示对TLMS或XRT的偏好以及影响他们对每种情况的推荐的排名因素。分析利用描述性统计数据,Fischer的精确测试,和Kruskal-Wallis检验非参数数据。
    结果:共收到141个完全应答(69.5%喉科医师)。大多数受访者在学术环境(93.5%)和多学科团队(94.0%)中实践。前连合受累是独立于病例的治疗建议的最重要的先验肿瘤因素(Likert量表:4.22/5),其次是侧向(李克特量表:4.02/5)。在所有专业中,单侧T1a病变推荐TLMS。喉科医师继续在T2病变中推荐TLMS(41.0%),高于头颈部外科医生(5.0%)和放射肿瘤学家(0.0%)。在所有案件中,生存率和嗓音结局是影响治疗决策的最重要临床因素.在更复杂的EGC演示中,放射肿瘤学家比喉科医生更重视声音(排名:1.6vs.2.7,Kruskall-Wallis:p<0.05)。
    结论:在更复杂的EGC临床表现中,与XRT相比,TLMS的偏好在专家之间有所不同,尽管驱动这些治疗建议的因素排名相似。这可能是由TLMS与XRT之后对病例相关语音结果的不同经验和观点驱动的,提示需要增加对肿瘤位置和深度如何影响语音结果的理解。
    方法:V喉镜,2024.
    OBJECTIVE: Transoral laser microsurgery (TLMS) and radiotherapy (XRT) are mainstays of treatment for early glottic carcinoma (EGC). Here, we investigated case-dependent provider treatment preferences and identify factors which impact decision-making in EGC.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional survey of laryngologists, head-and-neck surgeons, and radiation oncologists presented five diagrammatic cases of progressively advanced EGC (T1/2, N0). Respondents indicated preference for TLMS or XRT and ranked factors which influenced their recommendation for each case. Analysis utilized descriptive statistics, Fischer\'s exact tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests for nonparametric data.
    RESULTS: A total of 141 complete responses (69.5% laryngologists) were received. Most respondents practiced in academic settings (93.5%) and within multidisciplinary teams (94.0%). Anterior commissure involvement was the most important a priori tumor factor for case-independent treatment recommendation (Likert Scale: 4.22/5), followed by Laterality (Likert Scale: 4.02/5). Across all specialties, TLMS was recommended for unilateral T1a lesions. Laryngologists continued recommending TLMS in T2 lesions (41.0%) more than head-and-neck surgeons (5.0%) and radiation oncologists (0.0%). Across all cases, survival and voice outcomes were the most important clinical factors impacting treatment decisions. Radiation oncologists weighed voice more heavily than laryngologists in more complex presentations of EGC (rank: 1.6 vs. 2.7, Kruskall-Wallis: p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: In more complex clinical presentations of EGC, preference for TLMS compared to XRT differed across specialists, despite similar rankings of factors driving these treatment recommendations. This may be driven by differing experiences and viewpoints on case-dependent voice outcomes following TLMS versus XRT, suggesting a need for increased understanding of how tumor location and depth impact voice outcomes.
    METHODS: 5 Laryngoscope, 134:3686-3694, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述T1声门鳞状细胞癌(SCC)总体治疗方式的最新国家趋势,并确定与治疗方案相关的因素。
    方法:查询2004-2020年国家癌症数据库中所有声门cT1N0M0SCC患者。使用Cochran-Armitage趋势检验分析随时间的治疗模式。多变量逻辑回归用于确定与治疗方案相关的因素。
    结果:在确定的22,414名患者中,大多数患者仅接受RT(57%),21%的人只接受了手术,22%接受双模式治疗(“过度治疗”)。在这段时间里,T1声门型SCC的过度治疗发生率呈下降趋势(p<0.001),而仅手术治疗的发生率呈上升趋势(p<0.001).2016-2018年的治疗(OR:1.168[1.004至1.359]),2013-2015(OR:1.419[1.221至1.648]),2010-2012(OR:1.611[1.388至1.871]),2007-2009(OR:1.682[1.450至1.951]),或2004-2006年(OR:1.795[1.548至2.081])与2019-2020年相比,过度治疗的可能性更大。与T1a肿瘤相比,T1b肿瘤过度治疗的可能性较小(OR:0.795[0.707to0.894]),与T1a型肿瘤相比,首次接受手术的可能性较小(OR:0.536[0.485to0.592])。
    结论:T1声门型SCC的过度治疗一直在下降,随着手术率的增加。治疗年份与接受双模式治疗显著相关。最后,T1b疾病患者更有可能接受RT作为第一和唯一的治疗.
    方法:3喉镜,2024.
    OBJECTIVE: Describe recent national trends in overall treatment modalities for T1 glottic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and identify factors associated with treatment regimens.
    METHODS: National Cancer Database from 2004-2020 was queried for all patients with glottic cT1N0M0 SCC. Treatment patterns over time were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine the factors associated with treatment regimens.
    RESULTS: Of the 22,414 patients identified, most patients received RT only (57%), 21% received surgery only, and 22% received dual-modality treatment (\"over-treatment\"). Over the time period, there was a decreasing trend in rates of over-treatment for T1 glottic SCC (p < 0.001) and an increasing trend in surgery only (p < 0.001). Treatment in 2016-2018 (OR: 1.168 [1.004 to 1.359]), 2013-2015 (OR: 1.419 [1.221 to 1.648]), 2010-2012 (OR: 1.611 [1.388 to 1.871]), 2007-2009 (OR: 1.682 [1.450 to 1.951]), or 2004-2006 (OR: 1.795 [1.548 to 2.081]) versus 2019-2020 was associated with greater likelihood of over-treatment. T1b tumors were less likely to be over-treated (OR: 0.795 [0.707 to 0.894]) versus T1a tumors, and less likely to receive surgery first (OR: 0.536 [0.485 to 0.592]) versus T1a tumors.
    CONCLUSIONS: Over-treatment for T1 glottic SCC has been declining, with increasing rates of surgery only. Year of treatment was significantly associated with the receipt of dual-modality treatment. Finally, patients with T1b disease were more likely to receive RT as the first and only treatment.
    METHODS: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3633-3644, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前的文献对声门鳞状细胞癌(SCC)经口激光显微手术(TLM)后阳性切缘(PM)的管理提供了有限的指导。探索通过初始观察和再次切除治疗PMs的长期数据有限。我们的目标是确定TLM治疗声门SCC后PM患者的最佳治疗方法。
    2007年至2018年在我们机构前瞻性收集了TLM治疗后患有PMs的声门SCC患者的临床信息。我们在初始TLM期间使用喉模板,其中概述了切除区域以供将来参考。将数据与单变量分析进行比较,并使用Kaplan-Meier方法生成生存图。
    总共29例PMs患者接受了再次切除治疗(19例患者),密切观察(6例),或单独辅助放射(4例)。重新切除的患者在初始边缘病理上有SCC或严重的异型增生,23%的早期疾病复发(T1-T2)。5例(83%)接受密切观察的患者根据临床怀疑复发(最终病理证实)需要再次切除。与再切除患者有显著差异(p<.05)。因此,停止密切观察作为PMs的管理。四名患者(21%)在再切除标本上没有残留恶性肿瘤。深边缘仅占所有PM的17%。所有PM患者5年的疾病特异性生存率为82.4%(SE9.6%,CI53.4%-91.6%)。
    我们用TLM治疗早期声门SCC的长期经验支持再次切除作为PMs病例的适当管理。
    4.
    UNASSIGNED: The current literature provides limited guidance on the management of positive margins (PMs) following transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) for glottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Long-term data exploring the treatment of PMs with both initial observation and re-resection are limited. Our objective was to determine the optimal treatment for PM patients following TLM for glottic SCC.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical information on glottic SCC patients with PMs following treatment with TLM was prospectively collected at our institution from 2007 to 2018. We use a laryngeal template during the initial TLM where the area of resection is outlined for future reference. Data were compared with univariate analysis and survival plots were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 29 patients with PMs were treated with either re-resection (19 patients), close observation (6 patients), or adjuvant radiation alone (4 patients). Re-resection patients had SCC or severe dysplasia on initial margin pathology and 23% with early-stage disease had recurrence (T1-T2). Five (83%) patients who underwent close observation required re-resection based on clinical suspicion of recurrence (confirmed on final pathology), which was significantly different from the re-resection patients (p < .05). Close observation was therefore discontinued as a management of PMs. Four patients (21%) had no residual malignancy on re-resection specimens. Deep margins only accounted for 17% of all PMs. Disease-specific survival for all PM patients at 5 years was 82.4% (SE 9.6%, CI 53.4%-91.6%).
    UNASSIGNED: Our long-term experience with treating early-stage glottic SCC with TLM supports re-resection as an appropriate management for cases of PMs.
    UNASSIGNED: 4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对于选定的早期声门型喉癌,激光治疗是一种被广泛接受的治疗方式。但其作为抢救治疗的作用尚不清楚。我们的目的是调查肿瘤的结果和失败模式的挽救性科切。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2013年至2022年在三级转诊中心因早期声门癌接受了声带切除术的患者。主要结果指标是总生存期,喉保存率,气管造口术依赖率,和无病生存。
    结果:共142例患者(平均年龄:63岁,四分位间距[IQR]:45-72,123[86.9%]男性)进行了分析。平均22个月后有38例(26.8%)复发(IQR:17-26)。其中,25例(17.6%)接受了挽救性导管切除术,13例(9.1%)接受了其他挽救性治疗(11例[7.7%](化学)放疗和2例[1.4%]全喉切除术)。与其他抢救治疗相比,挽救性子宫切除术显示出更低的气管造口术率(0vs.31%,p=0.05),可比较的5年无病生存率(62%与54%,p=0.4),较高的5年喉部保存率(92%vs.54%,p=0.02),并提高5年总生存率(84%vs.62%,p=0.01)。与挽救性导管切除术失败相关的因素是年龄>60岁(比值比[OR]:1.3,95%置信区间[CI]:1.15-1.53),继续吸烟(OR:3.73,95%CI:3.5-4.4),大量吸烟(OR:1.24,95%CI:1.07-2.15),和pT1b+(OR:2.26,95%CI:2.1-2.9)。
    结论:挽救性导管切除术对保守性手术的复发性疾病具有良好的喉保存率和肿瘤结局。吸烟,高龄,和晚期肿瘤分期与挽救性导管切除术失败有关。
    OBJECTIVE: Laser cordectomy is a widely accepted treatment modality for selected cases of early glottic cancers, but its role as a salvage treatment remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the oncological outcomes and failure patterns of salvage cordectomy.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent cordectomy for early glottic cancer between 2013 and 2022 at a tertiary referral center. The main outcome measures were overall survival, larynx-preservation rate, tracheostomy dependency rate, and disease-free survival.
    RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (mean age: 63 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 45-72, 123[86.9 %] males) were analyzed. There were 38 (26.8 %) recurrences after a mean of 22 months (IQR: 17-26). Among them, 25 (17.6 %) underwent salvage cordectomy, while 13 (9.1 %) received other salvage treatments (11[7.7 %] (chemo)radiotherapy and 2[1.4 %] total laryngectomy). In comparison to the other salvage treatments, salvage cordectomy demonstrated lower tracheostomy rates (0 vs. 31 %, p = 0.05), comparable 5-year disease-free survival (62 % vs. 54 %, p = 0.4), higher 5-year larynx preservation rate (92 % vs. 54 %, p = 0.02), and improved 5-year overall survival rate (84 % vs. 62 %, p = 0.01). Factors associated with salvage cordectomy failure were age >60 years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.3, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.53), smoking continuation (OR: 3.73, 95 % CI: 3.5-4.4), heavy smoking (OR: 1.24, 95 % CI:1.07-2.15), and pT1b + (OR: 2.26, 95 % CI: 2.1-2.9).
    CONCLUSIONS: Salvage cordectomy offers favorable larynx preservation rates and oncological outcomes for recurrent disease amenable to conservative surgery. Smoking, advanced age, and advanced tumor stages are associated with salvage cordectomy failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    早期声门癌的放射治疗(RT)和CO2激光手术(CO2-LS)之间的选择仍然存在争议。我们系统地检查了电子数据库,以确定比较接受CO2-LS或RT治疗早期声门癌的患者的前瞻性试验。包括11项涉及1053名患者的研究。在选定的文献中,CO2激光设备的参数设置可以概括为波长10.6µm,超脉冲模式,连续设置,在目标结构上定制的功率(1-3W用于细微切除,4-15W用于切除更大的肿瘤),和大约2080-3900W/cm2的激光能量。使用RevMan5.3,我们估计了二分变量的合并赔率比(OR)和连续变量的合并平均差(MD),以及相关的95%置信区间(CI)。使用Higgins\'不一致性检验测量治疗变量的异质性,并表示为I2值。然后将连续变量描绘为使用PlotDigitizer2.6.8开发的直方图。与接受CO2-LS治疗的患者相比,接受RT治疗的患者抖动更好(MD1.27%,95%CI1.21~1.32,P<0.001),和“等级”的高分(MD6.54,95%CI5.31〜7.76,P<0.001),透气性(MD9.08,95%CI4.02~14.13,P<0.001),衰弱(MD2.13,95%CI0.29~3.98,P=0.02),和应变(MD3.32,95%CI0.57~6.07,P=0.02)“量表。CO2-LS治疗的患者局部控制率较差(OR3.14,95%CI1.52〜6.48,P=0.002),而第二原发肿瘤的发生率较低(OR0.30,95%CI0.15〜0.61,P<0.001)。希望回顾性分析能为早期声门患者选择个性化治疗提供建议。
    The choice between radiotherapy (RT) and CO2 laser surgery (CO2-LS) for early glottic cancer remains controversial. We systematically examined electronic databases in order to identify prospective trials comparing patients who had undergone CO2-LS or RT to treat early glottic cancer. Eleven studies involving 1053 patients were included. In the selected literature, the parameter setting of CO2 laser equipment can be summarized as wavelength 10.6 µm, superpulsed mode, continuous setting, power tailored on target structures (1-3 W for subtle resections and 4-15 W for cutting a larger tumor), and approximately 2080-3900 W/cm2 of laser energy. Using RevMan 5.3, we estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous variables and pooled mean differences (MDs) for continuous variables, along with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity in the treatment variables was measured using Higgins\' inconsistency test and expressed as I2 values. The continuous variables were then depicted as histograms developed using PlotDigitizer 2.6.8. Compared to patients treated with CO2-LS, those treated with RT had better jitter (MD 1.27%, 95% CI 1.21 ~ 1.32, P < 0.001), and high scores on the \"Grade (MD 6.54, 95% CI 5.31 ~ 7.76, P < 0.001), Breathiness (MD 9.08, 95% CI 4.02 ~ 14.13, P < 0.001), Asthenia (MD 2.13, 95% CI 0.29 ~ 3.98, P = 0.02), and Strain (MD 3.32, 95% CI 0.57 ~ 6.07, P = 0.02)\" scale. Patients treated with CO2-LS had worse local control rates (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.52 ~ 6.48, P = 0.002) while lower incidence of second primary tumor (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 ~ 0.61, P < 0.001). It is hoped that retrospective analysis can provide suggestions for early glottis patients to choose personalized treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:我们之前报道了JCOG0701的主要结果,多中心,第三阶段,比较早期声门癌(GC)的加速分割(Ax)与标准分割(SF)的非劣效性试验。在主要结果中,尽管与SF相比,3年PFS的疗效和Ax的毒性相似,Ax的非劣效性未得到统计学证实.为了评估JCOG0701的长期随访结果,我们进行了JCOG0701A3作为JCOG0701的辅助研究。
    方法:在JCOG0701中,370名患者被随机分配接受66-70Gy的SF(33-35分)(n=184)或60-64.8Gy的Ax(25-27分)(n=186)。此分析的数据截止日期为2020年6月。总生存率,无进展生存期,并对包括中枢神经系统缺血(CNSI)在内的晚期不良事件进行分析。
    结果:中位随访期为7.1年(范围:0.1-12.4),SF和Ax臂的PFS在5年分别为76.2%和78.2%,在7年分别为72.7%和74.8%(p=0.44)。SF和Ax臂的OS在5年分别为92.7%和89.6%,在7年分别为90.8%和86.5%(p=0.92)。在366名接受方案治疗的患者中,SF和Ax组的晚期不良事件的累积发生率在8年时分别为11.9%和7.4%(HR:0.53,95%CI:0.28~1.01,p=0.06).对于SF臂观察到2级或更高的CNSI为4.1%,对于Ax臂观察到1.1%(p=0.098)。
    结论:经过长期随访,Ax显示出与SF相当的疗效和更好的安全性。Ax可能适合早期GC,因为它在最小化处理时间方面很方便,成本,和劳动。
    OBJECTIVE: We previously reported the primary results of JCOG0701, a randomized, multicenter, phase 3, noninferiority trial comparing accelerated fractionation (Ax) to standard fractionation (SF) for early glottic cancer. In the primary results, although the similar efficacy of 3-year progression-free survival and toxicity of Ax compared with SF was observed, the noninferiority of Ax was not confirmed statistically. To evaluate the long-term follow-up results of JCOG0701, we conducted JCOG0701A3 as an ancillary study of JCOG0701.
    METHODS: In JCOG0701, 370 patients were randomly assigned to receive SF of 66 to 70 Gy (33-35 fractions; n = 184) or Ax of 60 to 64.8 Gy (25-27 fractions; n = 186). The data cutoff date for this analysis was in June 2020. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and late adverse events including central nervous system ischemia were analyzed.
    RESULTS: With a median follow-up period of 7.1 years (range, 0.1-12.4), progression-free survival of the SF and Ax arms were 76.2% and 78.2% at 5 years and 72.7% and 74.8% at 7 years (P = .44). OS of the SF and Ax arms were 92.7% and 89.6% at 5 years and 90.8% and 86.5% at 7 years (P = .92). Among 366 patients with a protocol treatment, the cumulative incidence of late adverse events of the SF and Ax arms were 11.9% and 7.4% at 8 years (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-1.01; P = .06). Central nervous system ischemia of grade 2 or higher was observed in 4.1% for the SF arm and 1.1% for the Ax arm (P = .098).
    CONCLUSIONS: After long-term follow-up, Ax showed comparable efficacy to SF and a tendency for better safety. Ax may be suitable for early glottic cancer because of its convenience in minimizing treatment time, cost, and labor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估在巴西公共和私人卫生系统中,对于早期声门癌(ESGC),大分割放疗(HYPOFRT)是否比常规分割放疗(CFRT)更具成本效益。
    方法:采用巴西公共和私人卫生系统作为付款人的观点,我们建立了一个终生马尔可夫模型,以描述一组65岁男性接受ESGCHYPOFRT或CFRT治疗后的健康状况.控制疾病的可能性,局部故障,远处转移,从随机临床试验中提取死亡和效用评分。费用基于公共和私人卫生系统的报销值。
    结果:在基本情况下,对于公共和私人卫生系统来说,HYPOFRT主导CFRT,更有效,成本更低,每个质量调整生命年(QALY)(公共卫生系统)的负ICER为264.32雷亚尔,ICER为2870.69雷亚尔/QALY(私人卫生系统)。ICER对局部故障的概率最敏感,控制疾病,和抢救治疗费用。对于概率敏感性分析,成本效益可接受性曲线表明,考虑到每个QALY(公共部门)的支付意愿门槛为2,000雷亚尔(905.39美元)和每个QALY(私营部门)的支付意愿门槛为16,000雷亚尔(7243.10美元),HYPOFRT有99.99%的可能性具有成本效益.在确定性和概率敏感性分析中,结果是稳健的。
    结论:考虑到每QALY40,000雷亚尔的阈值,在巴西公共卫生系统中,HYPOFRT与ESGC的CFRT相比具有成本效益。HYPOFRT的净货币收益(NMB)大约是CFRT的2,4倍(公共卫生系统)和5,2倍(私人卫生系统),这可能会打开整合新技术的机会。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy (HYPOFRT) is a cost-effective strategy than conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for early-stage glottic cancer (ESGC) in the Brazilian public and private health systems.
    METHODS: Adopting the perspective of the Brazilian public and private health system as the payer, a Markov model with a lifetime horizon was built to delineate the health states for a cohort of 65-year-old men after with ESGC treated with either HYPOFRT or CFRT. Probabilities of controlled disease, local failure, distant metastasis, and death and utilities scores were extracted from randomized clinical trials. Costs were based on the public and private health system reimbursement values.
    RESULTS: In the base case scenario, for both the public and private health systems, HYPOFRT dominated CFRT, being more effective and less costly, with a negative ICER of R$264.32 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) (public health system) and a negative ICER of R$2870.69/ QALY (private health system). The ICER was most sensitive to the probability of local failure, controlled disease, and salvage treatment costs. For the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicates that there is a probability of 99.99% of HYPOFRT being cost-effective considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of R$2,000 ($905.39) per QALY (public sector) and willingness-to-pay threshold of R$16,000 ($7243.10) per QALY (private sector). The results were robust in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: Considering a threshold of R$ 40,000 per QALY, HYPOFRT was cost-effective compared to CFRT for ESGC in the Brazilian public health system. The Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) is approximately 2,4 times (public health system) and 5,2 (private health system) higher for HYPOFRT than CFRT, which could open the opportunity of incorporating new technologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The incidence of all head and neck malignancies is rising worldwide, with carcinoma of the larynx constituting approximately 1% of all cancers. Early glottic cancer responds quite favorably to surgical intervention due to its early presentation, coupled with the low rate of regional and distant metastases. This article focuses on various approaches to the surgical treatment of early glottic cancer. Details include the clinical and radiological evaluation of laryngeal cancer, the goals of treatment, current surgical options for early disease, approach to surgical resection margins and management of nodal disease, and complications associated with each treatment modality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究分析了边缘状态对局部控制和生存的影响,以及经口CO2激光显微手术治疗早期声门型喉癌后的切缘/阳性处理。
    方法:351例患者(男性328例,23名女性,平均年龄65.6岁)接受手术。我们确定了以下保证金状态:负值,关闭浅层(CS),关闭深度(CD),正单浅层(SS),正多重浅表(MS),和积极的深(深)。
    结果:共286例患者(81.5%)切缘阴性,23(6.5%)的利润率接近(8CS,15CD)和42(12%)的利润率为正(16SS,9MS,17DEEP).在65例切缘接近/阳性的患者中,44例患者接受了扩大,6次放疗和15次随访。22例(6.3%)复发。有DEEP或CD切缘的患者表现出更高的复发风险(风险比分别为2.863和2.537),与切缘阴性的患者相比。单独使用激光进行局部控制,DEEP切缘患者的总体喉部保留和疾病特异性生存率显着下降(57.5%,86.9%和92.9%,p<0.05)。
    结论:具有CS或SS切缘的患者可以安全地接受随访。在CD和MS边距的情况下,任何额外的治疗应与患者讨论。在深度余量的情况下,总是建议额外的治疗。
    BACKGROUND: The present study analyzed the impact of margin status on local control and survival, and the management of close/positive margins after transoral CO2 laser microsurgery for early glottic carcinoma.
    METHODS: 351 patients (328 males, 23 females, mean age 65.6 years) underwent surgery. We identified the following margin statuses: negative, close superficial (CS), close deep (CD), positive single superficial (SS), positive multiple superficial (MS), and positive deep (DEEP).
    RESULTS: A total of 286 patients (81.5%) had negative margins, 23 (6.5%) had close margins (8 CS, 15 CD) and 42 (12%) had positive margins (16 SS, 9 MS, 17 DEEP). Among the 65 patients with close/positive margins, 44 patients underwent enlargement, 6 radiotherapy and 15 follow-up. Twenty-two patients (6.3%) recurred. Patients with DEEP or CD margins showed a higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratios of 2.863 and 2.537, respectively), compared to patients with negative margins. Local control with laser alone, overall laryngeal preservation and disease-specific survival decreased significantly in patients with DEEP margins (57.5%, 86.9% and 92.9%, p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CS or SS margins could be safely submitted to follow-up. In the case of CD and MS margins, any additional treatment should be discussed with the patient. In the case of DEEP margin, additional treatment is always recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:评估早期喉癌经口激光手术(TOLS)中额外使用窄带成像(NBI)是否可以改善临床预后。
    方法:随机对照试验,在2015年9月至2022年11月期间进行。
    方法:荷兰一家三级转诊医院。
    方法:对113例患者进行TOLS。使用白光成像(WLI,n=56)单独,或与NBI组合(n=57)。患者接受频繁的随访喉镜检查。切除边缘状态,复发率,和12个月时的无复发生存率,18个月,并在研究终止后(最长86个月)进行分析。
    结果:WLI组31例切缘阳性,而NBI组中为16(p=0.002)。12个月后,无复发生存率为92%:WLI为87%,NBI为96%,p=.07。WLI复发率为7/56(13%),与NBI的2/57(4%)相比,p=.09。18个月后,WLI的无复发生存率为84%,NBI为96%,p=.02。WLI复发率为9/56(16%),与NBI的2/57(4%)相比,p=.02。研究终止后,WLI组的无复发生存率为71%,NBI组为83%(p=.08).WLI的复发率为16/56,NBI为10/57(p=.16)。
    结论:在TOLS期间额外使用NBI显著减少了阳性切缘的数量。尽管在所有时间点都没有统计学意义,接受NBI支持的TOLS治疗的患者显示出更低的复发率和更好的无复发生存期.需要在更大的患者群体中进行进一步的研究来证实这些结果。
    Assessing whether the additional use of narrow-band imaging (NBI) in transoral laser surgery (TOLS) for early laryngeal cancer improves clinical outcomes.
    Randomized controlled trial, performed between September 2015 and November 2022.
    A tertiary referral hospital in The Netherlands.
    TOLS was carried out in 113 patients. The procedure was performed with white light imaging (WLI, n = 56) alone, or combined with NBI (n = 57). Patients received frequent follow-up laryngoscopy. Resection margin status, recurrence rate, and recurrence-free survival at 12 months, 18 months, and after study termination (maximum 86 months) were analyzed.
    Thirty-one cases in the WLI group had a positive resection margin, versus 16 in the NBI group (p = .002). After 12 months, the recurrence-free survival was 92%: 87% for WLI versus 96% for NBI, p = .07. The recurrence rate was 7/56 (13%) for WLI, versus 2/57 (4%) for NBI, p = .09. After 18 months, the recurrence-free survival was 84% for WLI versus 96% for NBI, p = .02. The recurrence rate was 9/56 (16%) for WLI, versus 2/57 (4%) for NBI, p = .02. After study termination, the recurrence-free survival was 71% for WLI versus 83% for the NBI group (p = .08). The recurrence rate was 16/56 for WLI, versus 10/57 for NBI (p = .16).
    The additional use of NBI during TOLS significantly decreased the number of positive resection margins. Although not statistically significant at all time points, patients treated with NBI-supported TOLS showed a lower recurrence rate and better recurrence-free survival. Further studies in larger patient groups are needed to confirm these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号