deceased donor

已故捐赠者
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    子宫移植是绝对子宫因素性不孕症(AUFI)的手术治疗,以没有子宫为特征的先天性或获得性疾病。全世界已经进行了80多例移植,导致30多个活产,来自活着的和已故的捐赠者。在PubMed和SCOPUS中通过搜索术语“子宫移植”和“已故供体”来收集有关已故供体子宫移植的已发表文章;从获得的107篇文章中,本手稿仅考虑病例报告和死亡供者子宫移植和由此产生的活产的系统评价.提取的数据包括手术日期(年),国家,接受者(AUFI的年龄和原因)和捐赠者(年龄和平价)详细信息,受体手术(子宫切除术)的结果,和活产(日期和胎龄)。同行评审出版物的搜索显示,24例死亡的供体子宫移植和12例活产(出生率为66%),随访期间移植物丢失的发生率为25%(24例中的6例)。在这个系列中,在美国进行了12例移植(7例出生),捷克共和国有五个(一个出生),三个在意大利(一个出生),两个在土耳其(两个出生),和两个在巴西(一个出生)。受者年龄中位数为29.8岁(范围21-36岁),而供体年龄中位数为36.1岁(范围20-57岁).在24位收件人中,100%受到MRKH(Mayer-Rokitanski-Kuster-Hauser)综合征的影响。据报道,未产捐赠者有2例活产。死亡的供体子宫移植的出生率与文献中报道的活体供体率非常相似,但是在第一组中,伦理影响可能不那么重要。有必要在国际子宫移植登记处登记每一个病例,以便进行系统的审查,并与活体捐赠者率进行比较。
    Uterus transplantation is the surgical treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI), a congenital or acquired condition characterized by the absence of a uterus. More than 80 transplants have been performed worldwide, resulting in more than 30 live births, originating both from living and deceased donors. The collection of published articles on deceased donor uterus transplantations was performed in PubMed and SCOPUS by searching for the terms \"Uterus transplantation\" AND \"deceased donor\"; from the 107 articles obtained, only case reports and systematic reviews of deceased donor uterus transplantations and the resulting live births were considered for the present manuscript. The extracted data included the date of surgery (year), country, recipient (age and cause of AUFI) and donor (age and parity) details, outcome of recipient surgery (hysterectomy), and live births (date and gestational age). The search of peer-reviewed publications showed 24 deceased donor uterus transplantations and 12 live births (a birth rate of 66%) with a 25% occurrence of graft loss during follow-up (6 of 24). Among this series, twelve transplants were performed in the USA (seven births), five in the Czech Republic (one birth), three in Italy (one birth), two in Turkey (two births), and two in Brazil (one birth). The median recipient age was 29.8 years (range 21-36), while the median donor age was 36.1 years (range 20-57). Of 24 recipients, 100% were affected by MRKH (Mayer-Rokitanski-Kuster-Hauser) syndrome. Two live births were reported from nulliparous donors. Deceased donor uterus transplantation birth rates are very similar to the living donor rates reported in the literature, but ethical implications could be less important in the first group. It is necessary to register every case in the International Registry for Uterus Transplantation in order to perform a systematic review and comparison with living donor rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾移植后移植物功能延迟(DGF)预示着预后较差。在高草酸尿症患者中,DGF的发病率较高。草酸是一种废物,当肾功能下降时积累。我们假设残留利尿和累积的废物会影响DGF的发生率。2018-2022年期间移植的患者参加了前瞻性队列研究。确定了草酸及其前体的移植前浓度。残留利尿和其他接受者的数据,收集供体或移植相关变量.纳入496例患者,154人没有透析。草酸,和乙醛酸,高于正常浓度的98.8%,100%的患者。24%的患者利尿残留≤150mL/min。157例患者发生DGF。多变量二元逻辑回归分析显示透析类型有显著影响,受者BMI,供体类型,年龄,和血清肌酐对DGF的风险。残余利尿和乙醇酸浓度与该风险成反比。乙醛酸直接成比例。透析人群的结果显示了相同的结果,但乙醛酸缺乏意义。总之,低残留利尿与DGF发病率增加相关。可能积累的废物也起作用。抢先移植可降低DGF的发生率。
    Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation heralds a worse prognosis. In patients with hyperoxaluria, the incidence of DGF is high. Oxalic acid is a waste product that accumulates when kidney function decreases. We hypothesize that residual diuresis and accumulated waste products influence the DGF incidence. Patients transplanted between 2018-2022 participated in the prospective cohort study. Pre-transplant concentrations of oxalic acid and its precursors were determined. Data on residual diuresis and other recipient, donor or transplant related variables were collected. 496 patients were included, 154 were not on dialysis. Oxalic acid, and glyoxylic acid, were above upper normal concentrations in 98.8%, and 100% of patients. Residual diuresis was ≤150 mL/min in 24% of patients. DGF occurred in 157 patients. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant influence of dialysis type, recipient BMI, donor type, age, and serum creatinine on the DGF risk. Residual diuresis and glycolic acid concentration were inversely proportionally related to this risk, glyoxylic acid directly proportionally. Results in the dialysis population showed the same results, but glyoxylic acid lacked significance. In conclusion, low residual diuresis is associated with increased DGF incidence. Possibly accumulated waste products also play a role. Pre-emptive transplantation may decrease the incidence of DGF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经实施了使用乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)阳性供体肾脏来扩大供体库,但是关于它们对移植结果的影响的证据有限.本研究旨在探讨供体HBV感染对移植结果的影响。
    收集了2015年至2021年的捐赠者和接受者数据。共筛选743例肾移植病例,包括94供体乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)+/受体HBsAg-(D+R-)和649供体HBsAg-/受体HBsAg-(D-R-)病例。分析终点包括受体HBV感染,延迟移植物功能(DGF),12个月内峰值估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR),受者生存,和死亡审查移植物存活(DCGS)。
    与D-R组相比,D+R组HBV感染的风险明显更高(6/72vs.3/231;相对风险,6.4;p=0.007)。随着乙型肝炎表面抗体(HBsAb)滴度的增加,HBV传播的风险显着降低(趋势p=0.003)。此外,与D-R组相比,D+R-组未显示DGF风险增加(比值比,0.70;p=0.51)在多变量混合模型中。两组在12个月内的eGFR峰值相似(β=1.01,p=0.71),这对患者生存率没有影响(风险比[HR],0.36;p=0.10)和DCGS(HR,0.79,p=0.59)在共享脆弱Cox模型中。
    使用HBsAg阳性供体肾脏在短期内对HBV免疫受者相对安全。D+R-不会对移植物功能恢复产生负面影响,并提供可比的移植后结果。在移植前保持HBsAb滴度超过100IU/L对于降低HBV传播的风险至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive donor kidneys to expand the donor pool has been implemented, but limited evidence exists regarding their impact on transplant outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effects of donor HBV infection on transplant outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Donor and recipient data between 2015 and 2021 were collected. A total of 743 kidney transplant cases were screened, including 94 donor hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)+/recipient HBsAg- (D+R-) and 649 donor HBsAg-/recipient HBsAg- (D-R-) cases. The analysis endpoints included recipient HBV infection, delayed graft function (DGF), peak estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within 12 months, recipient survival, and death-censored graft survival (DCGS).
    UNASSIGNED: The D+R- group had a significantly higher risk of HBV infection compared to the D-R- group (6/72 vs. 3/231; relative risk, 6.4; p = 0.007). The risk of HBV transmission decreased significantly with increasing hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer (p for trend = 0.003). Furthermore, the D+R- group did not exhibit an increased risk of DGF compared to the D-R- group (odds ratio, 0.70; p = 0.51) in the multivariable mixed model. Both groups had similar peak eGFR within 12 months (β = 1.01, p = 0.71), and this had no impact on patient survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; p = 0.10) and DCGS (HR, 0.79, p = 0.59) in the shared-frailty Cox model.
    UNASSIGNED: The use of HBsAg-positive donor kidneys appears relatively safe for HBV-immunized recipients in the short term. D+R- does not negatively affect graft function recovery and provides comparable posttransplant outcomes. Maintaining an HBsAb titer over 100 IU/L before transplantation is critical to reduce the risk of HBV transmission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the features and outcomes of 500 liver transplantations in adults over a 12-year period.
    METHODS: The study included data on 500 liver transplantations between May 2010 and April 2023. We analyzed 483 adults who underwent transplantation and 438 candidates for this procedure. All data were obtained from local liver transplantation registry. Clinical outcomes were recorded as of June 1, 2023. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica 12 (StatSoft Inc., USA) and Jamovi version 2.3.21.0 software (Jamovi project).
    RESULTS: Among 438 patients in the waiting list between January 2012 and May 2023, liver transplantation was performed in 198 (45%) cases including 27 (6%) transplantations from living-related donors and 37 (8%) procedures in other centers. There were 109 (25%) deaths. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 81% (95% CI 76-85%) and 50% (95% CI 42-59%), respectively. Organs from deceased donors (n=134, 27%) and living-related donors (n=366, 73%) were used for transplantations. Redo transplantations were necessary in 21 (4%) cases. The median age of recipients was 45 years (range 18-72), median MELD-Na score - 16 (range 6-43). The most common indications for transplantation were viral cirrhosis (37%), cholestatic liver disease (16%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (14%). Monotherapy with calcineurin inhibitors was performed in 39% of cases, combination of calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids, antimetabolites or mTOR inhibitors - 52%, three-component schemes - 8% of cases. Annual, 5- and 7-year survival rates of recipients after primary transplantation were 87% (95% CI: 84-90%), 79% (95% CI: 75-83%) and 75% (95% CI: 70-80%), respectively. In case of liver transplantation from living-related donors, these values were 89% (95% CI: 86-92%), 84% (95% CI: 80-88%) and 80% (95% CI: 75-85%), after transplantation from deceased donors - 81% (95% CI: 74-88%), 66% (95% CI: 57-76%) and 58% (95% CI: 45-72%), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation is highly effective for patients with diffuse and focal liver diseases. Living donors not only significantly improve availability of this technology, but also provide substantial advantages in outcomes compared to liver transplantation from deceased donors, reducing the likelihood of recipient mortality by 10% after one post-transplantation year and by more than 20% after five years.
    UNASSIGNED: Провести анализ особенностей и результатов 500 трансплантаций печени, выполненных взрослым пациентам за 12-летний период.
    UNASSIGNED: В исследование включены данные о 500 операциях по пересадке печени, выполненных с мая 2010 по апрель 2023 г. 483 взрослым пациентам, а также о 438 кандидатах на трансплантацию, состоявших в листе ожидания. Все сведения получены из локального научного регистра трансплантации печени. Клинические исходы зарегистрированы по состоянию на 1 июня 2023 г. Расчеты проводили с использованием пакета статистических программ Statistica 12 (StatSoft Inc., США) и Jamovi версия 2.3.21.0 (Jamovi Project, Австралия).
    UNASSIGNED: Из 438 пациентов, находившихся в листе ожидания в период с января 2012 по май 2023 г. трансплантация печени была выполнена в 198 (45%) наблюдениях, из них в 27 (6%) случаях — от родственных доноров, 37 (8%) пациентов оперированы в других центрах. Зарегистрировано 109 (25%) летальных исходов. Показатели 1- и 3-летней выживаемости составили 81% (95% доверительный интервал (ДИ) 76—85%) и 50% (95% ДИ 42—59%). Для трансплантаций использованы органы посмертных (n=134, 27%) и родственных (n=366, 73%) доноров. В 21 (4%) наблюдении выполнены ретрансплантации. Медиана возраста реципиентов на момент операции составила 45 лет (от 18 до 72 лет), медиана оценки по шкале MELD-Na — 16 баллов (от 6 до 43). Наиболее частыми показаниями были: цирроз печени (ЦП) вирусной этиологии — 37%, ЦП в исходе холестатических заболеваний — 16%, гепатоцеллюлярный рак — 14%. Стартовая поддерживающая иммуносупрессия проводилась в режиме монотерапии ингибиторами кальциневрина (ИКН) — 39%, комбинацией ИКН с глюкокортикоидами, антиметаболитами или mTOR-ингибиторами — 52%, трехкомпонентные схемы использованы в 8% наблюдений. Показатели 1-, 5- и 7-летней выживаемости реципиентов печени после первичной трансплантации составили 87% (95% ДИ 84—90%), 79% (95% ДИ 75—83%), 75% (95% ДИ 70—80%). При пересадке от родственных доноров: 89% (95% ДИ 86—92%), 84% (95% ДИ 80—88%), 80% (95% ДИ 75—85%); при трансплантации от посмертных доноров: 81% (95% ДИ 74—88%), 66% (95% ДИ 57—76%), 58% (95% ДИ 45—72%) соответственно.
    UNASSIGNED: Полученные результаты подтверждают высокую эффективность трансплантации печени в лечении пациентов с ее диффузными и очаговыми заболеваниями. Активное использование ресурса прижизненного донорства не только радикально повышает доступность этой медицинской технологии, но и дает существенные преимущества в результатах при сопоставлении с трансплантацией от посмертных доноров, снижая вероятность летального исхода реципиентов на 10% через год после пересадки и более чем на 20% — спустя 5 лет после операции.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    整体肾移植期间的尿液重建具有挑战性,用不同的技术描述。这里,我们报告了一例使用改良的利希输尿管膀胱造口术和输尿管输尿管造口术进行联合尿路重建的病例。
    Urinary reconstruction during en bloc kidney transplantation is challenging, with different techniques described. Here, we report a case of combined urinary reconstruction using modified Lich ureteroneocystostomy and ureteroureterostomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在冰岛,在雷克雅未克的Landspitali大学医院(LUH)进行了少量活体供体(LD)的肾脏移植,而已故的捐赠者移植直到最近都在国外进行。在这项研究中,我们评估了冰岛患者的肾移植结果.
    这是一项回顾性研究,包括2000年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间接受肾脏移植的所有冰岛居民。数据来自冰岛终末期肾病登记处,LUH的医疗记录,和Scandiatransplant数据库。慢性肾脏病流行病学协作方程用于计算年龄>18岁的受者和供者的血清肌酐估计肾小球滤过率。和修改的施瓦茨方程为年龄≤18岁的人。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存率,并采用对数秩检验进行组比较。
    在20年期间,共进行了221例患者的229例肾脏移植,其中135人(58.9%)来自LD。在LUH进行的移植是118(51.5%),其中116来自LD。在7.4年的中位随访期间(范围0.1-20),27例(12.2%)患者死亡,其中20人(74%)有正常的移植物。患者一年生存率为99.1%[95%置信区间(CI),97.9-100],5年生存率为95.7%(95%CI,92.7-98.7),10年生存率为87.7%(95%CI,82.4-93.4).死亡审查的移植物存活率为98.3%(95%CI,96.6-100),96.8%(95%CI,94.4-99.2),在1年、5年和10年时为89.2%(95%CI,84.1-94.7),分别。
    患者和移植物存活率与大型移植中心相当,证明了在一个小国与国外更大的中心合作运行高质量的肾脏移植计划的可行性。
    UNASSIGNED: In Iceland, a small number of kidney transplants from living donors (LDs) are performed at Landspitali University Hospital (LUH) in Reykjavik, while deceased donor transplants have until recently invariably been carried out abroad. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of kidney transplantation in Icelandic patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study that included all Icelandic residents who underwent kidney transplantation between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2019. Data were obtained from the Icelandic End-Stage Kidney Disease Registry, medical records at LUH, and the Scandiatransplant database. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation was used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine for recipients and donors aged >18 years, and the modified Schwartz equation for those aged ≤18 years. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was employed for group comparisons.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 229 kidney transplants in 221 patients were performed during the 20-year period, of which 135 (58.9%) were from LDs. Transplants carried out at LUH were 118 (51.5%), of which 116 were from LDs. During a median follow-up of 7.4 years (range 0.1-20), 27 (12.2%) patients died, 20 (74%) of whom had a functioning graft. One-year patient survival was 99.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 97.9-100], 5-year survival was 95.7% (95% CI, 92.7-98.7), and 10-year survival was 87.7% (95% CI, 82.4-93.4). Death-censored graft survival was 98.3% (95% CI, 96.6-100), 96.8% (95% CI, 94.4-99.2), and 89.2% (95% CI, 84.1-94.7) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Patient and graft survival are comparable with those of large transplant centers, demonstrating the feasibility of running a quality kidney transplant program in a small nation in collaboration with a larger center abroad.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2014年,A2/A2B死亡供体肾脏移植的选择被纳入肾脏分配系统,以改善B血型候补名单候选人的获取。尽管报告的结果非常好,整个美国的中心使用率仍然很低。这里,我们研究了在单中心实施A2/A2B方案对B血型肾移植受者的影响,其中IgG的截止滴度≤1:8,IgM的截止滴度≤1:16.
    回顾性观察性研究。
    从2019年1月1日至2022年12月,在单个中心进行已故供体肾脏移植的B血型接受者。
    根据供血者血型,比较A2/A2B与血型的相容性,对已死亡供者肾移植的受者进行分析。
    患者一年生存率,死亡审查的同种异体移植功能,主要的非功能,延迟的移植物功能,使用血清肌酐水平和1年时估计的肾小球滤过率测量的同种异体移植功能,活检证实的排斥反应,并且需要血浆置换。
    使用分类变量的Fisher检验或χ2检验以及连续变量的非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验进行A2/A2B和相容组之间的比较。
    在研究期间,共有104名B型血患者在我们中心接受了已故供体肾脏移植,49人(47.1%)接受了A2/A2B移植。与血型兼容的受者相比,A2/A2B受者的等待时间更低(57.9个月比74.7个月,P=0.01)。A2/A2B受者在心脏死亡后更有可能接受供体(24.5%vs1.8%,P<0.05)和经历移植功能延迟(65.3%vs41.8%)。在1个月时,平均血清肌酐水平或估计的肾小球滤过率没有观察到差异,3个月,肾移植后1年,急性排斥反应,或主要不起作用。
    单中心研究。小队列规模限制结果分析。
    A2/A2B方案的实施使等待B血型患者的移植量增加了83.6%,并使移植等待时间减少了22.5%,移植结果相似。
    受血者的血型是等待死者肾移植的时间的主要决定因素之一。在美国,B型血患者的肾脏等待时间最长。少数族裔占B血型候补患者的很大比例,有助于观察到肾移植率的种族差异。在这项研究中,与接受血型相容的肾脏相比,接受A2/A2B不相容的肾脏导致接受肾脏移植几乎提前18个月.接受A2/A2B肾脏的结果没有差异。
    UNASSIGNED: The option for A2/A2B deceased donor kidney transplantation was integrated into the kidney allocation system in 2014 to improve access for B blood group waitlist candidates. Despite excellent reported outcomes, center uptake has remained low across the United States. Here, we examined the effect of implementing an A2/A2B protocol using a cutoff titer of ≤1:8 for IgG and ≤1:16 for IgM on blood group B kidney transplant recipients at a single center.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective observational study.
    UNASSIGNED: Blood group B recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center from January 1, 2019, to December 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed based on donor blood type with comparisons of A2/A2B versus blood group compatible.
    UNASSIGNED: One-year patient survival, death-censored allograft function, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, allograft function as measured using serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, biopsy-proven rejection, and need for plasmapheresis.
    UNASSIGNED: Comparison between the A2/A2B and compatible groups were performed using the Fisher test or the χ2 test for categorical variables and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 104 blood type B patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant at our center during the study period, 49 (47.1%) of whom received an A2/A2B transplant. Waiting time was lower in A2/A2B recipients compared with blood group compatible recipients (57.9 months vs 74.7 months, P = 0.01). A2/A2B recipients were more likely to receive a donor after cardiac death (24.5% vs 1.8%, P < 0.05) and experience delayed graft function (65.3% vs 41.8%). There were no observed differences in the average serum creatinine level or estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post kidney transplantation, acute rejection, or primary nonfunction.
    UNASSIGNED: Single-center study. Small cohort size limiting outcome analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Implementation of an A2/A2B protocol increased transplant volumes of blood group B waitlisted patients by 83.6% and decreased the waiting time for transplantation by 22.5% with similar transplant outcomes.
    Recipient blood type is one of the main determinants of waiting time to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant. Patients with blood type B have some of the longest waiting times for a kidney in the United States. Minorities comprise a large percentage of blood group B waitlist patients, contributing to observed racial differences in kidney transplantation rates. In this study, accepting an A2/A2B incompatible kidney resulted in receiving a kidney transplant almost 18 months earlier compared with receiving a blood group compatible kidney. No differences in outcomes were seen by accepting A2/A2B kidneys.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:意大利目前没有心脏循环死亡判定(pDCDD)后的儿科器官捐献计划。在实施pDCDD程序之前,全球许多中心对儿科重症监护病房(PICU)工作人员的态度进行了研究.这项研究旨在最大程度地减少潜在的不良反应,并评估新捐赠实践的接受程度。
    方法:我们进行了一项电子和匿名调查,调查了在八个意大利PICU工作的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对pDCDD的态度。调查分为三个部分:(一)关于一般人口统计数据的问题;(二)关于个人捐赠意愿的18项声明,讨论捐赠的经验,和有关捐赠的知识;(III)关于器官捐赠的两种儿科马斯特里赫特III方案的态度陈述。
    结果:反应率为54.4%,大多数受访者是护士。在那些回答的人中,45.3%在中心工作,北方占40.8%,意大利南部为12.8%。总的来说,93.9%支持儿科器官和组织捐献,在神经学测定死亡(DNDD)后,90.3%支持捐赠,78.2%支持pDCDD,69.7%的人对参与III型患者的pDCDD的想法感到满意,中心的支持性反应百分比(77.2%)高于意大利北部(65.1%)和南部(54.5%)(p值<0.004)。关于场景,79.3%的参与者认为器官取回发生在已经死亡的患者中。总的来说,27.3%的人认为他们对DCDD的了解是足够的。
    结论:我们的研究提供了对意大利PICU工作人员对pDCDD的态度和知识的见解。尽管普遍缺乏这方面的知识,受访者对pDCDD表现出积极的态度,并强烈一致认为意大利基于心脏循环标准确定死亡的立法协议尊重“死亡供体规则”。“北方有几个区别,中央,和意大利南部地区,在我们看来,这些差异可以归因于纪念死者的不同做法。为了评估实践和培训如何影响PICU工作人员的态度,在计划实施后重复调查将是很有趣的。
    BACKGROUND: Italy presently does not have a pediatric organ donation program after cardiocirculatory determination of death (pDCDD). Before implementing a pDCDD program, many centers globally have conducted studies on the attitudes of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff. This research aims to minimize potential adverse reactions and evaluate the acceptance of the novel donation practice.
    METHODS: We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey on attitudes toward pDCDD among healthcare professionals (HCPs) working at eight Italian PICUs. The survey had three parts: (I) questions about general demographic data; (II) 18 statements about personal wishes to donate, experience of discussing donation, and knowledge about donation; (III) attitudinal statements regarding two pediatric Maastricht III scenarios of organ donation.
    RESULTS: The response rate was 54.4%, and the majority of respondents were nurses. Of those who responded, 45.3% worked in the Center, 40.8% in the North, and 12.8% in the South of Italy. In total, 93.9% supported pediatric organ and tissue donation, 90.3% supported donation after neurological determination of death (DNDD), 78.2% supported pDCDD, and 69.7% felt comfortable about the idea of participating in pDCDD on Type III patients, with a higher percentage of supportive responses in the Center (77.2%) than in the North (65.1%) and South (54.5%) of Italy (p-value < 0.004). Concerning scenarios, 79.3% of participants believed that organ retrieval took place in a patient who was already deceased. Overall, 27.3% considered their knowledge about DCDD to be adequate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insight into the attitudes and knowledge of PICU staff members regarding pDCDD in Italy. Despite a general lack of knowledge on the subject, respondents showed positive attitudes toward pDCDD and a strong consensus that the Italian legislation protocol for determining death based on cardiocirculatory criteria respects the \"dead donor rule.\" There were several distinctions among the northern, central, and southern regions of Italy, and in our view, these disparities can be attributed to the varying practices of commemorating the deceased. In order to assess how practice and training influence the attitude of PICU staff members, it would be interesting to repeat the survey after the implementation of a program.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亚裔和黑人患者在英国的肾移植等待名单上面临劣势,由于缺乏人类白细胞抗原和血型匹配的捐献者,来自绝大多数白人死者的捐献者库。这项研究评估了来自亚洲和黑人供体的肾脏同种异体移植物的结果。英国移植登记处分析了2001年至2015年间进行的成年死者供体肾脏移植。亚裔和黑人患者占所有已故捐献者的12.4%和6.7%,但仅占所有已故捐献者的1.6%和1.2%,分别。未经调整的生存分析显示,与亚洲和黑人供体相关的长期同种异体移植结果明显较差。与白人捐赠者相比。关于Cox回归分析,与白人相比,亚洲捐赠者和黑人接受者种族的结果较差,在种族匹配方面,与白色供体-白色受体基线组相比,并调整其他供体和受体因素,黑人供体-黑人受体的5年移植结果明显较差,亚洲捐赠者-白人接受者,和白色供体-黑色受体组合,未调整的5年移植物存活率下降。少数民族中死者捐赠的增加可以通过增加可用器官来使接受者受益。然而,这可能需要一种完善的方法来增强成果。
    Patients of Asian and black ethnicity face disadvantage on the renal transplant waiting list in the UK, because of lack of human leucocyte antigen and blood group matched donors from an overwhelmingly white deceased donor pool. This study evaluates outcomes of renal allografts from Asian and black donors. The UK Transplant Registry was analysed for adult deceased donor kidney only transplants performed between 2001 and 2015. Asian and black ethnicity patients constituted 12.4% and 6.7% of all deceased donor recipients but only 1.6% and 1.2% of all deceased donors, respectively. Unadjusted survival analysis demonstrated significantly inferior long-term allograft outcomes associated with Asian and black donors, compared to white donors. On Cox-regression analysis, Asian donor and black recipient ethnicities were associated with poorer outcomes than white counterparts, and on ethnicity matching, compared with the white donor-white recipient baseline group and adjusting for other donor and recipient factors, 5-year graft outcomes were significantly poorer for black donor-black recipient, Asian donor-white recipient, and white donor-black recipient combinations in decreasing order of worse unadjusted 5-year graft survival. Increased deceased donation among ethnic minorities could benefit the recipient pool by increasing available organs. However, it may require a refined approach to enhance outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号