本文提出了一个概念框架,用于研究两极分化的科学信任和科学不信任的世界观中现实的社会分叉,通过分析和整合五个概念:科学工作,数字工作,情感工作,时间工作,边界工作。尽管依赖主流科学的账户与不信任或否认科学的账户之间存在认识论上的不对称,有对称的社会过程有助于非专业话语的建构。通过概念分析,我们合成了逆向话语的赤字模型的替代方案,将社会行为者的模式取代为“有缺陷的科学家”,专注于他们的文化主管机构。拟议的框架有助于观察互动中极化现实的平行构造及其通过铰链对象的持续衔接,比如疫苗,安全带,枪,或Covid-19背景下的卫生口罩。我们通过比较的方法来说明这个框架,在两个争议中提出当代在线媒体的论点和模因:即,疫苗信任与疫苗不信任的观点,Covid说服与Covid可疑的话语。
This article proposes a conceptual framework to study the social bifurcation of reality in polarized science-trusting and science-distrusting lay worldviews, by analyzing and integrating five concepts: science work, number work, emotion work, time work, and boundary work. Despite the epistemological asymmetry between accounts relying on mainstream science and science-distrusting or denialist ones, there are symmetrical social processes contributing to the construction of lay discourses. Through conceptual analysis, we synthesize an alternative to the deficit model of contrarian discourses, replacing the model of social actors as \"defective scientists\" with a focus on their culturally competent agency. The proposed framework is useful for observing the parallel construction of polarized realities in interaction and their ongoing articulation through hinge objects, such as vaccines, seatbelts, guns, or sanitary masks in the Covid-19 context. We illustrate the framework through a comparative approach, presenting arguments and memes from contemporary online media in two controversies: namely, vaccine-trusting versus vaccine-distrusting views and Covid-convinced versus Covid-suspicious discourses.