Adult-onset Still\'s disease (AOSD) stands as a perplexing condition with diverse clinical manifestations, posing significant diagnostic challenges for healthcare professionals. This case report delves into the clinical trajectory, diagnostic challenges, treatment strategies, and outcomes experienced by a 67-year-old female with AOSD. This report advocates for considering AOSD as a potential diagnosis in patients presenting with systemic inflammatory symptoms, especially when other conditions have been ruled out. It highlights the complexity of AOSD and the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, close monitoring, and personalized treatment strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

Autoimmune hypophysitis (AH) is an uncommon condition where there is inflammation of the pituitary gland which leads to hormonal imbalances. It is often associated with autoimmune diseases; however, a case is yet to be reported with an association of AH with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We present a case of a 45-year-old female who complained of polyuria/polydipsia and rapid weight gain. An MRI of the head revealed enlargement of the pituitary gland, concerning for AH. Although she was initially treated for diabetes insipidus, she began reporting new complaints of joint pains and morning stiffness. She was clinically diagnosed with seronegative RA and improved with a trial of hydroxychloroquine. A repeat MRI showed improvement in the abnormal pituitary findings, and the patient was closely monitored with a multidisciplinary approach. Diagnosing and managing patients with AH are topics that are still being explored and researched as it is a relatively rare pathology. Consequently, we found the need to discuss the relationship of AH with seronegative RA and delve into the various diagnostic and treatment approaches.

This case report focuses on a 40-year-old female with multiple subcutaneous skin nodules presenting to the clinic for worsening skin lesions associated with erythema and mild tenderness. A biopsy of the skin lesions showed non-necrotizing granulomas with multinucleated giant cells. The patient was being worked up for non-necrotizing granulomatous skin lesions and was diagnosed with subcutaneous sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, histopathological changes, and ruling out other granulomatous causes. Our patient is being treated with systemic steroids, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, and adalimumab. The patient is nine months into the treatment. A clinically significant reduction in the nodule size was noted. Other systemic involvement of sarcoid was ruled out. This subcutaneous skin involvement is a rare finding called the Darier-Roussy sarcoid. Usually self-resolving but extensive, deformative lesions need to be treated.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to determine the pattern and cause of noninfectious uveitis in rheumatology practice. The secondary objective was to identify the pattern of treatment and outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Rheumatology, National Hospital and Medical Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. After receiving consent, electronic medical records (EMRs) of all patients with a diagnosis of noninfectious uveitis (NIU) from November 2019 to January 2023 were reviewed, and a total of 52 patients labeled as having noninfectious uveitis were identified. The collected data included age at diagnosis, anatomical location of uveitis, associated systemic disease, used medications, and outcomes. All cases had been diagnosed and assessed mutually by a rheumatologist and an ophthalmologist using the International Uveitis Study Group classification system to classify the pattern of uveitis by location, clinical course, and laterality and rule out the possibility of other ophthalmologic diseases. Disease activity was defined using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) guidelines. Data was analyzed on SPSS Statistics version 23 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in this study was 36.02 ± 43.31 years, with 31 (59.6%) male patients. Anterior uveitis was the most common type observed among the patients at 55.8%, panuveitis was found in 25%, intermediate uveitis and posterior uveitis were seen in 9.6% each. Based on laterality, unilateral eye involvement was identified in 53.8% of patients. Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and idiopathic uveitis were observed in 34.6% and 28.8%, respectively. In this study, 28 (54.9%) patients were on conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDDs), and 23 (45.1%) were on biological DMARDs. In the biologics group, 82% of patients were in remission in comparison to 60% in the cDMARDs group.
CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on noninfectious uveitis in the Pakistani population. The study concluded that anterior uveitis is the most common type of uveitis and is more common in males. Spondyloarthropathy is one of the most common underlying systemic diseases. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 is associated more with uveitis. Biologics are more effective than cDMARDs in controlling the disease. Collaborative work between different specialties resulted in early diagnosis of underlying systemic disease, better management plans, and disease outcomes. To obtain further details on noninfectious uveitis, a population-based study is needed in Pakistan.

The treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is one of the main challenges of modern medicine. Although a number of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are available, there is wide variability in clinical response to treatment among individuals. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been proposed to optimize treatment; however, some patients still experience unsatisfactory outcomes, although the blood concentrations of drugs in these patients remain in the therapeutic range. One possible reason for this is that the conventional samples (e.g., whole blood or plasma) used in TDM may not accurately reflect drug concentrations or concentrations of their metabolites at the target site. Hence, more refined TDM approaches to guide clinical decisions related to dose optimization are necessary. Circulating leukocytes or white blood cells have a critical role in driving the inflammatory process. They are recruited to the site of injury, infection and inflammation, and the main target of small molecule DMARDs is within immune cells. Given this, assaying drug concentrations in leukocytes has been proposed to be of possible relevance to the interpretation of outcomes. This review focuses on the clinical implications and challenges of drug monitoring of DMARDs in peripheral blood leukocytes from therapeutic or toxicological perspectives in IMIDs.

Psoriasis is a common skin condition worldwide. Moderate-to-severe disease is treated with biologic or non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. These include tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors. Case reports of inhibitors of TNF-a and IL-12p40 subunits causing interstitial pneumonia (IP) have been published in the literature, but no case of anti-IL-23p19 subunit biologics causing IP and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported before. We report a case of a patient with restrictive lung disease secondary to a body mass index of 36.54 kg/m2, obstructive sleep apnea, and psoriasis, who developed IP and ARDS presumed to be secondary to guselkumab, an anti-IL-23p19 subunit monoclonal antibody. He was on ustekinumab, an anti-IL-12/23p40 for the treatment of psoriasis, but was switched to guselkumab eight months before the presentation, and since then he had been complaining of progressive shortness of breath. He initially presented to the hospital after having drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) after being started on amoxicillin for a tooth infection. He was treated with high-dose intravenous steroids but developed progressive shortness of breath. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were added. An extensive infectious, autoimmune, and hypersensitivity work-up was undertaken, which returned negative. A bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage was performed, which revealed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). His lung imaging and oxygenation progressively got worse; hence, no lung biopsy was taken. He was intubated and required inhaled nitric oxide, but due to the lack of improvement, the family elected for comfort measures, and the patient was extubated and passed away. To our knowledge, this is the first case of an association between guselkumab, IP, ARDS, and DAH. Rare instances of DAH with DRESS have been reported before. Whether it was DRESS or guselkumab that caused DAH was uncertain in our patient. Clinicians should monitor for DAH and shortness of breath in patients on guselkumab so that more data can be obtained and studied in the future.

BACKGROUND: One target of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to achieve early sustained remission; over the long term, patients in sustained remission have less structural joint damage and physical disability. We evaluated Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission with abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate and impact of de-escalation (DE) in anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive patients with early RA.
METHODS: The phase IIIb, randomized, AVERT-2 two-stage study (NCT02504268) evaluated weekly abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate.
METHODS: SDAI remission (≤ 3.3) at week 24. Pre-planned exploratory endpoint: maintenance of remission in patients with sustained remission (weeks 40 and 52) who, from week 56 for 48 weeks (DE period), (1) continued combination abatacept + methotrexate, (2) tapered abatacept to every other week (EOW) + methotrexate for 24 weeks with subsequent abatacept withdrawal (abatacept placebo + methotrexate), or (3) withdrew methotrexate (abatacept monotherapy).
RESULTS: Primary study endpoint was not met: 21.3% (48/225) of patients in the combination and 16.0% (24/150) in the abatacept placebo + methotrexate arm achieved SDAI remission at week 24 (p = 0.2359). There were numerical differences favoring combination therapy in clinical assessments, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and week 52 radiographic non-progression. After week 56, 147 patients in sustained remission with abatacept + methotrexate were randomized (combination, n = 50; DE/withdrawal, n = 50; abatacept monotherapy, n = 47) and entered DE. At DE week 48, SDAI remission (74%) and PRO improvements were mostly maintained with continued combination therapy; lower remission rates were observed with abatacept placebo + methotrexate (48.0%) and with abatacept monotherapy (57.4%). Before withdrawal, de-escalating to abatacept EOW + methotrexate preserved remission.
CONCLUSIONS: The stringent primary endpoint was not met. However, in patients achieving sustained SDAI remission, numerically more maintained remission with continued abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept monotherapy or withdrawal.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02504268. Video abstract (MP4 62241 KB).
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience inflamed and damaged joints. RA is an autoimmune disease in which proteins called autoantibodies, particularly anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies, target the patient’s own joint tissue and organs by mistake, leading to symptomatic inflammation. Successful treatment can decrease the disease’s activity to a state known as remission. Patients in remission may experience little or no symptoms and it may be possible for some to then be able to decrease their treatment. Here, we report the results of a large, international study that looked at two treatments, abatacept and methotrexate, in patients with RA and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies. The study had two parts. Firstly, to see how many patients had success (remission) with weekly abatacept and/or methotrexate treatment, and secondly, to see if remission was maintained when treatment was either continued or decreased and stopped. The study showed that the number of patients in remission 6 months after treatment started was not greatly different between patients treated with both abatacept and methotrexate and those treated with just methotrexate. Those taking abatacept and methotrexate together had better remission rates 1 year later. More patients also stayed in remission when they continued to receive both abatacept and methotrexate compared with those who were just treated with abatacept or when their abatacept treatment was decreased and stopped. More patients stayed in remission when abatacept was decreased than when it was stopped. The results from this study may help determine possible future treatment reduction and/or withdrawal plans for some patients with RA.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Hydroxychloroquine is often used as a first-line treatment of rheumatoid arthritis despite limited evidence on its cardiovascular risk.
We conducted a cardiovascular safety evaluation comparing hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Using Medicare data (2008-2016), we identified 54,462 propensity score-matched patients with rheumatoid arthritis, aged ≥65 years, who initiated hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate. Primary outcomes were sudden cardiac arrest or ventricular arrythmia (SCA/VA) and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalized heart failure (HF). We also examined treatment effect modification by history of HF.
Hydroxychloroquine was not associated with risk of SCA/VA (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79-1.35) or MACE (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.97-1.18) compared with methotrexate. In patients with history of HF, hydroxychloroquine initiators had a higher risk of MACE (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.08-1.56), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.06-1.70), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.04-1.43), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.25-2.42), and hospitalized HF (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.07-1.54) compared to methotrexate initiators. Cardiovascular risks were not different in patients without history of HF except for an increased hospitalized HF risk (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.30-1.90) among hydroxychloroquine initiators.
In older patients with rheumatoid arthritis, hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate showed similar SCA/VA and MACE risks; however, hydroxychloroquine initiators with history of HF had higher risks of MACE, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction. An increased hospitalized HF risk was observed among hydroxychloroquine initiators regardless of an HF history.