OBJECTIVE: The predictive validity of disease-specific quality of life (QOL) remains unknown in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), although disease-specific measures are equally or more responsive to changes than generic QOL. We aimed to examine the predictive validity of the Lupus patient-reported outcome (PRO) for damage accrual.
METHODS: Patients with SLE and ≥2 measurements over time were included in Japanese nationwide multicentre registry (LUNA). The Lupus PRO questionnaire contains both health-related (HR) and non-HR-QOL measures. Damage accrual was evaluated using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). We examined the association between the Lupus-PRO score at baseline and longitudinal SDI scores using mixed-effects models adjusted for prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Among 1295 patients, those with higher HR-QOL of Lupus PRO at baseline demonstrated a significantly lower increase in SDI (-0.005/year, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.007 to - 0.004, p < 0.001). According to the categorisation of HR-QOL based on tertile, a similar dose-dependent effect of HR-QOL on longitudinal SDI was identified (second vs first tertile category: -0.101/year, 95% CI: -0.172 to - 0.030; third tertile category: -0.211/year, 95% CI: -0.281 to - 0.142). Non-HR-QOL was not significantly associated with the SDI scores. Among the HR-QOL domains, cognition, procreation, and physical health were significantly associated with the total SDI scores over time. HR-QOL was associated with corticosteroid-dependent and -independent SDI scores.
CONCLUSIONS: A higher HR-QOL of Lupus PRO was associated with a lower increase in SDI scores. Our findings imply the importance of disease-specific HR-QOL measurements in assessing prognosis.

Despite anticoagulant therapy, a antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has a higher rate of recurrent events, which can lead to damage accrual and a negative impact on life quality.
To evaluate the risk factors and APS subsets associated with damage accrual.
We conducted a retrospective single-center study. We reviewed the medical records of 282 APS patients, with a median age of 36 (IQR 30-46) years and a median of 195 (IQR 137-272) months. The primary endpoint was damage accrual during follow-up, defined as organ/tissue impairment present for at least six months or causing permanent loss. The secondary endpoints were early organ damage within six months of disease onset and death.
Eighty (28.4%) patients presented damage accrual; 52.5% developed damage within six months of APS onset, and 41.3% had more than one organ involved. Neuropsychiatric involvement, affecting 38.8% of the patients, was the most frequent, followed by peripheral vasculopathy and renal involvement, 35% either. Death happened in 7 (2.5 %) patients; damage accrual was associated with a 6-fold risk of death [OR 6.7 (95% CI 1.3-35.1), p = 0.03]. Microangiopathy and non-criteria manifestations were independent risk factors for damage accrual with 5-fold and 4-fold higher risk, respectively [(OR 4.9 (95% CI 2.1-11.7), p < 0.0001 and (OR 3.8 (95% CI 1.5-10.1), p = 0.007]. The cumulative incidence of damage accrual increased by 5.7-fold and 3.6-fold in patients with microangiopathy and non-criteria manifestations.
APS patients had a higher frequency of damage accrual. Microangiopathy and non-criteria manifestations were independent risk factors for damage accrual.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often mimics symptoms of other diseases, and the interval between symptom onset and diagnosis may be long in some of these patients. Aims: To describe the characteristics associated with the time to SLE diagnosis and its impact on damage accrual and mortality in patients with SLE from a Latin American inception cohort.
METHODS: Patients were from a multi-ethnic, multi-national Latin-American SLE inception cohort. All participating centers had specialized lupus clinics. Socio-demographic, clinical/laboratory, disease activity, damage, and mortality between those with a longer and a shorter time to diagnosis were compared using descriptive statistical tests. Multivariable Cox regression models with damage accrual and mortality as the end points were performed, adjusting for age at SLE diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, level of education, and highest dose of prednisone for damage accrual, plus highest dose of prednisone, baseline SLEDAI, and baseline SDI for mortality.
RESULTS: Of the 1437 included in these analyses, the median time to diagnosis was 6.0 months (Q1-Q3 2.4-16.2); in 721 (50.2%) the time to diagnosis was longer than 6 months. Patients whose diagnosis took longer than 6 months were more frequently female, older at diagnosis, of Mestizo ethnicity, not having medical insurance, and having \"non-classic\" SLE symptoms. Longer time to diagnosis had no impact on either damage accrual (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.93-1.28, p = 0.300) or mortality (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.88-2.12, p = 0.200).
CONCLUSIONS: In this inception cohort, a maximum time of 24 months with a median of 6 months to SLE diagnosis had no apparent negative impact on disease outcomes (damage accrual and mortality).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) with the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) remission state on damage accrual.
METHODS: This study classified SLE patients from the Lupus Clinic of the Royal Thai Army (LUCRA) cohort based on the SLE-DAS index, or Boolean-based, and SLEDAI-2K (Doria) remission state. Regression analysis models were constructed to identify predictors of the Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) during follow-up.
RESULTS: There were 197 patients identified; 97 patients met at least one definition of remission state, and 100 patients were in the non-remission group at enrollment. Of 97 patients, 97 achieved the SLE-DAS index-based definition, 74 achieved the SLE-DAS Boolean-based definition, and 55 achieved the Doria definition. The mean ± SD of follow-up was 4.77 ± 0.6 years. The changes in SDI over time were non-significantly lower in patients who met any definition of remission compared with those who did not. Multivariate analysis revealed that predictive factors for increased SDI were age and baseline SDI ≥ 1. SLE-DAS index, Boolean, and Doria-based definitions of remission at enrollment had no significant risk reduction on SDI compared with the non-remission group (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.37-1.32, p = .27; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.37-1.44, p = .37; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.39-1.65, p = .55, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLE who achieved remission status according to the SLE-DAS index or SLEDAI-2K definitions did not show any significant difference in damage accrual compared to those who were not in remission.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of Behçet\'s Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) and Behçet\'s Disease Damage Index (BDI) as tools for the detection of damage accrual in Behçet\'s patients compared to Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI). Also, to evaluate the correlation and the interclass correlation among the 3 indices to find out their consistency.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out on 102 adult Behçet\'s disease (BD) patients who were diagnosed according to the International Study Group criteria for BD. Disease severity and organ damage were assessed for each patient by VDI, BDI and BODI at baseline and 1-year follow-up visits. Damage accrual for each index was defined when there was an increase of at least 1 point (∆ ≥ 1) among the baseline and the follow-up visits.
RESULTS: Correlations among the 3 indices were significant, with (r = 0.835, P < 0.001) between VDI and BODI, (r = 0.835, P < 0.001) between VDI and BDI, and (r = 0.844, P < 0.001) between BODI and BDI scores. A highly significant positive correlation existed between the 3 indices and age and disease duration. In contrast, the correlation with the BD Current Activity Form was non-significant, which indicates good discriminative validity of the 3 indices. Neuropsychiatric and ocular systems showed a strong interclass correlation among the 3 indices. Regarding detecting damage accrual, BDI was more sensitive than BODI and showed more agreement with VDI.
CONCLUSIONS: BD damage indices, VDI, BODI and BDI, had good convergent and discriminative validity for the assessment of BD damage. BDI had more sensitivity than BODI to the detection of damage accrual.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is heterogeneous in organ involvement and disease severity, presenting a broad clinical phenotype. Systemic type I interferon (IFN) activity has been shown to be associated with lupus nephritis, autoantibodies, and disease activity in treated SLE patients; however, these relationships are unknown in treatment-naive patients. We aimed to determine the relationship of systemic IFN activity with clinical phenotypes, disease activity, and damage accrual in treatment-naive SLE patients before and after induction and maintenance therapy.
Forty treatment-naive SLE patients were enrolled for this retrospective longitudinal observational study to examine the relationship between serum IFN activity and clinical manifestations of EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria domains, disease activity measures, and damage accrual. As controls, 59 other treatment-naive rheumatic disease patients and 33 healthy individuals were recruited. Serum IFN activity was measured by WISH bioassay and presented as an IFN activity score.
Treatment-naive SLE patients had significantly higher serum IFN activity than other rheumatic disease patients (score: 97.6 and 0.0, respectively, p < 0.001). High serum IFN activity was significantly associated with fever, hematologic disorders (leukopenia), and mucocutaneous manifestations (acute cutaneous lupus and oral ulcer) of EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria domains in treatment-naive SLE patients. Serum IFN activity at baseline significantly correlated with SLEDAI-2K scores and decreased along with a decrease in SLEDAI-2K scores after induction and maintenance therapy (R2 = 0.112, p = 0.034). SLE patients who developed organ damage (SDI ≥ 1) had higher serum IFN activity at baseline than those who did not (SDI = 0) (150.0 versus 57.3, p= 0.018), but the multivariate analysis did not detect its independent significance (p = 0.132).
Serum IFN activity is characteristically high and is linked to fever, hematologic disorders, and mucocutaneous manifestations in treatment-naive SLE patients. Serum IFN activity at baseline correlates with disease activity and decreases in parallel with a decrease in disease activity after induction and maintenance therapy. Our results suggest that IFN plays an important role in the pathophysiology of SLE and that serum IFN activity at baseline may be a potential biomarker for the disease activity in treatment-naive SLE patients.

To analyse the association between the average \'adjusted\' Global APS Score (aGAPSS) over time, as a surrogate of disease activity, and change in Damage Index for APS (DIAPS) during follow-up in patients with thrombotic and non-thrombotic APS.
Two hundred APS patients (138 primary, 62 associated to other autoimmune diseases) were included. DIAPS change was calculated as the difference between basal DIAPS and DIAPS at the end of follow-up. The aGAPSS was calculated for each patient at baseline and on a yearly basis for up to 6 years (minimum 3 years). The average score per patient was computed and considered the reference aGAPSS. Linear regression models were designed to analyse the association between mean aGAPSS and DIAPS change. Moreover, factors associated to high (increase of DIAPS ≥1 during follow-up) vs low (increase of DIAPS <1 during follow-up) damage accrual were assessed.
A higher mean aGAPSS value was associated to a DIAPS increase during follow-up (b = 0.04, P < 0.001) in the multivariate analysis. Higher mean aGAPSS values were found in patients with a DIAPS increase ≥1 during follow-up compared with patients with an increase of <1 point [9.22 (95% CI 7.58, 10.86) vs 6.72 (95% CI 6.0, 7.43), P = 0.003]. aGAPSS increased the odds a DIAPS increment of ≥1 point during follow-up [OR = 1.12 (95% CI 1.04, 1.21), P = 0.003].
Our data support the utility of longitudinal assessing of the aGAPSS score in predicting damage accrual, measured by DIAPS, in APS.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and determinants of achieving the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), and the effect of LLDAS attainment on disease flare and damage accrual in a prospective, single-center cohort of Chinese lupus patients.
METHODS: Baseline and follow-up data from consecutive patients at the Peking University First Hospital were collected from January 2017 to June 2020.
RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were enrolled, with median (range) disease duration at enrolment of 2.3 (0.8-7.7) years, and median follow-up of 2.2 (1.0-2.9) years. By the end of the study, 139 (75.1%) patients had achieved LLDAS at least once; 82 (44.3%) patients achieved LLDAS for ≥ 50% of observations. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that 24-h urinary total protein (UTP; per g) (OR = 0.447, 95%CI [0.207-0.968], p = 0.041), serum creatinine (Scr; per 10 µmol/L) (OR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.52-0.99], p = 0.040), and C3 level (per 100 mg/L) (OR = 1.60, 95%CI [1.18-2.17], p = 0.003) at recruitment had independent negative associations with achieving LLDAS for ≥ 50% of observations. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a significant reduction in flare rate with increased proportion of time in LLDAS. Attainment of LLDAS in at least 50% of observations was an independent protective factor for damage accrual (OR = 0.19, 95%CI [0.04-0.99], p = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective Chinese cohort, LLDAS was an attainable goal in clinical practice. Nephritis-related markers (UTP and Scr) and C3 level at recruitment negatively influenced achievement of LLDAS. LLDAS achievement was significantly protective from flare and damage accrual.
CONCLUSIONS: • Low disease activity status (LLDAS) is an achievable target during SLE treatment in China. Urine protein, serum creatinine, and C3 level at recruitment independently affect LLDAS achievement in this group of Chinese lupus patients. • As a treatment target, LLDAS achievement has a highly protective effect for preventing flare and damage accrual, especially in case of achieving LLDAS for ≥ 50% of observations. • The present results further highlight the practical significance of treat-to-target principle in SLE management (T2T/SLE) and the needs for promoting the application of T2T/SLE in clinical practice as well as exploring the concrete implement strategy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical features, damage accrual, and survival of patients with familial and sporadic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
METHODS: A multi-ethnic, multinational Latin American SLE cohort was studied. Familial lupus was defined as patients with a first-degree SLE relative; these relatives were interviewed in person or by telephone. Clinical variables, disease activity, damage, and mortality were compared. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard adjusted for potential confounders for time to damage and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 66 (5.6%) patients had familial lupus, and 1110 (94.4%) had sporadic lupus. Both groups were predominantly female, of comparable age, and of similar ethnic distribution. Discoid lupus (OR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.08-3.60) and neurologic disorder (OR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.00-2.73) were significantly associated with familial SLE; pericarditis was negatively associated (OR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.87). The SLE Disease Activity Index and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) were similar in both groups, although the neuropsychiatric (45.4% vs. 33.5%; p = 0.04) and musculoskeletal (6.1% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.02) domains of the SDI were more frequent in familial lupus. They were not retained in the Cox models (by domains). Familial lupus was not significantly associated with damage accrual (HR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.30-1.55) or mortality (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.26-4.81).
CONCLUSIONS: Familial SLE is not characterized by a more severe form of disease than sporadic lupus. We also observed that familial SLE has a higher frequency of discoid lupus and neurologic manifestations and a lower frequency of pericarditis.

OBJECTIVE: Central nervous system disease occurs in over 20% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) resulting in major morbidity and damage. Cognitive dysfunction is common in SLE, but the cause remains uncertain and treatment options are limited. This study explores the influence of clinical, neuropsychological factors and anti-neuronal antibodies on lupus damage accrual.
METHODS: A prospective cohort with 99 SLE patients recruited between 2008 and 2013 and followed up in 2016 was established. Baseline evaluations were depression (MINI-Plus), cognitive function evaluating attention, visuospatial memory and executive functions, and anti-neuronal antibodies. Activity index (SLEDAI-2K) and SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI) were assessed at baseline and last follow-up.
RESULTS: At baseline, median (interquartile range) age was 36.0 years (27.0-45.0), disease duration 3.7 years (0.4-12.4), SLEDAI-2K 6.0 (3.0-12.0), and SDI score 1.0 (0-1.0). Major depression was present in 23%, cognitive deficit in 18%, and received immunomodulators in 36%. Anti-dsDNA/N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies were present in 19%, anti-ribosomal P in 12%, and anti-neuronal surface P antigen (NSPA) in 5%. After a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range 39-78), 11% had damage accrual. In a multivariate analysis, baseline SDI, SLEDAI-2K, and immunomodulators use were associated with final damage, whereas SLEDAI-2K and immunomodulator use were also associated with accrual damage. Models including anti-NSPA showed impact on final and accrual damage. Cognitive deficit, depression, and other autoantibodies were not predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: Disease activity and immunomodulator use associate with lupus damage. Of the anti-neuronal antibodies examined, anti-NSPA emerged as a potential poor prognostic factor, probably related to severe SLE onset requiring elevated corticosteroid doses. Key Points • Anti-NSPA may be a worse prognostic factor in SLE. • Other neuropsychological factors do not influence damage.