dry fog

干雾
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本出版物介绍了次氯酸干雾作为消毒剂对选定细菌的影响,病毒,孢子,和真菌以及便携式MicrolifeOXY300手指脉冲血氧计和RaspberryPiZero微型计算机的电子系统。根据PN-EN17272(变体I)在浓度为300、500和2000ppm的HClO下评估次氯酸对微生物试剂的影响。次氯酸雾对电子元件的影响的研究是在浓度为500ppm和2000ppm的气溶胶室中根据由30个(变体II)和90个雾化循环(变体III)组成的两个模型进行的。每个循环包括产生次氯酸干雾(25毫升/立方米)的过程,测试元件的去污,以及清洁消毒剂的腔室。在所有变体中,次氯酸干雾上检查的材料的暴露导致病毒数量减少,细菌,孢子,和真菌测试。此外,研究表明,在次氯酸雾化循环的变体中,性能参数没有变化,也没有观察到次氯酸干雾渗透到测试的医疗设备和电子系统的内部。
    This publication presents the effect of hypochlorous acid dry mist as a disinfectant on selected bacteria, viruses, spores, and fungi as well as on portable Microlife OXY 300 finger pulse oximeters and electronic systems of Raspberry Pi Zero microcomputers. The impact of hypochlorous acid on microbiological agents was assessed at concentrations of 300, 500, and 2000 ppm of HClO according to PN-EN 17272 (Variant I). Studies of the impact of hypochlorous acid fog on electronic components were carried out in an aerosol chamber at concentrations of 500 ppm and 2000 ppm according to two models consisting of 30 (Variant II) and 90 fogging cycles (Variant III). Each cycle included the process of generating a dry mist of hypochlorous acid (25 mL/m3), decontamination of the test elements, as well as cleaning the chamber of the disinfectant agent. The exposure of the materials examined on hypochlorous acid dry mist in all variants resulted in a decrease in the number of viruses, bacteria, spores, and fungi tested. In addition, the research showed that in the variants of hypochlorous acid fogging cycles analyzed, no changes in performance parameters and no penetration of dry fog of hypochlorous acid into the interior of the tested medical devices and electronic systems were observed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19爆发后,许多牙科诊所使用过氧化氢(H2O2)的干雾化来消毒空气和表面。吸入高浓度的H2O2溶液可能导致严重的呼吸问题。这项研究旨在评估牙科诊所吸入暴露于H2O2干雾的健康风险评估。这个横截面,我们进行了描述性分析研究,以确定9名牙科诊所工作人员在6个房间的H2O2吸入暴露量和健康风险.使用OSHAVI-6方法和流速为500mL/min的个人泵评估了职业性H2O2的暴露,该泵连接到含有15mLTiOSO4收集溶液的小型烧结玻璃撞击器。使用呼吸道症状问卷评估H2O2暴露对健康的影响。还使用新加坡职业卫生部门提供的方法进行了吸入H2O2的健康风险评估。6个房间的诊所工作人员对H2O2的平均呼吸暴露量为1.3至2.83ppm,高于国际组织建议的限值。呼吸困难(44.4%),咳嗽(33.3%),鼻灼伤(22.2%)是最普遍的健康问题。结果还显示,牙髓和手术的风险中等,降低牙周病的风险,恢复性护理,正畸学,和假肢。这项研究的结果表明,当使用自动过氧化氢蒸气雾化器时,根据房间体积计算喷洒时间,雾化30分钟后使用房间非常重要,可以大大降低风险排名。
    After the outbreak of COVID-19, many dental clinics use dry fogging of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to disinfect the air and surfaces. Inhalation of highly concentrated solutions of H2O2 may cause severe respiratory problems. This study aimed to estimate the health risk assessments of inhalation exposure to dry fogging of H2O2 in a dental clinic. This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was performed to determine the inhalation exposure and health risk of 9 dental clinic staff with H2O2 in six rooms. Occupational exposure to H2O2 was assessed using the OSHA VI-6 method and a personal pump with the flow rate of 500 mL/min connected to the midget fritted-glass impinger containing 15 mL of TiOSO4 collecting solution. The health effects of H2O2 exposure were assessed using a respiratory symptoms questionnaire. The health risk assessment of inhaled exposure to H2O2 was also performed using the method provided by the Singapore occupational health department. The mean respiratory exposure of clinic staff to H2O2 was ranged from 1.3 to 2.83 ppm for six rooms which was above the limits recommended by international organizations. Dyspnea (44.4%), cough (33.3%), and nasal burning (22.2%) were the most prevalent health problems. The results also showed a medium risk for endodontics and surgery, and lower risk for periodontics, restorative care, orthodontics, and prosthetics. The results of this study indicate that when using an automated hydrogen peroxide-vapor fogger, calculating the spraying time based on room volume and using the rooms after 30 min of fogging is very important and can greatly reduce the risk ranking.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Airborne disinfection of high-containment facilities before maintenance or between animal studies is crucial. Commercial spore carriers (CSC) coated with 106 spores of Geobacillus stearothermophilus are often used to assess the efficacy of disinfection. We used quantitative carrier testing (QCT) procedures to compare the sensitivity of CSC with that of surrogates for nonenveloped and enveloped viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), mycobacteria, and spores, to an aerosolized mixture of peroxyacetic acid and hydrogen peroxide (aPAA-HP). We then used the QCT methodology to determine relevant process parameters to develop and validate effective disinfection protocols (≥4-log10 reduction) in various large and complex facilities. Our results demonstrate that aPAA-HP is a highly efficient procedure for airborne room disinfection. Relevant process parameters such as temperature and relative humidity can be wirelessly monitored. Furthermore, we found striking differences in inactivation efficacies against some of the tested microorganisms. Overall, we conclude that dry fogging a mixture of aPAA-HP is highly effective against a broad range of microorganisms as well as material compatible with relevant concentrations. Furthermore, CSC are artificial bioindicators with lower resistance and thus should not be used for validating airborne disinfection when microorganisms other than viruses have to be inactivated.IMPORTANCE Airborne disinfection is not only of crucial importance for the safe operation of laboratories and animal rooms where infectious agents are handled but also can be used in public health emergencies such as the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. We show that dry fogging an aerosolized mixture of peroxyacetic acid and hydrogen peroxide (aPAA-HP) is highly microbicidal, efficient, fast, robust, environmentally neutral, and a suitable airborne disinfection method. In addition, the low concentration of dispersed disinfectant, particularly for enveloped viral pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, entails high material compatibility. For these reasons and due to the relative simplicity of the procedure, it is an ideal disinfection method for hospital wards, ambulances, public conveyances, and indoor community areas. Thus, we conclude that this method is an excellent choice for control of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号