暂无摘要。

Contamination of duodenoscopes is a significant concern due to the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among patients who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), resulting in outbreaks worldwide. In July 2020, it was determined that three different patients, all had undergone ERCP with the same duodenoscope, were infected. Two patients were infected with blaCTX-M-15 encoding Citrobacter freundii, one experiencing a bloodstream infection and the other a urinary tract infection, while another patient had a bloodstream infection caused by blaSHV-12 encoding Klebsiella pneumoniae. Molecular characterization of isolates was available as every ESBL-producing isolate undergoes Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) for comprehensive genomic analysis in our center. After withdrawing the suspected duodenoscope, we initiated comprehensive epidemiological research, encompassing case investigations, along with a thorough duodenoscope investigation. Screening of patients who had undergone ERCP with the implicated duodenoscope, as well as a selection of hospitalized patients who had ERCP with a different duodenoscope during the outbreak period, led to the discovery of three additional cases of colonization in addition to the three infections initially detected. No microorganisms were detected in eight routine culture samples retrieved from the suspected duodenoscope. Only after destructive dismantling of the duodenoscope, the forceps elevator was found to be positive for blaSHV-12 encoding K. pneumoniae which was identical to the isolates detected in three patients. This study highlights the importance of using NGS to monitor the transmission of MDROs and demonstrates that standard cultures may fail to detect contaminated medical equipment such as duodenoscopes.

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is among the highest waste generator in healthcare facilities. The major reasons include production of large-volume non-renewable waste, use of single-use devices, and reprocessing or decontamination processes. Single-use endoscopic accessories have gradually replaced reusable devices over last two decades contributing to the rising impact of GI endoscopy on ecosystem. Several reports of infection outbreaks with reusable duodenoscopes raised concerns regarding the efficacy and adherence to standard disinfection protocols. Even the enhanced reprocessing techniques like double high-level disinfection have not been found to be the perfect ways for decontamination of duodenoscopes and therefore, paved the way for the development of single-use duodenoscopes. However, the use of single-use endoscopes is likely to amplify the net waste generated and carbon footprint of any endoscopy unit. Moreover, single-use devices challenge one of the major pillars of sustainability, that is, \"reuse.\" In the era of climate change, a balanced approach is required taking into consideration patient safety as well as financial and environmental implications. The possible solutions to provide optimum care while addressing the impact on climate include selective use of disposable duodenoscopes and careful selection of accessories during a case. Other options include use of disposable endcaps and development of effective high-level disinfection techniques. The collaboration between the healthcare professionals and the manufacturers is paramount for the development of environmental friendly devices with low carbon footprint.

UNASSIGNED: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy is still a challenging procedure. The optimal approach, namely the type of endoscope and sphincter management, has yet to be defined.
UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy and safety of forward-viewing gastroscope and the side-viewing duodenoscope in ERCP of patients with Billroth II gastrectomy.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study of consecutive patients with Billroth II gastrectomy submitted to ERCP in an expert center for ERCP between 2005 and 2021. The outcomes assessed were: papilla identification, deep biliary cannulation, and adverse events (AEs). Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate potential associations and predictors of the main outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: We included 83 patients with a median age of 73 (IQR 65-81) years. ERCP was performed using side-viewing duodenoscope in 52 and forward-viewing gastroscope in 31 patients. Patients\' characteristics were similar in the two groups. The global rate of papilla identification was 66% (n = 55). The rate of deep cannulation was 58% considering all patients and 87% in the subgroup of patients in which the papilla major was identified. Cannulation was performed with standard methods in 65% of cases and with needle-knife fistulotomy in 35%. AEs occurred in 4 patients. There was no difference between duodenoscope and gastroscope in papilla identification (64% [95% CI: 51-77] vs. 71% [55-87]). Although not statistically significant, duodenoscope had a lower deep cannulation rate when considering all patients (52% [15-39] vs. 68% [7-35]) and a higher AEs rate (8% [1-15] vs. 0% [0-1]). In a multivariate analysis, the use of gastroscope significantly increased the deep cannulation rate (OR = 152.62 [2.5-9,283.6]).
UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates that forward-viewing gastroscope is at least as effective and safe as side-viewing duodenoscope for ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Moreover, our study showed that gastroscope is an independent predictor of successful cannulation.
UNASSIGNED: Colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) em doentes submetidos previamente a gastrectomia com reconstrução Billroth II é ainda um exame desafiante. A melhor abordagem, nomeadamente o tipo de endoscópio e a técnica de canulação biliar, ainda não está definida.
UNASSIGNED: Comparar a eficácia e segurança do gastroscópio de visão frontal e do duodenoscópio de visão lateral na CPRE de doentes com gastrectomia com reconstrução Billroth II.
UNASSIGNED: Conduzimos um estudo de coorte retrospectivo e unicêntrico que incluiu consecutivamente doentes com gastrectomia com reconstrução Billroth II submetidos a CPRE num centro de referência para CPRE entre 2005 e 2021. Os outcomes avaliados foram: identificação da papila, canulação biliar profunda e efeitos adversos (EAs). Regressão logística foi realizada para avaliar possíveis associações e preditores dos outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Incluímos 83 doentes com uma idade mediana de 73 (IIQ 65–81) anos. A CPRE foi realizada usando duodenoscópio em 52 doentes e usando o gastroscópio de visão frontal em 31 doentes. As características dos doentes foram semelhantes entre os dois grupos. A taxa global de identificação da papila foi de 66% (n = 55). A taxa de canulação profunda foi de 58% considerando todos os doentes e de 87% considerando apenas o subgrupo de doentes nos quais a papila major foi identificada. A canulação foi realizada usando métodos convencionais em 65% e usando fistulotomia com faca em 35% dos doentes. EAs ocorreram em 4 doentes. Não houve diferenças entre duodenoscópio e gastroscópio relativamente à identificação da papila [64% (95% CI: 51–77) vs 71% (55–87)]. Apesar de estatisticamente não significativo, o uso de duodenoscópio teve uma menor taxa de canulação profunda quando considerados todos os doentes [52% (15–39) vs 68% (7–35)] e uma maior taxa de EAs [8% (1–15) vs 0% (0–1)]. Na regressão logística, o uso de gastroscópio significativamente aumentou a taxa de canulação profunda [OR = 152.62 (2.5–9,283.6)].
UNASSIGNED: Este estudo demonstra que o uso de gastroscópio de visão frontal é pelo menos igualmente eficaz e seguro ao duodenoscópio na CPRE de doentes com gastrectomia com reconstrução Billroth II. Para além disso, o nosso estudo demonstrou que o uso de gastroscópio é um predictor independente para canulação.

Previous gastric procedures often make endoscopic interventions challenging. Our case study focuses specifically on performing an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) through a gastroscope (EVIS EXERA III GIF-HQ190, Olympus, Center Valley, USA) in a patient with a history of Billroth II gastrojejunostomy. Successful ERCP in Billroth II using a gastroscope with traditional ERCP instrumentation has been very rarely reported in case reports in the literature review. This case study provides an alternative method of access to the common bile duct (CBD) and treatment of obstruction to prevent the risk of morbidities from an open CBD exploration. The primary diagnosis for this patient was choledocholithiasis. He initially underwent a standard ERCP with a side-viewing duodenoscope (EVIS EXERA II, TJF-Q190V, Olympus, Center Valley, USA); however, due to the difficult anatomy from his previous Billroth II reconstruction, the CBD was very difficult to access. A gastroscope was then used instead to perform the ERCP, providing an innovative endoscopic therapy. Given the patient\'s multiple comorbidities, he was at high risk for morbidity and mortality with an open CBD exploration. Hence, this case report provides insight into an innovative endoscopic approach to CBD exploration with difficult anatomy.

The current standard of practice is to use a duodenoscope for the evaluation of the major duodenal papilla (MDP). Recently, cap-assisted endoscopy (CAE), which uses a transparent cap at the tip of a standard front-viewing endoscope, has emerged as an alternative.
A systematic literature search was performed in several databases from inception to January 2023 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of CAE for the evaluation of the MDP.
Nine studies including 806 patients met our inclusion criteria. The pooled rate of technical success for CAE was 93.2% (95% confidence interval, 85.6-96.9; I2 = 84.6%). A subgroup analysis comparing CAE with a standard endoscope showed higher odds for the evaluation of the MDP with CAE (but not a duodenoscope, which was better than CAE) with an odds ratio of 57.294 (95% confidence interval, 17.767-184.755; I2 = 45.303%).
CAE offers a significant advantage with high rates of complete MDP evaluation compared with standard forward-viewing endoscopy. However, CAE is associated with lower rates of success when compared with side-viewing endoscopes.

暂无摘要。

Contaminated reprocessed duodenoscopes pose a serious threat to patients in the endoscopy unit. Despite manufacturer changes to reprocessing guidelines, 20% of reprocessed duodenoscopes meet criteria for quarantine-level contamination based on microbiological or ATP testing. We aimed to examine risk factors for postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) infection.
Retrospective cohort analysis.
US Medicare Fee-For-Service claims (2015-2021) and all-payer data (2017).
In the Medicare data, 823 575 ERCP procedures were included. The all-payer five-state data, 16 609 procedures were included.
ERCP was identified by Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease (ICD) procedure codes. We identified inpatient infections using ICD diagnosis codes.
A logistic regression model predicted risk factors for infections occurring within 7-day and 30-day periods following ERCP. 7-day and 30-day all-cause hospitalisations and post-ERCP pancreatitis were also examined.
Post-ERCP infection occurred within 3.5% of 7-day and 7.7% of 30-day periods in Medicare. Disposable duodenoscopes were billed in 711 procedures, with 1.4% (n=10, 7-day) and 3.5% (n=25, 30-day) post-ERCP infections. Urgent ERCPs were the strongest risk factor for infections in the 7-day period (OR 3.3, 95% CI 3.2 to 3.4). Chronic conditions, sex (male), age (older) and race (non-white) were also risk factors. In the all-payer five-state data, fewer infections (2.4%, 7 days) were observed. No difference arose between Medicare and other payers for 7-day period infections (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.3).
Urgent ERCPs, patient chronic conditions and patient demographics are post-ERCP infection risk factors. Patients with infection risk factors should be targeted for specialised infection control prevention measures, including disposable duodenoscopes.

Recent outbreaks of duodenoscope-associated multidrugresistant organism infections have increased awareness and concern about the pitfalls in high-level disinfection protocols and duodenoscope design. A call for innovative approaches to reduce the risk of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms through duodenoscopes has led to the development of single-use duodenoscopes. As a new technology, questions have been raised regarding the performance, safety, cost, feasibility of implementation, and environmental impact of these novel duodenoscopes. This article discusses several of these aspects and presents a brief review of the literature.

One possible transmission route for nosocomial pathogens is contaminated medical devices. Formation of biofilms can exacerbate the problem. We report on a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that had caused an outbreak linked to contaminated duodenoscopes. To determine whether increased tolerance to disinfectants may have contributed to the outbreak, we investigated the susceptibility of the outbreak strain to disinfectants commonly used for duodenoscope reprocessing. Disinfection efficacy was tested on planktonic bacteria and on biofilm.
Disinfectant efficacy testing was performed for planktonic bacteria according to EN standards 13727 and 14561 and for biofilm using the Bead Assay for Biofilms. Disinfection was defined as ≥ 5log10 reduction in recoverable colony forming units (CFU).
The outbreak strain was an OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae of sequence type 101. We found a slightly increased tolerance of the outbreak strain in planktonic form to peracetic acid (PAA), but not to other disinfectants tested. Since PAA was the disinfectant used for duodenoscope reprocessing, we investigated the effect of PAA on biofilm of the outbreak strain. Remarkably, disinfection of biofilm of the outbreak strain could not be achieved by the standard PAA concentration used for duodenoscope reprocessing at the time of outbreak. An increased tolerance to PAA was not observed in a K. pneumoniae type strain tested in parallel.
Biofilm of the K. pneumoniae outbreak strain was tolerant to standard disinfection during duodenoscope reprocessing. This study establishes for the first time a direct link between biofilm formation, increased tolerance to disinfectants, reprocessing failure of duodenoscopes and nosocomial transmission of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae.