dermatology residents

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:皮肤科患者教育材料(PEM)的书写水平通常高于全国平均水平的七至八年级阅读水平。ChatGPT-3.5,GPT-4,DermGPT,和DocsGPT是响应用户提示的大型语言模型(LLM)。我们的项目评估了它们在指定阅读水平下生成皮肤病学PEM的用途。
    目的:本研究旨在评估在未指定和指定的阅读水平下,选择LLM在常见和罕见皮肤病学中产生PEM的能力。Further,该研究旨在评估这些LLM生成的PEM的意义保存情况,由皮肤科住院医师评估。
    方法:当前美国皮肤病学会PEMs的Flesch-Kincaid阅读水平(FKRL)评估了4种常见(特应性皮炎,寻常痤疮,牛皮癣,和带状疱疹)和4例罕见(大疱性表皮松解症,大疱性类天疱疮,层状鱼鳞病,和扁平苔藓)皮肤病。我们提示ChatGPT-3.5,GPT-4,DermGPT,和DocsGPT以“在[FKRL]中创建关于[条件]的患者教育讲义”,以在未指定的五年级和七年级FKRL中每个条件迭代生成10个PEM,使用MicrosoftWord可读性统计进行评估。由2名皮肤科住院医师评估了LLM中意义的保留。
    结果:当前的美国皮肤病学会PEMs对常见和罕见疾病的平均(SD)FKRL为9.35(1.26)和9.50(2.3),分别。对于常见疾病,LLM生产的PEM的FKRL介于9.8和11.21之间(未指定提示),在4.22和7.43之间(五年级提示),在5.98和7.28之间(七年级提示)。对于罕见疾病,LLM生产的PEM的FKRL范围在9.85和11.45之间(未指定提示),在4.22和7.43之间(五年级提示),在5.98和7.28之间(七年级提示)。在五年级阅读水平,与ChatGPT-3.5相比,GPT-4在常见和罕见条件下都能更好地生产PEM(分别为P=.001和P=.01),DermGPT(分别为P<.001和P=.03),和DocsGPT(分别为P<.001和P=.02)。在七年级的阅读水平,ChatGPT-3.5、GPT-4、DocsGPT、或DermGPT在生产常见条件下的PEM(所有P>.05);然而,对于罕见的情况,ChatGPT-3.5和DocsGPT的表现优于GPT-4(分别为P=.003和P<.001)。意义分析的保留表明,对于共同条件,DermGPT在整体阅读便利性方面排名最高,患者的可理解性,和准确性(14.75/15,98%);对于罕见的情况,GPT-4产生的施舍排名最高(14.5/15,97%)。
    结论:GPT-4的表现似乎优于ChatGPT-3.5,DocsGPT,和DermGPT在五年级FKRL的常见和罕见的情况下,尽管ChatGPT-3.5和DocsGPT在7级FKRL中在罕见情况下的表现均优于GPT-4。LLM生产的PEM可以可靠地满足七级FKRL的选择常见和罕见的皮肤病,并且易于阅读,患者可以理解,而且大多是准确的。LLM可能在提高健康素养和传播无障碍方面发挥作用,在皮肤病学中可以理解的PEM。
    BACKGROUND: Dermatologic patient education materials (PEMs) are often written above the national average seventh- to eighth-grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DermGPT, and DocsGPT are large language models (LLMs) that are responsive to user prompts. Our project assesses their use in generating dermatologic PEMs at specified reading levels.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the ability of select LLMs to generate PEMs for common and rare dermatologic conditions at unspecified and specified reading levels. Further, the study aims to assess the preservation of meaning across such LLM-generated PEMs, as assessed by dermatology resident trainees.
    METHODS: The Flesch-Kincaid reading level (FKRL) of current American Academy of Dermatology PEMs was evaluated for 4 common (atopic dermatitis, acne vulgaris, psoriasis, and herpes zoster) and 4 rare (epidermolysis bullosa, bullous pemphigoid, lamellar ichthyosis, and lichen planus) dermatologic conditions. We prompted ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DermGPT, and DocsGPT to \"Create a patient education handout about [condition] at a [FKRL]\" to iteratively generate 10 PEMs per condition at unspecified fifth- and seventh-grade FKRLs, evaluated with Microsoft Word readability statistics. The preservation of meaning across LLMs was assessed by 2 dermatology resident trainees.
    RESULTS: The current American Academy of Dermatology PEMs had an average (SD) FKRL of 9.35 (1.26) and 9.50 (2.3) for common and rare diseases, respectively. For common diseases, the FKRLs of LLM-produced PEMs ranged between 9.8 and 11.21 (unspecified prompt), between 4.22 and 7.43 (fifth-grade prompt), and between 5.98 and 7.28 (seventh-grade prompt). For rare diseases, the FKRLs of LLM-produced PEMs ranged between 9.85 and 11.45 (unspecified prompt), between 4.22 and 7.43 (fifth-grade prompt), and between 5.98 and 7.28 (seventh-grade prompt). At the fifth-grade reading level, GPT-4 was better at producing PEMs for both common and rare conditions than ChatGPT-3.5 (P=.001 and P=.01, respectively), DermGPT (P<.001 and P=.03, respectively), and DocsGPT (P<.001 and P=.02, respectively). At the seventh-grade reading level, no significant difference was found between ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DocsGPT, or DermGPT in producing PEMs for common conditions (all P>.05); however, for rare conditions, ChatGPT-3.5 and DocsGPT outperformed GPT-4 (P=.003 and P<.001, respectively). The preservation of meaning analysis revealed that for common conditions, DermGPT ranked the highest for overall ease of reading, patient understandability, and accuracy (14.75/15, 98%); for rare conditions, handouts generated by GPT-4 ranked the highest (14.5/15, 97%).
    CONCLUSIONS: GPT-4 appeared to outperform ChatGPT-3.5, DocsGPT, and DermGPT at the fifth-grade FKRL for both common and rare conditions, although both ChatGPT-3.5 and DocsGPT performed better than GPT-4 at the seventh-grade FKRL for rare conditions. LLM-produced PEMs may reliably meet seventh-grade FKRLs for select common and rare dermatologic conditions and are easy to read, understandable for patients, and mostly accurate. LLMs may play a role in enhancing health literacy and disseminating accessible, understandable PEMs in dermatology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:皮肤病理学教育占美国皮肤科住院医师培训的30%。COVID-19大流行加速了虚拟皮肤病理学的实施,以取代传统的显微镜用于居民教育。这项研究检查了美国皮肤科居民对虚拟皮肤病学的看法,因为缺乏这方面的研究。
    方法:匿名,机密,机构审查委员会批准的调查以电子方式分发给美国皮肤科住院医师,包括16个问题,比较了对虚拟和传统皮肤病理学教育的态度.回答为n=59。采用SAS软件进行统计学分析。
    结果:参与者认为虚拟成像在时间表灵活性方面优于传统显微镜(96.6%vs.1.7%,p<0.0001),讲座便利性(94.8%与0.0%,p<0.0001),个人评价(96.6%与0.0%,p<0.0001),成本效益(64.4%与6.8%,p<0.0001),和董事会考试准备(52.5%与16.9%,p=0.0005)。传统显微镜在图像质量方面受到青睐(50.8%与25.4%,p=0.0127)和总体效用(50.8%与27.1%,p=0.0195)。
    结论:我们的研究支持将虚拟皮肤病理学应用作为皮肤病住院医师培训的有价值的工具。还表明,传统的显微镜训练继续发挥关键作用。进一步的研究应该检查,如果有的话,随着更新和更强大的数字和扫描技术的出现,虚拟皮肤病理学可以逐渐取代传统的显微镜。
    BACKGROUND: Dermatopathology education accounts for 30% of U.S. dermatology residency training. The COVID-19 pandemic expedited the implementation of virtual dermatopathology in place of traditional microscopy for resident education. This study examined U.S. dermatology residents\' perceptions of virtual dermatopathology, as research in this area is lacking.
    METHODS: An anonymous, confidential, institutional review board-approved survey was electronically distributed to U.S. dermatology residents consisting of 16 questions comparing attitudes towards virtual and traditional dermatopathology education. Responses were n = 59. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software.
    RESULTS: Participants believe virtual imaging is superior to conventional microscopy in schedule flexibility (96.6% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.0001), lecture convenience (94.8% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.0001), personal review (96.6% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.0001), cost-effectiveness (64.4% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.0001), and board exam preparation (52.5% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.0005). Conventional microscopy was favored for image quality (50.8% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.0127) and overall utility (50.8% vs. 27.1%, p = 0.0195).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports virtual dermatopathology utilization as a valuable tool in dermatology residency training. Also it is shown that conventional microscopy training continues to play a key role. Further studies should examine whether, if ever, virtual dermatopathology could gradually replace conventional microscopy with the advent of newer and more powerful digital and scanning technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:职业倦怠综合征是一种由慢性职业紧张引起的心理健康障碍。职业倦怠和相关的合并症在医疗保健专业人员中普遍存在,作为医疗居民的弱势群体。尽管如此,目前在皮肤科居民中关于这个问题的科学医学文献很少。这项研究的目的是分析职业倦怠综合征的患病率,焦虑,皮肤科居民的抑郁症,以及相关的危险因素。
    方法:这是一项横断面试验,旨在包括2022年12月至2023年6月来自西班牙的皮肤科居民。通过在线消息应用程序发送了一份自我管理的表格,包括经过验证的量表来研究职业生活质量,倦怠综合征,焦虑,和抑郁症。
    结果:共有48名皮肤科居民被纳入研究,其中50%(24/48)是女性,平均年龄27岁(1.25)。共有58.33%(28/48)的居民有一定程度的焦虑,22.9%(11/48)有一定程度的抑郁,23.4%的人有中等程度的倦怠风险(11/48)。工作量是与所研究的3种疾病相关的主要危险因素,而管理支持或内在动机似乎起着保护作用。
    结论:职业倦怠综合征及其合并症均在西班牙皮肤科居民中普遍存在,且彼此密切相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Burnout syndrome is a mental health disorder due to chronic occupational stress. Both burnout and associated comorbidities are prevalent among health care professionals, being medical residents a vulnerable group. Despite this, the scientific medical literature currently available on this issue in dermatology residents is scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of the burnout syndrome, anxiety, and depression in dermatology residents, and the associated risk factors.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional trial designed to include dermatology residents from Spain (from December 2022 through June 2023). A self-administered form was sent via online messaging applications, including validated scales to study professional quality of life, burnout syndrome, anxiety, and depression.
    RESULTS: A total of 48 dermatology residents were included in the study, 50% of whom (24/48) were women, with a mean age of 27 years (1.25). A total of 58.33% (28/48) of the residents had some degree of anxiety, 22.9% (11/48) some degree of depression, and 23.4% a moderate risk of burnout (11/48). Workload was the main risk factor associated with the 3 disorders studied, while managerial support or intrinsic motivation seem to play a protective role.
    CONCLUSIONS: Burnout syndrome and its comorbidities are both prevalent in dermatology residents in Spain and closely related to each other.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号