donor lymphocyte infusion

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)后复发的急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)具有灾难性的预后。linatumomab,CD3/CD19定向双特异性T细胞衔接器,据报道对高级B细胞ALL(B-ALL)有效,即使在allo-HCT之后.然而,博纳多单抗治疗髓外复发(EMR)的疗效存在争议.供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)是另一种值得考虑的用于allo-HCT后复发的ALL的免疫疗法。我们报告了一名56岁的B-ALL妇女的病例。在第二次完全缓解(CR)期间进行了Allo-HCT。allo-HCT后13个月,B-ALL的孤立EMR(iEMR)无骨髓损伤。用2个周期的blinatumomab实现第三个CR。然后再施用四个周期的blinatumomab和DLI。患者未发生移植物抗宿主病,并已确认2年无治疗缓解,无第二次allo-HCT。因此,blinatumomab被认为是一种有效的挽救治疗iEMR的B-ALLallo-HCT后,因为iEMR的肿瘤负荷比全身复发时的低,低肿瘤负荷是blinatumomab疗效的预后因素。此外,免疫巩固疗法只有在不平衡的效应物/靶标比率得到恢复并且通过免疫监视降低肿瘤负荷的情况下,才可能引起移植物抗白血病效应.
    Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has a catastrophic prognosis. Blinatumomab, a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T cell engager, is reportedly effective for advanced B-cell ALL (B-ALL), even after allo-HCT. However, the efficacy of blinatumomab in extramedullary relapse (EMR) is controversial. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is another immunological treatment worth considering for ALL relapsed after allo-HCT. We report the case of a 56-year-old woman with B-ALL. Allo-HCT was performed during the second complete remission (CR). Thirteen months after allo-HCT, isolated EMR (iEMR) of B-ALL developed without bone marrow lesions. A third CR was achieved with 2 cycles of blinatumomab. An additional four cycles each of blinatumomab and DLI were then administered. The patient did not develop graft-versus-host disease and has confirmed 2-year treatment-free remission without a second allo-HCT. Therefore, blinatumomab was considered an effective salvage therapy for iEMR of B-ALL after allo-HCT, because iEMR could have a lower tumor burden than that seen in systemic relapse, and low tumor burden was a prognostic factor for response to blinatumomab. Furthermore, immunological consolidation therapies could only provoke graft-versus-leukemia effects if the imbalanced effector/target ratio was restored and the tumor burden was lowered through immunosurveillance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:定期监测CD34供体嵌合状态(DC)是预测AML/MDS的同种异体干细胞移植(alloHSCT)受体复发的高度敏感方法。CD34DC降至80%以下是随后复发的指标。有有限的研究评估由混合CD34DC(MDC)触发的供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)的疗效,解决嵌合体下降的问题。
    方法:我们对2012年至2023年连续接受DLI(有或没有阿扎胞苷)治疗CD34MDC的alloHSCT患者进行了回顾性分析。
    结果:在21例获得CD34DC随访的患者中,14(66.7%)在有或没有阿扎胞苷(dli-FDC)的DLI后实现了CD34全供体嵌合(FDC),而7人(33.3%)没有(dli-MDC)。与dli-MDC相比,dli-FDC的2年累积复发率(CIR)显着降低(21.4%vs.85.7%,P<0.001),与优越的总生存期相关(OS;未达到的中位年与0.67年[95%CI,0.58-ND],P<.001)。DLI后II-IV级急性GVHD的发生率为14.9%,dli-FDC组中重度cGVHD为42.8%.DLI后dli-FDC组的5年非复发死亡率(NRM)为7.1%。
    结论:我们的研究表明,DLI后CD34FDC的恢复与减少复发和改善总生存率相关。NRM低。
    BACKGROUND: Regular monitoring of CD34 donor chimerism (DC) is a highly sensitive method of predicting relapse in allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) recipients with AML/MDS. A fall of CD34 DC below 80% is an indicator of ensuing relapse. There are limited studies assessing the efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) triggered by mixed CD34 DC (MDC), in addressing falling chimerism.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive alloHSCT patients between 2012 to 2023 who received DLI (with or without azacitidine) for CD34 MDC without morphologic relapse at the time of infusion.
    RESULTS: Of the 21 patients with follow up CD34 DC available, 14 (66.7%) achieved CD34 full donor chimerism (FDC) following DLI with or without azacitidine (dli-FDC), while 7 (33.3%) did not (dli-MDC). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in dli-FDC compared to dli-MDC (21.4% vs. 85.7%, P < 0.001), correlating with superior overall survival (OS; median years not reached vs. 0.67 years [95% CI, 0.58-ND], P < .001). Rates of grade II-IV acute GVHD post-DLI were 14.9%, and moderate-severe cGVHD was 42.8% in the dli-FDC group. The 5-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) of the dli-FDC group was 7.1% following DLI.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the restoration of CD34 FDC post-DLI is associated with reduced relapse and improved overall survival, with low NRM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)为血液恶性肿瘤提供了潜在的治愈性治疗。治疗性移植物抗白血病(GvL)效应由供体T细胞攻击患者造血(恶性)细胞诱导。然而,如果健康的非造血组织成为目标,移植物抗疾病(GvHD)可能发展。HLA匹配的alloHCT后,GvL和GvHD由识别患者细胞上HLA呈递的多态肽的供体T细胞诱导,所谓的次要组织相容性抗原(MiHA)。GvL和GvHD之间的平衡取决于MiHA的组织分布和靶向这些MiHA的T细胞频率。针对广泛表达的MiHAs的T细胞诱导GvL和GvHD,而那些靶向具有造血限制表达的MiHA的诱导GvL而没有GvHD。最近,alloHCT后在天然免疫反应中鉴定的MiHA库扩展到159个HLA-I限制性的总MiHA,包括14个限制造血的MiHAs.这篇综述探讨了它们与预测的潜在相关性,监视器,并操纵GvL和GvHD以改善HLA匹配的alloHCT后的临床结果。
    Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) provides a potential curative treatment for haematological malignancies. The therapeutic Graft-versus-Leukaemia (GvL) effect is induced by donor T cells attacking patient hematopoietic (malignant) cells. However, if healthy non-hematopoietic tissues are targeted, Graft-versus-Disease (GvHD) may develop. After HLA-matched alloHCT, GvL and GvHD are induced by donor T cells recognizing polymorphic peptides presented by HLA on patient cells, so-called minor histocompatibility antigens (MiHAs). The balance between GvL and GvHD depends on the tissue distribution of MiHAs and T-cell frequencies targeting these MiHAs. T cells against broadly expressed MiHAs induce GvL and GvHD, whereas those targeting MiHAs with hematopoietic-restricted expression induce GvL without GvHD. Recently, the MiHA repertoire identified in natural immune responses after alloHCT was expanded to 159 total HLA-I-restricted MiHAs, including 14 hematopoietic-restricted MiHAs. This review explores their potential relevance to predict, monitor, and manipulate GvL and GvHD for improving clinical outcome after HLA-matched alloHCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    供体淋巴细胞输注(DLIs)通常是异基因造血干细胞移植后的推荐产品,以增加移植物抗白血病的效果。据报道,在移植后复发的慢性粒细胞白血病中,DLI的成功率更高。无论DLI的指示是什么,与DLI输注后相关的死亡率为5%-20%,超过三分之一的患者在DLI后将发展为急性和/或慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)。我们报告了两例移植后使用DLIs治疗残留病的病例。两个DLI都平淡无奇。输注后患者均未出现GVHD征象。虽然两个病人都因不同的原因而过期,均与DLI输注无关。来自已发表文献的信息表明,DLI应在复发后早期施用,或作为接受T细胞耗尽移植物的患者的预防策略。侵袭性疾病患者在DLI之前可能会从疾病减少中获益。然而,需要进一步的证据来评估其疗效,尤其是复发或残留的血液恶性肿瘤。
    Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) are often recommended products after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant to increase graft - versus - leukemia effect. More success rate of DLI has been reported in relapsed posttransplant chronic myeloid leukemia. Whatever the indication for DLI, mortality related to post-DLI infusion is 5%-20%, and more than one-third of patients will develop acute and/or chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) after DLI. We report two cases where DLIs were used for residual disease after posttransplant. Both of DLI went uneventful. None of the patient\'s developed signs of GVHD postinfusion. Although both patients expired with different causes, none were related to DLI infusion. Information from published literature suggests that DLI should be administered early after relapse or as a prophylactic strategy in patients receiving T-cell-depleted grafts, and patients with aggressive diseases may benefit from disease reduction before DLI. However, further evidence is required to evaluate its efficacy, especially in relapsed or residual hematological malignancies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景/目标:复发性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)仍然是一个尚未解决的不良结局问题。本案例研究旨在评估blinatumomab的有效性,有或没有门淋巴细胞输注(DLI),用于治疗可测量的残留病(MRD)阳性B-ALL。方法:本研究包括所有接受blinatumomab抢救治疗的患者。研究中包括11名患者。对所有患者进行MRD阴性评估。结果:在开始blinatumomab治疗之前,7名患者MRD检测呈阳性,三个测试为阴性,其中一人患有难治性疾病。造血细胞移植(HCT)保留给5例持续性MRD患者。6例患者MRD阴性,随后未进行HCT。只有两名患者复发;一名患者死于复发,另一例接受卡非佐米治疗,此后MRD阴性.9例患者在中位随访28个月(15-52个月)时MRD阴性。在最后一次随访日期,抢先DLI后,三名MRD阳性移植后患者中有两名仍处于分子完全缓解状态。在第一次打捞中,在诱导末期MRD阳性B细胞前体ALL的儿科患者中,blinatumomab可能实现完全缓解并桥接至HCT.结论:关于如何治疗移植后复发的决定继续影响生存结果。Blinatumomab联合DLI可能会延长高危儿科患者的释放选择范围。这种方法对于移植后MRD阳性的高风险ALL患者是令人鼓舞的。
    Background/Objectives: Relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) remains an unresolved matter of concern regarding adverse outcomes. This case study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of blinatumomab, with or without door lymphocyte infusion (DLI), in treating measurable residual disease (MRD)-positive B-ALL. Methods: All patients who received blinatumomab salvage therapy were included in this study. Eleven patients were included in the study. All patients were evaluated for MRD-negativity. Results: Before starting blinatumomab therapy, seven patients tested positive for MRD, three tested negative, and one had refractory disease. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was reserved for five patients with persistent MRD. Six patients became MRD-negative and subsequent HCT was not performed. Only two patients relapsed; one patient died of relapse, and the other one received carfilzomib-based therapy and was MRD-negative thereafter. Nine patients were MRD-negative at a median follow-up of 28 months (15-52 months). Two of three MRD-positive post-transplant patients remained in complete molecular remission after preemptive DLI at the last follow-up date. In the first salvage, blinatumomab may achieve complete remission and bridging to HCT in pediatric patients with end-of-induction MRD-positive B-cell precursor ALL. Conclusions: The decision on how to treat post-transplant relapse continues to affect survival outcomes. Blinatumomab combined with DLI may extend the armamentarium of release options for high-risk pediatric patients. This approach is encouraging for high-risk ALL patients who are MRD-positive post-transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项纵向研究基于供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)对外周血(PB)CD34+和CD3+供体嵌合(DC)下降的结果。
    方法:从2012年到2018年,从BMT数据库和电子病历(EMR)收集数据。主要目的是比较AML和MDS的allo-SCT后患者中基于PBCD34或CD3DC下降的DLI适应症及其总生存期(OS)。
    结果:18/70患者符合纳入标准。DLI的适应症为i)PBCD34DC≤80%下降,形态学复发,ii)下降PBCD34DC≤80%,无形态复发;iii)下降PBCD3DC≤80%,无下降PBCD34DC。Logrank分析显示PBCD34+DC下降和形态学复发具有显著较低的OS。如果在30天有PBCD34+和CD3+嵌合反应,线性回归显示DLI后OS更好(p=0.029),GVHD(p=0.032)和在DC下降时逐渐减弱的免疫抑制(p=0.042)。
    结论:DLI对于PBCD34+DC值≤80%和形态学复发具有最低的OS。在这项研究中,即使PBCD3+DC值低至13%,DLI后也实现了全DC,前提是PBCD34+DC保持>80%。进一步的研究在CD34+DC中作为疾病复发和移植丧失的生物标志物是至关重要的。
    This longitudinal study was based on the outcomes of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) for falling peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ and CD3+ donor chimerism (DC).
    From 2012 to 2018, data was collected from the BMT database and electronic medical records (EMR). The primary objective was to compare the indication for DLI based on falling PB CD34+ or CD3+ DC in patients post allo-SCT for AML and MDS and their overall survival (OS).
    18/70 patients met the inclusion criteria. Indications for DLI were i) falling PB CD34+ DC ≤ 80 % with morphological relapse, ii) falling PB CD34+ DC ≤ 80 % without morphological relapse and iii) falling PB CD3+ DC ≤ 80 % without falling PB CD34+ DC. Log rank analysis showed falling PB CD34+ DC and morphological relapse had significantly lower OS. Linear regression demonstrated better OS post DLI if there was PB CD34+ and CD3+ chimerism response at 30 days (p = 0.029), GVHD (p = 0.032) and tapering immunosuppression at the time of falling DC (p = 0.042).
    DLI for PB CD34+ DC values ≤ 80 % and morphological relapse had the lowest OS. In this study, full DC was achieved after DLI even with a PB CD3+DC value as low as 13 %, provided the PB CD34+ DC remained > 80 %. Further research is vital in CD34+ DC as a biomarker for disease relapse and loss of engraftment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)后疾病复发是治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的主要挑战。我们根据不同的治疗方法调查了allo-SCT复发后的总体生存率(OS)。
    方法:我们分析了2015年至2021年在圣安托万大学医院进行allo-SCT后复发的134例患者,ParisandSpedaliCivilidiBrescia,布雷西亚.其中,103(77%)接受治疗,包括69/103(67%)在明显复发时接受治疗,34/103(33%)在分子/细胞遗传学复发或混合嵌合发生时以先发制人的方式接受治疗。40/103(39%)患者的治疗是基于供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)。
    结果:1-,2-,接受DLI治疗的患者(n=40)的5年OS为67%,34%,34%,分别,对于预防性治疗的人(n=20)和43%,20%,20%,分别,对于明显复发的患者(n=20)(p<0.01)。1-,2-,未接受DLI治疗的患者(n=63)的5年OS为54%,40%,26%,分别,对于那些预防性治疗的人(n=14)和17%,5%,0%,分别,对于明显复发的患者(n=49)(p<0.01)。
    结论:采用先发制人策略的复发治疗与改善预后相关,特别是在使用DLI时。
    BACKGROUND: Disease relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the main challenge for curing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We investigated the overall survival (OS) after allo-SCT relapse according to different therapeutic approaches.
    METHODS: We analyzed 134 patients who relapsed after allo-SCT performed between 2015 and 2021 at Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris and Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia. Of these, 103 (77%) were treated, comprising 69/103 (67%) who received therapy in overt relapse and 34/103 (33%) who were treated in a pre-emptive manner when molecular/cytogenetics recurrence or mixed chimerism occurred. The treatment was donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI)-based for 40/103 (39%) patients.
    RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS of patients treated with DLI (n = 40) was 67%, 34%, and 34%, respectively, for those treated preventively (n = 20) and 43%, 20%, and 20%, respectively, for those treated in overt relapse (n = 20) (p < 0.01). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS of patients treated without DLI (n = 63) was 54%, 40%, and 26%, respectively, for those treated preventively (n = 14) and 17%, 5%, and 0%, respectively, for those treated in overt relapse (n = 49) (p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Relapse treatment with a pre-emptive strategy was associated with improved outcomes, particularly when DLI was employed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是许多血液恶性肿瘤以及非恶性疾病的潜在治愈疗法。HSCT治疗恶性血液病的部分治疗基础依赖于诱导移植物抗白血病(GVL)效应,其中供体免疫细胞识别并消除受体内残留的恶性细胞。从而保持缓解。GVL是临床上明显的现象;然而,负责诱导这种效应的特定细胞类型和所涉及的分子机制在很大程度上仍不明确。在供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)后观察到GVL的最佳例子之一,对复发性疾病或初期/预期复发的既定疗法。DLI涉及将来自原始HSCT供体的外周血淋巴细胞输注到受体中。取决于潜在的疾病和靶细胞的内在负担,在用DLI治疗的20-80%的患者中可以观察到持续缓解。在这次审查中,我们将讨论DLI后GVL机制的最新知识,通过操作DLI增强GVL的实验策略(例如新抗原疫苗接种,特定细胞类型的选择/消耗)和通过更好的GVL效应的分子定义来改善DLI和血液恶性肿瘤的细胞免疫疗法的研究前景。
    Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for many hematologic malignancies as well as non-malignant conditions. Part of the curative basis underlying HSCT for hematologic malignancies relies upon induction of the graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect in which donor immune cells recognize and eliminate residual malignant cells within the recipient, thereby maintaining remission. GVL is a clinically evident phenomenon; however, specific cell types responsible for inducing this effect and molecular mechanisms involved remain largely undefined. One of the best examples of GVL is observed after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI), an established therapy for relapsed disease or incipient/anticipated relapse. DLI involves infusion of peripheral blood lymphocytes from the original HSCT donor into the recipient. Sustained remission can be observed in 20-80% of patients treated with DLI depending upon the underlying disease and the intrinsic burden of targeted cells. In this review, we will discuss current knowledge about mechanisms of GVL after DLI, experimental strategies for augmenting GVL by manipulation of DLI (e.g. neoantigen vaccination, specific cell type selection/depletion) and research outlook for improving DLI and cellular immunotherapies for hematologic malignancies through better molecular definition of the GVL effect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    异基因干细胞移植(alloSCT)后未修饰的供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)可以增强有益的移植物抗白血病(GvL)作用,但也可能诱发严重的移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)。为了改善GvL和GvHD之间的平衡,确定影响DLI同种反应性的因素至关重要。
    我们研究了DLI时患者来源的抗原呈递细胞的存在的影响,如通过骨髓(BM)嵌合状态估计的,通过DLI时的绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)测量的淋巴细胞减少症,和存在接近DLI的病毒感染(从头或再激活)对DLI后GvHD的风险。该队列由急性白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征患者组成,他们在基于alemtuzumab的alloSCT后预防性或预防性接受DLI作为标准治疗。在复发风险高的患者中,在相关或无关供体的情况下,在alloSCT(n=88)后3个月给予DLI,剂量为0.3x106或0.15x106T细胞/kg,分别。所有其他患者(n=76)接受3x106或1.5x106T细胞/kg,分别,在alloSCT后6个月。
    对于两个DLI,具有低强度预处理和无关供体的患者发生GvHD的风险最高.对于三个月时给予的DLI,DLI前1周和后2周内的病毒感染是GvHD的另一个重要危险因素(与无病毒感染相比,风险比(HR)3.66).在alloSCT后六个月,病毒感染很少见,与GvHD无关.相比之下,混合BM嵌合体(与完全供体相比,≥5%混合嵌合体的HR3.63)是alloSCT后6个月给予DLI后GvHD的重要危险因素.<1000x106/l的ALC在此DLI之后显示出与GvHD相关的趋势(HR2.05与≥1000x106/l相比,95%置信区间0.94-4.45)。此外,数据表明,在3个月时存在接近DLI的病毒感染或在6个月时存在≥5%的混合嵌合体与GvHD的严重程度相关,从而增加它们对目前GvHD无复发生存的负面影响。
    这些数据表明,DLI后GvHD的危险因素取决于DLI的设置。
    Unmodified donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can boost the beneficial Graft-versus-Leukemia (GvL) effect but may also induce severe Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD). To improve the balance between GvL and GvHD, it is crucial to identify factors that influence the alloreactivity of DLI.
    We investigated the effects of the presence of patient-derived antigen-presenting cells at time of DLI as estimated by the bone marrow (BM) chimerism status, lymphopenia as measured by the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at time of DLI, and the presence of a viral infection (de novo or reactivation) close to DLI on the risk of GvHD after DLI. The cohort consisted of patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who prophylactically or pre-emptively received DLI as standard care after alemtuzumab-based alloSCT. In patients at high risk for relapse, DLI was administered at 3 months after alloSCT (n=88) with a dose of 0.3x106 or 0.15x106 T cells/kg in case of a related or unrelated donor, respectively. All other patients (n=76) received 3x106 or 1.5x106 T cells/kg, respectively, at 6 months after alloSCT.
    For both DLIs, patients with reduced-intensity conditioning and an unrelated donor had the highest risk of GvHD. For DLI given at three months, viral infection within 1 week before and 2 weeks after DLI was an additional significant risk factor (hazard ratio (HR) 3.66 compared to no viral infection) for GvHD. At six months after alloSCT, viral infections were rare and not associated with GvHD. In contrast, mixed BM chimerism (HR 3.63 for ≥5% mixed chimerism compared to full donor) was an important risk factor for GvHD after DLI given at six months after alloSCT. ALC of <1000x106/l showed a trend for association with GvHD after this DLI (HR 2.05 compared to ≥1000x106/l, 95% confidence interval 0.94-4.45). Furthermore, the data suggested that the presence of a viral infection close to the DLI at three months or ≥5% mixed chimerism at time of the DLI at six months correlated with the severity of GvHD, thereby increasing their negative impact on the current GvHD-relapse-free survival.
    These data demonstrate that the risk factors for GvHD after DLI depend on the setting of the DLI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    急性髓性白血病(AML)的异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后髓外(EM)复发罕见,并引起全身复发。因此,由于移植后患者的有限治疗是可行的,因此预后非常差.维奈托克(VEN)的疗效和安全性,据报道,新开发的口服B细胞白血病/淋巴瘤-2抑制剂联合氮杂胞苷(AZA)治疗新诊断的AML患者,这些患者不适合接受强化化疗.我们报告了一例病例,其中放射治疗和供体淋巴细胞输注后的VENAZA抢救治疗在AML患者中显示出同种异体HSCTEM复发的结果。
    Extramedullary (EM) relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is rare and causes systemic relapse. Consequently, the prognosis is very poor because limited treatment is feasible in post-transplant patients. The efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN), a newly developed oral inhibitor of B-cell leukemia/lymphoma-2, plus azacytidine (AZA) in patients newly diagnosed with AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy have been reported. We report a case in which VEN + AZA salvage treatment following radiation therapy and donor lymphocyte infusion afforded promising results in a patient with AML who showed post-allo-HSCT EM relapse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号