UNASSIGNED: In our aging population, primary care is under pressure to remain accessible to all. Effective use of digital health care could potentially lower general practitioners\' (GPs) workload. Some general practices are already implementing a digital health platform as a primary method to contact their patients. However, it is unknown how older people experience this novel way to communicate with their GP.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to study the experiences of patients aged 65 years and older in general practices who use digital health as a primary communication tool. The secondary aims were to identify barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health care and whether a practice focus on digital health influences older patients\' choice to enlist.
UNASSIGNED: We invited all patients aged 65 years and older at 2 general practices in Amsterdam that work with a novel digital health platform. We used purposive sampling to select a heterogeneous group of patients in terms of age, sex, level of education, digital literacy, and experiences with the digital app of their general practice. We conducted 18 semistructured interviews from May through July 2023. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: We generated three themes: (1) experiences of older people with digital health care in general practice, (2) impact of individual factors on digital health experiences, and (3) reasons for choosing a digitally oriented general practice. Participants reported both positive and negative experiences. The main perceived advantages of the digital health platform were increased accessibility, direct GP contact without an intermediary, and saving time through asynchronous communication. The disadvantages mentioned were log-in difficulties and problems with the automated explanatory questionnaire. Individual factors such as age, digital literacy, and expectations of general practice care seemed to impact people\'s experiences and could act as barriers or facilitators for using digital health. Reasons for older patients to enlist at a general practice were mainly practical. The digital orientation of the practice hardly played a role in this choice.
UNASSIGNED: Older patients in general practice see benefits to using a digital health platform that offers 2-way chat-based communication between the patient and GP. We found that individual factors such as skills, norms and values, attitudes toward digitalization, and expectations of general practice care impacted older patients\' experiences with digital health care. For many older participants, the digital profile of the general practice did not play a role in their choice to enlist. Further improvement of digital health platforms will be necessary to ensure digital health for all in general practice.

The increasing percentage of elderly in our society is challenging the health care system. To meet the challenge, we have implemented an experience-based master\'s programme in digital health care. The 3-yrs 90 ECTS programme consists of physical sessions of three days duration and weekly 2-3-hour digital lectures and bi-weekly supervisions. A main goal of the program has been to involve the students in relevant local and regional health problems as well as inviting health care personnel to participate in the planning of the study program, present relevant health problems and challenges and follow our open digital health workshops. In this way we have managed to create a stimulating learning environment for both students on further education and local and regional health care personnel.

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of mobile technologies in health care (mobile health; mHealth) has facilitated disease management, especially for chronic illnesses such as diabetes. mHealth for diabetes is an attractive alternative to reduce costs and overcome geographical and temporal barriers to improve patients\' conditions.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to reveal the dynamics of scientific publications on mHealth for diabetes to gain insights into who are the most prominent authors, countries, institutions, and journals and what are the most cited documents and current hot spots.
METHODS: A scientometric analysis based on a competitive technology intelligence methodology was conducted. An innovative 8-step methodology supported by experts was executed considering scientific documents published between 1998 and 2021 in the Science Citation Index Expanded database. Publication language, publication output characteristics, journals, countries and institutions, authors, and most cited and most impactful articles were identified.
RESULTS: The insights obtained show that a total of 1574 scientific articles were published by 7922 authors from 90 countries, with an average of 15 (SD 38) citations and 6.5 (SD 4.4) authors per article. These documents were published in 491 journals and 92 Web of Science categories. The most productive country was the United States, followed by the United Kingdom, China, Australia, and South Korea, and the top 3 most productive institutions came from the United States, whereas the top 3 most cited articles were published in 2016, 2009, and 2017 and the top 3 most impactful articles were published in 2016 and 2017.
CONCLUSIONS: This approach provides a comprehensive knowledge panorama of research productivity in mHealth for diabetes, identifying new insights and opportunities for research and development and innovation, including collaboration with other entities, new areas of specialization, and human resource development. The findings obtained are useful for decision-making in policy planning, resource allocation, and identification of research opportunities, benefiting researchers, health professionals, and decision makers in their efforts to make significant contributions to the advancement of diabetes science.

BACKGROUND: Queer individuals continue to be marginalized in South Africa; they experience various health care challenges (eg, stigma, discrimination, prejudice, harassment, and humiliation), mental health issues (eg, suicide and depression), and an increased spread of HIV or AIDS and sexually transmitted illnesses (STIs; chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis). Mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to resolve the health care deficits experienced by health care providers when managing queer individuals and by queer individuals when accessing sexual-reproductive health care services and needs, thus ensuring inclusivity and the promotion of health and well-being. Studies have proven that the nominal group technique (NGT) could be used to solve different social and health problems and develop innovative solutions. This technique ensures that different voices are represented during decision-making processes and leads to robust results.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify important contents to include in the development of an mHealth app for addressing the sexual-reproductive health care services and needs of queer individuals.
METHODS: We invited a group of 13 experts from different fields, such as researchers, queer activists, sexual and reproductive health experts, private practicing health care providers, innovators, and private health care stakeholders, to take part in a face-to-face NGT. The NGT was conducted in the form of a workshop with 1 moderator, 2 research assistants, and 1 principal investigator. The workshop lasted approximately 2 hours 46 minutes and 55 seconds. We followed and applied 5 NGT steps in the workshop for experts to reach consensus. The main question that experts were expected to answer was as follows: Which content should be included in the mHealth app for addressing sexual-reproductive health care services and needs for queer individuals? This question was guided by user demographics and background, health education and information, privacy and security, accessibility and inclusivity, functionality and menu options, personalization and user engagement, service integration and partnerships, feedback and improvement, cultural sensitivity and ethical considerations, legal and regulatory compliance, and connectivity and data use.
RESULTS: Overall, experts voted and ranked the following main icons: menu options (66 points), privacy and security (39 points), user engagement (27 points), information hub (26 points), user demographics (20 points), connectivity (16 points), service integration and partnerships (10 points), functionalities (10 points), and accessibility and inclusivity (7 points).
CONCLUSIONS: Conducting an NGT with experts from different fields, possessing vast skill sets, knowledge, and expertise, enabled us to obtain targeted data on the development of an mHealth app to address sexual-reproductive health care services and needs for queer individuals. This approach emphasized the usefulness of a multidisciplinary perspective to inform the development of our mHealth app and demonstrated the future need for continuity in using this approach for other digital health care innovations and interventions.

This study examines digital health challenges among end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients, a population characterized by older age, lower socioeconomic status, and limited access to modern technologies. Drawing from the Mere Exposure Effect, the Technology Acceptance Model, and insights from doctor-patient communication literature, our study implemented a month-long intervention across three distinct groups. The Digital Media Exposure Group watched doctor-recommended videos on YouTube using a tablet PC twice weekly for four weeks. The Digital Media Exposure with Doctor-Patient Communication Group engaged in physician-led discussions about the viewed content during their medical visits in addition to the activities in the first group. The Control Group received printed medical information that mirrored the content of the videos. Participants in this study, all of whom were diagnosed with ESKD, were recruited from a university hospital in South Korea (n = 88, Mage = 64.8). Their perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions regarding digital health care were measured and compared between groups. The results unveiled significant group differences [Wilk\'s Λ = 0.829, F(8, 164) = 2.02, p = 0.047, partial η2 = 0.090], with variations in attitudes, perceived ease of use, and intentions among groups, and effect sizes ranging from 0.069 to 0.096.These findings underscore the importance of tailored interventions to address digital health disparities, particularly among underserved demographic groups. Strategies that prioritize user-friendly interfaces and clear communication between doctors and patients are advocated to promote digital health engagement, ensuring equitable access and improved outcomes for patients with chronic disease.

The article presents systematic review of National and foreign publications concerning strategy of digital society development, definitions and concepts of digital twins in health care. The analysis of development of digital twins of patients and application of digital twins of human organs in medicine is presented. The experience of digital twins functioning in health care management system in Russia and abroad is presented.

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a novel app-based rehabilitation counselling program in patients recovering from total knee arthroplasty. In the app-based rehabilitation counselling program, a counselor provides one-on-one rehabilitation exercises and management-focused psychological counselling after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study included 42 patients, who were divided into three groups of 14 patients each: Group A, whose rehabilitation training was based on a guideline leaflet; Group B, whose rehabilitation was based on the app-based rehabilitation counselling program; and Group C, whose rehabilitation training was based on continuous passive motion combined with the app-based rehabilitation counselling program. To determine the effects of rehabilitation, the isokinetic knee muscle strength and knee joint range of motion were measured in addition to knee function tests such as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at two and three months after rehabilitation. The comparison of the means of the three groups was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with Group C showing significant variance in isokinetic knee muscle strength (p < 0.05), passive ROM (p < 0.01), and WOMAC (p < 0.05) after three months. As a result, this study confirmed the positive potential of the app-based rehabilitation counselling program.

BACKGROUND: Analyses of patient evaluations and barriers to the implementation of teledermatology procedures are still rare. The aim of this study was to determine whether administrative processes have an influence on the patient evaluation of telephone and video consultations.
METHODS: With the help of a patient survey, assessments of the processes and organisation surrounding the outpatient appointment were asked. These were then compared to the assessment of whether the telephone or video consultation is an alternative to on-site consultation.
RESULTS: In all, 1538 patients took part in the survey. Significant correlations were found between the evaluation of the telephone or video consultation and the distance between the place of residence and the outpatient clinic, whether the patient had already been seen several times or for the first time, as well as the evaluation of the waiting time for the appointment, the organisation before the appointment and the waiting time in the outpatient clinic.
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that even after the Coronavirus pandemic, telephone and video consultations remain an important tool for patients to contact their physician. However, patients\' perceptions of the processes around the outpatient appointment have an influence on their willingness to participate in a digital consultation.
UNASSIGNED: EINLEITUNG: Analysen zur patientenseitigen Bewertung und Hürden bei der Implementierung von teledermatologischen Verfahren sind noch selten. Das Ziel dieser Studie war zu ermitteln, ob administrative Prozesse Einfluss auf die Patientenbewertung von Telefon- und Videosprechstunden haben.
METHODS: Mithilfe einer Patientenbefragung wurden Einschätzungen zu den Prozessen und der Organisation rund um den Ambulanztermin erfragt. Anschließend wurden diese der Bewertung, ob die Telefon- oder Videosprechstunde eine Alternative zur Sprechstunde vor Ort ist, gegenübergestellt.
UNASSIGNED: An der Befragung nahmen 1538 Patienten und Patientinnen teil. Es konnten signifikante Zusammenhänge zwischen der Bewertung der Telefon- oder Videosprechstunde und der Entfernung zwischen Wohnort und Ambulanz, ob der Patient/die Patientin bereits mehrfach oder erstmalig vorstellig wurde, sowie der Beurteilung der Wartezeit auf den Termin, der Organisation vor dem Termin und der Wartezeit in der Ambulanz festgestellt werden.
UNASSIGNED: Die Studie zeigt, dass auch nach der Corona-Pandemie die Telefon- und Videosprechstunde für Patienten/Patientinnen ein wichtiges Instrument zur Kontaktaufnahme mit dem Arzt/der Ärztin bleibt. Jedoch hat die Wahrnehmung des Patienten/der Patientin bezüglich der Prozesse rund um den Ambulanztermin einen Einfluss auf die Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an einer digitalen Sprechstunde.

UNASSIGNED: In many countries, health care professionals are legally obliged to share information from electronic health records with patients. However, concerns have been raised regarding the sharing of notes with adolescents in mental health care, and health care professionals have called for recommendations to guide this practice.
UNASSIGNED: The aim was to reach a consensus among authors of scientific papers on recommendations for health care professionals\' digital sharing of notes with adolescents in mental health care and to investigate whether staff at child and adolescent specialist mental health care clinics agreed with the recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: A Delphi study was conducted with authors of scientific papers to reach a consensus on recommendations. The process of making the recommendations involved three steps. First, scientific papers meeting the eligibility criteria were identified through a PubMed search where the references were screened. Second, the results from the included papers were coded and transformed into recommendations in an iterative process. Third, the authors of the included papers were asked to provide feedback and consider their agreement with each of the suggested recommendations in two rounds. After the Delphi process, a cross-sectional study was conducted among staff at specialist child and adolescent mental health care clinics to assess whether they agreed with the recommendations that reached a consensus.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 84 invited authors, 27 responded. A consensus was reached on 17 recommendations on areas related to digital sharing of notes with adolescents in mental health care. The recommendations considered how to introduce digital access to notes, write notes, and support health care professionals, and when to withhold notes. Of the 41 staff members at child and adolescent specialist mental health care clinics, 60% or more agreed with the 17 recommendations. No consensus was reached regarding the age at which adolescents should receive digital access to their notes and the timing of digitally sharing notes with parents.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 17 recommendations related to key aspects of health care professionals\' digital sharing of notes with adolescents in mental health care achieved consensus. Health care professionals can use these recommendations to guide their practice of sharing notes with adolescents in mental health care. However, the effects and experiences of following these recommendations should be tested in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Earlier research shows that a significant number of resources are wasted on software projects delivering less than the planned benefits. It has, however, been evidenced that adopting a human-centered design approach when designing health devices can be beneficial. This understanding from earlier research has raised our interest in investigating how human-centered design might contribute to realizing the potential benefits of health care software projects. To our current knowledge, this intersection of human-centered design and benefit realization management has not yet comprehensively and consistently been researched within the context of digital health care solutions. Therefore, there is a need for evidence synthesis using systematic reviews to address this potential research gap.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine if human-centered design helps benefit realization management processes in the development of digital health care solutions and thereby enables better benefit realization. We explore the evidence of assumed or confirmed benefits of using human-centered design in the health care domain and whether better results have been reported when the benefit realization management process is followed.
METHODS: This protocol was developed following the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) guidelines. The proposed review would use a planned and systematic approach to identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant and recent studies (reported in English) to see if there is evidence that using human-centered design and benefit realization management has a positive effect on realizing set benefits in those projects. We will commence a systematic literature search using human-centered design, benefit realization management, and health care-related search terms within 5 repositories (ACM Digital Library, PubMed Central, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science). After removing duplicate results, a preliminary scan for titles and abstracts will be done by at least 2 reviewers. Any incongruities regarding whether to include articles for full-text review will be resolved by a third reviewer based on the predefined criteria.
RESULTS: Initial queries of 2086 records have been executed and papers are being prescreened for inclusion. The search was initiated in December 2023 and the results are expected in 2024. We anticipate finding evidence of the use of human-centered design in the development of digital health care solutions. However, we expect evidence of benefitting from both human-centered design and benefit realization management in this context to be scarce.
CONCLUSIONS: This protocol will guide the review of existing literature on the use of human-centered design and benefit realization management when developing digital health care solutions. The review will specifically focus on finding evidence of confirmed benefits derived from the use of human-centered design and benefit realization management. There may be an opportunity to gain a broader understanding of the tools or approaches that provide evidence of increased benefit realization within the health care domain.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/56125.