背景:虽然使用互联网和社交媒体进行研究招聘的优势是有据可查的,不断发展的在线环境也增强了虚假陈述获得激励或“巨魔”研究的动机。这种欺诈性攻击会损害数据完整性,项目时间的重大损失;资金;特别是对于弱势群体,研究信任。随着新技术和不断发展的社交媒体平台的迅速出现,在线数据收集中的虚假陈述变得更加容易。这种延续可能是由机器人或有恶意的个人发生的,但是仔细的计划可以帮助过滤掉欺诈性数据。
目标:以城市美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加土著年轻女性为例,本文旨在描述PRIOR(在线研究中提高数据完整性的协议),这是一个两步整合协议,用于打击在线调查研究中的欺诈参与。
方法:从2019年2月至2020年8月,我们招募了参与者进行形成性研究,准备一项前概念健康计划的在线随机对照试验。首先,我们描述了防止欺诈参与的初始方案,这被证明是不成功的。然后,我们描述了我们在2020年5月为提高协议性能和创建PRIOR所做的修改.变化包括传输数据收集平台,收集嵌入式地理空间变量,在筛查调查中启用定时功能,为每种数据收集方法或平台创建URL链接,并手动确认潜在合格参与者的识别信息。
结果:在实施之前,该项目在学习入学时经历了大量的欺诈尝试,在1300名筛选的参与者中,不到1%(n=6)被确定为真正符合条件。有了修改后的协议,在完成筛查调查的461人中,381不符合调查评估的资格标准。在80个这样做的人中,25人(31%)被确定为不合格。共有55人(69%)被确定为合格并在方案中得到验证,并被纳入形成性研究。
结论:欺诈性调查损害了研究的完整性,数据的有效性,以及参与者群体之间的信任。他们还耗尽了稀缺的研究资源,包括受访者的薪酬和人员时间。我们在防止数据在线虚假陈述之前的方法是成功的。本文回顾了有关在线研究中欺诈性数据参与的关键要素,并说明了为什么防止欺诈性数据收集的增强协议对于与弱势群体建立信任至关重要。
背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04376346;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/研究/NCT04376346。
■DERR1-10.2196/52281。
BACKGROUND: While the advantages of using the internet and social media for research recruitment are well documented, the evolving online environment also enhances motivations for misrepresentation to receive incentives or to \"troll\" research studies. Such fraudulent assaults can compromise data integrity, with substantial losses in project time; money; and especially for vulnerable populations, research trust. With the rapid advent of new technology and ever-evolving social media platforms, it has become easier for misrepresentation to occur within online data collection. This perpetuation can occur by bots or individuals with malintent, but careful planning can help aid in filtering out fraudulent data.
OBJECTIVE: Using an example with urban American Indian and Alaska Native young women, this paper aims to describe PRIOR (Protocol for Increasing Data Integrity in Online Research), which is a 2-step integration protocol for combating fraudulent participation in online survey research.
METHODS: From February 2019 to August 2020, we recruited participants for formative research preparatory to an online randomized control trial of a preconceptual health program. First, we described our initial protocol for preventing fraudulent participation, which proved to be unsuccessful. Then, we described modifications we made in May 2020 to improve the protocol performance and the creation of PRIOR. Changes included transferring data collection platforms, collecting embedded geospatial variables, enabling timing features within the screening survey, creating URL links for each method or platform of data collection, and manually confirming potentially eligible participants\' identifying information.
RESULTS: Before the implementation of PRIOR, the project experienced substantial fraudulent attempts at study enrollment, with less than 1% (n=6) of 1300 screened participants being identified as truly eligible. With the modified protocol, of the 461 individuals who completed a screening survey, 381 did not meet the eligibility criteria assessed on the survey. Of the 80 that did, 25 (31%) were identified as ineligible via PRIOR. A total of 55 (69%) were identified as eligible and verified in the protocol and were enrolled in the formative study.
CONCLUSIONS: Fraudulent surveys compromise study integrity, validity of the data, and trust among participant populations. They also deplete scarce research resources including respondent compensation and personnel time. Our approach of PRIOR to prevent online misrepresentation in data was successful. This paper reviews key elements regarding fraudulent data participation in online research and demonstrates why enhanced protocols to prevent fraudulent data collection are crucial for building trust with vulnerable populations.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04376346; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04376346.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/52281.