暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: The significance of micro-embolic signals (MES) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear. Previous studies had limitations, and cryoballoon (CB) ablation patients were underrepresented. Minimizing MES is recommended due to their uncertain neurocognitive impact.
METHODS: This prospective observational study included AF patients from a German center between February 2021 and August 2022. Patients were equally divided into paroxysmal (Group A) and persistent (Group B) AF. Group A received CB-PVI only, while Group B also had left atrial roof ablation. MES were detected using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography during ablation. Neurocognitive status was assessed pre- and post-procedure and at 3 months using the CERAD Plus battery.
RESULTS: The study analyzed 100 patients with a median age of 65.5 years. A total of 19,698 MES were observed, with 80% being gaseous and 20% solid in origin, primarily occurring during pulmonary vein angiography and the balloon freeze and thawing phase. The median MES per patient was 130 (IQR 92-256) in total, 298 (IQR 177-413) in bilateral (36%), and 110 (IQR 71-130) in unilateral (64%) recordings. No significant difference in total MES counts was found between the groups. None of the eleven neuropsychological tests showed cognitive decline post-procedure or at 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Our observations confirm that neurocognitive abilities are not affected either 24 hours or 3 months after AF ablation using the CB technique. However, despite the low MES burden associated with the CB, more work is needed to reduce small embolic events during AF ablation.

OBJECTIVE: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Initial data demonstrated high safety and efficacy. Data on long-term PVI durability and reconduction patterns in comparison to established energy sources for PVI are scarce. We compare findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first PFA to findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first cryoballoon ablation (CBA) based PVI.
RESULTS: A total of 550 consecutively enrolled patients underwent PFA or CBA index PVI. Repeat ablations in patients with symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrences were analysed. A total of 22/191 (12%) patients after index PFA-PVI and 44/359 (12%) after CBA-PVI underwent repeat ablation. Reconduction of any pulmonary vein (PV) was detected by multipolar spiral mapping catheter at each PV with careful evaluation of PV potentials and by 3D-mapping in 16/22 patients (73%) after PFA-PVI and in 33/44 (75%) after CBA-PVI (P = 1.000). Of 82 initially isolated PVs after PFA-PVI, 31 (38%) were reconducting; of 169 isolated PVs after CBA-PVI, 63 (37%) were reconducting (P = 0.936). Clinical atrial tachycardia occurred similarly in patients after PFA (5/22; 23%) and CBA (7/44; 16%; P = 0.515). Roof lines were set more often after PFA- (8/22; 36%) compared with CBA-PVI (5/44; 11%; P = 0.023). Repeat procedure duration [PFA: 87 (76, 123) min; CBA: 93 (75, 128) min; P = 0.446] was similar and fluoroscopy time [PFA: 11 (9, 14) min; CBA: 11 (8, 14) min; P = 0.739] equal between groups at repeat ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: During repeat ablation after previous PFA- or CBA-based PVI, electrical PV-reconduction rates and patterns were similar.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses substantial challenges in cardiovascular diseases, impacting patient health and economic burdens. Understanding the mechanical effects of AF on the left atrium (LA) and assessing the influence of treatment modalities on LA functions are critical. This study aims to assess the efficacy of echocardiographic and biochemical parameters in predicting AF recurrence following second generation cryoballoon ablation (CB-2). Ninety-two patients with symptomatic AF, treated with CB-2 at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, were prospectively examined from January 2021 to July 2023. The study endeavors to develop a predictive model for AF recurrence, investigating the relationship between echocardiographic measurements and serum biomarkers with recurrence. The follow-up duration for echocardiographic assessments and biochemical analyses was systematically documented. The study revealed a significant enhancement in LA mechanical functions during echocardiographic follow-ups three months post-procedure. Specifically, LA strain parameters emerged as significant predictors of recurrence (LAsr: 95%CI 1.004-1.246, p = 0.047; LAsct: 95%CI 1.040-1.750, p = 0.024). Biochemical analyses demonstrated a correlation between elevated PRO-BNP levels and an increased risk of recurrence (95%CI 1.000-1.003, p = 0.012). Moreover, specific biomarkers such as MYBPHL, which demonstrated increased levels post-procedure, were deemed indicative of atrial damage, suggesting potential additional atrial substrate modification beyond PVI. Consequently, improvements in LA function post-cryoballoon ablation and biochemical markers have surfaced as potential indicators for predicting AF recurrence. This study elucidates the effectiveness of CB-2 in treating AF and its impact on LA functions. Notably, LA strain measurements and PRO-BNP levels have emerged as reliable indicators for predicting recurrence. Beyond clinical implications, our research establishes a foundation for a deeper understanding of the role of CB-2 in AF management and factors associated with recurrence.

UNASSIGNED: Currently, two types of cryoballoon (CB) systems are available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since the POLARx (Boston Scientific) is softer during freezing than the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro; Medtronic), it tends to go more deeply into the pulmonary vein (PV), risking PV stenosis.
UNASSIGNED: Ninety-one patients underwent initial CB ablation for paroxysmal AF (AFA-Pro 56; POLARx 35). Twenty-six from each group were extracted using propensity score matching. The PV cross-sectional area (PVA) was measured by tracing the area within the PV plane at 5-mm intervals from the PV ostium in a distal direction for 20 mm or to the bifurcation in each PV. The PVA was compared before and 3 months after ablation.
UNASSIGNED: Time to balloon temperatures of -30 and - 40°C was significantly shorter and the nadir temperature was significantly lower with POLARx than with AFA-Pro. In the left inferior (LI) PV and right superior (RS) PV, the freezing balloon position was significantly deeper in POLARx than in AFA-pro. The freezing position in RSPV with mild to moderate narrowing was deeper than those without (10.2 ± 3.3 mm vs. 8.2 ± 1.8 mm, p = .01). In RSPV, the reduction of PVA tended to be greater with the POLARx than with the AFA-Pro (26.1% ± 14.1% vs. 19.9% ± 10.3%, p = .07).
UNASSIGNED: There was no significant difference in the incidence of PV stenosis between POLARx and AFA-Pro. However, if POLARx goes deep into the PVs, we will still have to be careful.

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces procedure times, but limited data is available about its impact on electrophysiology (EP) lab efficiency in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Using CEE-specific procedure data, the present study modeled cryoballoon ablation procedures on EP lab resource consumption to improve efficiency.
METHODS: A discrete event simulation model was developed to assess EP efficiency with cryoballoon ablation. Model inputs were taken from CEE sites within the Cryo Global Registry, namely Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, and Slovakia. The main endpoints were percentage of days that resulted in overtime and percentage of days with time for one extra simple EP procedure. Use of the \'figure of 8\' (Fo8) closure technique to reduce procedure time was also examined.
RESULTS: The mean lab occupancy time across all CEE sites was 133 ± 47 minutes (min: 104 minutes, max:181 minutes). Cryoballoon ablation in the base-case scenario resulted in 14.6% of days with overtime and 64.8% of days with time for an extra simple EP procedure. Use of the Fo8 closure technique enhanced these values to 5.5% and 85.3%, respectively. Model endpoints were most sensitive to changes in lab occupancy times and overtime start time.
CONCLUSIONS: In this CEE-specific analysis of EP lab efficiency it was found that 3 cryoballoon ablation procedures could be performed in 1 lab day, leaving time for a 4th simple EP procedure on most days. As such, use cryoballoon ablation for PVI is an effective way to improve EP lab efficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Successful left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) using only the cryoballoon (CB) is technically challenging for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the cross-over technique, wherein an overlapped ablation is performed by placing the CB from both directions in contact with the LAPW.
METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study of 194 consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) who underwent a first-time procedure of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) + PWI (108 patients) or PVI-only (86 patients) using the CB. The cross-over technique was applied in all LAPWI.
RESULTS: For ablation of the LA roof and bottom, respectively, a mean of 8.6 ± 1.0 (right to left [R→L] 4.3 ± 1.1 and left to right [L→R] 4.3 ± 1.1) and 9.1 ± 1.2 (R→L 4.6 ± 1.6 and L→R 4.5 ± 1.2) CB applications were delivered. LAPW was successfully isolated solely using the CB in 99.1% of patients. Although the PVI + PWI group had significantly longer procedure time, no severe adverse events were observed in either group. During a median follow-up of 19 months, freedom from recurrence of all atrial tachyarrhythmias was achieved in 93.5% of the PVI + PWI group and 72.9% of the PVI-only group (p = .011).
CONCLUSIONS: LAPWI performed solely with the CB using the cross-over technique is feasibly, safe, and was independently associated with a significantly higher freedom from recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with PVI alone in patients with PerAF.

The sheath-in-sheath technique, utilizing a 15Fr cryoballoon delivery sheath inserted into a 25 cm 16Fr sheath, effectively navigates tortuous iliac veins during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation, ensuring safe delivery and maintaining essential device performance without complications.

Balloon-based catheter ablation is a valuable option for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) because contiguous lesions can be created to achieve pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and the method is less dependent than traditional ablation methods on the operator\'s skill and experience. Cryoballoon ablation is used universally worldwide, with its efficacy and safety being comparable to the efficacy and safety of standard radiofrequency ablation, and the procedure can be completed in a relatively short time. Hot balloon ablation was developed in Japan. The balloon maintains its compliance even during the energy delivery, and a large areal ablation lesion is created. Furthermore, the hot balloon system is the only system for which oesophageal cooling is a standard feature. Laser balloon ablation, which is performed under direct endoscopic vision, has proven to be effective and safe for achieving a PVI. The laser balloon system provides an improved field of view and automated circumferential ablation for a rapid and effective PVI. The authors have reviewed the currently available balloon systems as used for AF ablation, i.e., PVI, and have provided detailed insight and perspectives on the currently available cryoballoon and hot balloon technologies, plus laser balloon technology.

Following its introduction into clinical practice, the cryoballoon (CB) has proved to be an alternative for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). In comparison with the standard radiofrequency procedure, the CB method results in a shorter procedure time and learning curve as well as a higher degree of reproducibility. A new cryoballoon (NCB) was recently introduced on the market. In this review, we addressed the following questions: Is the new system technically similar to the previous one? Is there a difference in terms of periprocedural parameters? Are acute success and complication rates similar? Is the learning curve different?