UNASSIGNED: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in screening for copy number variations (CNVs).
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by combining our study results with those reported in other articles. We retrospectively collected the data of pregnant women with NIPS testing in the Hangzhou Women\'s Hospital from December 2019 to February 2022. Simultaneously, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was carried out to identify all relevant peer-reviewed publications. Statistical analysis was performed based on the random-effects model to determine a pooled estimate of the positive predictive value (PPV).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 29 studies involving 2,667 women were included for analysis. The pooled PPV of NIPS in the detection of CNVs was 32.86% (95% confidence interval [24.61-41.64]). Statistical heterogeneity was high, while no significant publication bias was found in this meta-analysis. There were insufficient data to accurately determine sensitivity and specificity, as most studies only performed confirmatory tests on high-risk women.
UNASSIGNED: The PPV of NIPS in screening for CNVs was approximately 33%. Cautions should be kept in mind for the pretest guidance and subsequent after-test counseling when offering such genome-wide NIPS tests.

Background: Psychomotor delay, epilepsy and dysmorphic features are clinical signs which are described in multiple syndromes due to chromosomal imbalances or mutations involving key genes implicated in the stages of Early Embryonic Development. In this context, we report a 10 years old Tunisian patient with these three signs. Our objective is to determine the cause of developmental, behavioral and facial abnormalities in this patient. Methods: We used banding cytogenetics (karyotype) and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) to this purpose. Results: The karyotype was in favor of a derivative of chromosome 7 in the patient and Array CGH analysis revealed a loss of genetic material in 7p22.3-p22.1 (4,56 Mb) with a gain at 8q24.23-q24 (9.20 Mb) resulting from maternal 7/8 reciprocal translocation. An in silico analysis of the unbalanced region was carried out and showed that the 7p22.3-p22.1 deletion contains eight genes. Among them, BRAT1 gene, previously described in several neurodevelopmental diseases, may be a candidate gene which absence could be correlated to the patient\'s phenotype. However, the 8q24.23-q24 duplication could be involved in the phenotype of this patient. Conclusion: In this study, we report for the first time a 7p deletion/8q duplication in a patient with psychomoteur delay, epilepsy and facial dysmorphism. Our study showed that Array CGH still useful for delivering a conclusive genetic diagnosis for patients having neurodevelopmental abnormalities in the era of next-generation sequencing.

Rearrangements of the region 1q42.13q43 are rare, with only 7 cases reported to date. The imbalances described are usually the result of inherited translocations with other chromosomes. Moreover, few cases of both inter- and intrachromosomal deletions/duplications detected cytogenetically have been described. We report the molecular cytogenetic characterization of an inverted insertion involving the region 1q42.13q43 and segregating in 2 generations of a family. The deletion and the duplication of the same segment were detected in 2 affected family members. SNP array analysis showed the familial origin of the deletion/duplication due to the occurrence of a crossing-over during meiosis. Our report underlines the importance of determining the correct origin of chromosomal aberrations using different molecular cytogenetic tests in order to provide a good estimation of the reproductive risk for the members of the family.