diabetic retinopathies

糖尿病视网膜病变
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病视网膜病变(DR),一种威胁视力的糖尿病眼部并发症,是劳动年龄人口失明的主要原因之一。血脂异常是DR发展或恶化的潜在危险因素。流行病学研究中的证据相互矛盾。非诺贝特,抗高血脂药,具有脂质调节和多效性(非脂质)作用,可以减少微血管事件的发生率。
    相关研究是通过过去20年的PubMed/MEDLINE搜索确定的,使用广义术语“糖尿病视网膜病变”和特定术语“非诺贝特”和“血脂异常”。进一步审查了这些研究中引用的参考文献,以汇编这篇小型综述。这些关键的调查经过了细致的审查和综合,侧重于方法学方法和临床结果。此外,我们在表格中提供了开创性研究的主要发现,以增强理解和比较。
    越来越多的证据表明非诺贝特治疗由于其对血-视网膜屏障的可能的保护作用而减慢DR的进展。非诺贝特对DR进展和发展的保护属性可大致分为两类:脂质调节效应和非脂质相关(多效性)效应。脂质修饰作用是通过过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体-α激活介导的,而多效效应涉及血清C反应蛋白水平的降低,纤维蛋白原,和促炎标志物,和改善流动介导的扩张。在DR患者中,非诺贝特的调脂作用主要包括降低脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2水平和上调载脂蛋白A1水平.这些变化有助于非诺贝特的抗炎和抗血管生成作用。非诺贝特引发多种多效性效应,包括抗凋亡,抗氧化剂,抗炎,和抗血管生成特性,以及这些影响的间接后果。两项随机对照试验-非诺贝特干预和降低糖尿病事件和控制糖尿病心血管风险的行动研究-指出非诺贝特治疗可防止DR进展,与血脂水平无关。
    非诺贝特,一种有效降低DR进展的口服降血脂药,可能会减少发生威胁视力的并发症并需要侵入性治疗的患者数量。尽管它对DR进展具有良好的保护作用,在DR治疗中,非诺贝特治疗尚未获得广泛的临床接受。正在进行和未来的临床试验可能会阐明非诺贝特治疗在DR管理中的作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a sight-threatening ocular complication of diabetes mellitus, is one of the main causes of blindness in the working-age population. Dyslipidemia is a potential risk factor for the development or worsening of DR, with conflicting evidence in epidemiological studies. Fenofibrate, an antihyperlipidemic agent, has lipid-modifying and pleiotropic (non-lipid) effects that may lessen the incidence of microvascular events.
    UNASSIGNED: Relevant studies were identified through a PubMed/MEDLINE search spanning the last 20 years, using the broad term \"diabetic retinopathy\" and specific terms \"fenofibrate\" and \"dyslipidemia\". References cited in these studies were further examined to compile this mini-review. These pivotal investigations underwent meticulous scrutiny and synthesis, focusing on methodological approaches and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we provided the main findings of the seminal studies in a table to enhance comprehension and comparison.
    UNASSIGNED: Growing evidence indicates that fenofibrate treatment slows DR advancement owing to its possible protective effects on the blood-retinal barrier. The protective attributes of fenofibrate against DR progression and development can be broadly classified into two categories: lipid-modifying effects and non-lipid-related (pleiotropic) effects. The lipid-modifying effect is mediated through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α activation, while the pleiotropic effects involve the reduction in serum levels of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and pro-inflammatory markers, and improvement in flow-mediated dilatation. In patients with DR, the lipid-modifying effects of fenofibrate primarily involve a reduction in lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 levels and the upregulation of apolipoprotein A1 levels. These changes contribute to the anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects of fenofibrate. Fenofibrate elicits a diverse array of pleiotropic effects, including anti-apoptotic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-angiogenic properties, along with the indirect consequences of these effects. Two randomized controlled trials-the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes studies-noted that fenofibrate treatment protected against DR progression, independent of serum lipid levels.
    UNASSIGNED: Fenofibrate, an oral antihyperlipidemic agent that is effective in decreasing DR progression, may reduce the number of patients who develop vision-threatening complications and require invasive treatment. Despite its proven protection against DR progression, fenofibrate treatment has not yet gained wide clinical acceptance in DR management. Ongoing and future clinical trials may clarify the role of fenofibrate treatment in DR management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)是参与视网膜屏障破坏的主要物质。VEGF过度表达可引起糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)。黄斑激光光凝术是DME的标准治疗方法;然而,最近,玻璃体内注射抗VEGF已超过激光治疗。我们的目的是评估玻璃体内注射阿柏西普或雷珠单抗治疗初治DME的疗效。
    这个单中心,回顾性,介入,对比研究纳入了在Al-Azhar大学医院玻璃体内注射阿柏西普2mg/0.05mL或雷珠单抗0.5mg/0.05mL的未治疗DME导致视力障碍的眼睛,2023年3月至2024年1月之间的埃及。收集基线和注射后1、3和6个月的人口统计学数据和完整的眼科检查结果,包括以最小分辨率角(logMAR)表示法的对数表示的最佳矫正远距视力(BCDVA),裂隙灯生物显微镜,扩张眼底镜检查,和使用谱域光学相干层析成像测量的中心子场厚度(CST)。
    总的来说,将96例中位(四分位距[IQR])年龄为57(10)(范围:20-74)岁,男女比例为1:2.7的患者的96只眼分配到两组中的一组,年龄相当,性别,糖尿病持续时间,并存在其他合并症(均P>0.05)。基线糖尿病视网膜病变状态或DME类型组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。在这两组中,中位数(IQR)BCDVA从基线时的0.7(0.8)logMAR显着改善至注射后6个月时的0.4(0.1)logMAR(均P=0.001),在所有随访中,组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。阿柏西普组的中位数(IQR)CST从基线时的347(166)µm显着降低至注射后6个月时的180(233)µm,雷珠单抗组从基线时的360(180)µm下降到注射后6个月时的190(224)µm(均P=0.001),在所有随访中,组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组均无严重不良反应记录。
    雷珠单抗和阿柏西普在短期随访中对未治疗DME患者的解剖和功能结果同样有效,两种药物之间的注射计数没有显着差异。更大的前景,随机化,需要进行随访时间较长的双盲试验,以确认我们的初步结果.
    UNASSIGNED: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the primary substance involved in retinal barrier breach. VEGF overexpression may cause diabetic macular edema (DME). Laser photocoagulation of the macula is the standard treatment for DME; however, recently, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have surpassed laser treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injections of aflibercept or ranibizumab for managing treatment-naive DME.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-center, retrospective, interventional, comparative study included eyes with visual impairment due to treatment-naive DME that underwent intravitreal injection of either aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL or ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 mL at Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt between March 2023 and January 2024. Demographic data and full ophthalmological examination results at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months post-injection were collected, including the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundoscopy, and central subfield thickness (CST) measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, the 96 eyes of 96 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 57 (10) (range: 20-74) years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:2.7 were allocated to one of two groups with comparable age, sex, diabetes mellitus duration, and presence of other comorbidities (all P >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in baseline diabetic retinopathy status or DME type between groups (both P >0.05). In both groups, the median (IQR) BCDVA significantly improved from 0.7 (0.8) logMAR at baseline to 0.4 (0.1) logMAR at 6 months post-injection (both P = 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between groups at all follow-up visits (all P >0.05). The median (IQR) CST significantly decreased in the aflibercept group from 347 (166) µm at baseline to 180 (233) µm at 6 months post-injection, and it decreased in the ranibizumab group from 360 (180) µm at baseline to 190 (224) µm at 6 months post-injection (both P = 0.001), with no statistically significant differences between groups at all follow-up visits (all P >0.05). No serious adverse effects were documented in either group.
    UNASSIGNED: Ranibizumab and aflibercept were equally effective in achieving the desired anatomical and functional results in patients with treatment-naïve DME in short-term follow-up without significant differences in injection counts between both drugs. Larger prospective, randomized, double-blinded trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our preliminary results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)影响约10%的糖尿病患者。这种情况会导致视力模糊或扭曲,这显著影响了这些患者的生活质量。我们评估了玻璃体内注射甲氨蝶呤(MTX)对持续性DME的治疗效果。
    本前瞻性介入病例系列包括确诊的持续性DME患者,对以前的标准治疗无反应。患者接受了全面的眼部检查和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的黄斑成像。给予单次玻璃体内MTX注射(400µgMTX在0.16mL溶液中),随后在注射后1,3和6个月进行患者评估。最佳矫正远距视力(BCDVA),眼内压(IOP),黄斑厚度(MT),在基线和注射后测量中心子场厚度(CST),以评估治疗效果。
    我们纳入了30例患者的33只眼,其平均值为(标准差[SD],范围)年龄为62.7(8.3、44至77)岁,其中男性17人(56.7%),女性13人(43.3%)。所有参与者都患有2型糖尿病,带有平均值(SD,范围)持续时间为17.0年(6.8,10至31年)。大多数参与者(n=27只眼睛,81.8%)患有非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变,6只眼(18.2%)患有增生性糖尿病视网膜病变。四只眼睛(12.1%)曾接受过黄斑激光光凝。先前玻璃体内贝伐单抗注射的平均(SD)数量为3.4(0.8),29只眼(87.8%)接受了一次玻璃体内注射曲安奈德。在学习期间,CST差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);BCDVA无统计学差异,MT,或眼压(P>0.05)。成对比较显示,与基线值相比,注射后6个月的CST显着降低(P<0.05)。在调查期间,MTX没有副作用,如黄斑水肿,视网膜撕裂,玻璃体出血,眼内炎,或者视力丧失,被观察到。
    单次玻璃体内注射MTX可显著降低持续性DME患者的CST,没有相关的安全问题。然而,未观察到功能结局的显著改善.因此,没有强有力的证据推荐将其用作pDME的治疗方法.进一步研究,最好是长期随访的随机临床试验,有必要评估长期疗效,安全,以及玻璃体内MTX治疗持续性DME的潜在益处。
    UNASSIGNED: Diabetic macular edema (DME) affects approximately 10% of patients with diabetes mellitus. This condition can cause blurred or distorted vision, which significantly affects the quality of life of these patients. We evaluated the therapeutic effects of intravitreal methotrexate (MTX) injections on persistent DME.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective interventional case series included patients with confirmed persistent DME that was unresponsive to previous standard treatments. The patients underwent comprehensive eye examinations and macular imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT). A single intravitreal MTX injection (400 µg MTX in 0.16 mL solution) was administered, followed by patient assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months after injection. Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), macular thickness (MT), and central subfield thickness (CST) were measured at baseline and post-injection to evaluate treatment efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 33 eyes of 30 patients with a mean (standard deviation [SD], range) age of 62.7 (8.3, 44 to 77) years, of whom 17 (56.7%) were men and 13 (43.3%) were women. All participants had type 2 diabetes mellitus, with a mean (SD, range) duration of 17.0 (6.8, 10 to 31) years. Most participants (n = 27 eyes, 81.8%) had non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and six eyes (18.2%) had regressed proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Four eyes (12.1%) had undergone prior macular laser photocoagulation. The mean (SD) number of prior intravitreal bevacizumab injections was 3.4 (0.8), and 29 eyes (87.8%) had received one intravitreal triamcinolone injection. During the study period, a statistically significant difference was observed in CST (P < 0.05); however, no statistically significant differences were observed in BCDVA, MT, or IOP (P > 0.05). Pairwise comparison revealed a significant decrease in CST at 6 months post-injection compared to the baseline value (P < 0.05). During the investigation period, no side effects of MTX, such as macular edema, retinal tears, vitreous hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, or vision loss, were observed.
    UNASSIGNED: A single intravitreal MTX injection significantly reduced CST in patients with persistent DME, without relevant safety concerns. However, no significant improvement in functional outcomes was observed. Therefore, there is no strong evidence to recommend its use as a treatment for pDME. Further studies, preferably randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-ups, are warranted to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, and potential benefits of intravitreal MTX for the treatment of persistent DME.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在社区中筛查糖尿病性视网膜病变,而又不影响医院眼科医生的常规工作是远程眼科的本质。这项研究旨在调查从2012年到2020年筛查糖尿病视网膜病变的远程眼科实践的有效性。它还旨在比较印度南部地区医院组织的营地的2年患病率,以及脚步声,reporting,后续行动,患者反应,以及这些营地的诊断效能。
    所有参加流动营地的糖尿病和无法解释的视力恶化患者都接受了非扩张眼底照相。患者在地区医院与眼科医生进行了远程会诊,那些需要干预的人被叫到地区医院。研究了向医院报告的患者数量的趋势。根据问卷调查记录患者满意度。
    在8年的时间里,总共举办了682个营地,并对30230例患者进行了检查。对12157例(40.21%)患者进行远程会诊。需要进一步调查的患者,糖尿病视网膜病变的干预,或其他眼部病变的进一步治疗被紧急转诊至地区医院(30230名接受检查的患者中,n=3293[10.89%]).随着糖尿病持续时间的增加,临床上有意义的黄斑水肿的严重程度和存在显着增加(P<0.001)。多年来,远程会诊的百分比呈上升趋势(P=0.001)。同样,考虑到患者向医院报告的趋势,流失率逐年下降(P<0.05)。接受远程眼科咨询的12157例患者中,共有10974例(90.27%)对服务感到满意。
    多年来的远程会商呈增长趋势,流失率多年来有所下降。远程眼科在提供高质量的服务方面取得了成功,易于获得护理,提高患者满意度。关于远程眼科在其他主要可预防的失明原因中的作用的未来研究似乎是可能且必要的。
    UNASSIGNED: Screening for diabetic retinopathy in the community without compromising the routine work of ophthalmologists at hospitals is the essence of teleophthalmology. This study was aimed at investigating the efficacy of teleophthalmology practice for screening diabetic retinopathy from 2012 to 2020. It was also aimed at comparing the 2-year prevalence of camps organized by a district hospital in South India, as well as the footfall, reporting, follow-up, patient response, and diagnostic efficacy at these camps.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients with diabetes and unexplained vision deterioration attending the mobile camp units underwent non-dilated fundus photography. Patients underwent teleconsultation with the ophthalmologist at the district hospital, and those requiring intervention were called to the district hospital. Trends were studied for the number of patients reporting to the hospital. Patient satisfaction was recorded based on a questionnaire.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 682 camps were held over 8 years, and 30 230 patients were examined. Teleconsultation was done for 12 157 (40.21%) patients. Patients requiring further investigations, intervention for diabetic retinopathy, or further management of other ocular pathologies were urgently referred to the district hospital (n= 3293 [10.89%] of 30 230 examined patients). The severity and presence of clinically significant macular edema increased significantly with an increased duration of diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001). The percentage of teleconsultations showed an increasing trend over the years (P = 0.001). Similarly, considering trends of patients reporting to the hospital, the attrition rate decreased over the years (P < 0.05). A total of 10 974 of 12 157 (90.27%) patients who underwent teleophthalmic consultation were satisfied with the service.
    UNASSIGNED: Teleconsultations over the years showed an increasing trend, and the attrition rate decreased over the years. Teleophthalmology is achieving success in providing high-quality service, easy access to care, and in increasing patient satisfaction. Future studies on the role of teleophthalmology for other leading preventable causes of blindness seem possible and necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)是一种严重的威胁视力的疾病,一半的高风险PDR患者在5年内会出现法律失明,如果不及时治疗。这项研究旨在比较未经治疗的PDR患者在光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)上的放射状乳头周围毛细血管(RPC)密度方面的全视网膜光凝(PRP)和玻璃体内雷珠单抗注射。
    这个开放标签,prospective,随机临床试验包括50例未经治疗的PDR伴视盘新生血管的患者,并随机分为两组:第1组,患者间隔2周接受两次PRP,和第2组,患者接受三次玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(0.5mg),间隔1个月,连续3个月。患者接受了全面的眼科检查,包括干预前和最后一次激光治疗或首次玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗3个月后每月一次的最佳矫正远距视力(BCDVA)测量值和OCTA。在3个月的开始和结束时测试视野(VF)。
    42只(84%)眼完成了3个月的随访,包括PRP组22只眼(88%)和雷珠单抗组20只眼(80%).两组在人口统计学特征方面具有可比性,糖尿病持续时间,基线BCDVA,糖化血红蛋白水平,OCTA参数,VF指数,和眼压(均P>0.05)。PRP组从基线到3个月随访的RPC密度变化显着低于雷珠单抗组(RPC密度变化的平均差异:-3.61%;95%置信区间:-5.57%至-1.60%;P=0.001)。PRP组从基线到3个月随访的中位数(四分位距)logMAR变化(0.0[0.2])明显高于雷珠单抗组(-0.15[0.3];P<0.05)。从基线到3个月随访的中央凹厚度的中位数变化在两组之间存在显着差异(P=0.001)。
    在PDR和OCTA上椎间盘RPC密度的新生血管形成的眼中,雷珠单抗组增加,而PRP组减少。雷珠单抗组的视力增益高于PRP组。未来需要解决我们局限性的多中心试验来验证这项研究的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is a serious sight-threatening disease, and half of the patients with high-risk PDR can develop legal blindness within 5 years, if left untreated. This study was aimed at comparing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and intravitreal ranibizumab injections in terms of radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients with treatment-naive PDR.
    UNASSIGNED: This open-label, prospective, randomized clinical trial included 50 patients with treatment-naive PDR with optic disc neovascularization and randomized them into two groups: group 1, with patients undergoing two sessions of PRP 2 weeks apart, and group 2, with patients received three intravitreal ranibizumab injections (0.5 mg) 1 month apart for 3 consecutive months. Patients underwent a full ophthalmological examination, including best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) measurement in the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) notation and OCTA before intervention and monthly after the last laser session or the first intravitreal ranibizumab injection for 3 months of follow-up. Visual field (VF) was tested at the beginning and end of 3 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-two (84%) eyes completed the 3-month follow-up, including 22 eyes in the PRP group (88%) and 20 (80%) eyes in the ranibizumab group. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, diabetes duration, baseline BCDVA, glycated hemoglobin level, OCTA parameters, VF indices, and intraocular pressure (all P > 0.05). The RPC density change from baseline to the 3-month follow-up was significantly lower in the PRP group than in the ranibizumab group (mean difference in RPC density change: - 3.61%; 95% confidence interval: - 5.57% to - 1.60%; P = 0.001). The median (interquartile range) logMAR change from baseline to the 3-month follow-up (0.0 [0.2]) was significantly higher in the PRP group than in the ranibizumab group (- 0.15 [0.3]; P < 0.05). The median changes in central foveal thickness from baseline to the 3-month follow-up differed significantly between the two groups (P = 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: In eyes with PDR and neovascularization of the disc RPC density on OCTA increased in the ranibizumab group and decreased in the PRP group. Visual acuity gain was higher in the ranibizumab group than in the PRP group. Future multicenter trials addressing our limitations are required to verify the findings of this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在2型糖尿病患者中,糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的发展与血清chemerin水平升高呈正相关。本研究旨在探讨1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者血清chemerin水平与DR发展之间的可能关系。
    在这项横断面研究中,我们纳入了埃及人,并将他们分为四组:第1组,包括健康个体;第2组,包括无DR的T1DM患者;第3组,包括无增殖性DR(NPDR)的T1DM患者;第4组,包括有增殖性DR(PDR)的T1DM患者.评估包括最佳矫正视力评估,裂隙灯生物显微镜,基金副本,荧光素眼底血管造影,和黄斑眼相干断层扫描。从所有参与者获得空腹血样以测量血清chemerin,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),总胆固醇,甘油三酯,和肌酐水平。各组之间比较血清chemerin水平,以及它们与年龄的相关性,糖尿病的持续时间,HbA1c,总胆固醇,甘油三酯,和肌酐水平进行了分析。
    我们招募了209名参与者,包括第1组46例健康个体,第2组52例(T1DM和非DR),第3组61例(T1DM和NPDR),第4组50例(T1DM和PDR),组间平均年龄和性别比例相当.糖尿病的持续时间,身体质量指数,HbA1c,总胆固醇,甘油三酯,血清chemerin水平在各组间有显著差异(均P<0.001),而肌酐水平没有(P>0.05)。第4组血清chemerin水平明显高于第3组和第2组,第3组明显高于第2组,第3组和第4组明显高于第1组(均P<0.001)。然而,第1组和第2组具有可比性(P>0.05)。它与T1DM和HbA1c的持续时间相关,总胆固醇,甘油三酯,和肌酐水平,但与年龄无关。
    有DR的T1DM患者的血清chemerin水平高于无DR的T1DM患者或健康个体。PDR患者的血清chemerin水平高于NPDR患者。因此,血清chemerin水平是T1DM患者DR发生和严重程度的潜在生物标志物。然而,未来的诊断准确性研究需要证实这些潜在的应用.
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR) correlates positively with elevated serum chemerin levels. This study was aimed at investigating the probable association between the serum chemerin level and the development of DR in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
    UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study, we included Egyptians and classified them into four groups: group 1, including healthy individuals; group 2, including patients with T1DM without DR; group 3, including patients with T1DM with non-proliferative DR (NPDR); and group 4, including patients with T1DM with proliferative DR (PDR). The assessment included best-corrected distance visual acuity assessment, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, funduscopy, fundus fluorescein angiography, and macular ocular coherence tomography. Fasting blood samples were obtained from all participants to measure serum chemerin, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol, triglyceride, and creatinine levels. Serum chemerin levels were compared among the groups, and their correlations with age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and creatinine levels were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: We recruited 209 participants, including 46 healthy individuals in group 1, 52 patients (T1DM and no DR) in group 2, 61 patients (T1DM and NPDR) in group 3, and 50 patients (T1DM and PDR) in group 4, with comparable mean ages and sex ratios among groups. The diabetes duration, body mass index, HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and serum chemerin levels differed significantly among the groups (all P < 0.001), whereas the creatinine level did not (P > 0.05). The serum chemerin level was significantly higher in group 4 than in groups 3 and 2, in group 3 than in group 2, and in groups 3 and 4 than in group 1 (all P < 0.001). However, it was comparable between groups 1 and 2 (P > 0.05). It correlated with the duration of T1DM and HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and creatinine levels but not with age.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with T1DM with DR showed higher serum chemerin levels than those with T1DM without DR or healthy individuals. Serum chemerin levels were higher in those with PDR than in those with NPDR. Thus, serum chemerin levels are a potential biomarker of the development and severity of DR in patients with T1DM. Nevertheless, future diagnostic accuracy studies are required to confirm these potential applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病性视网膜病是重要的致残病症。Micro-RNAs(miRNAs)是基因表达的调节因子,疾病可以改变它们的表达。我们的目的是分析糖尿病视网膜病变患者血清和玻璃体样品中miRNA的表达。包括以下群体和个体数量:增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)(n=16),糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)(n=17),和特发性视网膜前膜(IEM)作为非糖尿病对照(n=23)。使用TaqMan低密度阵列(TLDAs)探索初始miRNA表达,随后通过定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)进行验证。通过用于富集分析的生物信息学工具鉴定靶基因。TLDA揭示了以下miRNA在PDR与IEM:miR-320a-3p,miR-92a-3p,和血清中的miR-375-3p,玻璃样品中的miR-541-5p和miR-223-5p。DME与IEM:miR-486-5p,miR-145-5p,miR-197-3p,和血清中的miR-125b-5p,和玻璃样品中的miR-212-3p。PDRvs.DME:miR-486-5p,miR-100-5p,miR-328-3p,miR-660-5p,血清中的miR-145和玻璃体样品中的miR-145。仅对miR-145、miR-92a、和血清中的miR-375。这三个验证的miRNA的相关富集途径,miR-145,miR-92a,miR-375是血管内皮生长因子及其受体,肝细胞生长因子受体,表皮生长因子,病灶粘连,和磷酸肌醇3-激酶。我们的结果支持miRNAs参与糖尿病视网膜病变的病理生理学,并增强其作为生物标志物或治疗资源的潜力。
    Diabetic retinopathies are important disabling conditions. Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) are regulators of gene expression and diseases can change their expression. Our aim was to analyze the expression of miRNAs in serum and vitreous samples from patients with diabetic retinopathies. The following groups and number of individuals were included: proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (n = 16), diabetic macular edema (DME) (n = 17), and idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) as non-diabetic controls (n = 23). The initial miRNA expression was explored using TaqMan low-density arrays (TLDAs) with subsequent validation through a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Target genes were identified through bioinformatic tools for enrichment analysis. The TLDAs revealed the following miRNAs with differential expression in terms of PDR vs. IEM: miR-320a-3p, miR-92a-3p, and miR-375-3p in the serum, with miR-541-5p and miR-223-5p in the vitreous samples. DME vs IEM: miR-486-5p, miR-145-5p, miR-197-3p, and miR-125b-5p in the serum, and miR-212-3p in vitreous samples. PDR vs. DME: miR-486-5p, miR-100-5p, miR-328-3p, miR-660-5p, and miR-145 in the serum and none in the vitreous samples. Validation was confirmed only for miR-145, miR-92a, and miR-375 in the serum. The relevant enriched pathways for these three validated miRNAs, miR-145, miR-92a, and miR-375 were the vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, hepatocyte growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor, focal adhesion, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Our results support the involvement of miRNAs in the pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathies and reinforce their potential as biomarkers or therapeutic resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病(DM)的长期微血管并发症之一,被认为是世界范围内视力丧失的主要原因。慢性高血糖可引起视网膜和脉络膜的微血管异常。脉络膜的血管组织向外部视网膜供血,光感受器,和视网膜色素上皮.它在视网膜的代谢交换中起着重要作用。许多实验研究报道,糖尿病患者的脉络膜病理可能在发展DR中起作用。脉络膜厚度(CT)可以反映脉络膜血管系统的变化,并可用于评估脉络膜本身的血管分布。CT在眼睛的健康状态和疾病状态以及衰老过程之间有所不同。这意味着较薄或较厚的脉络膜可能表明眼部疾病。脉络膜血管分布指数(CVI)也用作脉络膜血管分布评估的标志物,并间接定量测量脉络膜血管分布。已经进行了许多研究来评估许多不同眼部疾病中的脉络膜。然而,关于DM的CT结果,尤其是DR患者,各种增厚,变薄,或者没有变化。因此,有或无DR的DM患者的脉络膜状况在研究者之间仍存在争议.在这次系统审查中,我们回顾了18篇文章,研究了糖尿病患者不同阶段的脉络膜结构变化之间的关系,专注于CT,CVI,和其他一些评估脉络膜变化的参数。
    Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the long-term microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) and is considered a leading cause of vision loss worldwide. Chronic hyperglycemia can cause microvascular abnormalities to the retina and the choroid as well. The vascular tissue of the choroid supplies blood to the outer retina, photoreceptors, and retinal pigment epithelium. It plays an important role in the metabolic exchange of the retina. Many experimental studies reported that choroidal pathology in diabetic patients might play a role in developing DR. Choroidal thickness (CT) can reflect changes in the vasculature of the choroid and can be used to assess the vascularity of the choroid itself. CT differs between healthy and diseased states of the eye as well as with the aging process. This means that thinner or thicker choroid may indicate an ocular disease. Choroidal vascularity index (CVI) is also used as a marker for choroidal vascularity assessment and indirectly measures choroidal vascularity quantitatively. Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the choroid in many different ocular diseases. However, the results regarding CT in DM, especially in patients with DR, are various as thickened, thinned, or no changes. Thus, the status of the choroid in patients with DM with or without DR remains controversial between researchers. In this systematic review, we reviewed 18 articles that were done to investigate the relationship between structural choroidal changes in diabetic patients with different stages of DR, focusing on CT, CVI, and some other parameters evaluating choroidal changes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to compare the stereoacuities measured by TNO and Titmus tests, in diabetic patients with early retinopathies and those without diabetes (control group).
    METHODS: In this study, 139 participants (43 with diabetes mellitus, and 96 age-matched controls) were recruited from a retina subspecialist clinic in Qazvin, Iran, from September 2016 to March 2017. The stereo-acuities were measured following subjective refraction by Titmus and TNO tests at 40 cm. The patients with diabetes whose retinal exam revealed no background retinopathy or only microaneurysms (very mild diabetic retinopathy) in the worse eye were enrolled into this study.
    RESULTS: In the diabetic group, with TNO, the stereoacuity levels in 95.3% of the subjects were in 120, 240, and 480 levels, while in the non-diabetic group, 86.4% of the subjects were in 30, 60, and 120 levels. In the diabetic group, with Titmus, 86.1% of the subjects were in 40, 50, and 60 levels, while in the nondiabetic group 91.7% of the subjects were in 40 levels. The correlation between TNO and Titmus was statistically significant (r = 0.338, P<0.001) for the non-diabetic group, while it was not statistically significant (r = -0.034, P= 0.827) for the diabetic group.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the early stages of diabetic retinopathy, the global pathway of stereopsis is damaged more than the local. The difference in severity of damage to local and global pathways in patients with diabetes indicates that there may be different underlying mechanisms for these two pathways.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号