distractor

牵引器
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然最近在更好地理解认知控制背景下前额叶皮层(PFC)的参与方面取得了进展,确切的机制仍未完全理解。成功的行为需要正确检测与目标相关的线索,并抵制不相关的干扰。额叶网络被认为对于面对分心时保持认知控制很重要。本研究调查了伽马带力量在分心阻力和额顶网络中的作用,因为它的增加与胆碱能活性有关。我们研究了伽玛活性的变化及其与额叶顶向下调制的关系,以解决干扰物挑战和自下而上的干扰物处理。健康的年轻人在佩戴EEG时使用改良版的干扰物状况持续注意力任务(dSAT)进行了测试。改进型牵引器的设计使其可以夹带振荡活动,夹带的强度用于评估分心的程度。在干扰物挑战期间,自上而下的控制增加了左侧顶叶区域而不是啮齿动物研究预测的右侧前额叶区域的伽马功率。具体来说,左顶叶伽马功率响应于分心而增加,其中该增加量与反映视觉区域自下而上的分心处理的神经活动呈负相关。右前额叶区域伽玛功率的变异性与分心过程中响应时间变异性的增加有关。这可能表明右前额区可能有助于自上而下控制而不是其实现所需的信令。
    While recent advancements have been made towards a better understanding of the involvement of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the context of cognitive control, the exact mechanism is still not fully understood. Successful behavior requires the correct detection of goal-relevant cues and resisting irrelevant distractions. Frontal parietal networks have been implicated as important for maintaining cognitive control in the face of distraction. The present study investigated the role of gamma-band power in distraction resistance and frontoparietal networks, as its increase is linked to cholinergic activity. We examined changes in gamma activity and their relationship to frontoparietal top-down modulation for distractor challenges and to bottom-up distractor processing. Healthy young adults were tested using a modified version of the distractor condition sustained attention task (dSAT) while wearing an EEG. The modified distractor was designed so that oscillatory activities could be entrained to it, and the strength of entrainment was used to assess the degree of distraction. Increased top-down control during the distractor challenge increased gamma power in the left parietal regions rather than the right prefrontal regions predicted from rodent studies. Specifically, left parietal gamma power increased in response to distraction where the amount of this increase was negatively correlated with the neural activity reflecting bottom-up distractor processing in the visual area. Variability in gamma power in right prefrontal regions was associated with increased response time variability during distraction. This may suggest that the right prefrontal region may contribute to the signaling needed for top-down control rather than its implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在感官和认知过程之间复杂的相互作用中,大脑必须筛选大量的感官数据来确定相关信号。这种选择性机制对于有效控制行为至关重要,通过让生物体专注于重要任务并阻止干扰。抑制最近的干扰物(IRD)任务通过探索抑制干扰物如何影响视觉环境中物体的后续眼球运动来检查此选择过程。在一系列的实验中,克劳福德等人的研究。(2005a)表现出对先前被干扰者占据的位置出现的目标的延迟响应,展示了分心器对即将到来的目标的空间位置施加的传统抑制作用。这项研究旨在复制这种效果,并研究存在多个干扰因素时的任何潜在约束。探索是否在具有多个干扰因素的更具生态相关性的场景中观察到这种影响对于评估其可应用于更广泛环境的程度至关重要。实验1成功复制了效果,仅使用单个干扰物显示出明显的IRD效果。实验2-5探索了这种现象的许多可能的解释。
    In the complex interplay between sensory and cognitive processes, the brain must sift through a flood of sensory data to pinpoint relevant signals. This selective mechanism is crucial for the effective control of behaviour, by allowing organisms to focus on important tasks and blocking out distractions. The Inhibition of a Recent Distractor (IRD) Task examines this selection process by exploring how inhibiting distractors influences subsequent eye movements towards an object in the visual environment. In a series of experiments, research by Crawford et al. (2005a) demonstrated a delayed response to a target appearing at the location that was previously occupied by a distractor, demonstrating a legacy inhibition exerted by the distractor on the spatial location of the upcoming target. This study aimed to replicate this effect and to investigate any potential constraints when multiple distractors are presented. Exploring whether the effect is observed in more ecologically relevant scenarios with multiple distractors is crucial for assessing the extent to which it can be applied to a broader range of environments. Experiment 1 successfully replicated the effect, showing a significant IRD effect only with a single distractor. Experiments 2-5 explored a number of possible explanations for this phenomenon.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与情绪处理和调节异常以及认知缺陷有关。这项研究评估了PTSD患者和健康对照(HCs)在工作记忆(WM)维持人脸过程中与认知和情绪干扰物相关的差异大脑激活模式,并通过相反的影响评估了激活模式变化之间的关系分心类型和灰质体积(GMV)。22例PTSD和22例HC患者接受了T1加权磁共振成像(MRI)和事件相关功能MRI(fMRI),分别。记录与事件相关的fMRI数据,同时受试者使用人脸和与创伤相关的干扰物执行延迟响应WM任务。与HC相比,PTSD患者额下回(IFG)的GMV显着降低(p<0.05,FWE校正)。对于人脸干扰者的审判,与HC相比,患者额上回和IFG的活动显着降低(p<0.05,FWE校正)。与HCs相比,患者在与创伤相关的干扰物的面部识别任务中表现出较低的准确性评分和较慢的反应时间,并且在与创伤相关的干扰物试验中观察到STG中的大脑活动显着增加(p<0.05,FWE校正)。PTSD患者中与注意力分散作用相关的这种差异大脑激活模式可能与神经机制有关,这些神经机制与对混淆的注意力分散者的认知控制和控制情绪分散能力有关。
    Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with abnormalities in the processing and regulation of emotion as well as cognitive deficits. This study evaluated the differential brain activation patterns associated with cognitive and emotional distractors during working memory (WM) maintenance for human faces between patients with PTSD and healthy controls (HCs) and assessed the relationship between changes in the activation patterns by the opposing effects of distraction types and gray matter volume (GMV). Twenty-two patients with PTSD and twenty-two HCs underwent T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and event-related functional MRI (fMRI), respectively. Event-related fMRI data were recorded while subjects performed a delayed-response WM task with human face and trauma-related distractors. Compared to the HCs, the patients with PTSD showed significantly reduced GMV of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). For the human face distractor trial, the patients showed significantly decreased activities in the superior frontal gyrus and IFG compared with HCs (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). The patients showed lower accuracy scores and slower reaction times for the face recognition task with trauma-related distractors compared with HCs as well as significantly increased brain activity in the STG during the trauma-related distractor trial was observed (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Such differential brain activation patterns associated with the effects of distraction in PTSD patients may be linked to neural mechanisms associated with impairments in both cognitive control for confusable distractors and the ability to control emotional distraction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,状态焦虑通过增加对显着干扰者或威胁线索的敏感性或缩小空间注意力来促进刺激驱动的注意力捕获并损害目标导向的注意力控制。然而,这方面的最新发现喜忧参半,而对状态依赖性焦虑如何影响注意力表现知之甚少。这里,我们采用了一种新的双目标搜索范式来研究这种关系。这种范式使我们能够研究注意力控制以及在不同焦虑状态下焦点如何变窄。参与者在参与双目标视觉搜索任务之前,观看了一部短片-焦虑诱导或中立。我们发现,与那些有干扰者相比,他们在没有显著干扰者的试验中表现更快、更准确,他们在中心呈现的任务中比外围表现得更好。然而,尽管在引发焦虑的过程中自我报告的焦虑显着增加,参与者在速度和准确性方面的表现在焦虑和中立的会议上保持可比。这种韧性可能是由于补偿机制抵消了焦虑,由于双目标任务固有的高要求和工作内存负载。
    Previous research has shown that state anxiety facilitates stimulus-driven attentional capture and impairs goal-directed attentional control by increasing sensitivity to salient distractors or threat cues or narrowing spatial attention. However, recent findings in this area have been mixed, and less is known about how state-dependent anxiety may affect attentional performance. Here, we employed a novel dual-target search paradigm to investigate this relationship. This paradigm allowed us to investigate attentional control and how focus narrows under different anxiety states. Participants watched a short movie-either anxiety-inducing or neutral-before engaging in the dual-target visual search task. We found that they performed faster and more accurately in trials without the salient distractor compared to those with distractors, and they performed better in tasks presented on the center than the periphery. However, despite a significant increase in self-reported anxiety in the anxiety-inducing session, participants\' performance in terms of speed and accuracy remain comparable across both anxious and neutral sessions. This resilience is likely due to compensatory mechanisms that offset anxiety, a result of the high demands and working memory load inherent in the dual-target task.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在设计基于Sniffin\'Sticks嗅觉识别(SSOI)测试的中国改良嗅觉识别(CMOI)测试,方法是将不熟悉的干扰物和气味更改为中国人群。
    我们招募了200名健康志愿者(103名男性和97名女性,18-65岁,平均年龄35.04岁,SD10.96);在一项调查中,100名志愿者评估了他们对121种气味的熟悉程度,包括所有SSOI测试气味描述符和中国日常生活中常见的气味。根据调查结果对SSOI测试进行了修改。其他100名志愿者使用SSOI测试进行了三次测试,通过在SSOI测试中修改干扰物建立的修改干扰物嗅觉识别(MDOI)测试,和CMOI测试通过使用熟悉的难闻气味取代气味在MDOI测试中具有低正确识别率的气味而开发。我们比较了志愿者在修改过程中的测试分数。
    志愿者不熟悉SSOI测试中的31种气味描述符;23个熟悉度低的干扰物被更熟悉的干扰物取代。MDOI测试中正确识别率最低的三种气味(苹果,皮革,和菠萝)被熟悉的难闻气味所取代。CMOI测试中的测试分数明显高于其他测试(p<0.0001);CMOI测试中的正确识别率明显高于SSOI测试(p<0.01)。
    CMOI测试中的考试成绩显着提高;由于对气味及其干扰物的不熟悉,它防止了错误选择。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to design the Chinese Modified Olfactory Identification (CMOI) test based on the Sniffin\' Sticks Olfactory Identification (SSOI) test by changing unfamiliar distractors and odors for more familiar ones for the Chinese population.
    UNASSIGNED: We recruited 200 healthy volunteers (103 males and 97 females, aged 18-65 years, mean age 35.04 years, SD 10.96); in a survey, 100 volunteers rated their familiarity with 121 odors, including all the SSOI test odor descriptors and common odors in Chinese daily life. The SSOI test was modified according to the survey results. The other 100 volunteers were tested three times using the SSOI test, the Modified Distractors Olfactory Identification (MDOI) test established by modifying distractors in the SSOI test, and the CMOI test developed by using familiar unpleasant odors to displace the odors with low correct recognition rates in the MDOI test. We compared the test scores of the volunteers during the modification process.
    UNASSIGNED: Volunteers were unfamiliar with 31 odor descriptors in the SSOI test; 23 distractors with low familiarity were displaced with more familiar distractors. The three odors with the lowest correct recognition rate in the MDOI test (apple, leather, and pineapple) were displaced with familiar unpleasant odors. The test scores were significantly higher in the CMOI test than in others (p < 0.0001); the correct recognition rate in the CMOI test was significantly higher than in the SSOI test (p < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: The test scores in the CMOI test were significantly improved; it prevented choosing wrongly due to unfamiliarity with an odor and its distractors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脚跟骨折需要大量的手术切口,并且使用传统的撬动方法成功复位具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是评估使用Kirschner针引导牵张器治疗“外”位缩短跟骨内翻骨折的临床有效性。
    方法:回顾了2018年1月至2020年3月37例跟骨内翻缩短骨折患者的40例数据。术前进行侧位和轴位X线及3DCT检查以评估骨折类型,微创内固定是在“外”位置进行的,采用牵引器重新定位,术中和术后图像用于评估骨折复位和固定。在后续期间,使用VAS评分评估术后功能恢复状态,AOFAS评分,和FAOS得分。所有数据比较均采用配对样本t检验。
    结果:所有病例的平均随访时间为28.49±3.25个月,平均骨折愈合时间为7.84±0.71周。术后图像显示骨折复位固定良好,跟骨高度,长度,宽度,和反转角明显改善。在最后的后续行动中,跟骨高度,长度,宽度从39.35±4.44mm恢复,79.35±2.7mm,术前45.75±2.87mm至50.93±3.18mm,82.23±1.90mm,术后39.67±1.58mm(p<0.001;p<0.001;p<0.001)。跟骨倒置角由7.73°±2.26°恢复到3.80°±1.80°(p<0.001)。Böhler角和Gissane角从13.13°±3.02°和105.15°±8.94°提高到27.95°±3.41°和122.85°±5.54°(p<0.001;p<0.001)。没有未愈合的骨折,骨髓炎,或观察到创伤性关节炎。
    结论:微创内固定术结合“外入”位置的牵张器复位治疗跟骨内翻缩短骨折,在恢复解剖和保护软组织的同时有效。
    OBJECTIVE: Heel fractures need extensive surgical incisions and are challenging to successfully reposition using traditional prying. The goal of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of using a Kirschner pin-guided distractor to treat inversion shortening calcaneal fractures in the \"out-in\" position.
    METHODS: A total of 40 data from 37 patients with inversion shortened calcaneal fractures from January 2018 to March 2020 were reviewed. Preoperative lateral and axial X-rays and 3D CT were taken to assess the fracture type, and minimally invasive internal fixation was performed in the \"out-in\" position with distractor repositioning, and intraoperative and postoperative images were taken to assess fracture repositioning and fixation. During the follow-up period, the postoperative functional recovery status was assessed using the VAS score, AOFAS score, and FAOS score. Paired-samples t-test was used for all data comparisons.
    RESULTS: All cases received a mean follow-up of 28.49 ± 3.25 months, and the mean fracture healing time was 7.84 ± 0.71 weeks. The postoperative images showed well-fixed fracture repositioning, and calcaneal height, length, width, and inversion angles were significantly improved. At the final follow-up, the calcaneal height, length, and width recovered from 39.35 ± 4.44mm, 79.35 ± 2.7mm, and 45.75 ± 2.87mm preoperatively to 50.93 ± 3.18mm, 82.23 ± 1.90mm, and 39.67 ± 1.58mm postoperatively (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.001). The calcaneus inversion angle restored from 7.73° ± 2.26° to 3.80° ± 1.80° (p < 0.001). Böhler\'s angle and Gissane\'s angle improved from 13.13° ± 3.02° and 105.15° ± 8.94° to 27.95° ± 3.41° and 122.85° ± 5.54° (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). No non-healing fractures, osteomyelitis, or traumatic arthritis were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive internal fixation with distractor repositioning in the \"out-in\" position is effective in the treatment of inversion shortening calcaneal fractures while restoring the anatomy and protecting the soft tissue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    搜索丢失的物品时,我们调整注意力对象的已知属性。以前,人们认为注意力被调整到搜索目标的真实属性(例如,orange),或从不相关特征稍微移向可以更优化地将目标与干扰物区分开的值的属性(例如,红橙色;最佳调谐)。然而,最近的研究表明,注意力经常被调整到搜索目标的相对特征(例如,redder),以便与目标的相对特征相匹配的所有项目都能平等地吸引注意力(例如,所有红色项目;关系帐户)。显示最佳调整仅在识别目标的后期阶段发生。然而,这一部门的证据主要依赖于评估第一次眼球运动的眼动追踪研究.本研究测试了当任务以隐蔽的注意力完成并且不移动眼睛时,是否也可以观察到这种划分。我们使用参与者脑电图中的N2pc来评估秘密注意力,并发现了可比较的结果:注意力最初被调整到目标的相对颜色,与目标颜色的干扰物相比,相对匹配的干扰物的N2pc明显更大。然而,在响应精度方面,稍微移动,“最佳”干扰因素对目标识别的干扰最大。这些结果证实,早期(隐蔽)的注意力被调整到一个项目的相对属性,根据关系账户,而后来的决策过程可能会偏向于最佳特征。
    When searching for a lost item, we tune attention to the known properties of the object. Previously, it was believed that attention is tuned to the veridical attributes of the search target (e.g., orange), or an attribute that is slightly shifted away from irrelevant features towards a value that can more optimally distinguish the target from the distractors (e.g., red-orange; optimal tuning). However, recent studies showed that attention is often tuned to the relative feature of the search target (e.g., redder), so that all items that match the relative features of the target equally attract attention (e.g., all redder items; relational account). Optimal tuning was shown to occur only at a later stage of identifying the target. However, the evidence for this division mainly relied on eye tracking studies that assessed the first eye movements. The present study tested whether this division can also be observed when the task is completed with covert attention and without moving the eyes. We used the N2pc in the EEG of participants to assess covert attention, and found comparable results: Attention was initially tuned to the relative colour of the target, as shown by a significantly larger N2pc to relatively matching distractors than a target-coloured distractor. However, in the response accuracies, a slightly shifted, \"optimal\" distractor interfered most strongly with target identification. These results confirm that early (covert) attention is tuned to the relative properties of an item, in line with the relational account, while later decision-making processes may be biased to optimal features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不同模式之间的相互作用可以帮助更有效地感知刺激。然而,很少有研究关注多感官干扰因素如何影响任务表现。通过采用行为和事件相关电位(ERP)技术,本研究检查了多感官视听干扰物是否比单感官干扰物更有效地吸引注意力。此外,我们探讨了这种过程是否受到工作记忆负荷的调节。在三个实验中,周围听觉采用n-back任务(1-back和2-back),视觉,或视听干扰物。视觉和听觉干扰因素是白色光盘和纯音(实验1和2),动物的图片和声音(实验3),分别。实验1中的行为结果显示,在高工作记忆负荷下,但在低负荷条件下,没有明显的干扰效应。对带有视听干扰物的中央字母的反应明显慢于对没有干扰物的字母的反应,而单感干扰物和无干扰物条件之间没有显着差异。同样,实验2和3中的ERP结果表明,仅在高负荷条件下才存在集成。也就是说,简单视听干扰物的早期集成(240-340ms)和复杂视听干扰物的晚期集成(440-600ms)。这些发现表明,多感官干扰物可以整合并有效地吸引注意力远离主要任务,即,干扰效应。此外,这种效果只有在高工作记忆负荷条件下才会明显。
    The interplay between different modalities can help to perceive stimuli more effectively. However, very few studies have focused on how multisensory distractors affect task performance. By adopting behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) techniques, the present study examined whether multisensory audiovisual distractors could attract attention more effectively than unisensory distractors. Moreover, we explored whether such a process was modulated by working memory load. Across three experiments, n-back tasks (1-back and 2-back) were adopted with peripheral auditory, visual, or audiovisual distractors. Visual and auditory distractors were white discs and pure tones (Experiments 1 and 2), pictures and sounds of animals (Experiment 3), respectively. Behavioral results in Experiment 1 showed a significant interference effect under high working memory load but not under low load condition. The responses to central letters with audiovisual distractors were significantly slower than those to letters without distractors, while no significant difference was found between unisensory distractor and without distractor conditions. Similarly, ERP results in Experiments 2 and 3 showed that there existed an integration only under high load condition. That is, an early integration for simple audiovisual distractors (240-340 ms) and a late integration for complex audiovisual distractors (440-600 ms). These findings suggest that multisensory distractors can be integrated and effectively attract attention away from the main task, i.e., interference effect. Moreover, this effect is pronounced only under high working memory load condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于在其他二元决策中添加不相关的干扰因素选项是否会影响采取两种选择中的哪一种,一直存在争议。我们表明,如果干扰因素产生两种相反但不相互排斥的影响,那么关于这个问题的不同观点就会得到调和。每种效应在决策空间的不同部分占主导地位:(1)积极的干扰效应预测高价值的干扰者改善决策;(2)消极的干扰效应,与分裂归一化模型相关的类型,随着干扰值的增加,精度会降低。这里,我们证明了两种干扰因素效应在人类决策中共存,但在由选择值定义的决策空间的不同部分中共存。我们显示,经颅磁刺激(TMS)破坏内侧顶内区域(MIP)会增加积极的干扰作用,而以消极的干扰作用为代价。此外,具有较大MIP体积的个体也较不容易受到TMS诱导的破坏。这些发现还证明了MIP与干扰因素通过分裂正常化对决策的影响之间存在因果关系。
    There has been debate about whether addition of an irrelevant distractor option to an otherwise binary decision influences which of the two choices is taken. We show that disparate views on this question are reconciled if distractors exert two opposing but not mutually exclusive effects. Each effect predominates in a different part of decision space: (1) a positive distractor effect predicts high-value distractors improve decision-making; (2) a negative distractor effect, of the type associated with divisive normalisation models, entails decreased accuracy with increased distractor values. Here, we demonstrate both distractor effects coexist in human decision making but in different parts of a decision space defined by the choice values. We show disruption of the medial intraparietal area (MIP) by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) increases positive distractor effects at the expense of negative distractor effects. Furthermore, individuals with larger MIP volumes are also less susceptible to the disruption induced by TMS. These findings also demonstrate a causal link between MIP and the impact of distractors on decision-making via divisive normalisation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号