driveline exit site

传动系出口现场
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    心室辅助装置(VAD)的使用正在增加;然而,设备并发症的诊断和管理,例如动力传动系统出口(DES)是真菌感染的入口,不是众所周知的。
    进行了涉及搜索PubMed(2005年至2020年7月)的系统评价。一名43岁的女性患者患有左VAD(LVAD)(HeartMate3,Abbott,美国)也有报道。
    患者成功使用酮康唑乳膏和口服氟康唑治疗可能的浅表DES真菌感染。我们纳入了符合我们纳入标准的36项研究;然而,我们的审查中只包括了一个。在文学中,报告5例DES真菌感染,念珠菌是唯一的真菌病原体。
    LVAD真菌感染并不常见,但可能导致高死亡率,需要长时间的治疗,当没有手术替代方案时,可能会带来巨大的问题。然而,念珠菌属最常见。真菌感染只能产生清晰的分泌物,因此,基于脓性分泌物的传动系统感染的经典定义可能会有所不同。阴性皮肤培养并不排除DES感染的诊断,因此,经验诊断可能仅基于临床。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of ventricular assist devices (VAD) is increasing; however, diagnosis and management of device complications, such as the driveline exit site (DES) being the portal of entry for fungal infection, is not well known.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review involving searching PubMed (2005 to July 2020) was conducted. The case of a 43-year-old female patient who had a left VAD (LVAD) (HeartMate 3, Abbott, US) is also reported.
    UNASSIGNED: The patient was successfully treated with ketoconazole cream and oral fluconazole for likely superficial DES fungal infections. We included 36 studies that met our inclusion criteria; however, only one was included in our review. In the literature, five cases of DES fungal infection were reported, with Candida being the only fungal pathogen.
    UNASSIGNED: LVAD fungal infections are uncommon but can be responsible for high mortality rates, require a prolonged period of treatment, and can present a huge problem when surgical alternatives are not available. However, Candida species are most common. Fungal infections can only produce clear discharge, and so the classic definition of driveline infection based on purulent secretion can vary. Negative skin culture does not exclude the diagnosis of infection of the DES, and so empirical diagnosis may only be clinically based.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在系统地定义和分析有关具有心室辅助装置的患者的传动系统出口部位护理方法的研究。
    方法:2008年至2017年期间以英语和土耳其语发表的与使用心室辅助装置的患者的传动系统出口部位护理相关的研究来自国际ScienceDirect,PubMed,WebofScience,Scopus,和国家数据库。在总共83篇文章中,共纳入7篇符合纳入标准的研究文章.
    结果:与用于清洁传动系出口现场的试剂有关的发现,敷料闭合,换药频率,和使用动力传动系统锚固装置是从研究中包括的研究中获得的。发现用于皮肤清洁的氯己定溶液和用于敷料闭合的无菌纱布片和透明覆盖物是用于传动系出口部位护理的最优选方法。敷料变化频率从中心到中心变化很大,所有研究都使用了锚固装置。
    结论:对于使用心室辅助装置的患者的传动系统出口现场护理,尚无金标准方法,并且对传动系统出口现场护理的研究似乎受到限制。建议大规模,应进行随机对照研究,这将为传动系统出口现场护理提供更有力的证据。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to systematically define and analyze the studies on driveline exit site care methods for patients with a ventricular assist device.
    METHODS: The studies related to driveline exit site care of the patients with a ventricular assist device published in English and Turkish between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed from the international Science Direct, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the national databases. Of a total of 83 articles, a total of seven research articles which met the inclusion criteria were included in the study.
    RESULTS: Findings related to the agents used in the cleaning of the driveline exit site, dressing closures, dressing change frequency, and use of driveline anchoring devices were obtained from studies included in the research. It was found that chlorhexidine solution for skin cleaning and sterile gauze sheets and transparent covering for dressing closure were the most preferred methods for the driveline exit site care. Dressing change frequency varied considerably from center to center and anchoring devices were used in all studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is no gold standard method for the driveline exit site care of patients with a ventricular assist device and researches on the driveline exit site care seem to be limited. It is recommended that large-scale, randomized-controlled studies should be conducted which would provide a stronger proof of the driveline exit site care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) using left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have considerably improved the quality of life and survival rate of patients with end-stage heart failure. Despite substantial technological progress, major challenges with regard to VAD-specific and VAD-related infections have hitherto hindered the broader application of this promising therapy approach. Driveline infections (DLI) range among the main adverse events experienced in LVAD patients. However, many centers still apply their own protocol for driveline exit site (DLES) care and an international standard on prevention, reduction and early treatment of DLI after the perioperative period has not yet been defined. In March 2019, VAD coordinators and cardiac surgeons from Germany and Austria met to develop a standard of care procedure (SOP) as well as a new staging approach with recommended actions for treatment of VAD carriers. In this Driveline Expert STagINg and carE (DESTINE) study group we developed a 10-step SOP for DLES care with emphasis on essentials such as clean and save preparation, sterile dressing change and secure driveline immobilization. An advanced wound staging approach was defined with recommended actions for prevention, early detection and stage-related management of DLI. Broad consensus was reached on the fact that an interdisciplinary approach both in DLES care and DLES healing disorder awareness is required to prolong infect-free survival times on MCS as well as to ensure high patient compliance and quality of life. In conclusion, a new detailed SOP for appropriate DLES care and an advanced wound staging approach for prevention and management of DLI were defined on an expert level applicable for VAD clinicians, practitioners and care givers in Central Europe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    BACKGROUND: Driveline exit site (DLES) infection is a major complication of ventricular assist devices (VADs). Differences in the sheath material interfacing with exit site tissue appear to affect healing time and infection risk more than site hygiene, but the mechanistic basis for this is not clear.
    METHODS: Health record data from Utah Artificial Heart Program patients with HeartMate II (HMII) devices implanted from 2008 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed, with particular attention to interface type, incorporation (healing) time, and infections. Tissue samples from the DLES were collected at the time of VAD removal in a small subset. These samples were examined by routine histology and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM).
    RESULTS: Among 57 patients with sufficient data, 15 had velour interfaces and 42 had silicone. Indications for and duration of support were similar between the groups. The silicone group had shorter incorporation time (45 ±22 vs. 56 ±34 days, P=.17) and fewer DLES infections (20% vs. 1.7%, P=.026, for patient infections and 0.0340 vs. 0.166, P=.16, for infections per patient-year). Tissues from five patients, three with velour, were examined. Velour interfaces demonstrated more hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, and dermal inflammation. By ESEM, the silicone driveline tracts appeared relatively smooth and flat, whereas the velour interface samples were irregular with deep fissures and globular material adhering to the surface.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using the silicone portion of the HMII driveline at the DLES was associated with fewer infections and a trend toward faster healing in this small retrospective series. Whether the intriguing microscopic differences directly account for this needs further study on a larger scale.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号