OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) reliably improves patient-reported quality of life; however, patient population heterogeneity, in addition to other factors, ensures ongoing equipoise in choosing the ideal surgical treatment. Surgeon preference for fusion or decompression alone influences surgical treatment decision-making. Meanwhile, at presentation, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ considerably between females and males. The aims of this study were to determine whether there exists a difference in the rates of decompression and fusion versus decompression alone based on patient-reported sex, and to determine if widely accepted indications for fusion justify any observed differences or if surgeon preference plays a role.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) DLS study, a multicentered Canadian prospective study, investigating the surgical management and outcome of DLS. Decompression and fusion rates, patient characteristics, preoperative PROMs, and radiographic measures were compared between males and females before and after propensity score matching.
RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort, female patients were more likely to undergo decompression and fusion than male patients. Females were more likely to have the recognized indications for fusion, including kyphotic disc angle, higher spondylolisthesis grade and slip percentage, and patient-reported back pain. Other radiographic findings associated with the decision to fuse, including facet effusion, facet distraction, or facet angle, were not more prevalent in females. After propensity score matching for demographic and radiographic characteristics, similar proportions of male and female patients underwent decompression and fusion and decompression alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Although it remains unclear who should or should not undergo fusion, in addition to surgical decompression of DLS, female patients undergo fusion at a higher rate than their male counterparts. After matching baseline radiographic factors indicating fusion, this analysis showed that the decision to fuse was not biased by sex differences. Rather, the higher proportion of females undergoing fusion is largely explained by the radiographic and clinical indications for fusion, suggesting that specific clinical and anatomical features of this condition are indeed different between sexes.

Degenerative lumbar spine stenosis is one of the main causes of chronic pain and radiculopathy in advanced age people. Along with increase in average life expectancy, degenerative lumbar spine stenosis becomes the most common indication for spinal surgery. There is still no consensus regarding the most optimal surgical approach due to the variety of modern surgical methods. In recent years, minimally invasive spinal surgery has become a more advisable alternative to open surgery due to its advanced technical features combined with less soft tissue damage, lower risk of complications and shorter postoperative recovery.
Дегенеративный стеноз поясничного отдела позвоночника является одной из ведущих причин хронической боли и радикулопатии у пожилых людей. С увеличением средней продолжительности жизни данная патология становится наиболее распространенным показанием к операции на позвоночнике. В связи с многообразием существующих методов хирургического лечения до сих пор нет консенсуса по выбору оптимальной тактики. В последние годы минимально инвазивная хирургия позвоночника представляется обоснованной альтернативой открытой хирургии благодаря своей технологичности в сочетании со снижением объема повреждения мягких тканей, меньшим риском развития осложнений и сокращением времени восстановления пациента в послеоперационном периоде.

UNASSIGNED: A Prospective Study.
UNASSIGNED: To assess results of posterior occipito-cervical decompression and fusion operated with intra-operative traction/manipulation and instrumented reduction in cases of Basilar Invagination(BI).
UNASSIGNED: Total 22 patients of 8-65 years with diagnosed BI were operated for posterior occipito-cervical fusion by intra-operative traction/manipulation and instrumented reduction. Fusion was done using autologous bone graft taken from iliac crest. Immediate post-operative, first month and then every 3 months\' follow-up examination were done for minimum period of 2 years.
UNASSIGNED: 22 patients (10 males,12 females) with mean age of 23.9 years having BI were included. 11 patients had C1 occipitalization, 4 had platybasia and 9 had atlanto-axial dislocation (AAD). 1 patient with os odontoideum with kyphotic deformity expired on 4th postoperative day due to respiratory insufficiency (mortality rate 4.54%). Neurological improvement by at least by one grade according to RANAWAT\'s and/or NURICK\'S scale was observed in 17/21 patients (80.95%). 3 patients remained static and 1 had neuro-worsening. Mean mJOA score of 13.14 improved to 16.24. All had reduction of dens below foramen magnum according to McRae, chamberlain line and Ranawat index. Bone graft fused in all patients as confirmed with CT scan and dynamic X-rays. 1 wound dehiscence and 1 asymptomatic implant loosening were seen on follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Surgical treatment of BI with intra-operative traction/manipulation, instrumented reduction and posterior occipito-cervical fusion can achieve good correction of radiology, functional performance and clinical neurology as well as excellent fusion rates without adverse effects of trans-oral surgery.

UNASSIGNED: Longitudinal cohort.
UNASSIGNED: It is unclear if patients with a recurrent disc herniation benefit from a concurrent fusion compared with a repeat decompression alone. We compared outcomes of decompression alone (D0) versus decompression and fusion (DF) for recurrent disc herniation.
UNASSIGNED: Patients enrolled in the Quality and Outcomes Database from 3 sites with a first episode of recurrent disc herniation were identified. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data including the presence of listhesis and extent of facet resection on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging prior to the index surgery were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: Of 94 cases identified, 55 had D0 and 39 had DF. Patients were similar in age, sex distribution, smoking status, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and surgical levels. Presence of listhesis (D0 = 7, DF = 5, P = .800) and extent of facet resection (D0 = 19%, DF = 16%, P = .309) prior to index surgery were similar between the 2 groups. Estimated blood loss (D0 = 26 cm3, DF = 329 cm3, P < .001), operating room time (D0 = 79 minutes, DF = 241 minutes, P < .001) and length of stay (D0 <1 day, DF = 4 days, P < .001) were significantly less in the D0 group. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes were similar in both groups. Three patients in the D0 group and 2 patients in the DF group required revision. Regression analysis showed that presence of listhesis, extent of facet resection and fusion were not associated with the 12-month Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score.
UNASSIGNED: For a first episode recurrent disc herniation, surgeons can expect similar outcomes whether patients are treated with decompression alone or decompression and fusion.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine blunt trauma patients with the presence of a cerebrovascular injury may be given initiation of heparin anticoagulation treatment prior to necessary surgical stabilization. Literature regarding the safety and efficacy of these procedures while a patient is on active anticoagulation is limited, requiring further investigation. The primary research question for this study is: Can cervical spine decompression and fusion in the context of a blunt cerebrovascular injury and anticoagulation therapy be completed safely? To accomplish this a comparison of outcomes and perioperative complications was made to a control group.
METHODS: A total of 63 trauma patients requiring cervical spine decompression and fusion from 2013 to 2015 were identified at our North American level 1 trauma center. Evaluation of patient injury data, bleeding events, postoperative infections, and neurologic outcomes was collected from chart review. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading system was used to measure change in postoperative neurologic outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 63 patients, 14 had a concomitant cerebrovascular injury that required perioperative anticoagulation treatment. In the 14 patients receiving anticoagulation, 11 had anterior and 3 had posterior stabilization. A total of 2 patients experienced a complication (pneumonia and hardware failure), but neither was related to anticoagulation. An elevated prothrombin time value was noted postoperatively in 1 patient, but with no adverse outcome. No bleeding or thrombotic events, surgical site infection, or neurologic deterioration occurred. The difference in postoperative ASIA grades between groups was not significantly different (P = .57).
CONCLUSIONS: The operative cohort receiving anticoagulation therapy did not demonstrate an increase affinity for perioperative complications or a decline in ASIA scores postoperatively when compared to a control cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a cerebrovascular injury receiving anticoagulation treatment can undergo safe and successful cervical spine stabilization procedures.
METHODS: Therapeutic level III.

UNASSIGNED: Longitudinal comparative cohort.
UNASSIGNED: To determine if the duration of symptoms in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis affects postoperative outcomes after 1- or 2-level decompression and fusion.
UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing primary surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis at a single Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) participating site were identified. Demographic, surgical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data, including baseline and 12-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), back pain (BP, 0-10), leg pain (LP, 0-10), and EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) scores were collected. Individual medical records were reviewed for data on duration of symptoms prior to surgery. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts-those with preoperative symptom duration of less than 1 year, 1 to 2 years, or greater than 2 years.
UNASSIGNED: Complete data was available in 123 patients. Significant improvement in ODI, BP, and LP scores were observed in all groups. At 12-month follow-up improvement in ODI, BP, or LP was similar among the cohorts; with a trend toward significance with better improvement in LP scores in patients with a symptom duration of less than 1 year to those with symptom duration greater than 2 years (P = .058).
UNASSIGNED: The duration of symptoms up to 2 years prior to surgery may not be a useful predictor of improvement of back pain or disability scores in patients with spondylolisthesis requiring decompression and fusion. Although there was a positive trend for improvement in leg pain for those with a shorter duration of symptoms, this did not reach statistical significance in our study.