Parkinson\'s disease (PD) is a gradually worsening neurodegenerative disorder affecting the nervous system, marked by a slow progression and varied symptoms. It is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, affecting over six million people in the world. Its multifactorial etiology includes environmental, genomic, and epigenetic factors. Clinical symptoms consist of non-motor and motor symptoms, with motor symptoms being the classic presentation. Therapeutic approaches encompass pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and surgical interventions. Traditional pharmacological treatment consists of administering drugs (MAOIs, DA, and levodopa), while emerging evidence explores the potential of antidiabetic agents for neuroprotection and gene therapy for attenuating parkinsonian symptoms. Non-pharmacological treatments, such as exercise, a calcium-rich diet, and adequate vitamin D supplementation, aim to slow disease progression and prevent complications. For those patients who have medically induced side effects and/or refractory symptoms, surgery is a therapeutic option. Deep brain stimulation is the primary surgical option, associated with motor symptom improvement. Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion through percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy and a portable infusion pump succeeded in reducing \"off\" time, where non-motor and motor symptoms occur, and increasing \"on\" time. This article aims to address the general aspects of PD and to provide a comparative comprehensive review of the conventional and the latest therapeutic advancements and emerging treatments for PD. Nevertheless, further studies are required to optimize treatment and provide suitable alternatives.

This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pyridoxine compared to Dopaminergic agonists (cabergoline and bromocriptine) in post-partum lactation inhibition. Cochrane Central, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar, covering the period from inception to November 2023. Additionally, the bibliographies of included articles and previous meta-analyses were screened for any relevant articles. The systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The outcomes of interest encompassed inhibition of lactation, breast pain/tenderness, breast engorgement, milk secretion, fever, mastitis, prolactin level and adverse events related to pyridoxine, cabergoline and bromocriptine. Methodological quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for rigorous evaluation. Three clinical trials assessed the effectiveness of pyridoxine and dopaminergic agents (cabergoline and bromocriptine) for lactation inhibition. It was assessed by using different assessment methods such as a scale for milk secretion, serum prolactin levels, and questionnaires for assessing breast engorgement, breast pain, and milk leakage. On the global assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of dopaminergic agents, it was found that there was significant inhibition of lactation as compared to pyridoxine (p < 0.001). In conclusion, this systematic review contributes significant insights into lactation inhibition interventions. Dopaminergic agonists, specifically cabergoline and bromocriptine, stand out as more effective and tolerable choices compared to Pyridoxine. These findings provide a foundation for informed clinical decisions and underscore the need for careful consideration of lactation inhibition strategies in diverse clinical contexts.

BACKGROUND: The long-term prognosis of impulsive compulsive disorders (ICD) remains poorly studied in Parkinson\'s disease (PD).
OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the natural history of ICD and its impact on PD symptoms including cognition and treatment adjustments.
METHODS: We assessed PD patients at baseline (BL) with (BL-ICD+) or without (BL-ICD-) ICD despite dopamine agonist (DA) exposure of > 300 mg levodopa-equivalent daily dose for > 12 months at baseline and after more than two years of follow-up. ICD were assessed using the Ardouin\'s Scale of Behaviors in PD (ASBPD), cognition using the Mattis scale, and PD symptoms using the UPDRS score. Treatment adjustments, DA withdrawal-associated symptoms, and ICDs social consequences were recorded.
RESULTS: 149 patients were included (78 cases and 71 controls), mean duration of follow-up was 4.4 ± 1 years. At baseline, psychiatric disorders were more common among BL-ICD + (42.3 vs 12.3% among BL-ICD-, p < 0.01). At follow-up, 53.8% of BL-ICD + were not ICD-free while 21.1% of BL-ICD- had developed ICD. BL-ICD + more frequently experienced akinesia (21.8 vs 8.5%, p = 0.043) and rigidity worsening (11.5 vs 1.4%, p = 0.019) following therapeutic modifications. Decision to decrease > 50% DA doses (12.8 vs 1.4%, p = 0.019) or to withdraw DA (19.2 vs 5.6%, p = 0.025) was more frequently considered among BL-ICD+ . At follow-up, the prevalence of cognitive decline was lower among BL-ICD + (19.2 vs 37.1%, p = 0.025).
CONCLUSIONS: ICDs were associated with increased psychiatric burden at baseline and better cognitive prognosis. Most patients were still showing ICDs at the follow-up visit, suggesting ICD to be considered as a chronic, neuropsychiatric disorder.

BACKGROUND: Dopamine (DA) is likely to be involved in some depressive dimensions, such as anhedonia and amotivation, which account for a part of treatment-resistant forms. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) and direct D2 and D3 receptors agonists (D2/3r-dAG) are known to help, but we lack safety data about their combined usage. We report on safety and tolerance of the MAOI+D2r-dAG combination in a clinical series.
METHODS: All patients referred to our recourse center for depression between 2013 and 2021 were screened to select those who did receive the combo. Data were extracted from clinical files.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients of 60±17 years of age (8 women, 7 with age>65years, all suffered from treatment resistant depression, 7 with bipolar disorder) received the combo. There were no life-threatening adverse effects (AE). However, AE were reported by 14 patients (88%) most of which were mild and consisted of insomnia, nausea, nervousness, confusion, impulse control disorder and/or \"sleep attacks\". One patient presented a serious AE requiring a short hospitalization for confusion. Intolerance led to failure to introduce treatment in two patients (13%). The retrospective non-interventional design, the variety of molecules, and the modest sample size limited the scope of these results.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no life-threatening safety issue in combining MAOI and D2/3r-dAG, especially regarding cardiovascular side effects. The systematic screening of AE might account for their frequency, but these precluded the treatment in only two patients. Comparative studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this new combination.

Sleep disorders are among the most common nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson\'s disease and are associated with reduced cognition and health-related quality of life. Disturbed sleep can often present in the prodromal or early stages of this neurodegenerative disease, rendering it crucial to manage and treat these symptoms. Levodopa and dopaminergic agonists are frequently prescribed to treat motor symptoms in Parkinson\'s disease, and there is increasing interest in how these pharmacological agents affect sleep and their effect on concomitant sleep disturbances and disorders. In this review, we discuss the role of dopamine in regulating the sleep-wake state and the impact of neurodegeneration on sleep. We provide an overview of the effects of levodopa and dopaminergic agonists on sleep architecture, insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep-disordered breathing, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, and restless legs syndrome in Parkinson\'s disease. Levodopa and dopaminergic drugs may have different effects, beneficial or adverse, depending on dosing, method of administration, and differential effects on the different dopamine receptors. Future research in this area should focus on elucidating the specific mechanisms by which these drugs affect sleep in order to better understand the pathophysiology of sleep disorders in Parkinson\'s disease and aid in developing suitable therapies and treatment regimens.
Scanga A, Lafontaine A-L, Kaminska M. An overview of the effects of levodopa and dopaminergic agonists on sleep disorders in Parkinson\'s disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(6):1133-1144.

BACKGROUND: Medication regimens for Parkinson\'s disease (PD) may change as the disease progresses, symptoms fluctuate, or medication-related adverse events occur. This study evaluated treatment trends by observation year for patients initially receiving monotherapy with levodopa and a peripheral dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (PDDI).
METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, therapy changes were evaluated for patients across the US diagnosed with PD on or before 6/30/2014 who initially received levodopa-PDDI monotherapy. Index date was the first clinic visit. Post-index was any time between the first 31 days after index and study end (6/30/2019). Index Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) score and medication changes were also analyzed by index low (<400 mg/day) or high (≥400 mg/day) levodopa doses in the levodopa-PDDI combinations.
RESULTS: In the levodopa-PDDI cohort (n = 95), there were 0.39 dose escalations, 0.16 dose reductions, 0.12 discontinuations, 0.19 therapy switches, and 0.24 add-ons per patient per year during the study. Most dose escalations or add-ons occurred within the first 6 months post-index. Of those who ever stopped levodopa-PDDI (n = 34), 31 (91%) restarted within the study period. Most (83%) patients who restarted levodopa-PDDI did so in the same year as stopping treatment. Index low dose users were associated with lower H-Y scores, were more inclined to escalate their dose, and were less inclined to reduce their dose in the first 2 years of treatment than index high dose users.
CONCLUSIONS: Prescribers and patients tend to experiment with levodopa-PDDI treatment. Although many patients appeared to stop levodopa-PDDI after an initial course of treatment, most subsequently restarted treatment.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson\'s disease (PD) management seeks to balance the benefits and harms of current medications and evolves as the disease progresses. The natural history of PD and associated patterns of treatment change were analyzed to identify unmet needs in treatment of PD symptoms.
METHODS: Medical charts of patients from clinics across the US diagnosed on or before June 30th, 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Index date was the first clinic visit, and the post-index period was through study end (June 30th, 2019). Outcomes included the frequency of therapy changes in the post-index period, reasons for therapy change, and adverse events (AE).
RESULTS: Patients (n = 203) at index were receiving levodopa-peripheral dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (PDDI) monotherapy (47%), dopaminergic agonist (DA) monotherapy (15%), monoamine oxidase B inhibitor (MAOBI) monotherapy (14%), or combination therapies. The percentage of patients in Hoehn-Yahr disease Stage 1-2 was 52% at index and 20% by the end of the study. Frequencies of motor, non-motor, and neuropsychiatric symptoms increased during the enrollment. Levodopa-PDDI monotherapy and levodopa-PDDI + MAOBI had the lowest rates of therapy changes. Symptom relapse was the most common reason for dose escalation, add-on, and dose reduction, whereas AEs were the most common reason for discontinuation and switching. Dose escalation, add-on, and forward switch were most likely to occur in the first 6 months of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Therapy changes during the study period reflected the challenging and evolving management of PD as the disease progresses. New or add-on symptomatic treatments are needed that are well-tolerated and able to control PD symptoms.

Similar to other neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinson\'s disease (PD) has been extensively investigated with respect to its neuropathological background and possible treatment options. Since the symptomatic outcomes are generally related to dopamine deficiency, the current treatment strategies towards PD mainly employ dopaminergic agonists as well as the compounds acting on dopamine metabolism. These drugs do not provide disease modifying properties; therefore alternative drug discovery studies focus on targets involved in the progressive neurodegenerative character of PD. This study has aimed to present the pathophysiology of PD concomitant to the representation of drugs and promising molecules displaying activity against the validated and non-validated targets of PD.

Hyperprolactinemia, defined by a level of serum prolactin above the standard upper limit of normal range, is a common finding in clinical practice and prolactinomas are the main pathological cause. Prolactinomas lead to signs and symptoms of hormone oversecretion, such as galactorrhea and hypogonadism, as well as symptoms of mass effect, including visual impairment, headaches and intracranial hypertension. Diagnosis involves prolactin measurement and sellar imaging, but several pitfalls are involved in this evaluation, which may difficult the proper management. Treatment is medical in the majority of cases, consisting of dopamine agonists, which present high response rates, with a very favorable safety profile. Major adverse effects that should be monitored consist of cardiac valvulopathy and impulse control disorders. Other treatment options include surgery and radiotherapy. Temozolomide may be used for aggressive or malignant carcinomas. Finally, pregnancy outcomes are similar to general population even when dopamine agonist treatment is maintained.

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, there has been increasing awareness of the side effects of dopamine agonists (DAs), including impulse control disorders. We hypothesized that there may be a shift toward more conservative use of DAs.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the change in prescribing practices for dopaminergic medications in Parkinson\'s disease between 2010 and 2017.
METHODS: Data were collected from the Parkinson\'s Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative registry. Baseline characteristics were compared between the 2010 and 2017 cohorts using chi-squared tests for discrete and t tests for continuous variables. Logistic regressions were conducted for each class of medications to assess the effect of time points (2010 vs. 2017) and prespecified covariates on the probability of prescribing.
RESULTS: A total of 2,717 participants from 2010 and 2,900 participants from 2017 were included in the analysis. Mean (standard deviation) age was 67.4 (10) and 68.7 (9.3) for the 2010 and 2017 cohorts, respectively (P < 0.0001). After controlling for baseline characteristics, DA use was unchanged (P = 0.1172). The odds of using monoamine oxidase B inhibitors was 52% higher in 2017 than in 2010 (P < 0.0001), 38% lower for catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (P < 0.0001), 25% lower for amantadine (P < 0.0001), and 31% lower for anticholinergics (P = 0.0153). There was no difference in the utilization of levodopa in the 2 cohorts (86.1% vs. 86.2%; P = 0.5783).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing awareness of impulse control disorders, there has been no reduction in the use of DAs during the past decade. Overall, there is less utilization of adjunctive classes of drugs except for an increase in the use of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors.