days at home

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多患有痴呆症(PLWD)的人喜欢尽可能长时间呆在家里,在家庭中度过的天数(DAH)-定义为个人在医疗机构以外度过的时间-已成为该人群中以人为本的结果衡量标准。我们研究了PLWD中DAH与功能状态和健康状况之间的关系。
    方法:利用2010-2018年健康与退休研究(HRS)中美国65岁及以上痴呆症患者的全国代表性队列,我们评估了序数分类DAH变量与日常生活活动(ADL)数量之间的关系(范围0-10;10是独立的),移动性(0-5;5为移动),和自评健康状况(SRH)(0-4;4为优秀),控制患者特征。DAH被定义为在调查波之间的时间内,在医院或疗养院外度过的自我报告天数,通常为730天。
    结果:我们确定了3002名参与者(4192个观察结果,每位参与者平均1.4次观察)。平均DAH为704.4天(SD10.8天),并且64.9%在家中度过所有天(即730天)。DAH的2周下降与ADL评分降低0.32分相关(内部95%置信度[CI]:0.24-0.40,趋势P<0.001),流动性评分降低0.18分(95%CI:0.13-0.22,趋势P<0.001),SRH降低0.05点(95%CI:0.02-0.08,趋势P<0.001)。
    结论:我们证明,在痴呆人群中,DAH与患者报告的重要结局呈正相关,加强将DAH视为PLWD有意义的结果衡量标准的论点。
    BACKGROUND: Many persons living with dementias (PLWD) prefer to remain at home as long as possible, and days spent at home (DAH)-defined as the time an individual spends outside of healthcare facilities-has emerged as a person-centred outcome measure in this population. We examined the association between DAH and functional status and health among PLWD.
    METHODS: Utilizing a nationally representative cohort of individuals age 65 and older in the United States with dementia from the 2010-2018 Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we assessed the relationship between an ordinal categorical DAH variable and number of activities of daily living (ADLs) (range 0-10; 10 being independent), mobility (0-5; 5 being mobile), and self-rated health (SRH) (0-4; 4 being excellent), controlling for patient characteristics. DAH was defined as the number of self-reported days spent outside a hospital or nursing home in the time between survey waves, typically 730 days.
    RESULTS: We identified 3002 participants (4192 observations, average 1.4 observations per participant). The mean DAH was 704.4 days (SD 10.8 days) and 64.9% spent all days at home (i.e. 730 days). A 2-week decrease in DAH was associated with a lower ADL score by 0.32 points (95% confidence internal [CI]: 0.24-0.40, P-for-trend<0.001), a lower mobility score by 0.18 points (95% CI: 0.13-0.22, P-for-trend<0.001), and a lower SRH by 0.05 points (95% CI: 0.02-0.08, P-for-trend<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that DAH is positively associated with important patient-reported outcomes among the dementia population, strengthening the argument for considering DAH as a meaningful outcome measure for PLWD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多卫生系统都在努力支持老年人尽可能长时间留在家中的能力。关于患者报告的社会风险与在家时间长短之间的关系知之甚少。我们评估了社会风险与在家生活天数之间的关系,研究了一组住院和死亡风险较高的老年退伍军人。
    方法:一项前瞻性横断面研究,使用2018年对3479名年龄≥65岁的高危退伍军人进行的调查与退伍军人健康管理局的数据相关。社会风险包括社会资源的衡量标准(即,没有合伙人在场,低社会支持),物质资源(即,没有雇佣,财务压力,药物不安全,粮食不安全,和运输障碍),和个人资源(即,医学素养低,低于高中教育)。我们估计了社会风险与在家的日子有何关联,定义为住院以外的天数,长期护理,观察,或12个月内的急诊科设置,使用负二项回归模型。
    结果:没有合作伙伴,没有被雇用,遇到交通障碍,和低医学素养分别与在家天数减少2.57、3.18、3.39和6.14相关(即,设施天数增加27%,95%置信区间[CI]8%-50%;设施天数增加42%,95%CI7%-89%;设施天数增加34%,95%CI7%-68%;设施天数增加63%,95%CI27%-109%)。经历粮食不安全与在家呆2.62天相关(即,设施天数减少24%,95%CI3%-59%)。
    结论:研究结果表明,筛查社区退出高风险的老年退伍军人的社会风险(即,社会支持,物质资源,和医疗素养)可能有助于确定可能受益于家庭和社区健康和社会服务的患者,这些服务有助于留在家庭环境中。未来的研究应该集中在理解这些关联发生的机制上。
    BACKGROUND: Many health systems are trying to support the ability of older adults to remain in their homes for as long as possible. Little is known about the relationship between patient-reported social risks and length of time spent at home. We assessed how social risks were associated with days at home for a cohort of older Veterans at high risk for hospitalization and mortality.
    METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study using a 2018 survey of 3479 high-risk Veterans aged ≥65 linked to Veterans Health Administration data. Social risks included measures of social resources (i.e., no partner present, low social support), material resources (i.e., not employed, financial strain, medication insecurity, food insecurity, and transportation barriers), and personal resources (i.e., low medical literacy and less than high school education). We estimated how social risks were associated with days at home, defined as the number of days spent outside inpatient, long-term care, observation, or emergency department settings over a 12-month period, using a negative binomial regression model.
    RESULTS: Not having a partner, not being employed, experiencing transportation barriers, and low medical literacy were respectively associated with 2.57, 3.18, 3.39, and 6.14 fewer days at home (i.e., 27% more facility days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8%-50%; 42% more facility days, 95% CI 7%-89%; 34% more facility days, 95% CI 7%-68%; and 63% more facility days, 95% CI 27%-109%). Experiencing food insecurity was associated with 2.62 more days at home (i.e., 24% fewer facility days, 95% CI 3%-59%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that screening older Veterans at high risk of community exit for social risks (i.e., social support, material resources, and medical literacy) may help identify patients likely to benefit from home- and community-based health and social services that facilitate remaining in home settings. Future research should focus on understanding the mechanisms by which these associations occur.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究表明,心脏手术后女性的死亡率高于男性,但术后恢复过程中性别差异的信息有限。活着和出院的日子(DAH)结合了死亡,重新入院和停留时间,并且可以更好地量化恢复期间的性别差异。这个主要目标是评估(i)30天的DAH在性别和外科手术之间的变化,(ii)DAH对患者和手术复杂性的反应性,和(iii)DAH的长期预后价值。
    方法:我们评估了111,430名患者(26%为女性),这些患者接受了三种类型的心脏手术(孤立性冠状动脉搭桥术[CABG],孤立的非CABG,组合程序)在2009年至2019年之间。主要结果是30天的DAH(DAH30),次要结局为90天(DAH90)和180天(DAH180)的DAH.数据按性别和手术组分层。进行了未经调整和风险调整的分析,以确定DAH与患者的相关性-,手术-,和医院层面的特点。根据DAH30的天数将患者分为两组(低于和高于第10百分位数)。确定在DAH30时低于第10百分位数的患者在DAH90和DAH180时保持在该组中的比例。
    结果:女性的DAH30低于男性(22vs.23天),并在所有手术组中观察到(孤立的CABG23与24,孤立的非CABG22vs.23,合并手术19vs.21天)。临床风险因素包括多发病率,社会经济地位和手术复杂性与较低的DAH30值相关,但在许多因素方面,女性的DAH30值低于男性。在DAH30最低的第10百分位数的患者中,80%的女性和男性在90天保持在最低的第10百分位数,而72%的女性和76%的男性在180天时仍处于该百分位数。
    结论:DAH是对患者和手术危险因素差异的反应性结果。需要进一步的研究来确定新的护理途径,以减少男性和女性患者之间的结果差异。
    BACKGROUND: Research shows women experience higher mortality than men after cardiac surgery but information on sex-differences during postoperative recovery is limited. Days alive and out of hospital (DAH) combines death, readmission and length of stay, and may better quantify sex-differences during recovery. This main objective is to evaluate (i) how DAH at 30-days varies between sex and surgical procedure, (ii) DAH responsiveness to patient and surgical complexity, and (iii) longer-term prognostic value of DAH.
    METHODS: We evaluated 111,430 patients (26% female) who underwent one of three types of cardiac surgery (isolated coronary artery bypass [CABG], isolated non-CABG, combination procedures) between 2009 - 2019. Primary outcome was DAH at 30 days (DAH30), secondary outcomes were DAH at 90 days (DAH90) and 180 days (DAH180). Data were stratified by sex and surgical group. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses were conducted to determine the association of DAH with patient-, surgery-, and hospital-level characteristics. Patients were divided into two groups (below and above the 10th percentile) based on the number of days at DAH30. Proportion of patients below the 10th percentile at DAH30 that remained in this group at DAH90 and DAH180 were determined.
    RESULTS: DAH30 were lower for women compared to men (22 vs. 23 days), and seen across all surgical groups (isolated CABG 23 vs. 24, isolated non-CABG 22 vs. 23, combined surgeries 19 vs. 21 days). Clinical risk factors including multimorbidity, socioeconomic status and surgical complexity were associated with lower DAH30 values, but women showed lower values of DAH30 compared to men for many factors. Among patients in the lowest 10th percentile at DAH30, 80% of both females and males remained in the lowest 10th percentile at 90 days, while 72% of females and 76% males remained in that percentile at 180 days.
    CONCLUSIONS: DAH is a responsive outcome to differences in patient and surgical risk factors. Further research is needed to identify new care pathways to reduce disparities in outcomes between male and female patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在家中度过的时间可能有助于了解老年人创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的康复情况,包括患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)的患者。我们研究了ADRD对TBI后恢复的影响,并确定了社会经济劣势是否减轻了ADRD的影响。
    方法:我们分析了2010-2018年诊断为TBI的65岁以上的医疗保险受益人。家庭时间是通过从总随访中减去在护理环境中花费或死亡的天数来计算的,和医疗补助的双重资格是社会经济劣势的代表。
    结果:在20,350名参与者中,共有2463名(12.1%)诊断为ADRD,并且符合医疗补助双重资格。与没有任何一种情况的受益人相比,患有ADRD和Medicaid的受益人在TBI后在家的时间明显减少(比率0.66;95%置信区间[CI]0.64,0.69)。
    结论:TBI导致ADRD老年人受伤后一年的家庭时间显著减少,特别是那些经济脆弱的人。
    结论:在跌倒相关的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)等严重损伤后留在家中是老年人的重要目标。先前没有研究评估ADRD如何影响TBI后在家花费的时间。如果社会经济上处于不利地位,患有ADRD的老年TBI幸存者可能特别容易失去家庭时间。我们评估了ADRD和贫困对TBI后新的DAH测量的影响。生活在社会经济劣势人群中,DAH与ADRD相关的差异显著放大,这表明需要更有针对性的护理方法。
    Time spent at home may aid in understanding recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults, including those with Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementias (ADRD). We examined the impact of ADRD on recovery following TBI and determined whether socioeconomic disadvantages moderated the impact of ADRD.
    We analyzed Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years diagnosed with TBI in 2010-2018. Home time was calculated by subtracting days spent in a care environment or deceased from total follow-up, and dual eligibility for Medicaid was a proxy for socioeconomic disadvantage.
    A total of 2463 of 20,350 participants (12.1%) had both a diagnosis of ADRD and were Medicaid dual-eligible. Beneficiaries with ADRD and Medicaid spent markedly fewer days at home following TBI compared to beneficiaries without either condition (rate ratio 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64, 0.69).
    TBI resulted in a significant loss of home time over the year following injury among older adults with ADRD, particularly for those who were economically vulnerable.
    Remaining at home after serious injuries such as fall-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important goal for older adults. No prior research has evaluated how ADRD impacts time spent at home after TBI. Older TBI survivors with ADRD may be especially vulnerable to loss of home time if socioeconomically disadvantaged. We assessed the impact of ADRD and poverty on a novel DAH measure after TBI. ADRD-related disparities in DAH were significantly magnified among those living with socioeconomic disadvantage, suggesting a need for more tailored care approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    众所周知,相对于具有相似损伤严重程度的年轻成年人,老年人在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的恢复较差。然而,大多数老年人从TBI恢复良好。识别那些处于恢复不良风险增加的人可以提供适当的管理途径,促进有关姑息治疗或未满足需求的讨论,并允许有针对性的干预措施以优化生活质量或康复。我们试图探索老年人从TBI中恢复的异质性,以每月的家庭时间来衡量。以患者为中心的指标,定义为在家而不是在医院度过的时间,紧急护理,或其他设施。使用从2010-2018年的Medicare行政索赔数据获得的数据,采用基于组的轨迹模型来识别因TBI住院的65岁及以上的美国成年人样本中的独特恢复轨迹。接下来,我们使用逻辑回归确定了哪些患者水平特征将不良恢复与良好恢复区分开。在20350名受益人中,确定了四个独特的轨迹:回收率差(n=1,929(9.5%)),提高回收率(n=2,793(13.7%)),良好的回收率(n=13,512(66.4%)),回收率下降(n=2,116(10.4%))。相对于良好恢复轨迹组,不良成员的最强预测因子是阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆的诊断(奇数比(OR)2.42;95%置信区间(CI)2.16,2.72)和双重资格医疗补助,经济脆弱性的代表(OR5.13;95%CI4.59,5.74)。TBI严重程度与恢复轨迹无关。总之,这项研究确定了老年人TBI后一年内恢复的四个独特轨迹.三分之二因TBI住院的老年人返回社区并留在那里。在受伤后的三个月内,大部分时间都完成了每月家庭时间的恢复。一个重要的亚组,包括10%没有回家的患者,其主要特征是符合医疗补助和ADRD诊断。未来的研究应寻求进一步表征和调查已确定的恢复小组,以告知管理和制定干预措施以改善恢复。
    It is well-known that older adults have poorer recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) relative to younger adults with similar injury severity. However, most older adults do recover well from TBI. Identifying those at increased risk of poor recovery could inform appropriate management pathways, facilitate discussions about palliative care or unmet needs, and permit targeted intervention to optimize quality of life or recovery. We sought to explore heterogeneity in recovery from TBI among older adults as measured by home time per month, a patient-centered metric defined as time spent at home and not in a hospital, urgent care, or other facility. Using data obtained from Medicare administrative claims data for years 2010-2018, group-based trajectory modeling was employed to identify unique trajectories of recovery among a sample of United States adults age 65 and older who were hospitalized with TBI. We next determined which patient-level characteristics discriminated poor from favorable recovery using logistic regression. Among 20,350 beneficiaries, four unique trajectories were identified: poor recovery (n = 1929; 9.5%), improving recovery (n = 2,793; 13.7%), good recovery (n = 13,512; 66.4%), and declining recovery (n = 2116; 10.4%). The strongest predictors of membership in the poor relative to the good recovery trajectory group were diagnosis of Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementias (ADRD; odd ratio [OR] 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16, 2.72) and dual eligibility for Medicaid, a proxy for economic vulnerability (OR 5.13; 95% CI 4.59, 5.74). TBI severity was not associated with recovery trajectories. In conclusion, this study identified four unique trajectories of recovery over one year following TBI among older adults. Two-thirds of older adults hospitalized with TBI returned to the community and stayed there. Recovery of monthly home time was complete for most by 3 months post injury. An important sub-group comprising 10% of patients who did not return home was characterized primarily by eligibility for Medicaid and diagnosis of ADRD. Future studies should seek to further characterize and investigate identified recovery groups to inform management and development of interventions to improve recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Despite advances in the management of hematologic malignancies, a significant proportion of patients die of their disease. We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada (between 2005 and 2013) to determine the number of days spent at home in the last 6 months of life. We studied the predictors of the median number of days at home (DAH) using quantile regression. For the 11,127 patients with hematologic malignancies who died, the median number of DAH in the last 6 months was 156 days. Patients with acute leukemias (p < .0001), women (p < .0001), and those requiring transfusions (p < .0001) spent the fewest DAH. Patients assessed by palliative care prior to their last 6 months were likely to spend more time at home (p < .0001). Providing additional supports for patients nearing the end of life, including earlier access to palliative care and continued transfusion support, may increase the likelihood that patients can die at home.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Days spent at home has recently been identified as an important patient-centered outcome; yet, relatively little is known about time spent at home at the end of life among community-living older persons.
    The analytic sample included 457 decedents from an ongoing cohort study of 754 community-living persons, aged ≥70 years. Days spent at home were calculated as 180 days minus the number of days in a hospital, nursing home, or hospice facility. The condition leading to death was determined from death certificates and comprehensive assessments.
    The median number of days at home was 159 (interquartile range 125-174). There were 138 (30.2%) decedents at home during the entire 6-month period, while 163 (35.7%) were at home for fewer than 150 days. Days at home did not differ significantly by age (P = .922), sex (P = .238), or race/ethnicity (P = .199), but did differ according to the condition leading to death (P = .001), with the lowest value observed for organ failure (150 [106.5-168.5]), highest values for sudden death (177 [172-179]) and cancer (167 [140-174]), and intermediate values for advanced dementia (164 [118-174]), frailty (160.5 [130-174]), and other conditions (153 [118-175]).
    Among community-living older persons, days spent at home in the last 6 months of life do not differ by age, sex, or race/ethnicity, but are significantly lower for persons dying from organ failure. Additional efforts may be warranted to optimize time spent at home at the end of life, especially among older persons dying from organ failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the largest integrated health care system in the US, approximately 8.5 million Veteran patients receive informal care. Despite a need for training, half of VHA caregivers report that they have not received training that they deemed necessary. Rigorous study is needed to identify effective ways of providing caregivers with the skills they need. This paper describes the Helping Invested Families Improve Veterans\' Experience Study (HI-FIVES), an ongoing randomized controlled trial that is evaluating a skills training program designed to support caregivers of cognitively and/or functionally impaired, community-dwelling Veterans who have been referred to receive additional formal home care services. This two-arm randomized controlled trial will enroll a total of 240 caregiver-patient dyads. For caregivers in the HI-FIVES group, weekly individual phone training occurs for 3 weeks, followed by 4 weekly group training sessions, and two additional individual phone training calls. Caregivers in usual care receive information about the VA Caregiver Support Services Program services, including a hotline number. The primary outcome is the number of days a Veteran patient spends at home in the 12 months following randomization (e.g. not in the emergency department, inpatient or nursing home setting). Secondary outcomes include patient VHA health care costs, patient and caregiver satisfaction with VHA health care, and caregiver depressive symptoms. Outcomes from HI-FIVES have the potential to improve our knowledge of how to maximize the ability to maintain patients safely at home for caregivers while preventing poor mental health outcomes among caregivers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号