BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using implants with a high level of constraint has generally been recommended for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) who have valgus alignment. However, studies have reported favorable outcomes even with cruciate-retaining (CR) implants.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the coronal plane stability of CR-TKA in patients with valgus OA at the mid-term follow-up.
METHODS: Patients with primary valgus OA of the knee who underwent TKA from January 2014 to January 2021 were evaluated through stress radiography using a digital stress device with 100 N of force on both the medial and lateral side. Gap openings and degrees of angulation change were determined. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for both continuous and categorical variables. Inter-rater reliability of the radiographic measurements was evaluated using Cronbach\'s alpha.
RESULTS: This study included 25 patients (28 knees) with a mean preoperative mechanical valgus axis of 11.3 (3.6-27.3) degrees. The mean follow-up duration was 3.4 (1.04-7.4) years. Stress radiographs showed a median varus and valgus gap opening of 1.6 (IQR 0.6-3.0) mm and 1.7 (IQR 1.3-2.3) mm and varus and valgus angulation changes of 2.5 (IQR 1.3-4.8) degrees and 2.3 (IQR 2.0-3.6) degrees, respectively. No clinical signs of instability, implant loosening, or revision due to instability were observed throughout this case series.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that using CR-TKA for patients with valgus OA of the knee promoted excellent coronal plane stability.

UNASSIGNED: Cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may provide better physiological knee kinematics, proprioception, and quadricep recovery than posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. Therefore, we hypothesized that CR TKA with multimodal pain control may provide comparable postoperative pain and recovery as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).
UNASSIGNED: This study included patients with isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent CR TKA and UKA. TKA and UKA patients were propensity score-matched with age and body mass index (BMI) and compared using visual analog scales (VAS) for pain scores, total amount of morphine use (TMU), knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR), independent ambulation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs during hospitalization.
UNASSIGNED: After propensity score matching, 46 patients were included in the TKA and UKA groups, respectively, with no differences in demographic data. VAS at 6-72 h and TMU at 48 h after surgery were comparable between the groups. The knee flexion angle in the UKA group was significantly higher at 24 h (60.0° vs 46.6°; p<0.001) and 48 h (76.9° vs 69.1°; p = 0.021) than that in the TKA group. The SLR in the UKA group was significantly higher than that in the TKA group at 24-72 h. The UKA group ambulated significantly earlier (1.56 vs 2.13 days; p<0.001), had shorter LOS (3.68 vs 4.28 days; p<0.004) and incurred 12.43% lower costs when compared to the TKA group.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent CR TKA with multimodal pain management did not experience more postoperative pain or morphine use than those who underwent UKA. However, UKA patients seem to experienced faster recovery and shorter LOS than CR-TKA patients during the early postoperative course. Accordingly, UKA may be considered instead of TKA for patients who are good candidates for UKA and require expedited recovery.

BACKGROUND: Partial or total release of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is often performed intraoperatively in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) to alleviate excessive femoral rollback. However, the effect of the release of selected fibers of the PCL on femoral rollback in CR-TKA is not well understood. Therefore, we used a computational model to quantify the effect of selective PCL fiber releases on femoral rollback in CR-TKA.
METHODS: Computational models of 9 cadaveric knees (age: 63 years, range 47 to 79) were virtually implanted with a CR-TKA. Passive flexion was simulated with the PCL retained and after serially releasing each individual fiber of the PCL, starting with the one located most anteriorly and laterally on the femoral notch and finishing with the one located most posteriorly on the medial femoral condyle. The experiment was repeated after releasing only the central PCL fiber. The femoral rollback of each condyle was defined as the anterior-posterior distance between tibiofemoral contact points at 0° and 90° of flexion.
RESULTS: Release of the central PCL fiber in combination with the anterolateral (AL) fibers, reduced femoral rollback a median of 1.5 [0.8, 2.1] mm (P = .01) medially and by 2.0 [1.2, 2.5] mm (P = .04) laterally. Releasing the central fiber alone reduced the rollback by 0.7 [0.4, 1.1] mm (P < .01) medially and by 1.0 [0.5, 1.1] mm (P < .01) laterally, accounting for 47 and 50% of the reduction when released in combination with the AL fibers.
CONCLUSIONS: Releasing the central fibers of the PCL had the largest impact on reducing femoral rollback, either alone or in combination with the release of the entire AL bundle. Thus, our findings provide clinical guidance regarding the regions of the PCL that surgeons should target to reduce femoral rollback in CR-TKA.

BACKGROUND: The effects of kinematics on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain unclear. This study investigated the effects of kinematic patterns after CR-TKA on PROMs.
METHODS: We examined 35 knees (27 patients) undergoing primary CR-TKA. Knee kinematics and 2011 Knee Society Score were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 72.4 (± 28.2) months. Knee kinematics was analyzed using fluoroscopy, and the femoral antero-posterior position relative to the tibial component was assessed separately for medial and lateral compartments during a squat. The correlations between kinematics and PROMs were evaluated.
RESULTS: The average amount of posterior femoral translation from full extension to maximum flexion was 0.2 (± 2.6) mm for the medial femoral condyle and 4.1 (± 2.9) mm for the lateral condyle. Medial pivot motion was observed in 24 knees (68.6%) with a low rate (14.3%) of paradoxical anterior translation. The anterior position of the medial femoral condyle at 60° had a negative impact on discretionary activities (ρ = -0.37; P = .039), and at maximum flexion, had a negative impact on total functional activities (ρ = -0.46; P = .005), advanced activities (ρ = -0.45; P = .006), and discretionary activities (ρ = -0.63; P < .001). Anterior position of the lateral femoral condyle at 30° had a negative impact on total functional activities (ρ = -0.48; P = .005), walking and standing (ρ = -0.56; P < .001), and advanced activities (ρ = -0.49; P = .004), and at 60° had a negative impact on walking and standing (ρ = -0.45; P = .010).
CONCLUSIONS: The anterior positions of the medial and lateral femoral condyles at mid-flexion and maximum flexion had negative impacts on PROMs. Soft tissue conditions should be carefully managed to achieve medial knee joint stability, which can improve PROMs.

BACKGROUND: Total knee replacements (TKRs) are successful operations that utilities several operative techniques including cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilising (PS) prostheses. To date, neither approach has proved superior. Techniques and implants are under constant evolution and new trials are published. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine the current risks and benefits of these two approaches so that an up-to-date clinical recommendation can be given as to which approach if any is superior.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, EBCSO, and Google Scholar. Risk of bias was assessed based on the Cochrane risk of bias criteria. Meta-analysisusing the random effects model was performed by the STATA software and results were displayed on forest plots. Sensitivity analysis was performed for possible causes of heterogeneity.
RESULTS: From 1164 studies, 15 eligible trials were included. Meta-analysis showed that the CR approach had significantly lower Range of Motion and HSS scores. There was no significant difference in KSS, OKS, VAS, or WOMAC scores. Blood loss was significantly less in the CR group. However, there was no significant difference in total complications or revisions. Sensitivity analysis did not reveal any differences in the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite inherent limitations, this updated meta-analysis suggests that both CR and PS approaches continue to be equivocal in terms of clinical outcomes. Both patients and surgeons can be confident in selecting either approach.
METHODS: Level I.
BACKGROUND: the protocol of this systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO.
BACKGROUND: CRD42023391435.

UNASSIGNED: Although various total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant designs are widely used, the ideal TKA design is yet to be agreed upon. Although the benefits of cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA and medial stabilized (MS) TKA have been reported in literature, the early clinical outcomes of an MS TKA with CR inserts have not been reported. This study aims to report on the patient-reported clinical and radiological outcomes of MS-TKA combined with a CR insert.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective single-surgeon series evaluated the clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of 115 patients implanted with GMK Sphere CR. Patient outcomes were assessed with the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), Forgotten Joint Score, and Visual Analogue Scale for Satisfaction. Radiological assessment for alignment along with active flexion and extension were also assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Improvement in all scores was observed between the preoperative and 1-year follow-up timepoints, with statistical significance seen for Oxford Knee Score as well as KOOS Symptoms, Pain, Sport, quality of life, and activities of daily living subscales. The mean active flexion between the preoperative and both postoperative timepoints at 6 months and 1 year was also statistically significant (P = .021 and P = .001).
UNASSIGNED: MS-TKA with a CR insert can facilitate symptom relief and improve overall function of the knee after surgery. Both the patient and clinical outcomes were comparable to 1-year outcomes utilizing other MS-TKA designs and were superior to those at 1-year follow-up following implantation of CR-TKA. Most notability, the KOOS symptoms and sports score were higher for the MS-TKA with a CR insert than for an MS-TKA design.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of patellar position (ie, eversion, lateralization, and reduction) on medial and lateral gap measurements during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in both cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA designs.
METHODS: The present work analyzed 50 knees with primary osteoarthritis that underwent TKA between July and November 2019. Medial and lateral gaps were measured at different knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90°, and 120°) in 3 patellar positions after sequentially inserting CR type and PS type trial component in the same knee.
RESULTS: In CR TKA, medial gaps in patellar reduction showed significantly smaller gaps at 90° and 120° of knee flexion compared to those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). Lateral gaps in patellar reduction were also significantly larger than those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). The mediolateral gap difference in patellar reduction was significantly greater at all flexion angles compared to those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). In PS TKA, similar patterns were observed for medial gaps, lateral gaps, and mediolateral gap differences (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The ligament balancing with the patella everted or subluxed may lead to an overly tight medial gap and/or loose lateral gap in the knee with a closed arthrotomy, which has potential consequences for knee function in both CR and PS TKA designs. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering patellar position to ensure optimal soft-tissue balance and joint stability in TKA.

Posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee is a popular implant choice. At present, there is no consensus on whether sacrifice or retention of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) offers superior outcomes. This review explores the current literature available on CR total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PubMed was searched by keyword to find relevant articles for inclusion. Additional sources came from article references and joint registry reports. CR design knees have distinct kinematic gait patterns from posterior-stabilizing (PS) knees and exhibit paradoxical anterior femoral movement with less femoral rollback. While CR implants offer less flexion than PS designs, the difference is not clinically detectable as clinical scores are similar in the short and long term. CR implants have better long-term survival compared to PS knees, likely due to lower risk of aseptic loosening. CR total knee arthroplasties also have shorter operating times and lower risk of peri-prosthetic fractures. Because the CR implant is unconstrained, there may be an increased risk of instability compared to PS designs, but the literature is mixed. Overall, the current literature supports the continued use of CR TKAs due to their lower risk of complications, durability, and demonstrated equivalence in function to posterior-substituting models.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare midflexion rotational laxity between two different design concept models of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: symmetrical surface design of neutral joint line obliquity and asymmetrical surface design of varus joint line obliquity.
METHODS: Sixty-three knees that underwent cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty were evaluated. Manual maximum passive rotational stress without acceleration was applied to the knees under navigation monitoring. Pre-operative and post-operative internal and external rotational angles were measured at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion.
RESULTS: The post-operative internal rotational laxity was significantly increased compared with pre-operative levels at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° flexion among all subjects (mean 9.7° vs 11.1°, 10.6° vs 11.6°, 11.2° vs 12.9°, and 13.2° vs 14.9°; p = 0.01, 0.04, 0.001, and 0.008, respectively). The post-operative external rotational laxity was significantly decreased compared to pre-operative levels at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° flexion among all subjects (mean 10.8° vs 6.8°, 12.5° vs 9.4°, 12.8° vs 10.0°, and 11.3° vs 9.5°; p < 0.0001, < 0.0001, < 0.0001, and 0.0008, respectively). The post-operative total rotational laxity significantly decreased, compared with pre-operative levels, at 30° and 45° flexion among all subjects (mean 20.4° vs 17.9°, and 23.1° vs 21.1°; p = 0.002 and 0.04, respectively). The post-operative total rotational laxity was significantly smaller in asymmetrically designed total knee arthroplasty than in symmetrically designed total knee arthroplasty at 30°, 45°, and 60° flexion (mean 19.3° vs 15.8°, 22.8° vs 18.7°, and 24.4° vs 20.8°; p = 0.03, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively), whereas no significant difference was observed at 90° flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to symmetrical surface design, asymmetrical surface design resulted in lower rotational laxity at the midflexion range in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: III.

BACKGROUND: Both the cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) implant systems are commonplace in modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) practice. However, there is controversy regarding functional outcomes and survivorship. The aim of the underlying study was to evaluate differences between CR and PS TKA regarding knee function, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as well as complication rates.
METHODS: 140 patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for an unconstrained TKA were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. Patients received either a CR or PS implant. Range of motion and PROMs (Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level, University of California Los Angeles Activity scale and subjective satisfaction) were assessed prior to, 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery.
RESULTS: We found minor differences between treatment groups regarding demographic factors. Within the PS group duration of surgery was longer (mean PS 81.4 min vs CR 76.0 min, P = .006). We observed better flexion (median PS 120.0° vs CR 115°, P = .017) and an overall better range of motion (median PS 120.0° vs CR 115.0°, P = .008) for the PS group. PROMs did not differ between groups. At 2-year follow-up there were no revisions in either cohort. Five patients needed reoperations. Three patients needed manipulation under anesthesia, 2 in the CR and one in the PS group.
CONCLUSIONS: While PS TKA achieved a better flexion capability, PROMs were similar in CR and PS TKA. The CR implant design continues to be a reliable option for patients with an intact posterior cruciate ligament.