disproportionality

不相称性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    洛拉替尼显示对间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的明显全身和颅内疗效。我们旨在根据食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)建立氯拉替尼的安全性。
    收集了FAERS在2019年至2023年之间的报告,以进行不成比例分析。采用报告比值比(ROR)检测与氯拉替尼相关的潜在不良事件(AE)。临床特点,年龄和性别差异,还调查了AE的发病时间.
    在从FAERS数据库获得的8,818,870份AE报告中,共发现2,941份AE报告与洛拉替尼相关。发现167个与氯拉替尼相关的AE信号。经常报告的不良事件包括高胆固醇血症,水肿,认知障碍与临床试验和药物指导中观察到的一致。然而,药物标签中指出的AEs如间质性肺病和AV阻滞需要进一步评估。应更多关注新的潜在意外AE,包括肺动脉高压和放射性坏死。此外,我们检查了不同年龄和性别的特定高危AE。此外,大多数AE发生在氯拉替尼开始治疗后的前2个月内,中位发病时间为51天.
    我们的研究提供了对氯拉替尼上市后安全性的宝贵见解,这可能有利于氯拉替尼在临床上的合理和安全给药。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证氯拉替尼与确定的AE之间的关联。
    UNASSIGNED: Lorlatinib displays marked systemic and intracranial efficacy against anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to establish the safety profile of lorlatinib based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
    UNASSIGNED: Reports from the FAERS between 2019 and 2023 were collected to conduct the disproportionality analysis. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was employed to detect the potential adverse events (AEs) related to lorlatinib. The clinical characteristics, age and gender differences, time to onset of AEs were also investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 2,941 AE reports were found to be associated with lorlatinib among the 8,818,870 AE reports obtained from the FAERS database. 167 lorlatinib-related AE signals were identified. The frequently reported AEs including hypercholesterolemia, oedema, and cognitive disorder were in line with those observed in clinical trials and drug instruction. However, AEs such as interstitial lung disease and AV block indicated in the drug label require further evaluation. More attention should be paid to the new potential unexpected AEs including pulmonary arterial hypertension and radiation necrosis. Furthermore, we examined the specific high-risk AEs of different ages and genders. In addition, majority of AEs occurred within the first 2 months after lorlatinib initiation with a median onset time of 51 days.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study provides valuable insight into the post-marketing safety profile of lorlatinib, which can potentially benefit the rational and safe administration of lorlatinib in the clinic. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the associations between lorlatinib and the identified AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Lumateperone,一种新型抗精神病药物于2019年12月获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,但其不良事件概况仍未得到充分探索.本研究使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库来探讨其潜在的安全性问题。
    该研究对2019年第四季度至2023年第三季度的FAERS数据进行了回顾性分析,提取了与lumateperone相关的报告。使用报告赔率比(ROR)和贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)算法的不成比例分析用于检测不良事件(AE)的信号。
    我们的研究处理了与lumateperone相关的4,777个相关的AE披露,发布了125个信号,这些信号满足了26个系统器官类(SOCs)的ROR和BCPNN评估基准。有趣的是,这些信号中有108个被归类为未预料到的,聚焦明显的精神表现,如躁狂症(ROR=73.82,95%CI=57.09-95.46;IC=6.16,IC025=4.49),和轻躁狂(ROR=34.74,95%CI=15.54-77.64;IC=5.10,IC025=3.43),除尿潴留(ROR=3.59,95%CI=1.80-7.19;IC=1.84,IC025=0.18)和5-羟色胺综合征(ROR=8.69,95%CI=4.81-15.72;IC=3.11,IC025=1.45)等非精神病现象。
    该研究提供了有关lumateperone上市后的真实世界安全性数据,是对临床试验研究信息的重要补充。医疗保健专业人员应警惕服用lumateperone的双相抑郁症患者躁狂转变的风险。未来需要更多的流行病学研究来探索和进一步评估lumateperone的风险收益问题。
    UNASSIGNED: Lumateperone, a novel antipsychotic drug that was granted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in December 2019, remains insufficiently explored for its adverse event profile. This study used the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to explore its potential safety issues.
    UNASSIGNED: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of FAERS data from the fourth quarter of 2019 to the third quarter of 2023, extracting reports related to lumateperone. Disproportionality analysis using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) algorithms was employed to detect signals of adverse events (AEs).
    UNASSIGNED: Our research processed 4,777 pertinent AE disclosures related to lumateperone, unveiling 125 signals that satisfied both ROR and BCPNN evaluative benchmarks across 26 System Organ Classes (SOCs). Intriguingly, 108 of these signals were categorized as unanticipated, spotlighting notable psychiatric manifestations such as mania (ROR = 73.82, 95% CI = 57.09-95.46; IC = 6.16, IC025 = 4.49), and hypomania (ROR = 34.74, 95% CI = 15.54-77.64; IC = 5.10, IC025 = 3.43), alongside non-psychiatric phenomena like urinary retention (ROR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.80-7.19; IC = 1.84, IC025 = 0.18) and serotonin syndrome (ROR = 8.69, 95% CI = 4.81-15.72; IC = 3.11, IC025 = 1.45).
    UNASSIGNED: This research provides real-world safety data on lumateperone post-marketing and is an important supplement to the information from clinical trial studies. Healthcare professionals should be vigilant for the risk of a manic switch in patients with bipolar depression who are administered lumateperone. More epidemiological studies are needed in the future to explore and further evaluate the risk-benefit issue of lumateperone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据我们所知,之前没有研究分析乙酰唑胺与肺水肿之间的可能关联.这项研究的目的是使用EudraVigilance的数据来检测乙酰唑胺引起的肺水肿的安全信号。我们进行了不成比例分析(病例-非病例方法),计算截至2024年2月22日的报告赔率比(ROR)。在EudraVigilance登记的11684208例自发性不良反应病例中,38275例肺水肿。31例涉及乙酰唑胺。在超过一半的案例中,患者在接受白内障手术后接受单剂量乙酰唑胺治疗:潜伏期为10-90分钟.值得注意的是,有5例阳性再激发,6例导致死亡.乙酰唑胺的ROR为3.63(95%CI2.55-5.17)。在VigiBase®:ROR4.44中也观察到不成比例(95%CI3.34-5.90)。我们的研究证实了一个信号,表明与乙酰唑胺相关的严重肺水肿的风险。
    To our knowledge, no prior study has analysed a possible association between acetazolamide and pulmonary oedema. The aim of this study was to use data from the EudraVigilance to detect a safety signal for acetazolamide-induced pulmonary oedema. We performed a disproportionality analysis (case-noncase method), calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) up to 22 February 2024. Among 11 684 208 spontaneous cases of adverse reactions registered in EudraVigilance, 38 275 were pulmonary oedemas. Acetazolamide was involved in 31 cases. In more than half of those cases, the patients received a single dose of acetazolamide after undergoing cataract surgery: latency was 10-90 min. Remarkably, there were five cases of positive rechallenge and six cases resulted in death. The ROR for acetazolamide was 3.63 (95% CI 2.55-5.17). Disproportionality was also observed in VigiBase®: ROR 4.44 (95% CI 3.34-5.90). Our study confirms a signal that suggests a risk of serious pulmonary oedema associated with acetazolamide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在使用中国常规获得的数据评估数据挖掘技术在检测免疫接种后不良事件(AEFI)的安全性信号方面的性能。评估了检测疫苗安全性信号的四种不同方法。
    收集了2011年至2015年的AEFI数据用于我们的研究。我们使用四种不同的检测信号的方法分析了数据:比例报告比(PRR),报告赔率比(ROR),贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPNN),和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)。每种方法均以1-3个阳性阈值进行评估。为了评估这些方法的性能,我们使用已发表的信号速率作为金标准来确定敏感性和特异性.
    所识别的信号的数量从对于PRR1的602(具有阈值1)变化到对于MGPS1的127。当考虑常见反应作为参考标准时,MGPS1/2的敏感性为0.9%,PRR1/2的敏感性为38.2%,PRR1和ROR1的特异性为85.2%,MGPS1的特异性为96.7%.当考虑将罕见反应作为参考标准时,PRR1、PRR2、ROR1、ROR2和BCPNN的灵敏度最高(73.3%),而MGPS1表现出最高的特异性(96.9%)。
    对于常见的反应,敏感性适中,特异性高。对于罕见的反应,敏感性和特异性都很高。我们的研究为中国AEFI数据的信号检测方法和阈值的选择提供了有价值的见解。
    UNASSIGNED: The current study aims to assess the performance of data mining techniques in detecting safety signals for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) using routinely obtained data in China. Four different methods for detecting vaccine safety signals were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: The AEFI data from 2011 to 2015 was collected for our study. We analyzed the data using four different methods to detect signals: the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS). Each method was evaluated at 1-3 thresholds for positivity. To assess the performance of these methods, we used the published signal rates as gold standards to determine the sensitivity and specificity.
    UNASSIGNED: The number of identified signals varied from 602 for PRR1 (with a threshold of 1) to 127 for MGPS1. When considering the common reactions as the reference standard, the sensitivity ranged from 0.9% for MGPS1/2 to 38.2% for PRR1/2, and the specificity ranged from 85.2% for PRR1 and ROR1 to 96.7% for MGPS1. When considering the rare reactions as the reference standard, PRR1, PRR2, ROR1, ROR2, and BCPNN exhibited the highest sensitivity (73.3%), while MGPS1 exhibited the highest specificity (96.9%).
    UNASSIGNED: For common reactions, the sensitivities were modest and the specificities were high. For rare reactions, both the sensitivities and specificities were high. Our study provides valuable insights into the selection of signal detection methods and thresholds for AEFI data in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究调查了无家可归的州种族不相称性是否与过量死亡率的种族不相称性相关。
    方法:从美国住房和城市发展部获得了无家可归的人数(2015-2017年;按州和种族/族裔群体);人口估计和药物过量死亡人数(2018-2021年;按州和种族/族裔群体)从国家卫生统计中心获得。计算无家可归和过量死亡率不成比例的分数,以表明每个种族群体在经历无家可归的人中代表过多或不足的程度,或者在过量死亡中,分别(相对于每个种族群体在普通人群中的比例份额)。对于每个被检查的种族群体,具有稳健标准误差(SE)的普通最小二乘回归模型检查了无家可归的州级别不相称性与过量死亡率不相称性之间的关联,调整18-64岁和美国人口普查地区的百分比,以及教育程度和失业的不成比例。
    结果:无家可归的州种族不成比例与黑人过量死亡率的种族不成比例显着相关(b=0.16[SE=0.05];p<.01),美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(b=0.71[SE=0.23];p<0.01),和西班牙裔人口(b=0.17[SE=0.05];p<0.01),在针对地区和18-64岁的百分比进行调整的模型中。在对教育程度不成比例进行调整后,这三个人群中的显著正相关仍然存在,然而,在调整失业率不成比例后,这种关联在黑人人口中不再显著。
    结论:在无家可归者中种族/族裔少数群体比例最高的州,在过量死亡中种族/族裔少数群体比例相对较高。
    OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether state-level racial disproportionality in homelessness is associated with racial disproportionality in overdose mortality.
    METHODS: Counts of individuals experiencing homelessness (2015-2017; by state and racial/ethnic group) were obtained from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development; population estimates and counts of drug overdose deaths (2018-2021; by state and racial/ethnic group) were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. Homelessness and overdose mortality disproportionality scores were calculated to indicate the extent to which each racial group was over- or under- represented among those experiencing homelessness, or among overdose deaths, respectively (relative to each racial group\'s proportional share in the general population). For each racial group examined, ordinary least squares regression models with robust standard errors (SEs) examined associations between state-level disproportionality in homelessness and disproportionality in overdose mortality, adjusting for percent aged 18-64 and US Census Region, as well as disproportionality in educational attainment and unemployment.
    RESULTS: State-level racial disproportionality in homelessness was significantly and positively associated with racial disproportionality in overdose mortality for Black (b = 0.16 [SE = 0.05]; p < .01), American Indian/Alaska Native (b = 0.71 [SE = 0.23]; p < .01), and Hispanic populations (b = 0.17 [SE = 0.05]; p < .01), in models adjusting for region and percent aged 18-64. The significant positive associations in these three populations persisted after adjusting for educational attainment disproportionality, yet the association was no longer significant in the Black population after adjusting for unemployment disproportionality.
    CONCLUSIONS: States with the highest levels of racial/ethnic minority overrepresentation in homelessness generally also had relatively higher levels of racial/ethnic minority overrepresentation in overdose deaths.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前关于妊娠降钙素基因相关肽拮抗剂(CGRP-A)治疗发作性和慢性偏头痛的安全性的证据很少,并且尚未提供确切的信息。通过查询Vigibase®,世界卫生组织全球药物警戒数据库,本研究旨在检测CGRP-A和曲坦类药物与妊娠相关的报告频率的差异.
    方法:对VigiBase®自31.05.2023收集的重复安全性报告的不相称性分析,报告在妊娠期间暴露于CGRP-A,有或没有妊娠结局。使用具有95%置信区间(CI)的报告赔率比(ROR)作为不相称性的量度,并且用于检测不相称性报告信号的阈值设定为95%CI下限>1。
    结果:四百六十七份安全性报告报告报告了在怀孕期间暴露于CGRP-A,主要来自美利坚合众国(360/467,77%),患者报告频率更高(225/467,48%),主要是女性(431/467,92%),并且更频繁地报告在怀孕期间暴露于CGRP-A(400/467,86%)。与曲坦相比,对于妊娠相关安全性报告的总体报告,CGRP-A均未检测到不成比例的报告信号(ROR0.91,95%CI0.78-1.06),对于妊娠结局的报告(孕产妇和/或胎儿/新生儿,ROR0.54,95%CI0.45-0.66),或报告胎儿/新生儿结局(ROR0.53,95%CI0.41-0.68)。
    结论:这项研究表明,到目前为止,与Triptans相比,CGRP-A与VigiBase®妊娠相关的报告没有增加的信号。未来的药物警戒研究需要证实这些发现。
    BACKGROUND: Current evidence on the safety of calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists (CGRP-A) in pregnancy for the treatment of both episodic and chronic migraine is scarce and does not yet provide definitive information. By querying VigiBase®, the World Health Organization global pharmacovigilance database, this study aimed to detect differences in the reporting frequency between CGRP-A and triptans in relation to pregnancy.
    METHODS: Disproportionality analyses on de-duplicated safety reports collected in VigiBase® as of 31.05.2023 reporting exposure to CGRP-A in pregnancy with or without pregnancy outcomes. A Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of disproportionality and the threshold for the detection of a signal of disproportionate reporting was set with a 95% CI lower limit > 1.
    RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-seven safety reports reported exposure to CGRP-A in pregnancy, mostly originating from the United States of America (360/467, 77%), more frequently reported by patients (225/467, 48%), who were mainly females (431/467, 92%), and more frequently reported exposure to CGRP-A during pregnancy (400/467, 86%). Compared to triptans, no signals of disproportionate reporting were detected with CGRP-A either for the overall reporting of pregnancy-related safety reports (ROR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-1.06), for the reporting of pregnancy outcomes (maternal and/or foetal/neonatal, ROR 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.66), or for the reporting of foetal/neonatal outcomes (ROR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41-0.68).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, to date, there are no signals of increased reporting with CGRP-A compared to triptans in relation to pregnancy in VigiBase®. Future pharmacovigilance studies are needed to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:美泊利单抗已被FDA批准用于具有嗜酸性粒细胞表型的严重哮喘的附加维持治疗。关于美泊利单抗相关不良事件的真实世界研究有限。本研究旨在基于美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库探索美泊利单抗相关的不良事件。方法:在2015年10月至2022年12月期间,根据FAERS数据库的报告进行了不相称性分析,以评估美泊利单抗的安全性。人口统计信息,发病的时间,我们还研究了美泊利单抗长期暴露的安全性以及儿科患者的安全性.结果:在从FAERS数据库收集的13,497例美泊利单抗相关不良事件(AE)报告中,总共确定了736个重要的首选术语(PT)。经常报告的不良事件包括呼吸困难,疲劳,头痛与药物指导和以前的研究一致。意外的严重不良事件,如咳嗽,萎靡不振,胸部不适也被确认。大多数AE发生在美泊利单抗开始后的第一个月内。长期美泊利单抗暴露的患者以及儿科人群中经常报告肺炎和喘息。结论:我们的结果与以前的临床和真实世界研究的观察结果一致。还鉴定了美泊利单抗的新的和意外的AE信号。应密切关注美泊利单抗的长期安全性以及儿科人群的安全性。美泊利单抗的最佳使用需要前瞻性研究。
    Background: Mepolizumab has been approved by the FDA for add-on maintenance treatment of severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. Real-world studies on mepolizumab-associated adverse events are limited. The present study aimed to explore mepolizumab-related adverse events based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: A disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the safety profile of mepolizumab based on the reports from the FAERS database between October 2015 and December 2022. Demographic information, the time to onset, the safety of long-term mepolizumab exposure as well as safety in pediatric patients were also investigated. Results: A total of 736 significant preferred terms (PTs) were identified among the 13,497 mepolizumab-associated adverse events (AEs) reports collected from the FAERS database. The frequently reported AEs including dyspnea, fatigue, and headache were in line with drug instruction and previous studies. Unexpected significant AEs such as cough, malaise, and chest discomfort were also identified. Most AEs occurred within the first month after mepolizumab initiation. Pneumonia and wheezing were frequently reported in patients with long-term mepolizumab exposure as well as in the pediatric population. Conclusion: Our results were consistent with the observations in previous clinical and real-world studies. New and unexpected AE signals of mepolizumab were also identified. Close attention should be paid to the long-term safety of mepolizumab as well as safety in the pediatric population. Prospective studies are required for optimal use of mepolizumab.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们确定了具体的学科决策情况(即,脆弱的决策点[VDP])对美国2020年学校样本中的种族纪律差异做出了最大贡献。我们还研究了VDP对整体学科差异的贡献程度以及每所学校中最强的VDP之间的相似性程度。最后,我们直接将每所学校差异最大的VDP与办公室学科推荐率最高的情况(ODR)进行了比较,以确定与整体学校学科模式的一致性程度.我们发现学校内最常见的VDP是主观行为(例如,蔑视,中断)全天在教室里,身体攻击的ODR显著导致前10名VDP之间的差异。最强的单一VDP平均占整个学校种族差异的17%,前三名VDP占差异的37%。学校中最强的三个VDP在行为和位置上也非常一致。最后,ODR最多的情况和种族差异最大的情况之间存在适度的共识,样本中63%的学校的VDP与大多数ODR的情况相同。在缺乏对自己学校数据的规定性分析的情况下,这项研究的结果为学校领导和干预研究人员提供了更精确的,有希望的干预目标,以增加教育公平。
    In this study, we identified the specific discipline decision situations (i.e., vulnerable decision points [VDPs]) that contribute most to racial discipline disparities from a sample of 2020 schools across the United States. We also examined how much VDPs contributed to overall discipline disparities and the extent to which there was similarity among the strongest VDPs within each school. Last, we directly compared the VDP that contributed most to disparities in each school to situations with the highest rates of office discipline referrals (ODRs) to identify the extent of agreement with overall school discipline patterns. We found the most common VDPs within schools to be subjective behaviors (e.g., defiance, disruption) in classrooms throughout the day, with ODRs for physical aggression contributing notably to disparities among the top 10 VDPs. The strongest single VDP accounted for an average of 17% of racial disparities across the school and the top three VDPs accounted for 37% of disparities. The strongest three VDPs within schools also were remarkably consistent across behavior and location. Finally, there was moderate agreement between situations with the most ODRs and those with the strongest racial disparities, with 63% of schools in the sample having VDPs identical to their situations with most ODRs. In the absence of prescriptive analysis of their own school data, the results of this study provide school leaders and intervention researchers with more precise, promising targets for intervention to increase educational equity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童虐待与显著的发病率相关,预防是公共卫生的优先事项。鉴于儿童保护服务评估和回应中存在人际和结构性种族主义的证据,对于旨在支持儿童及其家庭的紧急干预措施和预防举措,必须优先考虑公平。照顾孩子的临床医生很有能力支持家庭,和以病人为中心的医疗之家,与社区服务合作,作为虐待预防服务的场所,具有独特的潜力。临床医生可以倡导支持家庭并降低儿童虐待风险的政策。
    Child maltreatment is associated with significant morbidity, and prevention is a public health priority. Given evidence of interpersonal and structural racism in child protective service assessment and response, equity must be prioritized for both acute interventions and preventive initiatives aimed at supporting children and their families. Clinicians who care for children are well positioned to support families, and the patient-centered medical home, in collaboration with community-based services, has unique potential as a locus for maltreatment prevention services. Clinicians can advocate for policies that support families and decrease the risk of child maltreatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    药物相关性肾损伤与住院时间延长、慢性肾脏病风险增加和死亡率增加有关。然而,目前缺乏关于儿童药物相关肾损伤的大人群研究.本研究旨在研究进行数据挖掘以产生关于药物的假设,这可能值得根据其增加儿童肾损伤的潜在风险进行评估。我们在FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中提取并分析了与儿童肾损伤相关的药物报告。我们使用比例报告比(PRR)进行了不成比例分析,以评估药物与儿童肾损伤之间的关系。同时,与药物标签进行比较,以确定药物,尽管目前在他们的标签中没有提到肾损伤,可能与儿童肾损伤的风险有关。在FAERS数据库中,共有6347名儿童患有药物相关的肾损伤。PRR最高的前五名药物为庆大霉素(PRR=12.28,N=157例,卡方=1602.77),哌拉西林他唑巴坦(PRR=9.77,N=129例,卡方=1003.24),氨氯地平(PRR=8.98,N=271例,卡方=1861.46),万古霉素(PRR=8.91,N=295例,卡方=1998.64),头孢曲松(PRR=8.00,N=251例,卡方=1494.02)。根据药品标签,9种药物(9/30)被归类为潜在的肾毒素。
    结论:大约三分之一与儿童肾损伤相关的药物在其药物标签中没有将肾损伤列为副作用。因此,未来的研究有必要评估这些药物是否与这种风险相关。
    背景:•肾毒性药物日益成为住院儿童急性肾损伤的常见原因。•目前,没有研究系统梳理与儿童肾损伤相关的药物。
    背景:•在数据挖掘中显示儿童潜在肾损伤信号的药物中约有三分之一没有在其药物标签中提及这种副作用。本研究提供了需要进一步研究的药物数据,以确定它们是否可能增加儿童肾损伤的风险。
    Drug-associated kidney injury is related to longer hospitalization and increased risk of chronic kidney disease and mortality. However, there is currently a lack of large population studies on drug-associated kidney injury in children. This study aimed to study perform data mining to generate hypotheses on drugs, which may deserve to be assessed as per their potential risk of increasing kidney injury in children. We extracted and analyzed reports on drugs associated with kidney injury in children in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). We conducted a disproportionality analysis using proportional reporting ratio (PRR) to evaluate the association between drugs and kidney injury in children. Meanwhile, comparisons were performed with drug labels to identify drugs that, despite not having kidney injury currently mentioned in their labels, may potentially be associated with risks of kidney injury in children. A total of 6347 children had drug-associated kidney injury in the FAERS database. The top five drugs with the highest PRR were gentamicin (PRR = 12.28, N = 157 cases, Chi-Squared = 1602.77), piperacillin-tazobactam (PRR = 9.77, N = 129 cases, Chi-Squared = 1003.24), amlodipine (PRR = 8.98, N = 271 cases, Chi-Squared = 1861.46), vancomycin (PRR = 8.91, N = 295 cases, Chi-Squared = 1998.64), and ceftriaxone (PRR = 8.00, N = 251 cases, Chi-Squared = 1494.02). According to drug labels, 9 drugs (9/30) were classified as potential nephrotoxins.
    CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of drugs associated with kidney injury in children do not list kidney injury as a side effect in their drug labels. Future studies are therefore warranted to evaluate whether these drugs are associated with such a risk.
    BACKGROUND: • Nephrotoxic drugs are an increasingly common cause of acute kidney injury in hospitalized children. • Currently, no study has systematically combed drugs associated with kidney injury in children.
    BACKGROUND: • Approximately a third of drugs showing signals for potential kidney injury in children in data mining do not mention this side effect in their drug labels. • This study provides data on drugs needing further study to determine whether they might increase the risk of kidney injury in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号