UNASSIGNED: To investigate the preparation of inclusion complexes of diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP)/β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) derivatives using a three-dimensional (3D) ball mill, and verify the inclusion behavior of the solid dispersion. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the effect of DPCP/β-CDs complex formation on the spleens of male C57BL/6 mice in terms of anti-inflammatory effects.
UNASSIGNED: The inclusion complexes of DPCP with β-CD and hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) were prepared using a 3D ball mill. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) were used to evaluate the solid-state properties. The solubility of the prepared DPCP/β-CD and HPβCD complexes and the intermolecular interaction between DPCP and β-CD derivatives in solution were assessed using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory effects of DPCPs in the prepared DPCP/CD complexes were investigated using spleens from male C57BL/6 mice, with measurement of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) secretion as an endpoint. Additionally, the protective effects of each drug on NIH-3T3 cells exposed to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation were examined.
UNASSIGNED: Solid-state characterization confirmed the formation of inclusion complexes in the 3D ground mixture (3DGM) (DPCP/β-CD = 1/1) and 3DGM (DPCP/HPβCD = 1/1) complexes through PXRD and IR analysis. The solubility of 3DGM (DPCP/β-CD = 1/1) and 3DGM (DPCP/HPβCD = 1/1) was 17.5 μg/mL and 58.4 μg/mL, respectively, indicating higher solubility than that of DPCP alone. NMR analysis of 3DGM samples suggested that DPCP/β-CD and DPCP/HPβCD form inclusion complexes at a molar ratio of 1/1 but with different inclusion modes. Regarding the anti-inflammatory activity of DPCP, 3DGM (DPCP/HPβ-CD) showed anti-inflammatory effects at lower doses compared to 3DGM (DPCP/β-CD) in terms of IFN-γ and NIH-3T3 cells injured by UV irradiation.
UNASSIGNED: We successfully formed inclusion complexes of DPCP/β-CD and DPCP/HPβCD using the 3D ground mixture method. NMR analysis suggested that DPCP/β-CD and DPCP/HPβCD form inclusion complexes at a molar ratio of 1/1 but with different inclusion modes. The anti-inflammatory activity of DPCP was more pronounced in 3DGM (DPCP/HPβCD) at lower doses compared to that in 3DGM (DPCP/β-CD), indicating that the HPβCD derivatives were more effective in enhancing the anti-inflammatory properties of DPCP.

BACKGROUND: Contact immunotherapy using diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) is a recommended treatment for severe alopecia areata (AA); however, few clinical factors are known, and few standardized application methods affecting therapeutic efficacy have been devised.
OBJECTIVE: To confirm the therapeutic response of DPCP immunotherapy in AA, first we analyze the factors influencing its outcome and patient satisfaction levels, after which we standardize the DPCP treatment method for better outcomes.
METHODS: We utilized a nationwide questionnaire-based survey to assess patient satisfaction and undertook a medical record review involving 412 patients currently undergoing treatment for DPCP.
RESULTS: The patients\' mean age was 36.4 years, and 27% of the cases were diagnosed as AA in childhood. Treatment response was higher when DPCP was used to treat the entire scalp, including subclinical lesions, and longer treatment durations and longer intervals between treatments were associated with a better treatment response. Atopy (atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma), thyroid disorder, and extent of hair loss were all negatively correlated with the treatment response. However, there was no correlation between the treatment response and factors such as the age of onset, a family history of AA, nail changes, or AA duration, which are commonly known to be associated with a poor prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: DPCP immunotherapy is an effective treatment for AA, and the study demonstrated the factors affecting DPCP treatment response and patients\' satisfaction and may contribute to standardizing the DPCP treatment method for better outcomes.

暂无摘要。

Cyclopropenone is a valuable electrophilic reagent that can react with electrophilic reagents, nucleophilic reagents, free radicals, organic metals, etc. Furthermore, cyclopropenone derivatives have shown significant biological activity in various diseases, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), melanoma, and alopecia areata (AA). The cyclopropenone analogue diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) has been approved for the treatment of AA. Given the potential therapeutic benefits of cyclopropenone derivatives, this review aims to systematically summarize the structures, synthesis routes, and potential pharmacological functions of cyclopropenone analogues in the hope of offering novel insights for further rational design of more drugs based on the cyclopropenone skeleton for the treatment of human diseases.

UNASSIGNED: Alopecia totalis (AT) and Alopecia universalis (AU) are forms of Alopecia areata (AA) which represent the strongest predictor of poor prognosis since spontaneous regrowth is <10%. Topical immunotherapy agent, diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) has shown clinical efficacy with limited side effects in severe forms of AA. However, its specific role in AT/AU characterized by complete hair loss over the scalp can help highlight the efficacy of the drug with fewer confounders.
UNASSIGNED: Data were collected from 18 patients diagnosed with AT/AU and treated with topical immunotherapy with DPCP as per protocol by Happle et al. Baseline Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and subclass was recorded. In the case of AU, baseline body hair loss score was also recorded. Patients were reassessed after 6 months of treatment in terms of change in SALT score and hair regrowth was assessed using the Global Assessment Score. The side effects during treatment were also assessed and recorded.
UNASSIGNED: Eighteen patients of whom eleven (61.1%) were diagnosed as AU and seven (38.9%) as AT were treated. The mean age was 21.6, with a male: female ratio of 3:2. The comorbidities noted were atopy in six (33.3%), atopy and hypothyroidism in one (5.5%), Down\'s syndrome in two (11.1%), and hypothyroidism alone in one (5.5%) patient. The mean duration of disease at the time of presentation was 3 years and all patients had remained refractory to various other modalities of treatment. All patients had a baseline SALT score of 100 corresponding to S5. After 6 months of treatment, 27.7% of patients did not show any response (SALT score S5), 16.6% had a score of S4, 11.1% had a score of S3, 11.1% had a score of S2, 22.2% had a score of S1, and 11.1% had a score of S0. On assessing improvement in body hair loss score, 36.3% of patients showed no improvement, 36.3% showed partial improvement, and 27.2% of patients showed complete body hair regrowth. About 55.5% of patients developed notable side effects that included severe local reactions, cervical lymphadenopathy, acne and pigmentation at the site of application as well as untreated sites.
UNASSIGNED: The AT/AU subtypes of AA, was amenable to treatment with contact immunotherapeutic agent DPCP with a >75% hair regrowth in 33.3% of patients. The castling phenomenon was seen in 63.6% of AU patients. The adverse effects noted were not severe enough to deter treatment.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a common disease characterized by hair loss with an autoimmune background. There are many lines of therapy, but no standard line for all cases. Consequently, treating severe forms of AA is challenging.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with DPCP alone in treating patients with severe or refractory AA.
METHODS: Our randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients with severe and recalcitrant AA. Group A included 13 patients who received only DPCP, while Group B included 11 patients who received both DPCP and PRP. After sensitization in both groups of patients, DPCP was applied to half the scalp weekly. In addition, PRP injection in all scalp was performed once a month in group B. The patients in both groups completed the study for six months.
RESULTS: The regrowth scale results were 53.85% and 54.5% for groups A and B, respectively. Although the response rate of group B was higher than that of group A, there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: From our clinical trial, it can be concluded that DPCP alone or combined with PRP is an effective and safe method for treating severe or recalcitrant AA.

Many therapeutic modalities are available for treating genital warts; however, the effectiveness of both diphenylcyclopropenone and podophyllin is still controversial.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of diphenylcyclopropenone and podophyllin in treating genital warts.
This study included 57 patients, divided randomly into two groups. Group (A): diphenylcyclopropenone (n = 29). Group (B): podophyllin 25% (n = 28). In group (A), sensitization was done with 2% diphenylcyclopropenone. Then, after 1 or 2 weeks, treatment started with a weekly application of diphenylcyclopropenone solutions ranging between 0.001 and 1% until clearance, or for a maximum of 10 sessions. In group (B), podophyllin 25% was applied weekly until clearance or for a maximum of 6 weeks.
Higher clearance was achieved in group A, with 19 of 29 (65.5%) patients, than in group B, with 9 of 28 (32.1%) (p-value = 0.004). Also, effectiveness increases with young age in group A. Shorter wart duration was associated with better response in both groups (p-value = 0.005). No serious adverse effects occurred in either group. No recurrence was detected in group A, while seven patients (77.8%) had recurrence in group B after 1 year of follow up.
Diphenylcyclopropenone shows a higher success rate than podophyllin in treating genital warts and a lower recurrence rate.

For decades, contact immunotherapy with dinitrochlorobenzene, diphencyprone, and squaric acid dibutylester has played an important role in both clinical practice and scientific research. It is listed as the first-line treatment for extensive alopecia areata and was more recently approved for melanoma treatment as an orphan drug in the USA. Moreover, owing to the relative low cost and safety, topical immunotherapy has also been used in many infectious, neoplastic, and inflammatory dermatological diseases. It is especially valuable in vulnerable groups, for cosmetic/pain sensitive areas, or for multiple lesions. In this review, we summarize the current evidence supporting the use of contact immunotherapy for treatment of skin diseases, from articles collected from PubMed database. Owing to space limitation and already numerous studies focusing on alopecia areata, we include only skin diseases other than alopecia areata. In addition to diseases that have been reported to be treated by contact immunotherapy, the hypothesized mechanism, prognosis prediction, efficacy, and safety of these topical agents are discussed.

Oral mini pulse (OMP) corticosteroids and diphencyclopropenone (DPCP) contact sensitisation are commonly used treatment modalities in severe cases of Alopecia areata (AA) in children but with scarce studies comparing the two modalities in children. In this study we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone OMP with DPCP contact sensitization in severe non progressive AA in children. This randomized open label study was undertaken in 30 children less than 18 years of age with extensive non progressive AA divided in two groups. Group I included 15 patients who received dexamethasone (5 mg/week) OMP as five tablets of 0.5 mg dexamethasone (i.e., 2.5 mg dexamethasone) on two consecutive days in a week. Group II included 15 patients who were treated with DPCP contact sensitization. The treatment was continued in all patients for 24 weeks. Patients were followed up every 4 weeks and records were maintained. Response rate was 100% in OMP group and 53.3% in DPCP group at 24 weeks. In Group I, complete regrowth was seen in 20% patients, and cosmetically acceptable regrowth in 66.7% while in Group II, complete regrowth was not seen in any of the patients, and cosmetically acceptable regrowth in 20% (p = 0.001). Hair regrowth started at mean duration of 7.7 weeks in Group I, while 11.3 weeks in Group II. Response rate of treatment with dexamethasone OMP leads to a significantly faster and better hair regrowth compared to DPCP contact immunotherapy in non-progressive extensive AA in children.