diversity, equity, and inclusion

多样性,Equity,和包容性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当一个社会的资源分散不均匀时,通常通过分配标准,沿着社会定义的人群类别出现了不同的模式。电源,宗教,亲属关系,声望,种族,种族,性别,年龄,性取向,和阶级都在决定谁能获得社会商品方面发挥作用。在大多数情况下,社会不平等是指结果缺乏平等,但它也可以指缺乏平等的机会。不幸的是,医疗保健不能幸免于这些社会差距和/或不平等。这些介入心脏病学中的医疗保健差异最近被心血管造影和干预(SCAI)协会带到了最前沿,作为2020-2021年的主要重点。在最近的出版物中,据报道,在介入心脏病学各小节中存在导致差异的独特因素.SCAI先天性心脏病理事会成立了一个工作组,以进一步调查影响先天性心脏病和儿科心脏病学实践的独特挑战和差异。
    When resources in a society are dispersed unevenly, generally through allocation standards, distinct patterns emerge along lines of socially defined categories of people. Power, religion, kinship, prestige, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and class all play a role in determining who has access to social goods in society. In most cases, social inequality refers to a lack of equality of outcome, but it can also refer to a lack of equality of access to opportunity. Unfortunately, health care is not immune to these social disparities and/or inequalities. These health care disparities in interventional cardiology were recently brought to the forefront by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) as a major focus of 2020-2021. In a recent publication, unique factors leading to disparities were reported to exist among the subsections of interventional cardiology. The congenital heart disease council of SCAI created a task force to further investigate the unique challenges and disparities impacting the practice of congenital heart disease and pediatric cardiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定LGBTQ+DEI出版物,并将目前跨亚专业手术领域的文献频率纳入背景。
    方法:使用PubMed进行PRISMA系统综述,MEDLINE,WebofScience于2024年4月进行。纳入标准要求定义的子专业的领域内DEI内容,而外语文献,糟糕的方法论,并排除重复项。主要终点是跨亚专业的出版物数量。次要终点包括出版日期,研究设计,和样本量。
    结果:在确定的702篇文章中,27人被包括在内神经外科在整形手术的同时进行了两项研究,骨科手术,耳鼻喉科,胸部手术分别为11、7、5和2。在各个亚专业中,出版物的频率具有统计学上的显着差异(p=0.031)。事后残留分析显示,神经外科和胸外科的出版物在统计上较少,而整形手术在统计学上更多(神经系统手术的p=0.04,0.002,0.21,0.42,0.04,整形手术,骨科手术,耳鼻喉科,和胸外科,分别)。次要结果发现,大部分出版日期在2022年至2024年之间。研究方法涉及横断面研究,社论,和回顾性审查(分别为14,11和3),中位样本量为248.5.
    结论:本系统综述提供了客观数据,可将DEI文献纳入外科亚专科。总的来说,这篇综述强调了神经外科领域缺乏LGBTQ+DEI文献,并主张纠正这一差距,使外科医生和患者受益.了解当前的数字并评估其他手术领域的进展可能会提供解决方案。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify LGBTQ+ diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) publications and contextualize the current frequency of the literature across subspecialty surgical fields.
    METHODS: A PRISMA systematic review using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science was conducted in April 2024. The main inclusion criterion was intrafield DEI content for defined subspecialties; exclusion criteria were foreign language, poor methodology, and duplicates. The primary endpoint was the number of publications across subspecialties. Secondary endpoints included publication dates, study design, and sample size.
    RESULTS: Of the 702 articles identified, 27 were included in the analysis. Neurologic surgery had 2 studies; plastic surgery, 11 studies; orthopedic surgery, 7 studies; otolaryngology, 5 studies; and thoracic surgery, 2 studies. There was a statistically significant different frequency of publications across subspecialties (P = 0.031). Post hoc residual analysis indicated that neurosurgery and thoracic surgery had statistically fewer publications, while plastic surgery had statistically more publications (P = 0.04, 0.002, 0.21, 0.42, and 0.04 for neurologic surgery, plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, and thoracic surgery, respectively). Secondary outcomes found a majority of publications between 2022 and 2024. Study methodologies involved cross-sectional studies, editorials, and retrospective reviews (14, 11, and 3 respectively) and had a median sample size of 248.5.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides objective data to contextualize DEI literature across surgical subspecialties. Overall, this review highlights the lack of LGBTQ+ DEI literature in neurosurgery and advocates for correcting this gap for the benefit of both surgeons and patients. Understanding the current numbers and evaluating progress in other surgical fields might provide solutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究使用自创框架来探索多样性,股本,和包容性(DEI)和健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)为重点的实验室和学习活动增加了学生对理解内隐偏见(IB)和SDoH方面的信心,以及这些活动如何影响学生的舒适度讨论和信心启动对话DEI/SDoH主题与同事,教员,supervisors,和病人。
    方法:第一年(P1)PharmD学生在两门课程中从事三项学习活动。学生被要求评估他们的偏见,并将DEI/SDoH纳入他们的专业身份形成(PIF)。本研究采用了混合方法,嵌入式方法,以分析通过问卷和在秋季学期的三个点进行的作业收集的评估数据。定量分析采用了准实验,主体之间,前测-后测设计。定性组件使用开放式问题来获得对参与者体验的更多见解,收集感知细节,并提供了上下文。
    结果:单因素方差分析显示,对于与信心理解IB和SDoH相关的所有项目,评估点之间有统计学上的显着增加。随着时间的推移,与主管/教职员工和患者讨论DEI/SDoH主题的舒适度增加。与同事讨论DEI/SDoH主题的舒适度没有增加。定性分析产生了三个突出的主题(偏见和特权意识,教育,和专业性)。
    结论:这项研究发现学生开始评估自己的知识,信仰,以及自我授权框架所定义的社会和专业环境中的主张。学生讨论DEI/SDoH主题的舒适度和信心随着时间的推移而增加。研究结果支持让学生参与多模态编程可能支持将DEI/SDoH纳入PIF。
    OBJECTIVE: This study used a self-authorship framework to explore if diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and social determinants of health (SDoH)-focused laboratories and learning activities increase student confidence in understanding aspects of implicit bias and SDoH, and how these activities impact student comfort in discussing and confidence in initiating conversations on DEI/SDoH topics with colleagues, faculty, supervisors, and patients.
    METHODS: First-year PharmD students engaged in 3 learning activities across 2 courses. Students were challenged to evaluate their biases and incorporate DEI/SDoH into their professional identity formation. This study used a mixed-methods, embedded approach to analyze assessment data collected via a questionnaire and assignments administered at 3 points during the fall semester. Quantitative analysis used a quasi-experimental, between-participants, pretest-posttest design. The qualitative component used open-ended questions to gain additional insight into participant experiences, gathered detail on perceptions, and provided context.
    RESULTS: A 1-way analysis of variance showed statistically significant increases between assessment points for all items related to confidence in understanding implicit bias and SDoH. Comfort in discussing DEI/SDoH topics with supervisors/faculty and patients increased over time. Comfort in discussing DEI/SDoH topics with colleagues did not increase. Three salient themes emerged from qualitative analyses: bias and privilege awareness, education, and professionalism.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that students started evaluating their own knowledge, beliefs, and claims in social and professional settings as defined by the self-authorship framework. Student comfort and confidence in discussing DEI/SDoH topics increased over time. Findings support that engaging students in multimodal programming may support incorporation of DEI/SDoH into professional identity formation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在描述当前时代主要心胸外科杂志编辑委员会性别构成的时间趋势。
    方法:对2008年至2023年两个北美心胸外科杂志的编辑委员会成员的性别代表性进行了横断面分析。成员姓名和角色是从可用的每月问题中收集的。使用经过验证的软件编程对性别进行分类。将女性代表的年度比例与胸外科劳动力进行了比较。
    结果:在研究期间,确定了558个人(3,641个名字),其中14.3%是女性。两种期刊的编辑委员会妇女总数都有所增加。妇女的比例也从2008年的2.5%(3/118)增加到2023年的17.8%(71/399)(P<.001),超过女性在胸外科劳动力中所占的比例,从2007年的3.8%增加到2021年的8.3%(P<0.001)。男性的平均参与时间比女性长(53.8个月比44.5个月,P=0.01)。编辑委员会高级职位中的女性也从2008年的3.3%(1/30)增加到2023年的28.6%(42/147)(P<.001),非指定职位的增长几乎是非指定职位的三倍,从2008年的2.3%(2/88)增加到2023年的11.5%(29/252)(P<.001)。
    结论:近年来,女性在高影响力心胸外科杂志编辑委员会和高级职位的任命比例超过了女性在心胸外科的总体代表性。这些发现表明在包容性努力方面取得了进展,并为减少学术性别差异提供了见解。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize chronologic trends of gender composition of the editorial boards of major cardiothoracic surgery journals in the current era.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of gender representation in editorial board members of 2 North American cardiothoracic surgery journals from 2008 to 2023. Member names and roles were collected from available monthly issues. Validated software programming was used to classify gender. The annual proportion of women representation was compared to the thoracic surgery workforce.
    RESULTS: During the study period, 558 individuals (3641 names) were identified, 14.3% of whom were women. The total number of editorial board women increased for both journals. The proportion of women also increased from 2.5% (3 out of 118) in 2008 to 17.8% (71 out of 399) in 2023 (P < .001), exceeding the percentage of women in the thoracic surgery workforce, which increased from 3.8% in 2007 to 8.3% in 2021 (P < .001). The average duration of participation was longer for men than for women (53.8 vs 44.5 months; P = .01). Women in editorial board senior roles also increased from 3.3% (1 out of 30) in 2008 to 28.6% (42 out of 147) in 2023 (P < .001), almost triple the increase in nondesignated roles from 2.3% (2 out of 88) in 2008 to 11.5% (29 out of 252) in 2023 (P < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, the appointment of women to the editorial boards of high-impact cardiothoracic surgery journals and senior roles have proportionally exceeded the overall representation of women in cardiothoracic surgery. These findings indicate progress in inclusive efforts and offer insight toward reducing academic gender disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着病理学领域的不断发展,我们的见习人数在下降。为了对抗这种趋势,ASC多样性,Equity,包容委员会成立了科学,医学,和细胞学SumMer证书计划,以改善病理学/细胞病理学的暴露,重点是多样性,股本,和包容。在这里,我们报告了该计划前两年的发现。
    方法:针对高中和大学阶段在医学领域代表性不足的学生开发了一个在线课程。它包括几个说教课程,介绍涉及细胞病理学家和细胞学家的常见程序。还包括对细胞病理学家的采访。对参与者进行了人口统计信息调查,并提供了课程评估。
    结果:在该计划的第一年(2021年),34名参与者完成了该计划,2022年增加到103。在这两年中,参与者的人口背景有所不同;然而,只有少数参与者自我认同在医学中代表性不足。在这两年中,绝大多数(>85%)的参与者都是高中生或大学生。2021年,100%的参与者表示该计划格式是有效的,94%的参与者认为该内容适合他们的教育水平;2022年的结果相似。2021年,66%的人认为医疗保健是一项潜在的职业;这一数字在2022年增加到83%。2021年和2022年,分别为31%和38%,分别,认为细胞学是一种职业。
    结论:评价非常好,对细胞病理学产生兴趣。在接触代表性不足的少数群体方面存在障碍,需要开展更多工作。扩展到更广泛的受众可能会增加外展。
    BACKGROUND: As our field of pathology continues to grow, our trainee numbers are on the decline. To combat this trend, the ASC Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee established the Science, Medicine, and Cytology SumMer Certificate program to improve exposure to pathology/cytopathology with a focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Herein, we report our findings of the first 2 years of the program.
    METHODS: An online course was developed targeting students who are underrepresented in medicine at the high school and college level. It consisted of several didactic sessions, presenting the common procedures involving cytopathologists and cytologists. Interviews with cytopathologists were also included. Participants were surveyed for demographic information and provided course evaluations.
    RESULTS: In the first year of the program (2021), 34 participants completed the program, which increased to 103 in 2022. In both years there was a diversity in participant demographic backgrounds; however, only a minority of participants self-identified as being underrepresented in medicine. A vast majority (>85%) of participants in both years were high school or college students. In 2021, 100% of participants stated that the program format was effective and 94% thought the content was appropriate for their level of education; in 2022 the results were similar. In 2021, 66% considered health care as a potential career; this value increased in 2022 to 83%. In 2021 and 2022, 31% and 38%, respectively, considered cytology as a career.
    CONCLUSIONS: Evaluations were excellent, generating interest in cytopathology. Barriers in reaching underrepresented minorities exist and additional work is needed. Expansion to a wider audience may increase outreach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    多样性,股本,包容是我们许多人在医学上努力实现的一个强大目标,在病人护理和行政领导方面。随着世界的发展,医学实践必须随之发展。我们认识到我们医学专业历史的重要性。如果我们不承认我们历史的所有部分,我们注定要重复一遍。这个特刊是独一无二的,不同于以前在诊断细胞病理学上发表的任何文章。这个问题着眼于一些细胞病理学的历史。此历史回顾之后是细胞病理学的一些现状。有对全球细胞病理学的见解。本问题的最后一部分探讨了美国对细胞技术学校的迫切需求。所有这些领域都对过去至关重要,present,和细胞病理学的未来。
    Diversity, equity, and inclusion is a powerful goal which many of us strive toward in medicine, both in patient care and administrative leadership. As the world evolves, the practice of medicine must evolve with it. We are cognizant of the importance of the history of our medical specialties. If we do not acknowledge all parts of our history, we are doomed to repeat it. This special issue is unique and unlike anything that has previously been published in Diagnostic Cytopathology. This issue looks at some of the history of cytopathology. This historical review is followed by some of the present state of cytopathology. There are insights into global cytopathology. The final portion of this issue examines the critical need for cytotechnology schools in the United States. All of these areas are critical to the past, present, and future of cytopathology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管大约五分之一的妇产科(OBGYN)居民从骨科或国际医学院入学,关于向住院医师过渡的大多数文献都集中在对抗疗法的医学院毕业生身上。为这种教育转型创造全面的干预措施,我们必须了解所有入境居民的需求。我们的目标是检查OBGYN居民对他们过渡到居住权的看法,并了解居民的背景和医学院环境如何影响他们感知的准备感。
    方法:一项16项调查询问了有关人口统计的问题,向居住权的过渡,居民福祉,倦怠,以及向团契的过渡。对准备的感知进行了评估,提出了以下问题:“我觉得我已经为居住的第一年做好了充分的准备”(1=强烈同意,5=强烈反对)。卡方检验和Fisher精确检验和逻辑回归探讨了感知准备与居民背景的关联。
    方法:2022年培训考试时进行的调查。
    方法:所有OBGYN居民。
    结果:在5761名符合条件的参与者中,3741(64.9%)同意并完成了调查。在回答问题的3687名参与者中,2441(66.2%)同意或强烈同意他们已经做好了充分的准备。与同种疗法毕业生相比,骨病毕业生报告的感觉准备较少(379/610,62.1%vs1,924/2,766,69.6%)(OR0.72,95CI0.60-0.86,p<0.01)。与来自对抗疗法机构的毕业生相比,国际医学院毕业生报告感觉准备好的可能性要低7倍(137/304,45.1%vs1924/2776,69.6%)(OR0.60,95CI0.53-0.68,p<0.01)。与白人受访者相比,来自代表性不足的种族和族裔背景的受访者不太可能报告感觉准备好了(276/535,51.6%vs1738/2387,72.8%)(OR0.39,95CI0.33-0.48,p<0.01)。
    结论:居民对向居住权过渡的看法的差异突出表明,有必要开始用全面和可获得的资源来抵消普遍存在的不平等现象。
    OBJECTIVE: Although approximately one-fifth of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents matriculate from osteopathic or international medical schools, most literature regarding the transition to residency focuses on allopathic medical school graduates. To create comprehensive interventions for this educational transition, we must understand the needs of all incoming residents. Our objective was to examine OBGYN residents\' perceptions of their transition to residency, and to understand how residents\' background and medical school environment influence their perceived sense of readiness.
    METHODS: A 16-item survey asked questions about demographics, the transition to residency, resident well-being, burnout, and the transition to fellowship. Perception of preparedness was assessed with the question \"I felt that I was well-prepared for the first year of residency\" (1=strongly agree, 5=strongly disagree). Chi-squared and Fisher\'s exact tests and logistic regression explored association of perceived preparedness with residents\' backgrounds.
    METHODS: Survey administered at time of the in-training examination in 2022.
    METHODS: All OBGYN residents.
    RESULTS: Of 5761 eligible participants, 3741 (64.9%) provided consent and completed the survey. Of the 3687 participants who answered the question, 2441 (66.2%) either agreed or strongly agreed that they felt well-prepared. Fewer osteopathic graduates reported feeling prepared compared to allopathic graduates (379/610, 62.1% vs 1,924/2,766, 69.6%) (OR 0.72, 95%CI 0.60-0.86, p < 0.01). International medical school graduates were seven times less likely to report feeling prepared compared to those from allopathic institutions (137/304, 45.1% vs 1924/2776, 69.6%) (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.53-0.68, p < 0.01). Respondents from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds were less likely to report feeling prepared compared to White respondents (276/535, 51.6% vs 1738/2387, 72.8%) (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.33-0.48, p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Differences in residents\' perceptions of their transition to residency highlight the need to begin offsetting pervasive inequities with comprehensive and accessible resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    科学会议和会议是研究人员建立网络的宝贵机会,沟通,发展知识。对于早期职业科学家来说,会议也可能令人生畏,令人困惑,压倒性的,特别是没有足够的准备或经验。从这个角度来看,我们根据以前在科学会议和会议中的经验提供建议。这些指南概述了有关准备和参加会议的隐藏课程的部分内容,导航会议,与其他科学家建立网络,并在坚持建议的行为准则的同时参加社会活动。
    Scientific conferences and meetings are valuable opportunities for researchers to network, communicate, and develop knowledge. For early career scientists, conferences can also be intimidating, confusing, and overwhelming, especially without having adequate preparation or experience. In this Perspective, we provide advice based on previous experiences navigating scientific meetings and conferences. These guidelines outline parts of the hidden curriculum around preparing for and attending meetings, navigating conference sessions, networking with other scientists, and participating in social activities while upholding a recommended code of conduct.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号