diagnostic specificity

诊断特异性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    猪肺炎支原体(M.猪肺炎)是一种重要的猪呼吸道疾病复合病原体,促使许多猪场和生产系统追求猪肺炎支原体消除策略。抗体测试在证明猪肺炎支原体的持续自由方面具有成本效益,经常取代深气管拭子的PCR检测。该过程通常包括使用猪肺炎支原体筛选抗体ELISA测试牛群的亚群,通过验证性测试进一步评估非阴性结果,如PCR。最近,已引入用于检测猪肺炎支原体抗体的商业(Biochek)荧光微球免疫测定(FMIA)作为ELISA的替代方法。将其性能与三个商业ELISA(Idexx,Hipra,和Biochek)使用接种了猪肺炎支原体的猪的实验血清样品,M.hyorhinis,猪滑道M,M.絮凝剂,或模拟接种Friis培养基。FMIA始终在比ELISA更早的时间点检测到猪肺炎支原体,尽管使用制造商建议的截止值遇到了两个假阳性结果。ROC分析允许根据测试目标评估各种截止值。错误分类错误计数的泊松回归在BiovetFMIA和HipraELISA中没有发现差异,但错误分类错误明显少于Idexx和BiocheckELISA。这项研究表明,由于FMIA在早期阶段具有出色的抗体检测率,因此FMIA可以替代传统的ELISA进行筛查。或者,采用更严格的截断值以提高诊断特异性,可以将FMIA定位为可行的验证性试验选择.总的来说,FMIA是猪肺炎支原体抗体监测检测的最佳选择,提供测试策略的多功能性(例如,三重FMIA猪肺炎支原体/PRRSV1型和2型),并有助于提高猪健康管理的诊断能力。
    Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyopneumoniae) is a significant porcine respiratory disease complex pathogen, prompting many swine farms and production systems to pursue M. hyopneumoniae elimination strategies. Antibody testing is cost-effective in demonstrating sustained freedom from M. hyopneumoniae, often replacing PCR testing on deep tracheal swabs. The process typically involves testing a subpopulation of the herd using an M. hyopneumoniae screening antibody ELISA, with non-negative results further assessed through confirmatory testing, such as PCR. Recently, a commercial (Biochek) fluorescent microsphere immunoassay (FMIA) for detecting M. hyopneumoniae antibodies has been introduced as an alternative to ELISA. Its performance was compared to three commercial ELISAs (Idexx, Hipra, and Biochek) using experimental serum samples from pigs inoculated with M. hyopneumoniae, M. hyorhinis, M. hyosynoviae, M. flocculare, or mock-inoculated with Friis medium. FMIA consistently detected M. hyopneumoniae at earlier time points than the ELISAs, although two false-positive results were encountered using the manufacturer\'s recommended cutoff. ROC analysis allowed for the evaluation of various cutoffs depending on testing objectives. Poisson regression of misclassification error counts detected no difference in the Biovet FMIA and Hipra ELISA but significantly fewer misclassification errors than Idexx and Biocheck ELISAs. This study showed FMIA as a suitable alternative to traditional ELISAs for screening purposes due to its superior antibody detection rate at early stages. Alternatively, adopting a more stringent cutoff to improve diagnostic specificity could position the FMIA as a viable confirmatory test option. Overall, FMIA is an optimal choice for M. hyopneumoniae antibody surveillance testing, offering versatility in testing strategies (e.g., triplex FMIA M. hyopneumoniae/PRRSV types 1 and 2) and contributing to improved diagnostic capabilities in porcine health management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    野生动物,与家畜分享病原体,在传染病的流行病学中起着至关重要的作用。从野生动物中取样带来了重大挑战,然而,纳入疾病监测和监测计划至关重要。通常,大规模监测涉及使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)测试的血清学筛查,通常只对家畜进行验证。这项研究评估了市售ELISA测试对342份野生反刍动物血清样品和100份野猪的诊断特异性。我们评估了三种口蹄疫测试:两种用于小反刍动物,两个是裂谷热,一个是羊痘病毒。使用公式真阴性/(假阳性+真阴性)计算诊断特异性。科恩的卡帕系数测量测试之间的一致性。结果显示所有测试的高特异性和一致性。口蹄疫(FMD)的特异性范围从Prionics的93.89%到IDEXX的100%,IDvet显示99.6%。FMDIDvet和IDEXX之间的一致性最高,为97.1%。裂谷热(RVF)测试,Ingezim和IDvet,达到100%和98.83%的特异性,分别。通过重新测试单个反应器并灭活补体获得最佳特异性。贡献:市售ELISA试剂盒对口蹄疫和类似的跨界动物疾病具有特异性,可用于高度特异性的野生动物测试。
    Wild animals, sharing pathogens with domestic animals, play a crucial role in the epidemiology of infectious diseases. Sampling from wild animals poses significant challenges, yet it is vital for inclusion in disease surveillance and monitoring programmes. Often, mass surveillance involves serological screenings using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests, typically validated only for domestic animals. This study assessed the diagnostic specificity of commercially available ELISA tests on 342 wild ruminant serum samples and 100 from wild boars. We evaluated three tests for foot-and-mouth disease: two for Peste des petits ruminants, two for Rift Valley fever and one for Capripox virus. Diagnostic specificity was calculated using the formula True Negative/(False Positive + True Negative). Cohen\'s kappa coefficient measured agreement between tests. Results showed high specificity and agreement across all tests. Specificity for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) ranged from 93.89% for Prionics to 100% for IDEXX, with IDvet showing 99.6%. The highest agreement was between FMD IDvet and IDEXX at 97.1%. Rift Valley fever (RVF) tests, Ingezim and IDvet, achieved specificities of 100% and 98.83%, respectively. The optimal specificity was attained by retesting single reactors and inactivating the complement.Contribution: Commercially available ELISA kits are specific for foot-and-mouth disease and similar transboundary animal diseases and can be used for highly specific wild animal testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:罂粟种子(PS)可能是严重过敏反应的原因,尤其是对坚果和其他种子同时过敏的个体,但缺乏诊断标准和致敏模式。
    目的:评估PS提取物和单个过敏原在诊断PS过敏中的作用及其与树坚果和荞麦的交叉反应性。
    方法:我们的回顾性研究包括36例PS致敏患者;10例阳性,26例口服食物激发(OFC)阴性。我们鉴定了单个PS过敏原,并将sIgE与PS提取物的诊断性能与其过敏原进行了比较。通过竞争性ELISA评估PS与来自其他种子的相关变应原之间的交叉反应性。
    结果:我们确定了四种新的PS过敏原:Paps1(vicilin),巴氏1(27-424)(α-发夹蛋白),Paps2(legumin),和Paps3(小亲水性种子蛋白)。OFC阳性与PS过敏原的较高PS-sIgE水平和较高sIgE水平相关,除了巴氏3号。PS和α-发品蛋白-sIgE有效区分了过敏和耐受患者,AUC值为0.95和0.94。PS-sIgE>10.00kUA/L表现出90%的敏感性和73%的特异性,而α-Hairpinin-sIgE>2.60kUA/L表现出100%的敏感性和77%的特异性。vicilin和legumin与榛子和荞麦同源物高度交叉反应,而α-发红蛋白-sIgE与相关的杏仁过敏原发生交叉反应。
    结论:这是迄今为止关于罂粟种子过敏的最广泛的研究。罂粟种子和α-hairpinin-sIgE是罂粟种子临床反应性的高度敏感指标,而vicilin和legumin-sIgE有助于对榛子和荞麦同时敏感。
    BACKGROUND: Poppy seed (PS) can be a cause of severe allergic reactions, especially in individuals with concurrent allergy to tree nuts and other seeds, but diagnostic criteria and sensitization patterns are lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of PS extract and individual allergens in diagnosing PS allergy and their cross-reactivities with tree nuts and buckwheat.
    METHODS: Our retrospective study included 36 PS-sensitized patients; 10 with a positive and 26 with a negative oral food challenge (OFC). We identified individual PS allergens and compared the diagnostic performance of specific IgE (sIgE) to PS extract with its allergens. Cross-reactivities between PS and related allergens from other seeds were assessed by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
    RESULTS: We identified 4 novel PS allergens: Pap s 1 (vicilin), Pap s 1 (27-424) (α-hairpinin), Pap s 2 (legumin), and Pap s 3 (small hydrophilic seed protein). A positive OFC correlated with higher PS-sIgE levels and elevated sIgE levels for the PS allergens, except for Pap s 3. PS and α-hairpinin-sIgE effectively differentiated allergic from tolerant patients, with area under the curve values of 0.95 and 0.94. PS-sIgE >10.00 kUA/L exhibited 90% sensitivity and 73% specificity, whereas α-hairpinin-sIgE >2.60 kUA/L showed 100% sensitivity and 77% specificity. PS vicilin and legumin highly cross-reacted with hazelnut and buckwheat homologs, whereas α-hairpinin-sIgE cross-reacted with the related almond allergen.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the most extensive study on PS allergy to date. PS and α-hairpinin-sIgE are highly sensitive indicators of clinical reactivity to PS, whereas vicilin and legumin-sIgE contribute to concurrent sensitization to hazelnut and buckwheat.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:两种或更多种针对胰岛素(IAA)的自身抗体,谷氨酸脱羧酶(GADA),胰岛抗原-2(IA-2A)或锌转运蛋白8(ZnT8A)表示1期(血糖正常)或2期(血糖异常)1型糖尿病先于3期1型糖尿病。将两个实验室中通过凝集PCR(ADAP)测定的自动多重抗体检测与单重放射结合测定(RBA)进行比较,以定义诊断特异性和敏感性的阈值水平。
    方法:IAA,GADA,IA-2A和ZnT8A在1504(54%女性)基于人群的对照(PBC)中进行了分析,456(55%女性)医生的办公室控制(DOC)和535(41%女性)献血者控制(BDC)以及2300(48%女性)新诊断的患者(1-10岁)患有3期1型糖尿病。在100次10倍交叉验证中计算了自身抗体阳性的阈值,以通过最大化χ2统计量(chisq)或使用第98百分位的特异性(Spec98)将患者与对照分开。阈值的平均值和95%CI,提出了敏感性和特异性。
    结果:四种自身抗体的ADAPROC曲线在两个ADAP实验室中显示出相当的AUC,并且高于RBA。使用chisq检测两种或更多种自身抗体在ADAP中显示0.97(0.95,0.99)灵敏度和0.94(0.91,0.97)特异性,而在RBA中显示0.90(0.88,0.95)灵敏度和0.97(0.94,0.98)特异性。使用Spec98,ADAP显示0.92(0.89,0.95)的敏感性和0.99(0.98,1.00)的特异性,而RBA中的0.89(0.77,0.86)的敏感性和1.00(0.99,1.00)的特异性。与DOC和BDC相比,PBC的诊断敏感性和特异性更高。
    结论:ADAP在两个实验室中具有可比性,两者都与澳洲联储相当或更好,定义两种或两种以上1型糖尿病自身抗体的阈值水平。
    背景:由LeonaM.和HarryB.Helmsley慈善信托基金(授权号2009-04078)支持,瑞典战略研究基金会(DnrIRC15-0067)和瑞典研究委员会,战略研究区(Dnr2009-1039)。AL得到了DiaUnion合作研究的支持,由欧盟国际会计准则共同出资,丹麦首都地区,索恩地区和诺和诺德基金会。
    BACKGROUND: Two or more autoantibodies against either insulin (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), islet antigen-2 (IA-2A) or zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A) denote stage 1 (normoglycemia) or stage 2 (dysglycemia) type 1 diabetes prior to stage 3 type 1 diabetes. Automated multiplex Antibody Detection by Agglutination-PCR (ADAP) assays in two laboratories were compared to single plex radiobinding assays (RBA) to define threshold levels for diagnostic specificity and sensitivity.
    METHODS: IAA, GADA, IA-2A and ZnT8A were analysed in 1504 (54% females) population based controls (PBC), 456 (55% females) doctor\'s office controls (DOC) and 535 (41% females) blood donor controls (BDC) as well as in 2300 (48% females) patients newly diagnosed (1-10 years of age) with stage 3 type 1 diabetes. The thresholds for autoantibody positivity were computed in 100 10-fold cross-validations to separate patients from controls either by maximizing the χ2-statistics (chisq) or using the 98th percentile of specificity (Spec98). Mean and 95% CI for threshold, sensitivity and specificity are presented.
    RESULTS: The ADAP ROC curves of the four autoantibodies showed comparable AUC in the two ADAP laboratories and were higher than RBA. Detection of two or more autoantibodies using chisq showed 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) sensitivity and 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) specificity in ADAP compared to 0.90 (0.88, 0.95) sensitivity and 0.97 (0.94, 0.98) specificity in RBA. Using Spec98, ADAP showed 0.92 (0.89, 0.95) sensitivity and 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) specificity compared to 0.89 (0.77, 0.86) sensitivity and 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) specificity in the RBA. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were higher in PBC compared to DOC and BDC.
    CONCLUSIONS: ADAP was comparable in two laboratories, both comparable to or better than RBA, to define threshold levels for two or more autoantibodies to stage type 1 diabetes.
    BACKGROUND: Supported by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (grant number 2009-04078), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (Dnr IRC15-0067) and the Swedish Research Council, Strategic Research Area (Dnr 2009-1039). AL was supported by the DiaUnion collaborative study, co-financed by EU Interreg ÖKS, Capital Region of Denmark, Region Skåne and the Novo Nordisk Foundation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    牛布鲁氏菌病的直接诊断方法有一些局限性,因此,血清学检查是诊断该疾病的基础。然而,尚未对全球范围内牛布氏杆菌病控制计划中使用的主要检测方法进行评估诊断敏感性(DSe)和诊断特异性(DSp)的荟萃分析.这项系统评价和荟萃分析旨在估计DSe,DSp以及单独用于诊断牛布鲁氏菌病的血清学测试的准确性。CABI数据库,科克伦图书馆,PubMed/MEDLINE,SciELO,Scopus和WebofScience被用来选择文章。搜索产生了5308项研究,其中71项采用质量评估工具进行系统评价,65项研究纳入meta分析.对于荟萃分析,考虑了178个测定和11个不同的血清学测试。要估计测试的DSe和DSp,研究根据研究的动物选择进行划分:(1)进行随机或连续选择参与者的研究(非病例对照研究)和(2)所有研究,包括病例对照研究。仅考虑非病例对照研究来估计DSe,表现最佳和最差的测试是iELISA测试(间接酶免疫分析-细菌悬浮液作为抗原-BS)(96.5%,95%CI:94.1-97.9%)和2ME(2-巯基乙醇测试)(85.0%,95%CI:79.6-89.1%),分别;而对于DSp,FPA(荧光偏振测定)(99%,7%,95%CI:99.5-99.8%)和PCFIA测试(蛋白质浓度荧光免疫测定)(78.5%,95%CI:70.0-85.1%)表现出更好和更差的表现,分别。总的来说,我们的结果表明,当病例对照研究纳入荟萃分析时,评估的11项血清学检查中的DSe和DSp有高估,考虑到它对与疾病的人口诊断相关的时间和成本的影响,这是一个令人担忧的问题,因为这些测试中的一些常规用于全世界牛布鲁氏菌病的控制和根除计划。此外,表现出最佳DSe和DSp的测试,iELISA(BS)和FPA,分别,相对容易执行和解释,并且显示最佳总体准确性的测试是FPA。
    The direct methods for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis have several limitations, therefore serological tests are the basis for the diagnosis of the disease. However, a meta-analysis estimating the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) on the main tests used in bovine brucellosis control programs worldwide has not been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the DSe, DSp and thereby accuracy of serological tests individually used in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. The databases CABI, Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Science were used to select articles. The search resulted in 5308 studies, of which 71 were selected for systematic review using quality assessment tools and 65 studies were included in the meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, 178 assays and 11 different serological tests were considered. To estimate DSe and DSp of the tests, studies were divided according to animal selection for the studies: (1) studies that carried out a random or consecutive selection of participants (noncasecontrol studies) and (2) all studies, including casecontrol studies. Considering only the non-case-control studies to estimate the DSe, the tests that exhibited the best and worst performance were the iELISA test (indirect enzyme immunoassay - bacterial suspension as antigen - BS) (96.5%, 95% CI: 94.1-97.9%) and 2ME (2- mercaptoethanol test) (85.0%, 95% CI: 79.6-89.1%), respectively; while for DSp, the FPA (fluorescence polarization assay) (99, 7%, 95% CI: 99.5-99.8%) and PCFIA tests (protein concentration fluorescence immunoassay) (78.5%, 95% CI: 70.0-85.1%) showed better and worse performance, respectively. Overall, our results showed an overestimation in the DSe and DSp of the eleven serological tests assessed when casecontrol studies were included in the meta-analysis, which is a concern considering its impacts on the time and costs associated with populational diagnosis of the diseases, since several of these tests are routinely used in the control and eradication programs of bovine brucellosis worldwide. Furthermore, the tests that exhibited the best DSe and DSp, iELISA (BS) and FPA, respectively, are relatively easy to perform and interpret and the test which showed the best overall accuracy was FPA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当从独立于研究样本的验证样本中估计诊断测试的灵敏度和特异性时,我们为疾病的患病率提供了新的置信区间。新间隔基于轮廓似然性,并结合了改善覆盖概率的调整。通过仿真评估了其覆盖概率和预期长度,并将其与其他两种方法进行了比较。即Lang和Reiczigel(2014)和Flor等人的论文。(2020年)。新间隔的预期长度小于Lang和Reiczigel间隔的预期长度,而其覆盖范围大致相同。与Flor间隔的比较导致了类似的预期长度,但新间隔的覆盖概率更高。总而言之,事实证明,新的区间比它的两个竞争对手都要好。
    We present a new confidence interval for the prevalence of a disease for a situation when sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test are estimated from validation samples independent of the study sample. The new interval is based on profile likelihood and incorporates an adjustment improving the coverage probability. Its coverage probability and expected length were assessed by simulation and compared to two other methods for this problem, namely those by Lang and Reiczigel (2014) and Flor et al. (2020). Expected length of the new interval is less than that of the Lang and Reiczigel interval while its coverage is about the same. Comparison to the Flor interval resulted in similar expected length but higher coverage probabilities for the new interval. All in all, the new interval proved to be better than both its competitors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与直接荧光抗体测试(DFAT)相比,我们估计了免疫组织化学(IHC)方案的诊断灵敏度(DSe)和特异性(DSp)。这是狂犬病诊断的黄金标准。我们从199个家畜和野生动物病例中获得了大脑样本(100个DFAT阴性,99DFAT阳性),通过从南非2个政府认可的狂犬病病毒(RABV)检测实验室的便利采样,2015年2月至2017年8月。将在2个认可的实验室在4-8°C下储存数天至数周的组织福尔马林固定并石蜡包埋。每8例使用多克隆抗RABV核蛋白抗体和聚合物检测系统检测IHC阳性。RABVIHC测试的总体DSe和DSp为98%(95%CI:93-100%)和99%(95%CI:95-100%),分别。家犬占98例RABVIHC阳性病例中的41例,剩下的是4只家猫,25家畜,28野生动物鼠疫科物种,包括7个猫鼬和其他9个猫鼬,是最常被感染的野生食肉动物,其次是11头狼.3例家犬检测结果不一致;2例为IHC-/DFAT+,1例为IHC+/DFAT-。考虑到假阴性狂犬病诊断的含义,参与定期的实验室间比较至关重要,和次要或确认方法,比如IHC,应在所有提交的标本上进行,特别是有人类接触史的阴性病例。
    We estimated the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and specificity (DSp) of an immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocol compared to the direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT), which is the gold standard test for rabies diagnosis. We obtained brain samples from 199 domestic and wild animal cases (100 DFAT-negative, 99 DFAT-positive), by convenience sampling from 2 government-accredited rabies virus (RABV) testing laboratories in South Africa, between February 2015 and August 2017. Tissues that had been stored at 4-8°C for several days to weeks at the 2 accredited laboratories were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Nighty-eight cases tested IHC-positive using a polyclonal anti-RABV nucleoprotein antibody and a polymer detection system. The overall DSe and DSp for the RABV IHC test were 98% (95% CI: 93-100%) and 99% (95% CI: 95-100%), respectively. Domestic dogs accounted for 41 of 98 RABV IHC-positive cases, with the remainder in 4 domestic cats, 25 livestock, and 28 wildlife. Herpestidae species, including 7 meerkats and 9 other mongoose species, were the most frequently infected wild carnivores, followed by 11 jackals. Three cases in domestic dogs had discordant test results; 2 cases were IHC-/DFAT+ and 1 case was IHC+/DFAT-. Considering the implications of a false-negative rabies diagnosis, participating in regular inter-laboratory comparisons is vital, and a secondary or confirmatory method, such as IHC, should be performed on all submitted specimens, particularly negative cases with human contact history.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    登革热病毒(DENV)抗体测定经常与来自已经感染相关黄病毒或针对相关黄病毒接种疫苗的个体的血清发生交叉反应。这项研究的目的是确定两种DENVELISA与来自接种黄热病病毒(YFV)和日本脑炎病毒(JEV)疫苗的个体血清的特异性。用在YFV或JEV疫苗接种后3-4周或0.5-6年获得的血清测试Panbio和Novatec登革热IgGELISA,并确定测定的诊断特异性。作为控制,使用DENV测试血清,YFV,JEV,寨卡和西尼罗河病毒中和测定。Panbio和NovatecELISA对接种YFV的受试者血清的诊断特异性分别为98.2%和88.2%,分别。尽管YFV中和抗体滴度高,但在前4周内交叉反应很少见,并且大多是在以后发现的。使用来自接种JEV的个体的血清的Panbio和Novatec测定的特异性为100%和92.9%。交叉反应发生在疫苗接种后的早期时间段。两个ELISA的测量值密切相关。因此,PanbioELISA显示出更高的诊断特异性,可能适用于疾病高发地区的血清阳性率研究.
    Dengue virus (DENV) antibody assays frequently cross-react with sera from individuals who have been infected with or vaccinated against related flaviviruses. The goal of this study was to determine the specificity of two DENV ELISAs with sera from individuals vaccinated against yellow fever virus (YFV) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV). The Panbio and the Novatec Dengue IgG ELISAs were tested with sera obtained 3-4 weeks or 0.5-6 years after YFV or JEV vaccination and the diagnostic specificity of the assays was determined. As controls, the sera were tested using DENV, YFV, JEV, Zika and West Nile virus neutralization assays. The diagnostic specificity of the Panbio and the Novatec ELISA with sera from YFV-vaccinated subjects was 98.2% and 88.2%, respectively. Cross-reactions were rare in the first 4 weeks despite high YFV-neutralizing antibody titers and were mostly found later. The specificity of the Panbio and Novatec assays with sera from JEV-vaccinated individuals was 100% and 92.9%. Cross-reactions occurred in the early time period after vaccination. The measurement values of the two ELISAs correlated strongly. Thus, the Panbio ELISA showed higher diagnostic specificity and may be suitable for seroprevalence studies in areas with high disease prevalence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腹膜透析(PD)相关性腹膜炎的发生和后果限制了其在肾衰竭人群中的应用。对大量临床人群的研究可能会增强我们对腹膜炎的了解。为了促进这些研究,我们开发了一种使用Medicare索赔数据测量腹膜炎发生率的方法,以表征腹膜炎趋势并确定其临床风险因素。
    方法:PD相关腹膜炎的回顾性队列研究。
    方法:美国肾脏数据系统标准分析文件用于索赔,资格,模态,和人口统计信息。样本包括在2013年至2017年期间接受PD治疗的患者,这些患者接受了Medicare按服务收费(FFS)保险,并已支付透析或医院服务索赔。
    未经证实:腹膜炎风险以年份为特征,年龄,性别,种族,种族,恢复肾脏替代疗法,肾衰竭的原因,和先前的腹膜炎发作。
    结果:主要结局是腹膜炎,使用ICD-9和ICD-10诊断代码识别。紧密间隔的腹膜炎报告(30天)汇总为1次腹膜炎发作。
    方法:使用泊松回归对腹膜炎患者水平的危险因素进行建模。
    结果:我们从396,289例腹膜炎报告中确定了70,271例腹膜炎发作。尽管使用了各种代码来记录腹膜炎的发作,没有一个主要使用。腹膜炎发作通常通过多个汇总的索赔来识别,每次发作的平均和中位数分别为5.6和2。我们发现40%的发作完全是门诊发作,9%完全住院,16%完全基于无法明确区分腹膜炎和导管感染/炎症的编码(“导管编码”)。总腹膜炎发生率为每患者年0.54次(EPPY)。排除导管编码后的比率为0.45EPPY,仅限于仅包括肾脏科医师或透析提供者索赔的发作时的比率为0.35EPPY。腹膜炎的发病率每年下降5%,并因患者的年龄等因素而异(较高年龄的发病率较低),种族(黑色>白色>亚洲),和先前的腹膜炎发作(每次发作的发生率更高)。
    结论:编码异质性表明缺乏标准化。仅基于导管代码的发作可能代表假阳性。腹膜炎发作未根据症状或微生物数据进行验证。
    结论:PD相关腹膜炎的发生率随时间下降,在老年患者中更低。基于索赔的方法为PD相关腹膜炎的研究提供了一个有希望的框架。
    The occurrence and consequences of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis limit its use in populations with kidney failure. Studies of large clinical populations may enhance our understanding of peritonitis. To facilitate these studies we developed an approach to measuring peritonitis rates using Medicare claims data to characterize peritonitis trends and identify its clinical risk factors.
    Retrospective cohort study of PD-associated peritonitis.
    US Renal Data System standard analysis files were used for claims, eligibility, modality, and demographic information. The sample consisted of patients receiving PD treated at some time between 2013 and 2017 who were covered by Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) insurance with paid claims for dialysis or hospital services.
    Peritonitis risk was characterized by year, age, sex, race, ethnicity, vintage of kidney replacement therapy, cause of kidney failure, and prior peritonitis episodes.
    The major outcome was peritonitis, identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Closely spaced peritonitis claims (30 days) were aggregated into 1 peritonitis episode.
    Patient-level risk factors for peritonitis were modeled using Poisson regression.
    We identified 70,271 peritonitis episodes from 396,289 peritonitis claims. Although various codes were used to record an episode of peritonitis, none was used predominantly. Peritonitis episodes were often identified by multiple aggregated claims, with the mean and median claims per episode being 5.6 and 2, respectively. We found 40% of episodes were exclusively outpatient, 9% exclusively inpatient, and 16% were exclusively based on codes that do not clearly distinguish peritonitis from catheter infections/inflammation (\"catheter codes\"). The overall peritonitis rate was 0.54 episodes per patient-year (EPPY). The rate was 0.45 EPPY after excluding catheter codes and 0.35 EPPY when limited to episodes that only included claims from nephrologists or dialysis providers. The peritonitis rate declined by 5%/year and varied by patient factors including age (lower rates at higher ages), race (Black > White>Asian), and prior peritonitis episodes (higher rate with each prior episode).
    Coding heterogeneity indicates a lack of standardization. Episodes based exclusively on catheter codes could represent false positives. Peritonitis episodes were not validated against symptoms or microbiologic data.
    PD-associated peritonitis rates decline over time and were lower among older patients. A claims-based approach offers a promising framework for the study of PD-associated peritonitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血清学测试的诊断性能的评估通常依赖于另一个作为参考的测试或已知感染状态的样本。然而,这两种都很少可用于野生动物中新兴的病原体。纵向疾病血清学数据可以通过多事件捕获-标记-重新捕获(MECMR)模型进行分析,以解决状态分配中的不确定性,允许我们估计流行病学参数,如发病率和死亡率。我们假设通过估计状态分配中的不确定性,MECMR模型评估了血清测试对兔出血性疾病病毒(RHDV)和粘液瘤病毒(MYXV)的诊断性能。我们在两个欧洲兔(Oryctolaguscuniculusalgirus)种群中对RHDV的三个测试和MYXV的一个测试的纵向血清学数据评估了这一假设。首先,我们使用有限混合模型为每个测试选择了最佳截止阈值,不依赖于参考测试或样本的参考方法。第二,我们使用MECMR模型比较了三种RHDV检测方法的诊断灵敏度(Se)和特异性(Sp).第三,我们比较了MECMR和有限混合模型在一系列截止值范围内对诊断性能的估计.MECMR模型显示,采用GI.2抗原(Se:100%)的RHDV测试优于采用GI.1抗原的两项测试(Se:21.7%±8.6%和8.7%±5.9%)。在他们选择的截止点(RHDVGI.2为2.0,MYXV为2.4),Se和Sp的估计值在MECMR模型和有限混合模型之间是一致的。在研究期间(2018年5月至2020年9月),在非围栏部位,MYXV血清阳性的欧洲兔的月生存率显着高于血清阴性兔(82.7%±4.9%对61.5%±12.7%)。我们得出的结论是,MECMR模型可以可靠地估计欧洲兔子中RHDV和MYXV的血清学测试的诊断性能。该结论可以扩展到其他诊断测试和宿主病原体系统。通过MECMR模型分析的纵向疾病监测数据可以验证新宿主物种中新兴病原体的诊断测试,同时估计流行病学参数。
    Estimation of the diagnostic performance of serological tests often relies on another test assumed as a reference or on samples of known infection status, yet both are seldom available for emerging pathogens in wildlife. Longitudinal disease serological data can be analysed through multi-event capture-mark-recapture (MECMR) models accounting for the uncertainty in state assignment, allowing us to estimate epidemiological parameters such as incidence and mortality. We hypothesized that by estimating the uncertainty in state assignment, MECMR models estimate the diagnostic performance of serological tests for rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) and myxoma virus (MYXV). We evaluated this hypothesis on longitudinal serological data of three tests of RHDV and one test of MYXV in two populations of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus algirus). First, we selected the optimal cut-off threshold for each test using finite mixture models, a reference method not relying on reference tests or samples. Second, we used MECMR models to compare the diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the three tests for RHDV. Third, we compared the estimates of diagnostic performance by MECMR and finite mixture models across a range of cut-off values. The MECMR models showed that the RHDV test employing GI.2 antigens (Se: 100%) outperformed two tests employing GI.1 antigens (Se: 21.7% ± 8.6% and 8.7% ± 5.9%). At their selected cut-offs (2.0 for RHDV GI.2 and 2.4 for MYXV), the estimates of Se and Sp were concordant between the MECMR and finite mixture models. Over the duration of the study (May 2018 to September 2020), the monthly survival of European rabbits seropositive for MYXV was significantly higher than that of seronegative rabbits (82.7% ± 4.9% versus 61.5% ± 12.7%) at the non-fenced site. We conclude that MECMR models can reliably estimate the diagnostic performance of serological tests for RHDV and MYXV in European rabbits. This conclusion could extend to other diagnostic tests and host-pathogen systems. Longitudinal disease surveillance data analysed through MECMR models allow the validation of diagnostic tests for emerging pathogens in novel host species while simultaneously estimating epidemiological parameters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号