digital training

数字化培训
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    集中护理会危及实习生的学习经验,并需要进行教育改革。在这里,我们介绍结构化数字课程的开发和评估,除了临床实习,来应对这些挑战。
    结构化数字课程在荷兰的VUmc/阿姆斯特丹UMC外科实习计划中实施。课程使用围绕技能或临床状况构建的模块化格式。每个模块包括背景信息,数字元素,如电子学习和交互式视频博客,和自我评估。从4月1日到6月30日,2022年,我们进行了一项混合方法评估,通过调查和访谈比较了实习生在传统课程和数字课程之间的经验。
    39名实习生(28.1%)完成了调查,17(24.2%)来自传统课程,22(31.9%)来自结构化混合课程。访谈结果对调查结果进行了三角剖分和补充。实习生赞赏这两个课程(课程分数7.4±2.0与8.1±1.1,P=0.207)。干预队列特别赞赏可用研究材料的结构化和全面呈现,这导致了一种赋权感。
    整合结构化的数字课程以支持临床实习为实习生提供全面的,容易获得的知识,完善他们对临床主题的理解,并产生赋权的感觉。临床和数字教育的结合确保充分接触对未来医生至关重要的科目,即使临床暴露有限。因此,使用结构化的数字课程为实习生做好准备,并帮助实习计划充分应对未来的医疗挑战。
    集中护理会危及实习生的学习经验,并需要进行教育改革。结构化的数字课程可以通过提供易于访问的知识来提高实习生对临床主题的理解,从而在这种情况下赋予实习生权力。
    UNASSIGNED: Centralization of care jeopardizes interns\' learning experiences and necessitates educational changes. Here we present the development and evaluation of a structured digital curriculum, offered in addition to the clinical internship, to address these challenges.
    UNASSIGNED: The structured digital curriculum was implemented in a the VUmc/Amsterdam UMC surgical internship program in the Netherlands. The curriculum used a modular format built around a skill or clinical condition. Each module included background information, digital elements like e-learnings and interactive vlogs, and self-assessments. From April 1st to June 30th, 2022, we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation comparing interns\' experiences between the conventional and digital curriculum through surveys and interviews.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-nine interns (28.1 %) completed the survey, 17 (24.2 %) from the traditional curriculum and 22 (31.9 %) from the structured blended curriculum. Results from the interviews triangulated and complemented survey results. Interns appreciated both curricula (course marks 7.4 ± 2.0 vs. 8.1 ± 1.1, P = 0.207). The intervention cohort specifically appreciated the structured and comprehensive presentation of available study materials, which resulted in a sense of empowerment.
    UNASSIGNED: Integrating a structured digital curriculum to support clinical internships provides interns with comprehensive, readily accessible knowledge, refines their understanding of clinical topics, and results in feelings of empowerment. The combination of clinical and digital education ensures adequate exposure to subjects vital for future doctors, even if clinical exposure is limited. Thus, using a structured digital curriculum prepares the intern and helps the internship program to adequately navigate future medical challenges.
    UNASSIGNED: Centralization of care jeopardizes interns\' learning experiences and necessitates educational changes. A structured digital curriculum can empower interns in this scenario by providing readily accessible knowledge which refines their understanding of clinical topics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然社区卫生工作者(CHW)作为健康倡导者处于有利地位,他们经常缺乏支持,感到被低估。倡导培训可以为CHW做好准备,以更好地支持社区。
    本研究使用基于设计的研究方法(1)探讨参与数字宣传课程的课程开发研讨会如何影响CHW(n=25)对宣传的看法,以及(2)描述CHW参与如何影响课程开发。数据是通过五个讨论组和七个调查在六个月内收集的。
    最初,CHW认为自己是社区倡导者,而不是自我倡导者。他们越来越多地考虑倡导改善工作条件的好处,并渴望更多地参与决策。CHW积极反映了他们在塑造课程以提高内容可接受性和有效性方面的咨询作用。
    让CHWs参与宣传的培训工作必须克服CHWs内化的系统性障碍和规范,这些障碍和规范阻止他们发挥作为倡导者的全部潜力。
    While community health workers (CHWs) are well-positioned as health advocates, they frequently lack support and feel undervalued. Advocacy training may prepare CHWs to support communities better.
    This study uses a design-based research approach to (1) explore how participation in curriculum-development workshops for a digital advocacy course influenced CHWs\' (n = 25) perceptions of advocacy and (2) describe how CHW involvement shaped course development. Data were collected via five discussion groups and seven surveys over six months.
    Initially, the CHWs perceived themselves as community-advocates but not as self-advocates. They increasingly reflected on the merits of advocating for better working conditions and aspired to greater involvement in decision-making. CHWs reflected positively on their advisory role in shaping the course to improve content acceptability and validity.
    Training efforts to engage CHWs in advocacy must overcome systemic barriers and norms internalized by CHWs that deter them from reaching their full potential as advocates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可移动局部义齿(RPD)设计对于牙科治疗的长期成功至关重要,但是牙科学生在RPD设计培训和能力获取方面的缺点已经持续了数十年。数字生产在口腔医学中的患病率正在增加,和数字RPD(D-RPD)模块,在我们以前的工作中报告的经过认证的牙科技术人员客观操作技能检查(OMEDT)系统的框架下,可能会改进现有的学生RPD培训模式。
    我们旨在确定与传统训练相比,用于RPD设计的基于虚拟3D仿真的渐进式数字训练模块的功效。
    我们开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,包括重庆医科大学口腔医学院的牙科技术学生。队列1接受了传统的RPD设计培训(7周)。队列2接受了基于文本和2D草图的D-RPD模块训练(7周)。队列3接受了基于文本和2D草图的D-RPD模块飞行员培训(4周),并继续接受基于真实患者的3D虚拟模型的培训(3周)。在训练后1个月和1年进行基于虚拟模型的RPD设计测试。我们收集了RPD设计分数和进行每次评估所花费的时间。
    我们收集了RPD设计分数以及训练后1个月和1年进行每次评估所花费的时间。这项研究招募了109名学生,包括58名(53.2%)女生和51名(56.8%)男生。队列1在两个测试中得分最低,队列3得分最高(队列1-3在1个月时:平均得分为65.8,SD21.5;平均得分为81.9,SD6.88;和平均得分为85.3,SD8.55;P<.001;队列1-3在1y时:平均得分为60.3,SD16.7;平均得分为75.5,SD3.90;平均得分为90.9,SD<4.3。在1个月时,队列之间的时间差异无统计学意义(队列1-3:平均2407.8,SD1370.3s;平均1835.0,SD1329.2s;和平均1790.3,SD1195.5s,分别;P=.06),但在1年时具有统计学意义(队列1-3:平均2049.16,SD1099.0s;平均1857.33,SD587.39s;平均2524.3,SD566.37s,分别;P<.001)。队列内比较表明,队列1在1个月和1年的得分差异无统计学意义(95%CI-2.1至13.0;P=.16),而队列3在1年后获得了更高的分数(95%CI2.5-8.7;P=.001),1年后,队列2的得分明显较低(95%CI-8.8至-3.9;P<.001)。
    队列3在两个时间点都获得了最高分,并在1年时保留了能力,这表明包括虚拟3D仿真在内的渐进式D-RPD培训促进了RPD设计能力的提高。采用D-RPD培训可能有利于学习成果。
    UNASSIGNED: Removable partial denture (RPD) design is crucial to long-term success in dental treatment, but shortcomings in RPD design training and competency acquisition among dental students have persisted for decades. Digital production is increasing in prevalence in stomatology, and a digital RPD (D-RPD) module, under the framework of the certified Objective Manipulative Skill Examination of Dental Technicians (OMEDT) system reported in our previous work, may improve on existing RPD training models for students.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to determine the efficacy of a virtual 3D simulation-based progressive digital training module for RPD design compared to traditional training.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed a prospective cohort study including dental technology students at the Stomatology College of Chongqing Medical University. Cohort 1 received traditional RPD design training (7 wk). Cohort 2 received D-RPD module training based on text and 2D sketches (7 wk). Cohort 3 received D-RPD module pilot training based on text and 2D sketches (4 wk) and continued to receive training based on 3D virtual casts of real patients (3 wk). RPD design tests based on virtual casts were conducted at 1 month and 1 year after training. We collected RPD design scores and the time spent to perform each assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: We collected the RPD design scores and the time spent to perform each assessment at 1 month and 1 year after training. The study recruited 109 students, including 58 (53.2%) female and 51 male (56.8%) students. Cohort 1 scored the lowest and cohort 3 scored the highest in both tests (cohorts 1-3 at 1 mo: mean score 65.8, SD 21.5; mean score 81.9, SD 6.88; and mean score 85.3, SD 8.55, respectively; P<.001; cohorts 1-3 at 1 y: mean score 60.3, SD 16.7; mean score 75.5, SD 3.90; and mean score 90.9, SD 4.3, respectively; P<.001). The difference between cohorts in the time spent was not statistically significant at 1 month (cohorts 1-3: mean 2407.8, SD 1370.3 s; mean 1835.0, SD 1329.2 s; and mean 1790.3, SD 1195.5 s, respectively; P=.06) but was statistically significant at 1 year (cohorts 1-3: mean 2049.16, SD 1099.0 s; mean 1857.33, SD 587.39 s; and mean 2524.3, SD 566.37 s, respectively; P<.001). Intracohort comparisons indicated that the differences in scores at 1 month and 1 year were not statistically significant for cohort 1 (95% CI -2.1 to 13.0; P=.16), while cohort 3 obtained significantly higher scores 1 year later (95% CI 2.5-8.7; P=.001), and cohort 2 obtained significantly lower scores 1 year later (95% CI -8.8 to -3.9; P<.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Cohort 3 obtained the highest score at both time points with retention of competency at 1 year, indicating that progressive D-RPD training including virtual 3D simulation facilitated improved competency in RPD design. The adoption of D-RPD training may benefit learning outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    跑步者可以使用ChatGPT来生成训练计划以增强表现或健康方面。然而,基于不同输入信息生成的ChatGPT训练计划的质量未知。该研究的目的是根据不同的输入信息粒度评估ChatGPT为跑步者生成的六周训练计划。ChatGPT使用不同的输入信息粒度生成了三个训练计划。从文献中得出22项培训计划的质量标准,并由教练专家以1-5李克特量表对培训计划进行评估。Friedmann测试评估了培训计划之间质量的显着差异。对于训练计划1、2和3,给予中位数<3的评分为19、11和1次,给予3的中位数评分为3,5和8次,给予>3的中位数评分为0,6,13次,分别。与3项标准的培训计划2相比,培训计划1的评分明显较低,与训练计划3相比,评分显著降低15倍(p<0.05)。与9项标准的计划3相比,训练计划2获得显著较低的评级(p<0.05)。ChatGPT生成的计划由教练专家进行次优排名,虽然当提供更多的输入信息时,质量会提高。了解与编程长跑训练相关的方面很重要,我们建议避免在没有专家教练反馈的情况下使用ChatGPT生成的培训计划。
    ChatGPT may be used by runners to generate training plans to enhance performance or health aspects. However, the quality of ChatGPT generated training plans based on different input information is unknown. The objective of the study was to evaluate ChatGPT-generated six-week training plans for runners based on different input information granularity. Three training plans were generated by ChatGPT using different input information granularity. 22 quality criteria for training plans were drawn from the literature and used to evaluate training plans by coaching experts on a 1-5 Likert Scale. A Friedmann test assessed significant differences in quality between training plans. For training plans 1, 2 and 3, a median rating of <3 was given 19, 11, and 1 times, a median rating of 3 was given 3, 5, and 8 times and a median rating of >3 was given 0, 6, 13 times, respectively. Training plan 1 received significantly lower ratings compared to training plan 2 for 3 criteria, and 15 times significantly lower ratings compared to training plan 3 (p < 0.05). Training plan 2 received significantly lower ratings (p < 0.05) compared to plan 3 for 9 criteria. ChatGPT generated plans are ranked sub-optimally by coaching experts, although the quality increases when more input information are provided. An understanding of aspects relevant to programming distance running training is important, and we advise avoiding the use of ChatGPT generated training plans without an expert coach\'s feedback.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在数字通信技术在日常生活中起关键作用的时代,社会住房居民仍然极易受到数字排斥的影响。
    目的:本研究旨在评估基于电话的培训干预措施的可行性和可接受性,该干预措施旨在使人们能够自信地使用数字通信技术(即,视频通话和基于Web的消息传递)。
    方法:与英国社会住房协会合作进行,在COVID-19大流行期间,一个统一的权威机构的数字纳入团队促进了干预。采用了混合方法,包括按需收集定量和定性数据,reach,实施,和潜在的结果。在招聘过程中,通过电话采访收集了关于进行或不进行培训原因的人口和定性数据。数字能力和幸福感数据是通过干预前后的自我报告调查收集的。
    结果:在接受培训的4485名居民中,67(1.49%)表示有兴趣,其中67人中有12人(18%)完成了培训。调查结果表明,社会住房居民对基础数字培训的需求。主要发现围绕着有兴趣接受培训的人的辍学率高。壁垒受到社会经济和健康状况的强烈影响,反映了这个群体中常见的社会数字不平等。对于培训参与者,干预是可以接受的,并实现了目标,展示量身定制的潜力,坚持不懈地努力克服障碍。自我报告的幸福感或数字能力结果没有变化(但这受到样本量小的限制)。
    结论:社会数字不平等影响范围,实施,以及社会住房居民电话数字化培训的可接受性。通过使用受信任的中介,可以克服接触和培训数字排斥群体的障碍,个性化的招聘方法,尽量减少行政壁垒,以及量身定制的敏捷培训计划。认识到这些举措的资源密集型性质,这项研究呼吁加强对国家数字包容政策中中介努力的认可。
    BACKGROUND: In an era in which digital communication technologies play a pivotal role in everyday life, social housing residents remain highly susceptible to digital exclusion.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a telephone-based training intervention designed to empower people to confidently use digital communication technologies (ie, video calls and web-based messaging).
    METHODS: Conducted in collaboration with a UK social housing association, the intervention was facilitated by a unitary authority\'s Digital Inclusion Team during the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed methods approach was used, encompassing quantitative and qualitative data collection on demand, reach, implementation, and potential outcomes. Demographic and qualitative data on the reasons for undertaking or not undertaking the training were collected via telephone interviews during the recruitment process. Digital competency and well-being data were collected via a self-reported survey before and after the intervention.
    RESULTS: Among the 4485 residents who were offered training, 67 (1.49%) expressed interest, of whom 12 (18%) of the 67 completed the training. The findings indicate a demand for basic digital training among social housing residents. The key findings revolve around the substantial dropout rate among those who were interested in undertaking the training. Barriers were strongly influenced by socioeconomic and health circumstances, reflecting the sociodigital inequalities commonly found in this group. For the training participants, the intervention was acceptable and achieved its goals, demonstrating the potential of tailored, persistent training efforts in overcoming barriers. There were no changes in self-reported well-being or digital competency outcomes (but this was limited by the small sample size).
    CONCLUSIONS: Sociodigital inequalities impact the reach, implementation, and acceptability of telephone-based digital training for social housing residents. Barriers to reaching and training digitally excluded groups can be overcome through the use of trusted intermediaries, personalized recruitment approaches, the minimization of administrative barriers, and tailored and agile training programs. Recognizing the resource-intensive nature of such initiatives, this study calls for enhanced recognition of intermediary efforts in national digital inclusion policies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    评估与常规护理相比的20周家庭等距握力训练(IHT)对成年人收缩压(SBP)的影响。
    这是一个随机的,控制,评估者盲法试验。参与者被随机分为IHT(干预组)或常规护理(对照组)。
    随机分配到干预组的参与者进行为期16分钟的家庭IHT有效锻炼,每周三次,共20周。随机分配到对照组的参与者被要求像往常一样继续他们的日常活动。
    主要结果是20周内组间SBP的差异。次要结果是舒张压,心率,握力,和自我管理的家庭血压测量。
    48名成年人(平均[SD]年龄,64[8]年)纳入本试验。调整后的SBP组间平均差异为8.12mmHg(95%CI0.24至16.01,p=0.04)-有利于常规护理组。在任何家庭血压测量中,组间没有发现差异。
    该试验表明,在降低SBP方面,20周的家庭等距握力训练并不优于常规护理。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the effects of 20 weeks of home-based isometric handgrip training (IHT) compared with usual care on systolic blood pressure (SBP) in adults.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded trial. Participants were randomised to either IHT (intervention group) or usual care (control group).
    UNASSIGNED: Participants randomised to the intervention group performed a session of 16 min of effective workout home-based IHT three times per week for 20 weeks. Participants randomised to the control group were asked to continue their daily activities as usual.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was the difference in SBP between groups over 20 weeks. Secondary outcomes were diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, handgrip strength, and self-administered home blood pressure measures.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-eight adults (mean [SD] age, 64 [8] years) were included in this trial. The adjusted between-group mean difference in SBP was 8.12 mmHg (95% CI 0.24 to 16.01, p = 0.04) - favouring the usual care group. No differences between groups were found in any of the home blood pressure measurements.
    UNASSIGNED: This trial showed that 20 weeks of home-based isometric handgrip training was not superior compared to the usual care in lowering SBP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们评估了一项针对非专业人士的数字学习计划,以在青少年解决问题的干预措施中发展基于知识的能力,以检查培训对学习者中基于知识的能力的总体影响;并以嵌套并行的方式比较两种培训条件(有或没有辅导的自我指导数字培训)的影响,双臂,个别随机对照试验。符合条件的参与者年龄在18岁以上;精通印地语或英语;能够获得数字培训;并且没有提供结构化心理治疗的经验。从2022年3月31日至2022年6月19日招募了277名参与者,其中230人(83%)完成了研究。从培训前(平均值=7.01,SD=3.29)到培训后(平均值=8.88,SD=3.80),能力得分显着增加,培训前评估后6周。在随机分配到教练组的参与者中,知识能力得分显示出更大的增加(AMD=1.09,95%CI0.26-1.92,p=0.01),效应大小(d)为0.33(95%CI0.08-0.58)。与自我指导训练臂(n=56,40.3%)相比,更多的参与者在教练臂中完成了训练(n=96,69.6%)。总之,教练支持的远程数字培训干预与学习者的参与度和心理治疗知识能力的提高相关。
    We evaluated a digital learning programme for non-specialists to develop knowledge-based competencies in a problem-solving intervention for adolescents to examine the overall impact of training on knowledge-based competencies among learners; and to compare the effects of two training conditions (self-guided digital training with or without coaching) in a nested parallel, two-arm, individually randomised controlled trial. Eligible participants were 18 or older; fluent in Hindi or English; able to access digital training; and had no prior experience of delivering structured psychotherapies. 277 participants were enrolled from 31 March 2022 to 19 June 2022 of which 230 (83%) completed the study. There was a significant increase in competency score from pre-training (Mean = 7.01, SD = 3.29) to post-training (Mean = 8.88, SD = 3.80), 6 weeks after the pre-training assessment. Knowledge competency scores showed larger increase among participants randomised to the coaching arm (AMD = 1.09, 95% CI 0.26-1.92, p = 0.01) with an effect size (d) of 0.33 (95% CI 0.08-0.58). More participants completed training in the coaching arm (n = 96, 69.6%) compared to the self-guided training arm (n = 56, 40.3%). In conclusion, a coach-supported remote digital training intervention is associated with enhanced participation by learners and increased psychotherapeutic knowledge competencies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:荷尔蒙宫内节育器,长效可逆避孕方法,自2019年以来,尼日利亚联邦卫生部正在将其引入尼日利亚私营和公共部门的试点地点。为卫生保健提供者的培训提供信息,我们对一项混合数字和面对面培训进行了研究,该研究利用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估提供者受训人员的能力.这项研究代表了使用OSCE评估数字培训有效性的少数记录在案的经验之一。方法:从2021年9月至10月,在埃努古,尼日利亚的卡诺和奥约州,使用混合数字/面对面培训方法,对来自公共和私营部门医疗机构的62名卫生保健提供者进行了激素宫内节育器服务提供培训。供应商,熟练提供铜宫内节育器,接受了使用数字模块的说教组件,接下来是面对面的实习,最后监督提供者培训生工作场所的服务提供。在为期一天的实习期间,使用OSCE评估了技能。结果:使用OSCE评估技能为研究团队提供了有价值的信息。提供者受训人员的表现很高(平均94%正确完成了欧安组织的步骤)。结论:OSCE被用作这项试点研究的研究方法;迄今为止,欧安组织尚未纳入FMOH扩大的培训方法。OSCE上的提供者受训人员表现一致,毫不奇怪,因为提供者学员在提供铜宫内节育器方面经验丰富。如果并且当培训向没有铜宫内节育器经验的提供者推出时,OSCE可能在提供服务之前评估技能方面发挥更重要的作用。在推出激素宫内节育器和其他避孕技术方面,应进一步探索OSCE在设计混合数字/面对面培训方法中的作用。
    Background: The hormonal intrauterine device, a long-acting reversible contraceptive method, is being introduced to pilot sites in the private and public sector in Nigeria by the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Health since 2019. To inform training of health care providers, a study was conducted on a hybrid digital and in-person training which utilized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) to assess competency of provider trainees. This study represents one of few documented experiences using OSCE to assess the effectiveness of a digital training. Methods: From September - October 2021, in Enugu, Kano and Oyo states of Nigeria, 62 health care providers from public and private sector health facilities were trained in hormonal IUD service provision using a hybrid digital / in-person training approach. Providers, who were skilled in provision of copper IUD, underwent a didactic component using digital modules, followed by an in-person practicum, and finally supervised service provision in the provider trainee\'s workplace. Skills were assessed using OSCE during the one-day practicum. Results: Use of the OSCE to assess skills provided valuable information to study team. The performance of provider trainees was high (average 94% correct completion of steps in the OSCE). Conclusions: OSCE was used as a research methodology as part of this pilot study; to date, OSCE has not been integrated into the training approach to be scaled up by FMOH. Uniformly high performance of provider trainees was seen on the OSCE, unsurprising since provider trainees were experienced in providing copper IUD. If and when training is rolled out to providers inexperienced with copper IUD, OSCE may have a more important role to assess skills before service provision. The role of OSCE in design of hybrid digital / in-person training approaches should be further explored in rollout of hormonal IUD and other contraceptive technologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    任务共享可能涉及培训非专业卫生工作者(NSHW)以提供简短的心理健康干预措施。这种方法有望缩小全球精神卫生治疗差距。然而,培训中低收入国家一线工人大干部的能力有限,阻碍了这些干预措施的大规模应用。
    中央邦的ESSENCE(使科学翻译服务,以加强抑郁症护理)项目,印度,旨在通过两项序贯随机对照试验来应对这些挑战.首先,培训试验将评估数字培训的有效性和成本效益,与传统的面对面训练相比,在实现NSHWs提供抑郁症干预的临床能力方面。该初步试验之后将进行实施试验,旨在评估远程增强的实施支持的有效性,与常规实施支持相比,解决初级保健机构提供抑郁症护理的障碍。
    该项目涉及开发和试点测试一个可扩展的基于智能手机的计划,用于培训NSHW,为抑郁症筛查提供简短的心理干预。这项初步研究指导了使用NSHW进行数字训练方法的随机试验,以评估该方法的有效性。该试验之后将进行一项整群随机试验,以评估远程实施支持在确保初级保健设施中有效提供抑郁症护理方面的有效性。
    这些试验的结果可能为可持续培训和实施支持模式提供信息,以将抑郁症护理纳入初级保健,以便在资源有限的环境中扩大规模。
    UNASSIGNED: Task sharing may involve training nonspecialist health workers (NSHWs) to deliver brief mental health interventions. This approach is promising for reducing the global mental health treatment gap. However, capacity is limited for training large cadres of frontline workers in low- and middle-income countries, hindering uptake of these interventions at scale.
    UNASSIGNED: The ESSENCE (enabling translation of science to service to enhance depression care) project in Madhya Pradesh, India, aims to address these challenges through two sequential randomized controlled trials. First, a training trial will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digital training, compared with conventional face-to-face training, in achieving clinical competency of NSHWs in delivering an intervention for depression. This initial trial will be followed by an implementation trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a remote enhanced implementation support, compared with routine implementation support, in addressing barriers to delivery of depression care in primary care facilities.
    UNASSIGNED: This project involved developing and pilot testing a scalable smartphone-based program for training NSHWs to deliver a brief psychological intervention for depression screening. This initial research guided a randomized trial of a digital training approach with NSHWs to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach. This trial will be followed by a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of remote implementation support in ensuring efficient delivery of depression care in primary care facilities.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings from these trials may inform sustainable training and implementation support models to integrate depression care into primary care for scale-up in resource-constrained settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高辍学率是在线研究中报道的常见问题。了解哪些风险因素与退出研究相关,可以通过制定有效的策略来防止退出研究。
    目的:本研究旨在加深对心身康复患者在线研究退出预测因素的理解。我们调查了社会人口统计学,自愿干预,身心健康,数字用于健康和康复,与COVID大流行相关的变量决定了研究退出。
    方法:患者(N=2155)从德国的四个心身康复诊所招募,并在T1时填写在线问卷,这是在他们的康复住院之前。其中大约一半(1082/2155,50.2%)在康复住院后的T2退出,在此期间,向患者提供了三项自愿数字培训。根据患者参加的培训数量,他们被定义为对照组或干预组.进行卡方检验,以检查退出患者和保留患者在社会人口统计学变量方面的差异;并比较比较组和干预组之间的退出率差异。使用Logistic回归分析来评估与调查中保留的因素有关。
    结果:对照组的辍学率最高,为68.4%(173/253),与48.0%的干预组(749/1561)相比,50.0%(96/192),和43.0%(64/149)的辍学率。诊断为焦虑和抑郁综合障碍的患者的辍学率最高,高达63.5%(47/74)。年轻患者(<50岁)和受教育程度较低的患者更有可能退出研究。与健康相关的应用程序和/或互联网使用行为较少的患者更有可能退出研究。留在工作中的病人,感染冠状病毒的患者更有可能退出研究。
    结论:这项研究调查了在线研究中辍学的预测因素。患者社会人口统计学的不同因素,身心健康,数字使用,COVID大流行相关因素,研究设计可以与辍学率相关。对于以心理健康为重点的在线研究,建议考虑这些可能的辍学预测因素,并采取适当的策略来帮助辍学风险高的患者克服困难完成研究。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04453475;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04453475。
    High dropout rates are a common problem reported in web-based studies. Understanding which risk factors interrelate with dropping out from the studies provides the option to prevent dropout by tailoring effective strategies.
    This study aims to contribute an understanding of the predictors of web-based study dropout among psychosomatic rehabilitation patients. We investigated whether sociodemographics, voluntary interventions, physical and mental health, digital use for health and rehabilitation, and COVID-19 pandemic-related variables determine study dropout.
    Patients (N=2155) recruited from 4 psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics in Germany filled in a web-based questionnaire at T1, which was before their rehabilitation stay. Approximately half of the patients (1082/2155, 50.21%) dropped out at T2, which was after the rehabilitation stay, before and during which 3 voluntary digital trainings were provided to them. According to the number of trainings that the patients participated in, they were categorized into a comparison group or 1 of 3 intervention groups. Chi-square tests were performed to examine the differences between dropout patients and retained patients in terms of sociodemographic variables and to compare the dropout rate differences between the comparison and intervention groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess what factors were related to study dropout.
    The comparison group had the highest dropout rate of 68.4% (173/253) compared with the intervention groups\' dropout rates of 47.98% (749/1561), 50% (96/192), and 42.9% (64/149). Patients with a diagnosis of combined anxiety and depressive disorder had the highest dropout rate of 64% (47/74). Younger patients (those aged <50 y) and patients who were less educated were more likely to drop out of the study. Patients who used health-related apps and the internet less were more likely to drop out of the study. Patients who remained in their jobs and patients who were infected by COVID-19 were more likely to drop out of the study.
    This study investigated the predictors of dropout in web-based studies. Different factors such as patient sociodemographics, physical and mental health, digital use, COVID-19 pandemic correlates, and study design can correlate with the dropout rate. For web-based studies with a focus on mental health, it is suggested to consider these possible dropout predictors and take appropriate steps to help patients with a high risk of dropping out overcome difficulties in completing the study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号