data privacy

数据隐私
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项工作旨在探索多中心数据异质性对深度学习脑转移(BM)自动分割性能的影响,并评估增量迁移学习技术的有效性,即不忘记学习(LWF),在不共享原始数据的情况下提高模型的泛化性。
    方法:来自埃尔兰根大学医院(UKER)的总共六个BM数据集,苏黎世(USZ)大学医院,斯坦福,UCSF,纽约大学(NYU),和BraTS挑战2023被使用。首先,为独家单中心培训和混合多中心培训建立了BM自动分割的DeepMedic网络的性能,分别。随后,对保护隐私的双边合作进行了评估,其中,预训练模型共享给另一个中心,以便使用具有或不具有LWF的迁移学习(TL)进行进一步训练。
    结果:对于单中心培训,在各自的单中心测试数据上,BM检测的平均F1评分范围为0.625(NYU)至0.876(UKER).混合多中心培训显着提高了斯坦福大学和纽约大学的F1成绩,在其他中心的改善微不足道。当UKER预训练模型应用于USZ时,在UKER和USZ的综合测试数据上,LWF的平均F1得分(0.839)高于幼稚TL(0.570)和单中心训练(0.688)。NaiveTL提高了灵敏度和轮廓精度,但损害精度。相反,LWF表现出值得称赞的敏感性,精度和轮廓精度。当申请斯坦福时,观察到类似的表现。
    结论:数据异质性(例如,转移密度的变化,空间分布,和跨中心的图像空间分辨率)导致BM自动分割性能不同,对模型的泛化性提出了挑战。LWF是一种有前途的对等隐私保护模型培训方法。
    OBJECTIVE: This work aims to explore the impact of multicenter data heterogeneity on deep learning brain metastases (BM) autosegmentation performance, and assess the efficacy of an incremental transfer learning technique, namely learning without forgetting (LWF), to improve model generalizability without sharing raw data.
    METHODS: A total of six BM datasets from University Hospital Erlangen (UKER), University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Stanford, UCSF, New York University (NYU), and BraTS Challenge 2023 were used. First, the performance of the DeepMedic network for BM autosegmentation was established for exclusive single-center training and mixed multicenter training, respectively. Subsequently privacy-preserving bilateral collaboration was evaluated, where a pretrained model is shared to another center for further training using transfer learning (TL) either with or without LWF.
    RESULTS: For single-center training, average F1 scores of BM detection range from 0.625 (NYU) to 0.876 (UKER) on respective single-center test data. Mixed multicenter training notably improves F1 scores at Stanford and NYU, with negligible improvement at other centers. When the UKER pretrained model is applied to USZ, LWF achieves a higher average F1 score (0.839) than naive TL (0.570) and single-center training (0.688) on combined UKER and USZ test data. Naive TL improves sensitivity and contouring accuracy, but compromises precision. Conversely, LWF demonstrates commendable sensitivity, precision and contouring accuracy. When applied to Stanford, similar performance was observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Data heterogeneity (e.g., variations in metastases density, spatial distribution, and image spatial resolution across centers) results in varying performance in BM autosegmentation, posing challenges to model generalizability. LWF is a promising approach to peer-to-peer privacy-preserving model training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医学知识图谱提供了可解释的决策支持,帮助临床医生提供及时的诊断和治疗建议。然而,在现实世界的临床实践中,患者前往不同的医院寻求各种医疗服务,导致不同医院的患者数据分散。由于数据安全问题,数据碎片化限制了知识图的应用,因为单医院数据无法为生成精确的决策支持和全面的解释提供完整的证据。研究知识图谱系统多中心集成的新方法,信息敏感的医疗环境,使用零散的患者记录进行决策支持,同时保持数据隐私和安全性。
    目的:本研究旨在提出一种面向电子健康记录(EHR)的知识图谱系统,用于与多中心零散的患者医疗数据进行协作推理,同时保护数据隐私。
    方法:该研究引入了EHR知识图谱框架和新的协作推理过程,用于利用多中心碎片信息。该系统部署在每个医院中,并使用统一的语义结构和观察医疗结果伙伴关系(OMOP)词汇来标准化本地EHR数据集。该系统将本地EHR数据转换为语义格式并执行语义推理以生成中间推理结果。生成的中间发现使用hypernym概念来分离原始医疗数据。中间发现和哈希加密的患者身份通过区块链网络进行同步。多中心中间发现进行了最终推理和临床决策支持,而无需收集原始EHR数据。
    结果:通过一项应用研究对该系统进行了评估,该研究涉及利用多中心片段化的EHR数据来提醒非肾脏病临床医生注意被忽略的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者。该研究涵盖了3家医院的非肾病科1185名患者。患者至少访问了两家医院。其中,通过使用多中心EHR数据进行协作推理,确定124例患者符合CKD诊断标准,而单独来自个别医院的数据不能促进这些患者CKD的识别.临床医生的评估表明,78/91(86%)患者为CKD阳性。
    结论:所提出的系统能够有效地利用多中心片段化的EHR数据进行临床应用。应用研究显示了该系统具有迅速和全面的决策支持的临床优势。
    BACKGROUND: The medical knowledge graph provides explainable decision support, helping clinicians with prompt diagnosis and treatment suggestions. However, in real-world clinical practice, patients visit different hospitals seeking various medical services, resulting in fragmented patient data across hospitals. With data security issues, data fragmentation limits the application of knowledge graphs because single-hospital data cannot provide complete evidence for generating precise decision support and comprehensive explanations. It is important to study new methods for knowledge graph systems to integrate into multicenter, information-sensitive medical environments, using fragmented patient records for decision support while maintaining data privacy and security.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to propose an electronic health record (EHR)-oriented knowledge graph system for collaborative reasoning with multicenter fragmented patient medical data, all the while preserving data privacy.
    METHODS: The study introduced an EHR knowledge graph framework and a novel collaborative reasoning process for utilizing multicenter fragmented information. The system was deployed in each hospital and used a unified semantic structure and Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) vocabulary to standardize the local EHR data set. The system transforms local EHR data into semantic formats and performs semantic reasoning to generate intermediate reasoning findings. The generated intermediate findings used hypernym concepts to isolate original medical data. The intermediate findings and hash-encrypted patient identities were synchronized through a blockchain network. The multicenter intermediate findings were collaborated for final reasoning and clinical decision support without gathering original EHR data.
    RESULTS: The system underwent evaluation through an application study involving the utilization of multicenter fragmented EHR data to alert non-nephrology clinicians about overlooked patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The study covered 1185 patients in nonnephrology departments from 3 hospitals. The patients visited at least two of the hospitals. Of these, 124 patients were identified as meeting CKD diagnosis criteria through collaborative reasoning using multicenter EHR data, whereas the data from individual hospitals alone could not facilitate the identification of CKD in these patients. The assessment by clinicians indicated that 78/91 (86%) patients were CKD positive.
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed system was able to effectively utilize multicenter fragmented EHR data for clinical application. The application study showed the clinical benefits of the system with prompt and comprehensive decision support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)在计算机辅助药物设计(CADD)中起着至关重要的作用。随着机器学习(ML)的使用越来越多,这种发展进一步加速。主要是深度学习(DL),以及计算硬件和软件的改进。因此,最初对人工智能在药物发现中应用的疑虑已经消除,导致药物化学的显着好处。同时,认识到人工智能仍处于起步阶段,面临着一些需要解决的限制,以充分发挥其在药物发现中的潜力。一些值得注意的限制是不够的,无标签,和不统一的数据,一些人工智能产生的分子与现有分子的相似性,缺乏不足的基准,知识产权(IPR)相关的数据共享障碍,对生物学的理解很差,专注于代理数据和配体,缺乏整体方法来表示输入(分子结构),以防止输入分子的预处理(特征工程),等。人工智能基础设施的主要组成部分是输入数据,因为人工智能驱动的改进药物发现的大部分成功都取决于数据的质量和数量,用于训练和测试人工智能算法,除了其他一些因素。此外,数据吞噬DL方法,没有足够的数据,可能会崩溃以兑现他们的诺言。目前的文献提出了几种方法,在某种程度上,在药物发现的背景下,有效处理低数据,以获得更好的AI模型输出。这些是转移学习(TL),主动学习(AL),单次或一次性学习(OSL),多任务学习(MTL)数据增强(DA),数据合成(DS),等。一种不同的方法,它允许在通用平台上共享专有数据(不影响数据隐私)以训练ML模型,是联邦学习(FL)。在这次审查中,我们比较和讨论这些方法,他们最近的应用,和局限性,同时对小分子数据进行建模,以获得药物发现中AI方法的改进输出。文章还总结了其他一些处理不足数据的新方法。
    Artificial intelligence (AI) has played a vital role in computer-aided drug design (CADD). This development has been further accelerated with the increasing use of machine learning (ML), mainly deep learning (DL), and computing hardware and software advancements. As a result, initial doubts about the application of AI in drug discovery have been dispelled, leading to significant benefits in medicinal chemistry. At the same time, it is crucial to recognize that AI is still in its infancy and faces a few limitations that need to be addressed to harness its full potential in drug discovery. Some notable limitations are insufficient, unlabeled, and non-uniform data, the resemblance of some AI-generated molecules with existing molecules, unavailability of inadequate benchmarks, intellectual property rights (IPRs) related hurdles in data sharing, poor understanding of biology, focus on proxy data and ligands, lack of holistic methods to represent input (molecular structures) to prevent pre-processing of input molecules (feature engineering), etc. The major component in AI infrastructure is input data, as most of the successes of AI-driven efforts to improve drug discovery depend on the quality and quantity of data, used to train and test AI algorithms, besides a few other factors. Additionally, data-gulping DL approaches, without sufficient data, may collapse to live up to their promise. Current literature suggests a few methods, to certain extent, effectively handle low data for better output from the AI models in the context of drug discovery. These are transferring learning (TL), active learning (AL), single or one-shot learning (OSL), multi-task learning (MTL), data augmentation (DA), data synthesis (DS), etc. One different method, which enables sharing of proprietary data on a common platform (without compromising data privacy) to train ML model, is federated learning (FL). In this review, we compare and discuss these methods, their recent applications, and limitations while modeling small molecule data to get the improved output of AI methods in drug discovery. Article also sums up some other novel methods to handle inadequate data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当代,多学科研究揭示了人工智能(AI)对数据隐私的影响。这篇综述采用了人工智能生态系统的观点,并提出了一个过程-结果连续体来对人工智能技术进行分类;这个观点有助于理解人工智能相对于隐私决策的心理方面的细微差别。具体来说,不同类型的人工智能会影响传统研究的隐私决策框架,包括隐私演算,心理所有权,以不同的方式产生社会影响。通过了解人工智能技术的过程或结果导向如何影响隐私决策,我们解释了人工智能如何创造隐私优势,但也带来了挑战。未来的研究需要跨隐私决策,但更普遍的是在隐私和人工智能的交叉点,帮助培养道德,可持续社会。
    Contemporary, multidisciplinary research sheds light on data privacy implications of artificial intelligence (AI). This review adopts an AI ecosystem perspective and proposes a process-outcome continuum to classify AI technologies; this perspective helps to understand the nuances of AI relative to psychological aspects of privacy decision-making. Specifically, different types of AI affect traditionally studied privacy decision-making frameworks including the privacy calculus, psychological ownership, and social influence in varied ways. By understanding how the process- or outcome-orientation of an AI technology affects privacy decision-making, we explain how AI creates privacy benefits but also poses challenges. Future research is needed across privacy decision-making, but also more generally at the intersection of privacy and AI, to help foster an ethical, sustainable society.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    工业物联网(IIoT)的安全性至关重要,网络入侵检测系统(NIDS)在其中发挥着不可或缺的作用。尽管关于利用深度学习技术实现网络入侵检测的研究越来越多,由于深度学习需要大规模数据集进行训练,因此设备的本地数据有限可能会导致模型性能不佳。一些解决方案建议集中设备的本地数据集用于深度学习训练,但这可能涉及用户隐私问题。为了应对这些挑战,这项研究提出了一种新颖的基于联邦学习(FL)的方法,旨在提高网络入侵检测的准确性,同时确保数据隐私保护。这项研究将卷积神经网络与注意力机制相结合,开发了一种专门为IIoT设计的新的深度学习入侵检测模型。此外,变分自动编码器被纳入以增强数据隐私保护。此外,FL框架使多个IIoT客户端能够在不共享其原始数据的情况下联合训练共享入侵检测模型。此策略显著提高了模型的检测能力,同时有效解决了数据隐私和安全问题。为了验证该方法的有效性,在真实世界的物联网(IoT)网络入侵数据集上进行了一系列实验。实验结果表明,我们的模型和FL方法显著提高了关键性能指标,如检测精度,精度,与传统的局部训练方法和现有模型相比,以及假阳性率(FPR)。
    The security of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is of vital importance, and the Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) plays an indispensable role in this. Although there is an increasing number of studies on the use of deep learning technology to achieve network intrusion detection, the limited local data of the device may lead to poor model performance because deep learning requires large-scale datasets for training. Some solutions propose to centralize the local datasets of devices for deep learning training, but this may involve user privacy issues. To address these challenges, this study proposes a novel federated learning (FL)-based approach aimed at improving the accuracy of network intrusion detection while ensuring data privacy protection. This research combines convolutional neural networks with attention mechanisms to develop a new deep learning intrusion detection model specifically designed for the IIoT. Additionally, variational autoencoders are incorporated to enhance data privacy protection. Furthermore, an FL framework enables multiple IIoT clients to jointly train a shared intrusion detection model without sharing their raw data. This strategy significantly improves the model\'s detection capability while effectively addressing data privacy and security issues. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, a series of experiments were conducted on a real-world Internet of Things (IoT) network intrusion dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that our model and FL approach significantly improve key performance metrics such as detection accuracy, precision, and false-positive rate (FPR) compared to traditional local training methods and existing models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:可穿戴设备有可能通过早期发现和监测慢性疾病来改变医疗保健。这项研究旨在评估可穿戴设备的接受度,用法,以及不使用的原因。方法:在德国使用匿名问卷收集有关可穿戴拥有权的数据,使用行为,接受健康监测,和分享数据的意愿。结果:在643名受访者中,550名参与者提供了可穿戴接受数据。平均年龄为36.6岁,其中51.3%为女性,39.6%居住在农村地区。总的来说,33.8%的人报告说穿着可穿戴设备,主要是智能手表或健身腕带。男性(63.3%)和女性(57.8%)表示愿意佩戴传感器进行健康监测,61.5%的人愿意与医疗保健提供商共享数据。关注的问题包括数据安全,隐私,和感知的缺乏需要。结论:该研究强调了可穿戴设备的接受度和潜力,特别是健康监测和与医疗保健提供者的数据共享。解决数据安全和隐私问题可以加强创新可穿戴设备的采用,比如植入物,早期发现和监测慢性病。
    Background: Wearables have the potential to transform healthcare by enabling early detection and monitoring of chronic diseases. This study aimed to assess wearables\' acceptance, usage, and reasons for non-use. Methods: Anonymous questionnaires were used to collect data in Germany on wearable ownership, usage behaviour, acceptance of health monitoring, and willingness to share data. Results: Out of 643 respondents, 550 participants provided wearable acceptance data. The average age was 36.6 years, with 51.3% female and 39.6% residing in rural areas. Overall, 33.8% reported wearing a wearable, primarily smartwatches or fitness wristbands. Men (63.3%) and women (57.8%) expressed willingness to wear a sensor for health monitoring, and 61.5% were open to sharing data with healthcare providers. Concerns included data security, privacy, and perceived lack of need. Conclusion: The study highlights the acceptance and potential of wearables, particularly for health monitoring and data sharing with healthcare providers. Addressing data security and privacy concerns could enhance the adoption of innovative wearables, such as implants, for early detection and monitoring of chronic diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这份手稿中,我们开发了一个多方框架,为多个数据贡献者量身定制,从组合数据源中寻求机器学习见解。以统计学习原理为基础,我们介绍了多密钥同态加密逻辑回归(MK-HELR)算法,旨在对加密的多方数据执行逻辑回归。鉴于基于聚合数据集构建的模型通常表现出卓越的泛化能力,我们的方法为数据贡献者提供了共享数据的集体力量,同时确保他们的原始数据由于加密而保持私有。除了促进对来自不同来源的组合加密数据的逻辑回归外,该算法创建了一个具有动态成员资格的协作学习环境。值得注意的是,它可以在学习过程中无缝地融入新的参与者,解决了在学习过程开始之前需要设置预定数量的贡献者的现有方法的关键限制。这种灵活性在现实世界的场景中至关重要,适应不同的数据贡献时间表和参与者数量的意外波动,由于增加和离开。使用AI4I公共预测性维护数据集,我们演示了MK-HELR算法,为进一步的安全研究奠定了基础,动态,和协作多方学习方案。
    In this manuscript, we develop a multi-party framework tailored for multiple data contributors seeking machine learning insights from combined data sources. Grounded in statistical learning principles, we introduce the Multi-Key Homomorphic Encryption Logistic Regression (MK-HELR) algorithm, designed to execute logistic regression on encrypted multi-party data. Given that models built on aggregated datasets often demonstrate superior generalization capabilities, our approach offers data contributors the collective strength of shared data while ensuring their original data remains private due to encryption. Apart from facilitating logistic regression on combined encrypted data from diverse sources, this algorithm creates a collaborative learning environment with dynamic membership. Notably, it can seamlessly incorporate new participants during the learning process, addressing the key limitation of prior methods that demanded a predetermined number of contributors to be set before the learning process begins. This flexibility is crucial in real-world scenarios, accommodating varying data contribution timelines and unanticipated fluctuations in participant numbers, due to additions and departures. Using the AI4I public predictive maintenance dataset, we demonstrate the MK-HELR algorithm, setting the stage for further research in secure, dynamic, and collaborative multi-party learning scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然使用互联网和社交媒体进行研究招聘的优势是有据可查的,不断发展的在线环境也增强了虚假陈述获得激励或“巨魔”研究的动机。这种欺诈性攻击会损害数据完整性,项目时间的重大损失;资金;特别是对于弱势群体,研究信任。随着新技术和不断发展的社交媒体平台的迅速出现,在线数据收集中的虚假陈述变得更加容易。这种延续可能是由机器人或有恶意的个人发生的,但是仔细的计划可以帮助过滤掉欺诈性数据。
    目标:以城市美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加土著年轻女性为例,本文旨在描述PRIOR(在线研究中提高数据完整性的协议),这是一个两步整合协议,用于打击在线调查研究中的欺诈参与。
    方法:从2019年2月至2020年8月,我们招募了参与者进行形成性研究,准备一项前概念健康计划的在线随机对照试验。首先,我们描述了防止欺诈参与的初始方案,这被证明是不成功的。然后,我们描述了我们在2020年5月为提高协议性能和创建PRIOR所做的修改.变化包括传输数据收集平台,收集嵌入式地理空间变量,在筛查调查中启用定时功能,为每种数据收集方法或平台创建URL链接,并手动确认潜在合格参与者的识别信息。
    结果:在实施之前,该项目在学习入学时经历了大量的欺诈尝试,在1300名筛选的参与者中,不到1%(n=6)被确定为真正符合条件。有了修改后的协议,在完成筛查调查的461人中,381不符合调查评估的资格标准。在80个这样做的人中,25人(31%)被确定为不合格。共有55人(69%)被确定为合格并在方案中得到验证,并被纳入形成性研究。
    结论:欺诈性调查损害了研究的完整性,数据的有效性,以及参与者群体之间的信任。他们还耗尽了稀缺的研究资源,包括受访者的薪酬和人员时间。我们在防止数据在线虚假陈述之前的方法是成功的。本文回顾了有关在线研究中欺诈性数据参与的关键要素,并说明了为什么防止欺诈性数据收集的增强协议对于与弱势群体建立信任至关重要。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04376346;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/研究/NCT04376346。
    DERR1-10.2196/52281。
    BACKGROUND: While the advantages of using the internet and social media for research recruitment are well documented, the evolving online environment also enhances motivations for misrepresentation to receive incentives or to \"troll\" research studies. Such fraudulent assaults can compromise data integrity, with substantial losses in project time; money; and especially for vulnerable populations, research trust. With the rapid advent of new technology and ever-evolving social media platforms, it has become easier for misrepresentation to occur within online data collection. This perpetuation can occur by bots or individuals with malintent, but careful planning can help aid in filtering out fraudulent data.
    OBJECTIVE: Using an example with urban American Indian and Alaska Native young women, this paper aims to describe PRIOR (Protocol for Increasing Data Integrity in Online Research), which is a 2-step integration protocol for combating fraudulent participation in online survey research.
    METHODS: From February 2019 to August 2020, we recruited participants for formative research preparatory to an online randomized control trial of a preconceptual health program. First, we described our initial protocol for preventing fraudulent participation, which proved to be unsuccessful. Then, we described modifications we made in May 2020 to improve the protocol performance and the creation of PRIOR. Changes included transferring data collection platforms, collecting embedded geospatial variables, enabling timing features within the screening survey, creating URL links for each method or platform of data collection, and manually confirming potentially eligible participants\' identifying information.
    RESULTS: Before the implementation of PRIOR, the project experienced substantial fraudulent attempts at study enrollment, with less than 1% (n=6) of 1300 screened participants being identified as truly eligible. With the modified protocol, of the 461 individuals who completed a screening survey, 381 did not meet the eligibility criteria assessed on the survey. Of the 80 that did, 25 (31%) were identified as ineligible via PRIOR. A total of 55 (69%) were identified as eligible and verified in the protocol and were enrolled in the formative study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fraudulent surveys compromise study integrity, validity of the data, and trust among participant populations. They also deplete scarce research resources including respondent compensation and personnel time. Our approach of PRIOR to prevent online misrepresentation in data was successful. This paper reviews key elements regarding fraudulent data participation in online research and demonstrates why enhanced protocols to prevent fraudulent data collection are crucial for building trust with vulnerable populations.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04376346; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04376346.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/52281.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生物银行,通过收集和储存病人的血液,组织,基因组,和其他生物样本,为心血管疾病等慢性病的研究和管理提供独特而丰富的资源,糖尿病,和癌症。这些样本包含有价值的细胞和分子水平信息,可用于破译疾病的发病机理,指导新型诊断技术的发展,治疗方法,个性化医疗策略。本文首先概述了生物银行的历史演变,他们的分类,以及技术进步的影响。随后,它阐述了生物库在揭示慢性病的分子生物标志物中的重要作用,促进基础研究向临床应用的转化,实现个体化治疗和管理。此外,样品处理标准化等挑战,信息隐私,并讨论了安全性。最后,从政策支持的角度来看,监管改善,和公众参与,本文对生物银行的未来发展方向和应对挑战的策略进行了预测,旨在维护和增强其在支持慢性病预防和治疗方面的独特优势。
    Biobanks, through the collection and storage of patient blood, tissue, genomic, and other biological samples, provide unique and rich resources for the research and management of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer. These samples contain valuable cellular and molecular level information that can be utilized to decipher the pathogenesis of diseases, guide the development of novel diagnostic technologies, treatment methods, and personalized medical strategies. This article first outlines the historical evolution of biobanks, their classification, and the impact of technological advancements. Subsequently, it elaborates on the significant role of biobanks in revealing molecular biomarkers of chronic diseases, promoting the translation of basic research to clinical applications, and achieving individualized treatment and management. Additionally, challenges such as standardization of sample processing, information privacy, and security are discussed. Finally, from the perspectives of policy support, regulatory improvement, and public participation, this article provides a forecast on the future development directions of biobanks and strategies to address challenges, aiming to safeguard and enhance their unique advantages in supporting chronic disease prevention and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大数据是指大量产生的超大数据,速度,品种,和真实性。这位护士科学家在利用大数据提出关于患者护理和医疗保健系统的新假设方面具有独特的优势。本文的目的是为护士科学家提供了解大数据的使用和能力的入门指南。在这里,我们讨论实际,伦理,社会,以及在护理研究中使用大数据的教育意义。使用大数据的一些实际挑战包括数据可访问性,数据质量,缺少数据,可变数据标准,健康数据的碎片化,和软件方面的考虑。反对的道德立场随着大数据的使用而出现,支持和反对使用大数据的论点是出于对机密性的担忧,匿名,和自主性。大数据的使用具有健康公平维度,解决数据公平问题在道德上是当务之急。有必要将利用大数据进行护理研究所需的能力纳入高级护理教育课程。护理科学有很大的机会来发展和接受大数据的潜力。护士科学家不应该是旁观者,而是政策变化的合作者和驱动力,以更好地利用和利用大数据的潜力。
    Big data refers to extremely large data generated at high volume, velocity, variety, and veracity. The nurse scientist is uniquely positioned to leverage big data to suggest novel hypotheses on patient care and the healthcare system. The purpose of this paper is to provide an introductory guide to understanding the use and capability of big data for nurse scientists. Herein, we discuss the practical, ethical, social, and educational implications of using big data in nursing research. Some practical challenges with the use of big data include data accessibility, data quality, missing data, variable data standards, fragmentation of health data, and software considerations. Opposing ethical positions arise with the use of big data, and arguments for and against the use of big data are underpinned by concerns about confidentiality, anonymity, and autonomy. The use of big data has health equity dimensions and addressing equity in data is an ethical imperative. There is a need to incorporate competencies needed to leverage big data for nursing research into advanced nursing educational curricula. Nursing science has a great opportunity to evolve and embrace the potential of big data. Nurse scientists should not be spectators but collaborators and drivers of policy change to better leverage and harness the potential of big data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号