diagnostic prediction model

诊断预测模型
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的目的是在最初怀疑中枢神经系统(CNS)感染的成人队列中验证和完善国际脑炎协会提出的脑炎标准。
    方法:我们纳入了两项前瞻性队列研究的患者,这些研究包括疑似中枢神经系统感染的成年人,他们接受了诊断性腰椎穿刺。我们评估了可能和可能的脑炎标准的测试特征。参考标准是脑炎的最终临床诊断。通过基于其各自的赔率调整每个标准的权重来进行标准的重新校准。
    结果:总共评估了1446次发作,其中162人(11%)有脑炎的临床诊断。可能的脑炎的敏感性为41%(95%CI33-49),特异性为88%(95%CI86-90)。可能的脑炎的敏感性和特异性分别为27%(95%CI20-34)和95%(95%CI94-96)。通过基于赔率的加权,我们重新校准了每个单独标准的权重,导致一个由精神状态改变(体重为2)组成的模型,癫痫发作(体重3),CSF白细胞计数升高(体重5)和神经影像学异常(体重9)。我们建议在5点切断可能的脑炎,(敏感性93%[95%CI88-96];特异性51%[95%49-54]),对于可能的脑炎,在8时(敏感性为51%[95%CI44-59];特异性为91%[95%CI89-92])。
    结论:我们验证并完善了现有的脑炎诊断标准,导致灵敏度大大提高。这些更新的标准有望促进脑炎的准确识别。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate and refine the encephalitis criteria proposed by the International Encephalitis Consortium in a cohort of adults initially suspected of a central nervous system (CNS) infection.
    METHODS: We included patients from two prospective cohort studies consisting of adults suspected of a CNS infection whom underwent a diagnostic lumbar puncture. We evaluated the test characteristics of the criteria for both possible and probable encephalitis. The reference standard was a final clinical diagnosis of encephalitis. Recalibration of the criteria was done by adjusting the weight of each criterion based on their respective odds.
    RESULTS: In total 1446 episodes were evaluated, of whom 162 (11%) had a clinical diagnosis of encephalitis. Possible encephalitis had a sensitivity of 41% (95% CI 33-49) and a specificity of 88% (95% CI 86-90). Probable encephalitis had a sensitivity and specificity of respectively 27% (95% CI 20-34) and 95% (95% CI 94-96). Through odds-based weighting, we recalibrated the weight of each individual criterion, resulting in a model consisting of an altered mental status (weight of 2), seizures (weight of 3), elevated CSF leukocytes (weight of 5) and abnormalities on neuroimaging (weight of 9). We proposed a cut-off at 5 for possible encephalitis, (sensitivity 93% [95% CI 88-96]; specificity 51% [95% 49-54]), and at 8 for probable encephalitis (sensitivity 51% [95% CI 44-59]; specificity 91% [95% CI 89-92]).
    CONCLUSIONS: We validated and refined the existing diagnostic criteria for encephalitis, leading to a substantially enhanced sensitivity. These updated criteria hold promise to facilitate the accurate identification of encephalitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    致心律失常性右心室心肌病(ARVC)可导致心脏猝死和危及生命的心力衰竭。由于其高致死率和有限的治疗方法,ARVC的发病机制和诊断生物标志物亟待探索。本研究旨在探索ARVC中lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA竞争性内源性RNA(ceRNA)网络。从基因表达综合(GEO)数据库获得的mRNA和lncRNA表达数据集用于分析ARVC和非失败对照之间的差异表达的mRNA(DEM)和lncRNA(DElnc)。差异表达的miRNA(DEmiR)从先前的谱分析工作中获得。使用starBase预测DEmiR的目标,并与DEM和DElnc相交,构建了lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA的ceRNA网络。通过实时定量PCR在人心脏组织中验证DEM和DElnc。使用蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络和加权基因共表达网络分析来识别集线器基因。利用网络中的hub基因及其ceRNA对建立了ARVC诊断预测的逻辑回归模型。总共确定了448个DEM(282个上调和166个下调),主要富集在细胞外基质和纤维化相关的GO术语和KEGG通路中,如细胞外基质组织和胶原原纤维组织。四个mRNAs和两个lncRNAs,包括COL1A1,COL5A1,FBN1,BGN,XIST,和LINC00173通过ceRNA网络鉴定,通过实时定量PCR在人体心脏组织中进行验证,并用于构建逻辑回归模型。训练集和验证集均显示了模型的良好ARVC诊断预测性能。我们研究中建立的潜在lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA调控网络和逻辑回归模型可能为ARVC提供有希望的诊断方法。
    Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) can lead to sudden cardiac death and life-threatening heart failure. Due to its high fatality rate and limited therapies, the pathogenesis and diagnosis biomarker of ARVC needs to be explored urgently. This study aimed to explore the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network in ARVC. The mRNA and lncRNA expression datasets obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were used to analyze differentially expressed mRNA (DEM) and lncRNA (DElnc) between ARVC and non-failing controls. Differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRs) were obtained from the previous profiling work. Using starBase to predict targets of DEmiRs and intersecting with DEM and DElnc, a ceRNA network of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA was constructed. The DEM and DElnc were validated by real-time quantitative PCR in human heart tissue. Protein-protein interaction network and weighted gene co-expression network analyses were used to identify hub genes. A logistic regression model for ARVC diagnostic prediction was established with the hub genes and their ceRNA pairs in the network. A total of 448 DEMs (282 upregulated and 166 downregulated) were identified, mainly enriched in extracellular matrix and fibrosis-related GO terms and KEGG pathways, such as extracellular matrix organization and collagen fibril organization. Four mRNAs and two lncRNAs, including COL1A1, COL5A1, FBN1, BGN, XIST, and LINC00173 identified through the ceRNA network, were validated by real-time quantitative PCR in human heart tissue and used to construct a logistic regression model. Good ARVC diagnostic prediction performance for the model was shown in both the training set and the validation set. The potential lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network and logistic regression model established in our study may provide promising diagnostic methods for ARVC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变(NAION)与视网膜中央动脉阻塞(CRAO)危险因素的差异,并建立预测诊断列线图。
    方法:该研究包括37例单眼NAION患者,20与单眼CRAO,和24患有高血压。性别,年龄,并记录全身疾病。血常规,脂质,血液流变学,颈动脉和肱动脉多普勒超声,并收集超声心动图。视神经盘区域,杯区,测量NAION和CRAO组未受累眼和高血压组右眼的杯盘比(C/D)。
    结果:CRAO组患侧颈动脉内膜中层厚度(C-IMT)较NAION组厚(P=0.039),血流介导扩张(FMD)较低(P=0.049)。与高血压患者相比,NAION患者全血降低粘度低切变(WBRV-L)和红细胞聚集指数(EAI;P=0.045,0.037)较高,CRAO患者红细胞刚性指数(IR)和红细胞变形指数(EDI;P=0.004,0.001)较高。NAION组的视杯和C/D小于其他两组(P<0.0001)。诊断预测模型具有较高的诊断特异性(83.7%)和敏感性(85.6%),这与高血压高度相关,患侧的C-IMT,口蹄疫,血小板(PLT),EAI,C/D
    结论:CRAO患者表现出比NAION更厚的C-IMT和更差的内皮功能。NAION和CRAO可能与血液流变学异常有关。NAION可能涉及小杯和小C/D。诊断列线图可用于初步识别NAION和CRAO。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference in risk factors between non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and develop a predictive diagnostic nomogram.
    METHODS: The study included 37 patients with monocular NAION, 20 with monocular CRAO, and 24 with hypertension. Gender, age, and systemic diseases were recorded. Blood routine, lipids, hemorheology, carotid and brachial artery doppler ultrasound, and echocardiography were collected. The optic disc area, cup area, and cup-to-disc ratio (C/D) of the unaffected eye in the NAION and CRAO group and the right eye in the hypertension group were measured.
    RESULTS: The carotid artery intimal medial thickness (C-IMT) of the affected side of the CRAO group was thicker (P=0.039) and its flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was lower (P=0.049) than the NAION group. Compared with hypertension patients, NAION patients had higher whole blood reduced viscosity low-shear (WBRV-L) and erythrocyte aggregation index (EAI; P=0.045, 0.037), and CRAO patients had higher index of rigidity of erythrocyte (IR) and erythrocyte deformation index (EDI; P=0.004, 0.001). The optic cup and the C/D of the NAION group were smaller than the other two groups (P<0.0001). The diagnostic prediction model showed high diagnostic specificity (83.7%) and sensitivity (85.6%), which was highly related to hypertension, the C-IMT of the affected side, FMD, platelet (PLT), EAI, and C/D.
    CONCLUSIONS: CRAO patients show thicker C-IMT and worse endothelial function than NAION. NAION and CRAO may be related to abnormal hemorheology. A small cup and small C/D may be involved in NAION. The diagnostic nomogram can be used to preliminarily identify NAION and CRAO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全身性炎症和相互器官相互作用与射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)的病理生理学有关。然而,临床价值,特别是炎症和心脏外器官功能障碍对HfpEF的诊断预测能力尚未探讨.在这项横断面研究中,根据纳入和排除标准,选择2014年1月至2022年6月在ChiHFpEF队列中的1808例住院患者。使用来自ChHFpEF队列的数据通过逻辑回归并通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和Brier评分评估,开发了具有来自常规血液测试以及肝和肾功能不全的HFpEF的诊断模型。然后,该模型通过10倍交叉验证进行了验证,并以列线图和基于网络的在线风险计算器的形式呈现.多因素和LASSO回归分析显示,年龄,血红蛋白,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,AST/ALT比值,肌酐,尿酸,心房颤动,肺动脉高压与HFpEF相关。预测模型表现出合理准确的判别(ROC,0.753,95%CI0.732-0.772)和校准(Brier评分为0.200)。随后的内部验证显示良好的辨别和校准(AUC=0.750,Brier评分为0.202)。除了参与HFpEF的病理生理学外,炎症和多器官相互作用对HFpEF具有诊断预测价值。筛选和优化炎症和多器官相互作用的生物标志物代表了一个新的领域,以改善HFpEF的非侵入性诊断工具。
    Systemic inflammation and reciprocal organ interactions are associated with the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the clinical value, especially the diagnositc prediction power of inflammation and extra-cardiac organ dysfunction for HfpEF is not explored. In this cross-sectional study, 1808 hospitalized patients from January 2014 to June 2022 in ChiHFpEF cohort were totally enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. A diagnostic model with markers from routine blood test as well as liver and renal dysfunction for HFpEF was developed using data from ChiHFpEF-cohort by logistic regression and assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and Brier score. Then, the model was validated by the tenfold cross-validation and presented as nomogram and a web-based online risk calculator as well. Multivariate and LASSO regression analysis revealed that age, hemoglobin, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, AST/ALT ratio, creatinine, uric acid, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary hypertension were associated with HFpEF. The predictive model exhibited reasonably accurate discrimination (ROC, 0.753, 95% CI 0.732-0.772) and calibration (Brier score was 0.200). Subsequent internal validation showed good discrimination and calibration (AUC = 0.750, Brier score was 0.202). In additoin to participating in pathophysiology of HFpEF, inflammation and multi-organ interactions have diagnostic prediction value for HFpEF. Screening and optimizing biomarkers of inflammation and multi-organ interactions stand for a new field to improve noninvasive diagnostic tool for HFpEF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脑室周围-脑室内出血是新生儿颅内出血的最常见类型,特别是在出生后的头3天。严重的脑室周围-脑室内出血被认为是轻度脑室周围-脑室内出血的进展,并且通常与严重的神经系统后遗症密切相关。然而,目前尚无特异性指标可用于预测入院早期从轻度到重度脑室周围-脑室内的进展.本研究旨在建立重症PIVH的早期诊断预测模型。
    方法:本研究为回顾性队列研究,数据来自MIMIC-III(v1.4)数据库。在NICU入院的前24小时内收集的实验室和临床数据已被用作单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析的变量,以构建基于列线图的严重脑室周围-脑室内出血的早期预测模型,并随后进行验证。
    结果:建立了一个预测模型,并用列线图表示,它包括三个变量:输出,NICU入住后24小时内血小板计数最低,血管活性药物的使用。通过计算曲线下面积显示模型的预测性能为0.792,表明良好的判别力。校准图显示了观察结果和预测结果之间的良好校准,Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示出较高的一致性(p=0.990)。内部验证显示0.788曲线下的计算面积。
    结论:这种严重的PIVH预测模型,由NICU内三个容易获得的指标建立,表现出良好的预测能力。它为新生儿学家提供了更用户友好和方便的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage is the most common type of intracranial bleeding in newborns, especially in the first 3 days after birth. Severe periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage is considered a progression from mild periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage and is often closely associated with severe neurological sequelae. However, no specific indicators are available to predict the progression from mild to severe periventricular-intraventricular in early admission. This study aims to establish an early diagnostic prediction model for severe PIVH.
    METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study with data collected from the MIMIC-III (v1.4) database. Laboratory and clinical data collected within the first 24 h of NICU admission have been used as variables for both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to construct a nomogram-based early prediction model for severe periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage and subsequently validated.
    RESULTS: A predictive model was established and represented by a nomogram, it comprised three variables: output, lowest platelet count and use of vasoactive drugs within 24 h of NICU admission. The model\'s predictive performance showed by the calculated area under the curve was 0.792, indicating good discriminatory power. The calibration plot demonstrated good calibration between observed and predicted outcomes, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed high consistency (p = 0.990). Internal validation showed the calculated area under a curve of 0.788.
    CONCLUSIONS: This severe PIVH predictive model, established by three easily obtainable indicators within the NICU, demonstrated good predictive ability. It offered a more user-friendly and convenient option for neonatologists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨ABO血型与肿瘤标志物联合检测在胃癌诊断中的价值。方法:选择2015年1月至2019年12月在本中心治疗的胃癌患者3650例,纳入5822例对照,按7:3分为训练集和验证集。在训练集中采用二元logistic回归方法构建胃癌的诊断和预测模型。通过计算预测概率P值,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评价预测模型对胃癌的诊断价值,并在验证集中进行了验证。结果:训练集中诊断和预测模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.936(95CI:0.926-0.941),灵敏度为81.66%,特异性为98.61%。在验证集中,AUC为0.941(95CI:0.932-0.950),灵敏度为82.33%,特异性为99.02%。此外,本研究获得的诊断模型对健康人群中的早期胃癌患者具有较高的诊断价值(训练集的AUC,验证集和总人口分别为0.906、0.920和0.908)。结论:我们构建了一个包括血型和肿瘤标志物的胃癌诊断模型。对胃癌患者的诊断具有较高的参考价值,该模型可以更好地区分早期胃癌和健康人。
    Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the value of combined detection of ABO blood group and tumor markers in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 3650 gastric cancer patients treated in our center from January 2015 to December 2019, and 5822 controls were recruited, and divided into training set and validation set according to 7:3. The diagnostic and predictive model of gastric cancer was constructed by binary logistic regression method in the training set. The diagnostic value of the prediction model for gastric cancer was evaluated by calculating the prediction probability P value and drawing the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and was verified in the validation set. Results: The Area under the curve (AUC) of the diagnosis and prediction model in the training set was 0.936 (95%CI: 0.926-0.941), the sensitivity was 81.66%, and the specificity was 98.61%. In the validation set, the AUC was 0.941 (95%CI: 0.932-0.950), the sensitivity was 82.33%, and the specificity was 99.02%. Furthermore, the diagnostic model obtained in this study had a high diagnostic value for early gastric cancer patients in the healthy population (AUC of training set, validation set and total population were 0.906, 0.920 and 0.908, respectively). Conclusions: We constructed a diagnostic model for gastric cancer including blood group and tumor markers, which has high reference value for the diagnosis of gastric cancer patients, and the model can better distinguish early gastric cancer from healthy people.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非传染性慢性病,尤其是炎症性肠病(IBDs),高血压,和糖尿病,具有长时间和多系统的特点,它们的发病率每年都在增加,给患者造成严重的经济负担和心理压力。因此,这些疾病值得科学和一致的疾病管理。此外,医院缺乏全面的“早期疾病线索跟踪-个性化治疗系统-随访”模式也加剧了这种困境。基于这些事实,我们提出了一种基于慢性病的IBDs个性化预测管理系统,重点研究了已建立的IBDs相关预测模型,总结了其优缺点。呼吁研究者重视模式与临床实践的融合,不断修正模式,实现真正的慢性病个体化医疗,从而为IBD等慢性疾病的快速诊断和充分治疗提供了重要价值,遵循“复发-缓解”疾病模型,实现患者长期用药和精准疾病管理。目标是通过科学改进长期用药,实现慢性病管理新水平,精确的疾病管理,和个性化医疗,有效延长缓解期,降低发病率和致残率。
    Non-infectious chronic diseases, especially inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, are characterized by a prolonged and multisystemic course, and their incidence increases annually, usually causing serious economic burden and psychological stress for patients. Therefore, these diseases deserve scientific and consistent disease management. In addition, the lack of a comprehensive \"early disease clues tracking-personalized treatment system-follow-up\" model in hospitals also exacerbates this dilemma. Based on these facts, we propose an individualized prediction management system for IBDs based on chronic diseases, focusing on the established IBDs-related prediction models and summarizing their advantages and disadvantages. We call on researchers to pay attention to the integration of models with clinical practice and the continuous correction of models to achieve truly individualized medical treatment for chronic diseases, thus providing substantial value for the rapid diagnosis and adequate treatment of chronic diseases such as IBDs, which follow the \"relapse-remission\" disease model, and realizing long-term drug use and precise disease management for patients. The goal is to achieve a new level of chronic disease management by scientifically improving long-term medication, precise disease management, and individualized medical treatment, effectively prolonging the remission period and reducing morbidity and disability rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:威尔逊病,也被称为肝豆状核变性,是一种罕见的人类常染色体隐性遗传铜代谢障碍。临床表现多样,诊断和治疗经常延迟。本研究的目的是建立一种新的威尔逊病预测诊断模型,并通过对小创伤的多元回归分析评价其预测效果。准确性好,低成本,和可量化的血清学指标,为了及早发现威尔逊病,提高诊断率,并明确治疗方案。
    UNASSIGNED:回顾性分析2003年1月至2022年5月云南省第一人民医院收治的127例Wilson病患者作为实验组,73例血清学指标正常但未确诊为Wilson病的患者。采用SPSS26.0版软件进行单因素筛选,采用多元二元logistic回归分析筛选出独立因素。采用R版本4.1.0软件对所包含的独立影响因素建立直观的列线图预测模型。通过计算一致性指数(C指数)并绘制校准曲线,评估和量化了列线图预测模型的准确性。同时,计算列线图预测模型的曲线下面积(AUC)和莱比锡评分的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),以比较列线图模型和当前莱比锡评分对威尔逊病的预测能力.
    未经批准:丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT),天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST),碱性磷酸酶(AKP),白蛋白(ALB),尿酸(UA),血清钙(Ca),血清磷(P),血红蛋白(HGB)与Wilson病的发生密切相关(p<0.1)。威尔逊病的预测模型包含七个独立的预测因子:ALT,AST,AKP,ALB,UA,Ca,预测模型的AUC值为0.971,C指数值为0.972。校准曲线与理想曲线很好地拟合。列线图预测模型对Wilson病的发生有较好的预测效果,绘制Leipzig评分的ROC曲线,并计算AUC值。Leipzig评分的AUC为0.969,说明预测模型和评分系统具有预测价值,列线图预测模型对中心的研究对象有较好的预测效果。
    未经批准:ALT,AST,AKP,ALB,UA,Ca,P是威尔逊病的独立预测因子,并且可以用作早期预测因子。基于列线图预测模型,最佳阈值为0.698,是判断Wilson病的重要参考指标。与莱比锡的得分相比,列线图预测模型具有较高的敏感性和特异性,具有较好的临床应用价值。
    UNASSIGNED: Wilson\'s disease, also known as hepatolenticular degeneration, is a rare human autosomal recessive inherited disorder of copper metabolism. The clinical manifestations are diverse, and the diagnosis and treatment are often delayed. The purpose of this study is to establish a new predictive diagnostic model of Wilson\'s disease and evaluate its predictive efficacy by multivariate regression analysis of small trauma, good accuracy, low cost, and quantifiable serological indicators, in order to identify Wilson\'s disease early, improve the diagnosis rate, and clarify the treatment plan.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis was performed on 127 patients with Wilson\'s disease admitted to the First People\'s Hospital of Yunnan Province from January 2003 to May 2022 as the experimental group and 73 patients with normal serological indicators who were not diagnosed with Wilson\'s disease. SPSS version 26.0 software was used for single factor screening and a multivariate binary logistic regression analysis to screen out independent factors. R version 4.1.0 software was used to establish an intuitive nomogram prediction model for the independent influencing factors included. The accuracy of the nomogram prediction model was evaluated and quantified by calculating the concordance index (C-index) and drawing the calibration curve. At the same time, the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram prediction model and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the Leipzig score was calculated to compare the predictive ability of the nomogram model and the current Leipzig score for Wilson\'s disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), albumin (ALB), uric acid (UA), serum calcium (Ca), serum phosphorus (P), and hemoglobin (HGB) are closely related to the occurrence of Wilson\'s disease (p < 0.1). The prediction model of Wilson\'s disease contains seven independent predictors: ALT, AST, AKP, ALB, UA, Ca, and P. The AUC value of the prediction model was 0.971, and the C-index value was 0.972. The calibration curve was well fitted with the ideal curve. The nomogram prediction model had a good predictive effect on the occurrence of Wilson\'s disease; the ROC curve of Leipzig score was drawn, and the AUC value was calculated. The AUC of the Leipzig score was 0.969, indicating that the prediction model and the scoring system had predictive value, and the nomogram prediction model had a better predictive effect on the research objects of the center.
    UNASSIGNED: ALT, AST, AKP, ALB, UA, Ca, and P are independent predictors of Wilson\'s disease, and can be used as early predictors. Based on the nomogram prediction model, the optimal threshold was determined to be 0.698, which was an important reference index for judging Wilson\'s disease. Compared with the Leipzig score, the nomogram prediction model has a relatively high sensitivity and specificity and has a good clinical application value.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:临床预测模型可确定肺栓塞(PE)的测试前概率,并评估这些患者的测试需求。冠状病毒感染与更大的PE风险相关,增加其严重程度并赋予更差的预后。PE的发病机制在有和没有SARS-CoV-2感染的患者中似乎不同。本系统综述旨在通过查阅现有文献,发现为PE开发的概率模型在COVID-19患者中的应用。
    方法:在PubMed上进行文献检索,Scopus,并进行了EMBASE数据库。包括所有报道了在COVID-19患者中使用临床预测模型的数据的研究。对于非随机研究,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。
    结果:评估五种预测模型的13项研究(Wells评分,日内瓦得分,YEARS算法,以及PERC和PEGeD临床决策规则)。1187例COVID-19患者采用了不同的量表。总的来说,模型显示出有限的预测能力。具有低(或不太可能)临床概率的两级Wells评分与D-二聚体水平<3000ng/mL或正常床边肺部超声结合显示出排除PE的足够相关性。
    结论:我们的系统评价表明,在一般人群中开发的可用于PE的临床预测模型不适用于COVID-19患者。因此,它们在临床实践中使用,因为不建议使用唯一的诊断筛查工具。需要在这些患者中验证的新的PE临床概率模型。
    Clinical prediction models determine the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) and assess the need for tests for these patients. Coronavirus infection is associated with a greater risk of PE, increasing its severity and conferring a worse prognosis. The pathogenesis of PE appears to be different in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. This systematic review aims to discover the utility of probability models developed for PE in patients with COVID-19 by reviewing the available literature.
    A literature search on the PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases was carried out. All studies that reported data on the use of clinical prediction models for PE in patients with COVID-19 were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies.
    Thirteen studies that evaluated five prediction models (Wells score, Geneva score, YEARS algorithm, and PERC and PEGeD clinical decision rules) were included. The different scales were used in 1,187 patients with COVID-19. Overall, the models showed limited predictive ability. The two-level Wells score with low (or unlikely) clinical probability in combination with a D-dimer level <3000ng/mL or a normal bedside lung ultrasound showed an adequate correlation for ruling out PE.
    Our systematic review suggests that the clinical prediction models available for PE that were developed in the general population are not applicable to patients with COVID-19. Therefore, their use is in clinical practice as the only diagnostic screening tool is not recommended. New clinical probability models for PE that are validated in these patients are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    UNASSIGNED:临床预测模型确定了肺栓塞(PE)的测试前概率,并评估了这些患者对测试的需求。冠状病毒感染与更大的PE风险相关,增加其严重程度并赋予更差的预后。PE的发病机制在有和没有SARS-CoV-2感染的患者中似乎不同。本系统综述旨在通过查阅现有文献,发现为PE开发的概率模型在COVID-19患者中的应用。
    未经授权:在PubMed上进行文献检索,Scopus,并进行了EMBASE数据库。包括所有报道了在COVID-19患者中使用临床预测模型的数据的研究。对于非随机研究,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。
    未经评估:评估了五种预测模型的13项研究(Wells评分,日内瓦得分,YEARS算法,以及PERC和PEGeD临床决策规则)。1187例COVID-19患者采用了不同的量表。总的来说,模型显示出有限的预测能力。具有低(或不太可能)临床概率的两级Wells评分与D-二聚体水平<3000ng/mL或正常床边肺部超声结合显示出排除PE的足够相关性。
    UNASSIGNED:我们的系统评价表明,在普通人群中开发的可用于PE的临床预测模型不适用于COVID-19患者。因此,它们在临床实践中使用,因为不建议使用唯一的诊断筛查工具。需要在这些患者中验证的新的PE临床概率模型。
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical prediction models determine the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) and assess the need for tests for these patients. Coronavirus infection is associated with a greater risk of PE, increasing its severity and conferring a worse prognosis. The pathogenesis of PE appears to be different in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. This systematic review aims to discover the utility of probability models developed for PE in patients with COVID-19 by reviewing the available literature.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search on the PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases was carried out. All studies that reported data on the use of clinical prediction models for PE in patients with COVID-19 were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirteen studies that evaluated five prediction models (Wells score, Geneva score, YEARS algorithm, and PERC and PEGeD clinical decision rules) were included. The different scales were used in 1,187 patients with COVID-19. Overall, the models showed limited predictive ability. The two-level Wells score with low (or unlikely) clinical probability in combination with a D-dimer level < 3000 ng/mL or a normal bedside lung ultrasound showed an adequate correlation for ruling out PE.
    UNASSIGNED: Our systematic review suggests that the clinical prediction models available for PE that were developed in the general population are not applicable to patients with COVID-19. Therefore, their use is in clinical practice as the only diagnostic screening tool is not recommended. New clinical probability models for PE that are validated in these patients are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号