dose volume histogram

剂量体积直方图
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:量化(折叠锥卷积)CCC算法和(蒙特卡洛)MC算法之间的差异,并提醒计划者在使用两种算法时应注意两种算法的某些可能的不确定性。
    方法:30例宫颈癌VMAT计划采用PinnacleTPS(Philips)设计,并平均分为两组:简单组(SG,目标体积仅为PTV)和复杂组(CG,目标音量包括PTV和PGTV)。PinnacleTPS的计划已转移到摩纳哥TPS(Elekta)。计划参数都保持不变,重新计算了剂量。从PinnacleTPS的剂量分布获得的Gamma通过率(GPR)与使用基于三个三轴平面的SNC软件从摩纳哥TPS获得的剂量分布(横向,矢状和冠状)。GPR和DVH用于量化pinnacleTPS中的CCC算法与摩纳哥TPS中的MC算法之间的差异。
    结果:在Pinnacle和MonacoTPS的DVH的统计剂量指数中,有7个(7/15)剂量指标差异有统计学意义,和10(10/18)个剂量指数差异具有统计学意义。3%/3毫米标准,最多(5/6)来自SG和CG的GPR大于95%。但以2%/2毫米标准,两组中最多(5/6)的GPR低于90%。此外,我们发现GPR也与选定的三轴平面和计划的复杂性有关(GPR随SG和CG而变化)。
    结论:Pinnacle和摩纳哥TPS的CCC和MC算法之间存在明显差异。在量化CCC和MC算法的差异上,DVH可能优于2D伽马分析。应该注意TPS算法的不确定性,特别是当DVH上的指示器处于阈值的临界点时,因为使用的算法可能会高估或低估DVH指标。
    OBJECTIVE: To quantify the difference between the (collapsed cone convolution) CCC algorithm and the (Monte Carlo) MC algorithm and remind that the planners should pay attention to some possible uncertainties of the two algorithms when employing the two algorithms.
    METHODS: Thirty patients\' cervical cancer VMAT plans were designed with a Pinnacle TPS (Philips) and divided equally into two groups: the simple group (SG, target volume was only the PTV) and the complex group (CG, target volume included the PTV and PGTV). The plans from the Pinnacle TPS were transferred to the Monaco TPS (Elekta). The plans\' parameters all remained unchanged, and the dose was recalculated. Gamma passing rates (GPRs) obtained from dose distribution from Pinnacle TPS compared with that from Monaco TPS with SNC software based on three triaxial planes (transverse, sagittal and coronal). GPRs and DVH were used to quantify the difference between the CCC algorithm in pinnacle TPS and the MC algorithm in Monaco TPS.
    RESULTS: Among the statistical dose indexes in DVHs from the Pinnacle and Monaco TPSs, there were 7(7/15) dose indexes difference with statistically significant differences in the SG, and 10(10/18) dose indexes difference with statistically significant differences in the CG. With 3%/3 mm criterion, the most (5/6) GPRs were greater than 95% from the SG and CG. But with 2%/2 mm criterion, the most (5/6) GPRs were less than 90% from the two groups. In addition, we found that GPRs were also related to the selected triaxial planes and the complexity of the plan (GPRs varied with the SG and CG).
    CONCLUSIONS: Obvious difference between the CCC and MC algorithms from Pinnacle and Monaco TPS. DVH maybe better than 2D gamma analysis on quantifying difference of the CCC and MC algorithms. Some attention should be paid to the uncertainty of the TPS algorithm, especially when the indicator on the DVH is at the critical point of the threshold value, because the algorithm used may overestimate or underestimate the DVH indicator.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的目的是通过剂量比较空腔内近距离放射治疗技术(ICBT)与徒手(空腔内间质,IC+IS)技术。
    27例局部晚期宫颈癌患者被纳入研究。包括超过内侧1/3的子宫旁残留疾病而不延伸至骨盆外侧壁的患者。外束放射治疗(EBRT)后,其中使用钴60高剂量率(60CoHDR)近距离放射治疗源。两种计划的剂量均为6.5Gy×4分,每天2分,相隔6小时,超过2天。自由手近距离放射治疗技术,包括在不使用模板的情况下放置中央串联和2个卵形针,已应用。通过激活和停用针头产生了两个计划,并通过归一化到V100进行比较。
    施加总共79根针。使用配对t检验,对两个计划进行了剂量学比较。与ICBT计划中的87.22%相比,自由手计划的平均V90(接受90%剂量的体积)显着更高,为94.2%(p≤0.0001)。自由手和ICBT计划的平均V100值为89.06%和81.51%(p≤0.0001),分别,赞成自由手计划。平均D90(剂量至90%体积),徒手计划的D98和D100分别为6.28灰色(Gy),4.91Gy,和3.62Gy,分别,但是ICBT计划中的等效参数是5.26Gy,3.72Gy,和2.61Gy,p值≤0.0001。在这两个计划中,膀胱的D2cc,直肠,乙状结肠4.59Gy,3.98Gy,2.77Gy,和4.46Gy,3.90Gy,2.67Gy,分别,没有统计学意义。
    与具有相似剂量的危险器官的ICBT技术相比,徒手近距离放射治疗(ICIS)对高风险临床目标体积(HR-CTV)的剂量分布具有统计学意义。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare intra-cavitary brachytherapy technique (ICBT) with free-hand (intra-cavitary + interstitial, IC + IS) technique.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty seven locally advanced carcinoma cervix patients were included in the study. Patients with more than medial 1/3rd parametrial residual disease without extending upto lateral pelvic wall were included, following external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in which cobalt-60 high-dose-rate (60Co HDR) brachytherapy source was used. Dose for both plans were 6.5 Gy × 4 fractions, 2 fractions per day, 6 hours apart, over 2 days. Free-hand brachytherapy technique, consisted of placement of central tandem and 2 ovoids along with needles without using template, was applied. Two plans were generated by activating and deactivating the needles, and compared by normalizing to V100.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 79 needles were applied. Using paired-t test, dosimetric comparison of both the plans was done. Free-hand plan had a significant higher mean V90 (volume receiving 90% of the dose) of 94.2% compared with 87.22% in ICBT plan (p ≤ 0.0001). Free-hand and ICBT plans presented a mean V100 values of 89.06% and 81.51% (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively, favoring free-hand plan. The mean D90 (dose to 90% volume), D98, and D100 of free-hand plan were 6.28 Gray (Gy), 4.91 Gy, and 3.62 Gy, respectively, but equivalent parameters in ICBT plan were 5.26 Gy, 3.72 Gy, and 2.61 Gy, with p value ≤ 0.0001. In both the plans, D2cc of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 4.59 Gy, 3.98 Gy, 2.77 Gy, and 4.46 Gy, 3.90 Gy, 2.67 Gy, respectively, with no statistical significance.
    UNASSIGNED: Free-hand brachytherapy (IC + IS) achieves a statistically significant better dose distribution to high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) comparing with ICBT technique with similar dose to organs at risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估八种主要商业治疗计划系统(TPSs)和剂量报告系统(DRS)的剂量体积直方图(DVH)结构差异,用于各种解剖部位和目标尺寸的临床治疗计划。
    方法:来自10个选择的临床治疗计划的剂量文件,立体定向放射治疗处方或尖锐的剂量梯度,如头颈部计划,从1分18Gy的处方剂量到35分70Gy,每个计算为0.25厘米和0.125厘米网格尺寸,在EclipseTPS中创建和匿名化,并出口到其他七个主要的TPS(Pinnacle,RayStation,元素)和DRS(MIM,莫比乌斯,ProKnow,和速度)系统进行比较。从每个评估系统中收集每个计划临床重要性的剂量-体积约束点(D0.03cc[Gy],volume,并且平均剂量用于没有指定约束的结构)。将每个报告的约束类型和结构体积标准化为来自Eclipse的值,用于成对比较。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行统计显著性,并根据计划调整评估多变量回归模型,网格大小,以及到目标中心的距离。
    结果:对于相对于Eclipse的所有DVH点,所有系统报告的中值彼此相差1.0%,然而,他们都不同于Eclipse。考虑到平均值,Pinnacle,RayStation,和元素的平均值分别为1.038、1.046、1.024,而MIM,莫比乌斯,ProKnow,和Velocity分别相对于Eclipse报告了1.026、1.050、1.033和1.022。较小的剂量网格尺寸略微改善了系统之间的一致性,没有统计学意义。对于相对于Eclipse的结构卷,在所有系统中都可以看到更大的差异,中位数差异高达3.0%,平均值差异高达10.1%。
    结论:在所有系统之间观察到很大的差异。Eclipse通常报道,在统计上显著的水平,低于所有其他评估系统的值。降低剂量网格分辨率导致的非显著变化表明该分辨率可能不如计算DVH曲线的其他方面重要。例如结构的3D建模。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dose volume histogram (DVH) construction differences across 8 major commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) and dose reporting systems for clinically treated plans of various anatomic sites and target sizes.
    METHODS: Dose files from 10 selected clinically treated plans with a hypofractionation, stereotactic radiation therapy prescription or sharp dose gradients such as head and neck plans ranging from prescription doses of 18 Gy in 1 fraction to 70 Gy in 35 fractions, each calculated at 0.25 and 0.125 cm grid size, were created and anonymized in Eclipse TPS, and exported to 7 other major TPS (Pinnacle, RayStation, and Elements) and dose reporting systems (MIM, Mobius, ProKnow, and Velocity) systems for comparison. Dose-volume constraint points of clinical importance for each plan were collected from each evaluated system (D0.03 cc [Gy], volume, and the mean dose were used for structures without specified constraints). Each reported constraint type and structure volume was normalized to the value from Eclipse for a pairwise comparison. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical significance and a multivariable regression model was evaluated adjusting for plan, grid size, and distance to target center.
    RESULTS: For all DVH points relative to Eclipse, all systems reported median values within 1.0% difference of each other; however, they were all different from Eclipse. Considering mean values, Pinnacle, RayStation, and Elements averaged at 1.038, 1.046, and 1.024, respectively, while MIM, Mobius, ProKnow, and Velocity reported 1.026, 1.050, 1.033, and 1.022, respectively relative to Eclipse. Smaller dose grid size improved agreement between the systems marginally without statistical significance. For structure volumes relative to Eclipse, larger differences are seen across all systems with a range in median values up to 3.0% difference and mean up to 10.1% difference.
    CONCLUSIONS: Large variations were observed between all systems. Eclipse generally reported, at statistically significant levels, lower values than all other evaluated systems. The nonsignificant change resulting from lowering the dose grid resolution indicates that this resolution may be less important than other aspects of calculating DVH curves, such as the 3-dimensional modeling of the structure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的图像引导自适应近距离放射治疗计划,从对靶和危险器官(OAR)的累积放射治疗剂量的角度分析肿瘤反应和毒性。局部晚期宫颈癌。
    患者接受了对整个骨盆的二维同步放化疗,然后进行腔内近距离放射治疗(ICBT),剂量处方指向\'A\'。基于CT图像的规划,描绘高风险临床目标体积(HR-CTV),膀胱,直肠,和乙状结肠通过生成剂量-体积直方图(DVH)数据并优化目标和OAR的剂量进行。对疾病和晚期毒性的反应进行了后续评估,随着统计分析数据的生成。
    这项研究招募了136名患者。划定的HR-CTV范围从20.9cc到37.1cc,中位数为30.2cc。A点的等效剂量为每分2Gy(EQD2),范围为71.31Gy至79.75Gy,中位数为75.1Gy,EQD2HR-CTVD90的范围为71.9Gy至89.7Gy,中位数为85.1Gy。在患者中,69.2%显示完全响应。经过25个月的中位随访,50名患者保持无病,其中74.0%的患者接受≥85Gy的HR-CTVD90,而26.0%的患者接受<85Gy的HR-CTVD90。
    在中低收入国家无法使用磁共振设备的情况下,将基于CT图像的治疗计划纳入ICBT的常规实践中,为描绘目标和OAR的体积和生成DVH数据提供了范围。这可以证明是疾病反应和毒性的更好替代品。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze tumour response and toxicity with respect to cumulative radiotherapy dose to target and organs at risk (OARs) with computed tomography (CT)-based image guided adaptive brachytherapy planning for locally advanced carcinoma cervix.
    METHODS: Patients were treated with two-dimensional concurrent chemoradiotherapy to whole pelvis followed by intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) with dose prescription to point \'A\'. CT image-based delineation of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), urinary bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon was done with generation of dose-volume histogram (DVH) data and optimization of doses to target and OARs. Follow up assessments were done for response of disease and toxicity with generation of data for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Delineated volume of HR-CTV ranged from 20.9 to 37.1 mL, with median value of 30.2 mL. The equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) for point \'A\' ranged from 71.31 to 79.75 Gy with median value of 75.1 Gy and EQD2 HR-CTV D90 ranged from 71.9 to 89.7 Gy with median value of 85.1 Gy. 69.2% of patients showed complete response and after median follow-up of 25 months, 50 patients remained disease free, of whom, 74.0% had received ≥85 Gy to HR-CTV D90 versus 26.0% receiving <85 Gy to HR-CTV D90.
    CONCLUSIONS: s Amidst the unavailability of magnetic resonance imaging facilities in low middle income countries, incorporation of CT-image based treatment planning into routine practice for ICBT provides the scope to delineate volumes of target and OARs and to generate DVH data, which can prove to be a better surrogate for disease response and toxicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨中度大分割质子束治疗(PBT)的中央非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预后。
    方法:在2006年至2019年期间,回顾性分析了34例接受中度低分割PBT的位于中央的T1-T4N0M0NSCLC患者。
    结果:中位随访时间为50.8个月(范围=5.8-100.4个月)。3年总生存率,无进展生存期(PFS),局部控制率为70.4%,55.5%和80.5%,分别。在5例(14.7%)患者中观察到PBT后2级或3级肺部不良事件(AE);然而,1例(2.9%)患者出现3级放射性肺炎.值得注意的是,未观察到4级或更高的AE。关于肺剂量和近端支气管树最大剂量与2级或更高肺AE之间的相关性,平均肺剂量与AEs之间存在弱相关性(p=0.035).尽管临床目标体积(CTV)是导致PFS不良的危险因素,PBT后CTV与肺AEs无明显相关性。
    结论:中度大分割PBT可能是中央cT1-T4N0M0NSCLC的一种有用的放疗方法。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes of patients with centrally located non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) using moderate hypofractionation.
    METHODS: Between 2006 and 2019, 34 patients with centrally located T1-T4N0M0 NSCLC who received moderate hypofractionated PBT were retrospectively reviewed.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up was 50.8 months (range=5.8-100.4 months). The 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and local control rates were 70.4%, 55.5% and 80.5%, respectively. Grade 2 or 3 lung adverse events (AEs) after PBT were observed in five (14.7%) patients; however, grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was observed in one (2.9%) patient. Notably, no grade 4 or higher AEs were observed. Regarding the correlation between the lung dose and proximal bronchial tree maximum dose and grade 2 or higher lung AEs, a weak correlation was observed between the mean lung dose and AEs (p=0.035). Although the clinical target volume (CTV) was a risk factor for poor PFS, no significant correlation was found between the CTV and lung AEs after PBT.
    CONCLUSIONS: Moderate hypofractionated PBT may be a useful radiotherapy method for centrally located cT1-T4N0M0 NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项工作的目的是开发和验证一种用于远程剂量测定审核的方法,该方法可以对患者CT体积中的测量剂量和计划剂量进行剂量-体积直方图参数比较。该方法是通过调整和组合基于远程电子射野成像(EPID)的审核方法(基于虚拟Epid的标准体模审核-VESPA)和从平面剂量测定测量中估计3D患者剂量分布的方法而得出的。该方法已通过一系列误差引起的计划进行了测试,包括监视单元和多叶准直器(MLC)定位误差。对11个放射治疗中心进行了试点审计研究。两项临床试验的IMRT计划,采用前列腺切除术后(RAVES试验)计划和头颈部(HPV试验)计划.比较了计划剂量和估计测量剂量的临床相关DVH参数。发现该方法重现了0.5%以内的诱导剂量误差,并且对小至0.5mm的MLC定位误差敏感。对于RAVES计划审核,除一个DVH结果外,所有DVH结果均在3%以内,对于HPV计划审核,除三个结果外,所有DVH结果均在3%以内,最大差异为3.2%。审核方法的结果为审核计划提供了具有临床意义的DVH指标,并可以提高对中心放疗质量的了解。
    Objective.The aim of this work was to develop and validate a method for remote dosimetric auditing that enables dose-volume histogram parameter comparisons of measured and planned dose in the patient CT volume.Approach. The method is derived by adapting and combining a remote electronic portal imaging (EPID) based auditing method (Virtual Epid based Standard Phantom Audit-VESPA) and a method to estimate 3D in-patient dose distributions from planar dosimetric measurements. The method was tested with a series of error-induced plans including monitor unit and multileaf collimator (MLC) positioning errors. A pilot audit study was conducted with eleven radiotherapy centres. IMRT plans from two clinical trials, a post-prostatectomy (RAVES trial) plan and a head and neck (HPV trial) plan were utilized. Clinically relevant DVH parameters for the planned dose and estimated measured dose were compared.Main results. The method was found to reproduce the induced dose errors within 0.5% and was sensitive to MLC positioning errors as small as 0.5 mm. For the RAVES plan audit all DVH results except one were within 3% and for the HPV plan audit all DVH results were within 3% except three with a maximum difference of 3.2%.Significance. The results from the audit method produce clinically meaningful DVH metrics for the audited plan and could enable an improved understanding of a centre\'s radiotherapy quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    网格放射疗法是应用于晚期大体积肿瘤患者的治疗技术之一。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在评估用于治疗庞大的头颈部(H和N)肿瘤的网格放射治疗技术的生物学和剂量学参数的差异,并将其与常规适形放射治疗进行比较。
    UNASSIGNED:摩纳哥治疗计划系统(TPS)设计了三维适形和网格放射治疗。选择8例(H和N)大肿瘤,使用单个部分15-20Gy。肿瘤和危险器官(OAR)的剂量-体积直方图用于通过Matlab程序计算等效均匀剂量(EUD)(Gy)。此外,比较了两种技术(网格放射疗法和常规适形放射疗法)的TPS肿瘤的剂量学参数。
    UNASSIGNED:与适形治疗相比,Grid在肿瘤和OAR中获得了较低的EUD(Gy),因为网格原理保护大约一半的肿瘤区域免受辐射导致肿瘤的覆盖较少。此外,其中OAR与肿瘤封闭和多叶屏蔽(1厘米)比其他技术更有效,根据Niemierko的定义,导致放射生物学值降低。放射生物学结果显示两种方法存在显著差异,两个计划的肿瘤TPS获得的剂量学数据为P<0.05。
    UNASSIGNED:网格计划比OAR的保形技术实现了更低的EUD值。因此,它为这些器官提供了更多的节约和更少的并发症。
    Grid radiotherapy is one of the treatment techniques applied to treat patients with advanced bulky tumors.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to estimate the difference in biological and dosimetric parameters of the grid radiotherapy technique for the treatment of bulky head and neck (H and N) tumors and compare it with conventional conformal radiotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Three-dimensional conformal and grid radiotherapy were designed by the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS). Eight bulky tumors of (H and N) cases were selected, using a single fraction 15-20 Gy. Dose-volume histogram of the tumors and organs at risk (OARs) used to calculate the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) (Gy) by Matlab program. Furthermore, dosimetric parameters of the tumors from the TPS were compared for two techniques (grid radiotherapy and the conventional conformal radiotherapy).
    UNASSIGNED: Grid attained a lower EUD (Gy) in tumors and OARs as compared to conformal therapy, as Grid principle protects about half of the tumor area from the radiation leads to less coverage of the tumor. Also, where OARs in closed with tumors and the shielding by multi-leaf (1 cm) were more effective than other techniques, lead to a decrease of radiobiological values according to its definition by Niemierko. Radiobiological results showed significant differences between the two methods, and dosimetric data obtained by the TPS for tumours for two plans were P < 0.05.
    UNASSIGNED: The grid plan achieves lower values of EUDs than the conformal technique for OARs. Hence, it achieves more sparing and fewer complications for these organs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)III期的预期化学放射免疫疗法可能导致治疗后肺功能(PF)受损。我们假设总体PF的减少对应于后续CT中组织密度的增加。因此,本研究的目的是将放射学改变的动力学与一氧化碳弥散能力(DLCO)和FEV1相关联,这可能有助于更好地了解辐射诱发的肺部疾病.方法:纳入85例NSCLCIII患者。他们都接受了两个周期的铂类诱导化疗,然后是高剂量辐射。此后,63/85例患者(74%)接受durvalumab治疗1年.在完成放疗(RT)后三个月和六个月进行肺功能测试(PFTs),并与基线进行比较。在同一时间点,患者接受诊断性CT(dCT)。使用基于RayStation®模型的分割和可变形图像配准将这些dCT与规划CT(pCT)匹配。产生由特定等剂量定义的差分体积以将它们与PFT相关联。结果:一般来说,在中等剂量范围内发现了PFTs和差异体积之间的显着相关性,特别是对于接受处方剂量的65%至45%(V65−45%)和DLCO(p<0.01)的肺部体积。该体积范围也预测RT后的DLCO(p值0.03)。在多变量分析中,DLCO(p值0.040)和FEV1(p值0.014)预测肺炎。结论:目前的分析显示,在中剂量范围内,DLCO的动力学与CT形态变化之间存在很强的关系。这令人信服地表明了在治愈性治疗方法的背景下常规使用PFTs的重要性。
    Introduction: Curatively intended chemo-radio-immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage III may lead to post-therapeutic pulmonary function (PF) impairment. We hypothesized that the decrease in global PF corresponds to the increase in tissue density in follow-up CTs. Hence, the study aim was to correlate the dynamics in radiographic alterations to carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and FEV1, which may contribute to a better understanding of radiation-induced lung disease. Methods: Eighty-five patients with NSCLC III were included. All of them received two cycles of platinum-based induction chemotherapy followed by high dose radiation. Thereafter, durvalumab was administered for one year in 63/85 patients (74%). Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed three months and six months after completion of radiotherapy (RT) and compared to baseline. At the same time points, patients underwent diagnostic CT (dCT). These dCTs were matched to the planning CT (pCT) using RayStation® Model Based Segmentation and deformable image registration. Differential volumes defined by specific isodoses were generated to correlate them with the PFTs. Results: In general, significant correlations between PFTs and differential volumes were found in the mid-dose range, especially for the volume of the lungs receiving between 65% and 45% of the dose prescribed (V65−45%) and DLCO (p<0.01). This volume range predicted DLCO after RT (p-value 0.03) as well. In multivariate analysis, DLCO (p-value 0.040) and FEV1 (p-value 0.014) predicted pneumonitis. Conclusions: The current analysis revealed a strong relation between the dynamics of DLCO and CT morphology changes in the mid-dose range, which convincingly indicates the importance of routinely used PFTs in the context of a curative treatment approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    碳离子放射治疗是不可切除/不可手术的有吸引力的治疗选择,头颈部非鳞状细胞癌。与头颈部癌的碳离子放射治疗相关的眼内出血在很大程度上是一个未研究的领域;因此,我们调查了其发生率和预测因素。
    我们评估了79名患者(即,158眼),通过碳离子放射治疗治疗的头颈部非鳞状细胞癌,随访期≥12个月。剂量测定参数,如Dmax,Dmean和Vd[用“d”Gy(RBE)辐照的体积]和年龄,性别,主站点,组织学和合并症作为眼内出血的预测因素进行分析。
    79例患者(158只眼)中有7例(8.9%)发生眼内出血,中位潜伏期为24个月(范围,15-47个月)。眼内出血的5年累积发生率为6%。Dmax和V10-60用于眼球,眼内出血组的视网膜和视神经明显高于其他组(Dmax和V10-60p<0.001)。在单变量分析中,对于眼球和视网膜,V40≥0.83cm3和≥0.66cm3(p=0.001),Dmax≥54.75Gy(RBE)和≥54.58Gy(RBE)(p=0.002),分别,是眼内出血的预测因子。此外,上颌原发性(p=0.025)和年龄较小(年龄<60岁,p=0.048)是眼内出血的重要危险因素。
    眼球的剂量参数,如V40和Dmax,视网膜和上颌窦原发性和年龄较小是碳离子放疗后眼内出血的重要预测因素.
    Carbon-ion radiotherapy is an attractive treatment option for unresectable/inoperable, nonsquamous cancers of the head and neck. Intraocular hemorrhage associated with carbon-ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancer is largely an unresearched area; hence, we investigated its incidence and predictive factors.
    We evaluated 79 patients (i.e., 158 eyes) with nonsquamous cancers of the head and neck treated by carbon-ion radiotherapy with a follow-up period of ≥12 months. Dosimetric parameters such as Dmax, Dmean and Vd [volume irradiated with \"d\" Gy (RBE)] and age, gender, primary site, histology and comorbidities were analyzed as predictors of intraocular hemorrhage.
    Seven (8.9%) of 79 patients (158 eyes) developed intraocular hemorrhage with a median latent period of 24 months (range, 15-47 months). The 5-year cumulative incidence of intraocular hemorrhage was 6%. Dmax and V10-60 for eyeballs, retina and optic nerves were significantly higher in intraocular hemorrhage group than the rest (p <0.001 for Dmax and V10-60). On univariate analysis, V40 ≥0.83 cm3 and ≥0.66 cm3 (p = 0.001) and Dmax ≥54.75 Gy (RBE) and ≥54.58 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.002) for eyeball and retina, respectively, were predictors of intraocular hemorrhage. Additionally, maxillary primary (p = 0.025) and younger age (age <60 years, p = 0.048) were significant risk factors for intraocular hemorrhage.
    Dosimetric parameters such as V40 and Dmax for the eyeball, retina and maxillary sinus primary and younger age were significant predictors of intraocular hemorrhage following carbon-ion radiotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: To develop a risk model based on dosimetric metrics to predict local recurrence in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensive modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
    METHODS: 493 consecutive patients were included, among whom 44 were with local recurrence. One-to-two propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance variables between recurrent and non-recurrent groups. Dosimetric metrics were extracted, and critical dosimetric predictors of local recurrence were identified by Cox regression model. Moreover, recurrent sites and patterns were examined by transferring the recurrent tumor to the pretreatment planning computed tomography.
    RESULTS: After PSM, 44 recurrent and 88 non-recurrent patients were used for dosimetric analysis. The univariate analysis showed that eight dosimetric metrics and homogeneity index were significantly associated with local recurrence. The risk model integrating D5 and D95 achieved a C-index of 0.706 for predicting 3-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS). By grouping patients using median value of risk score, patients with risk score ˃ 0.885 had significantly lower 3-year LRFS (66.2% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.023). As for recurrent features, the proportion of relapse in nasopharynx cavity, clivus, and pterygopalatine fossa was 61.4%, 52.3%, and 40.9%, respectively; and in field, marginal, and outside field recurrence constituted 68.2%, 20.5% and 11.3% of total recurrence, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study developed a novel risk model that could effectively predict the LRFS in NPC patients. Additionally, nasopharynx cavity, clivus, and pterygopalatine fossa were common recurrent sites and in field recurrence remained the major failure pattern of NPC in the IMRT era.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号