OBJECTIVE: This pilot randomized controlled clinical trial compares the clinical outcome obtained in persistent periodontal pockets during 9-month follow-up of supportive periodontal step 4 treatment performed by either combining subgingival instrumentation with adjunctively used sodium hypochlorite/amino acid gel and crosslinked hyaluronic acid (xHyA) or subgingival instrumentation alone.
METHODS: Study protocol is registered under NCT06438354 at Clinicaltrials.gov. Patients seeking further therapy after completed step 2 non-surgical periodontal treatment underwent either repeated subgingival instrumentation with adjunctive application of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid gel and crosslinked hyaluronic acid (group A) or repeated subgingival instrumentation alone (group B). One calibrated investigator performed the treatment sequence in both groups accordingly. Subgingival instrumentation of the residual pockets was carried out under local anaesthesia using hand- and ultrasonic instruments, as well as air polishing in both groups. Patients were instructed to continue oral hygiene without any restriction. At 3-month re-evaluation treatment was repeated accordingly at sites with persistent 5 mm probing depth and BoP + . Clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket probing depth (PPD), gingival recession (GR), and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at baseline (T1), 3- (T2) and 9-month (T3) post-op, with CAL as a primary outcome measure.
RESULTS: In total 52 patients (20 females and 32 males, mean age 58.4 ± 2.4 years) presenting with 1448 sites which required further periodontal treatment were enrolled. Both groups exhibited homogeneity in terms of age, gender, smoking habit, initial number of sites, and BOP. At 9-month evaluation, PD reduction and CAL gain showed significant differences between the test and control group, favouring the adjunctive treatment. GR tended to exhibit more recovery in the test group compared to the control group. Although BOP frequency effectively reduced in both groups, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the study, the present data indicates that, during subgingival instrumentation of persistent pockets, the adjunctive usage of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid gel and xHyA sufficiently improves the clinical outcomes. The continuous improvement of CAL in association with the GR scores observed in group A, indicates that sites subjected to adjunctive treatment may indicate a tendency for a regenerative response to treatment within the 9-month follow-up period.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the regenerative clinical and radiographic effects of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (xHyA) with enamel matrix proteins (EMD) at six months after regenerative treatment of periodontal intrabony defects.
METHODS: Sixty patients presenting one intrabony defect each were randomly assigned into control (EMD) and test (xHyA) groups. Clinical attachment level (CAL) gain was the primary outcome, while pocket probing depth (PPD), gingival recession (REC), bleeding on probing (BOP), full-mouth plaque score (FMPS), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), and radiographic parameters such as defect depth (BC-BD), and defect width (DW) were considered secondary outcome variables. Parameters were recorded at baseline and after 6 months.
RESULTS: At the 6-month follow-up, 54 patients were available for statistical analysis. In the control and test groups, the mean CAL gain was statistically significant in the intragroup comparison (p < 0.001). 48.1% of test sites showed a CAL gain ≤ 2 mm compared with 33.3% of control sites. The mean PPD reduction was statistically significant in the intragroup comparison in both groups (p < 0.001). The mean REC increase was similar in the two groups: 1.04 ± 1.29 mm vs 1.11 ± 1.22 mm (test vs control). The mean BC-BD, DW, FMPS, FMBS, and BOP changed statistically significantly only in the intragroup comparison, not in the intergroup comparison.
CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments, EMD and xHyA, produced similar statistically significant clinical and radiographical improvements after six months when compared with baseline.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the microbiological outcomes obtained with either subgingival debridement (SD) in conjunction with a gel containing sodium hypochlorite and amino acids followed by subsequent application of a cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel (xHyA) gel, or with SD alone.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients diagnosed with stages II-III (grades A/B) generalised periodontitis were randomly treated with either SD (control) or SD plus adjunctive sodium hypochlorite/amino acids and xHyA gel (test). Subgingival plaque samples were collected from the deepest site per quadrant in each patient at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. Pooled sample analysis was performed using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method for the identification of detection frequencies and changes in numbers of the following bacteria: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A.a), Porphyromonas gingivalis (P.g), Tannerella forsythia (T.f), Treponema denticola (T.d), and Prevotella intermedia (P.i).
RESULTS: In terms of detection frequency, in the test group, statistically significant reductions were found for P.g, T.f, T.d and P.i (p < 0.05) after 6 months. In the control group, the detection frequencies of all investigated bacterial species at 6 months were comparable to the baseline values (p > 0.05). The comparison of the test and control groups revealed statistically significant differences in detection frequency for P.g (p = 0.034), T.d (p < 0.01) and P.i (p = 0.02) after 6 months, favouring the test group. Regarding reduction in detection frequency scores, at 6 months, statistically significant differences in favour of the test group were observed for all investigated bacterial species: A.a (p = 0.028), P.g (p = 0.028), T.f (p = 0.004), T.d (p <0.001), and P.i (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: The present microbiological results, which are related to short-term outcomes up to 6 months post-treatment, support the adjunctive subgingival application of sodium hypochlorite/amino acids and xHyA to subgingival debridement in the treatment of periodontitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate periodontal wound healing following scaling and root planing (SRP) in conjunction with the application of sodium hypochlorite/amino acids and cross-linked hyaluronic acid (xHyA) gels in dogs.
METHODS: In four beagle dogs, 2-wall intrabony defects were created and metal strips were placed around the teeth. Clinical parameters were measured 4 weeks after plaque accumulation. The experimental root surfaces were subjected to SRP with either the subgingival application of a sodium hypochlorite/amino acid gel and a xHyA gel (test group) or SRP alone (control group) using a split-mouth design. Clinical parameters were re-evaluated at 6 weeks. The animals were sacrificed at 8 weeks for histological analysis.
RESULTS: The test group showed significant improvements in all clinical parameters compared to the control group. Histologically, the test group exhibited statistically significantly greater new bone formation [i.e., length of newly formed bone, new bone area] compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, statistically significantly greater formation of new attachment [i.e., linear length of new cementum adjacently to newly formed bone with inserting collagen fibers] and new cementum was detected in the test group compared with the control group at 8 weeks (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The adjunctive subgingival application of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid and xHyA gels to SRP offers an innovative novel approach to enhance periodontal wound healing/regeneration.
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings have for the first-time shown histologic evidence for periodontal regeneration in support of this novel treatment modality.

Dermal filler injectability is a critical factor for commercial product adoption by medical aesthetic professionals and for successful clinical administration. We have previously reported (in vitro and ex vivo) cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal filler benchmarking in terms of manual and automated injectability requirements. To further enhance the function-oriented product characterization workflows and the clinical relevance of dermal filler injectability assessments, the aim of this study was to perform in vivo evaluations. Therefore, several variants of the MaiLi® product range (OxiFree™ technology) were characterized in vitro and in vivo in terms of injectability attributes, with a focus on hydrogel system homogeneity and ease of injection. Firstly, standardized in vitro assays were performed in SimSkin® cutaneous equivalents, with variations of the clinical injector, injection site, and injection technique. Then, automated injections in SimSkin® cutaneous equivalents were comparatively performed in a texture analysis setup to obtain fine-granulometry injection force profile results. Finally, five female participants were recruited for the in vivo arm of the study (case reports), with variations of the clinical injector, injection site, and injection technique. Generally, the obtained quantitative force values and injection force profiles were critically appraised from a translational viewpoint, based on discussions around the OxiFree™ manufacturing technology and on in-use specialized clinician feedback. Overall, the present study outlined a notable level of homogeneity across the MaiLi® product range in terms of injectability attributes, as well as consistently high ease of administration by medical aesthetic clinicians.

The injectability of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers is influenced by polymer concentration, polymer cross-linking type and degree, the presence of lidocaine or other functional excipients, types of syringes, and injection techniques. Finished product injectability constitutes a critical quality attribute for clinical injectors, as it strongly influences product applicability and ease of use in aesthetic medicine. While injectable product extrusion force specifications are provided by the respective device manufacturers, the qualitative informative value of such datasets is low for injectors wishing to compare product brands and technologies from an injectability standpoint. Therefore, the present study comparatively assessed 28 cross-linked HA dermal fillers (JUVÉDERM®, Restylane®, BELOTERO®, TEOSYAL RHA®, and STYLAGE® brands) using various injectability benchmarking setups for enhanced clinical-oriented relevance. Manual product injections were performed by three specialized and experienced clinicians, whereas automatic product extrusion was performed using a Texture Analyzer instrument. The various hydrogel products were injected into ex vivo human skin and into SimSkin® cutaneous equivalents to appropriately account for injection-related counterpressure. The injectability results revealed important variability between and within product brands, with a strong influence of the local anesthetic lidocaine, HA contents, and needle gauge size. Critical appraisals of the investigated products were performed, notably from manufacturing process-based and clinical ease of application-based standpoints, centered on respective experimental injectability quality levels. Generally, it was confirmed that each HA-based dermal filler product requires specific expertise for optimal injection, mainly due to differing viscoelastic characteristics and injectability attributes. Overall, the present study set forth evidence-based and clinical-oriented rationale elements confirming the importance for injectors to work with injectable products with which they are experienced and comfortable to optimize clinical results.

In photoaged human skin, type I collagen fragmentation impairs dermal extracellular matrix (ECM) integrity, resulting in collapsed/contracted fibroblasts with reduced type I procollagen synthesis. Injections of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (CL-HA) reverse these deleterious changes. To investigate the time course and effects of biochemical changes induced by injected CL-HA, particularly whether fibroblast activation leads to accumulation/deposition of dermal collagen, we injected CL-HA into photoaged skin of human participants over 60 years-old and performed biochemical/microscopic analyses of skin samples. Beginning 1 week post-injection and lasting 6-9 months, fibroblasts exhibited activation, including increased immunostaining and gene expression of markers of type I collagen synthesis, such as heat shock protein 47 and components of the transforming growth factor-β pathway. At 1 week post-injection, multiphoton microscopy revealed elongation/stretching of fibroblasts, indicating enhanced dermal mechanical support. At 4 weeks, second-harmonic generation microscopy revealed thick collagen bundles densely packed around pools of injected CL-HA. At 12 months, accumulation of thick collagen bundles was observed and injected CL-HA remained present in substantial amounts. Thus, by occupying space in the dermal ECM, injected CL-HA rapidly and durably enhances mechanical support, stimulating fibroblast elongation and activation, which results in thick, densely packed type I collagen bundles accumulating as early as 4 weeks post-injection and continuing for at least a year. These observations indicate that early and prolonged clinical improvement following CL-HA injection results from space-filling and collagen deposition. As type I collagen has an estimated half-life of 15 years, our data provide the foundations for optimizing the timing/frequency of repeat CL-HA injections.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes obtained with either mechanical subgingival debridement in conjunction with a sodium hypochlorite and amino acids containing gel followed by subsequent application of a cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel (xHyA) gel, or with mechanical debridement alone.
METHODS: Fourty-eight patients diagnosed with stages II-III (Grades A/B) generalised periodontitis were randomly treated with either scaling and root planing (SRP) (control) or SRP plus adjunctive sodium hypochlorite/amino acid and xHyA gels (test). The primary outcome variable was reduction of probing depth (PD), while changes in clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PI) were secondary outcomes. The outcomes were assessed at baseline, at 3 and 6 months following therapy.
RESULTS: All patients completed the 6 months evaluation. At 6 months, the test group showed statistically significantly better results in terms of mean PD reduction (2.9 ± 0.4 vs 1.8 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001). Similarly, mean CAL gain was statistically higher in the test group compared to the control one (test: 2.6 ± 0.5 vs control: 1.6 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001). Mean BOP decreased from 81.8 ± 16.2% to 48.9 ± 14.5% in control (p < 0.001) and from 83.2 ± 15.5% to 17.6 ± 11.5% in test (p < 0.001) groups with a statistically significant difference favouring the test group (p < 0.001). Mean PI scores were reduced statistically significantly in both groups (from 38.8 ± 26% to 26.5 ± 20.5% in control (p = 0.039) and from 60.6 ± 10.9% to 12.7 ± 8.9% in test group (p < 0.001)), with a statistically significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001). The number of moderate pockets (4-6 mm) were reduced from 1518 (41.2%) to 803 (22.6%) in the control and from 1803 (48.6%) to 234 (7.7%) in the test group with a statistically significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001), while the number of deep pockets (≥ 7 mm) changed from 277 (7.6%) to 35 (1.0%) in the control and from 298 (8.7%) to 4 (0.1%) in test group (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Within their limits the present data indicate that: a) both treatments resulted in statistically significant improvements in all evaluated clinical parameters, and b) the adjunctive subgingival application of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid and xHyA to SRP yielded statistically significantly higher improvements compared to SRP alone.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid and xHyA gels to subgingival mechanical debridement appears to represent a valuable approach to additionally improve the outcomes of non-surgical periodontal treatment. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT04662216 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

OBJECTIVE: The adjunctive subgingival application of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid and a mixture of natural and cross-linked hyaluronic acid gels (high molecular weight) has been recently proposed as a novel modality to enhance the outcomes of non-surgical periodontal therapy. The aim of this prospective case series was to evaluate the clinical outcomes obtained following the subgingival application of a combination of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid and a mixture of natural and cross-linked hyaluronic acid (high molecular) gels in conjunction with non-surgical periodontal therapy.
METHODS: Twenty-one systemically healthy, non-smoking patients diagnosed with stage II-III, grade A/B periodontitis underwent full-mouth subgingival debridement (SD) performed with ultrasonic and hand instruments. All sites with probing depths (PD) ≥ 4 mm were treated with additional repeated (i.e., 2-3 times) instillation of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid gel in the periodontal pockets prior to and during SRP. Following mechanical debridement, a mixture of natural and cross-linked hyaluronic acid (high molecular) gel was applied in the pockets. The primary outcome variable was PD reduction; changes in clinical attachment level (CAL) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were the secondary outcomes. The clinical parameters were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months after therapy.
RESULTS: Compared to baseline, a statistically significant mean reduction of PD values was obtained after 3 and 6 months, amounting to 2.6 ± 0.4 mm, and 2.9 ± 0.4 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean CAL gain measured 2.3 ± 0.5 mm at 3 months and 2.6 ± 0.5 mm at 6 months in comparison to baseline (p < 0.001). Mean reduction of BOP values was 54.9 ± 16.9 % at 3 months and 65.6 ± 16.4 % at 6 months (p < 0.001). The number of moderate pockets (4-5 mm) decreased from 1808 at baseline to 274 at the 6-month evaluation, and the number of deep (≥ 6 mm) pockets dropped from 319 to 3, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sodium hypochlorite/amino acid and a mixture of natural and cross-linked hyaluronic acid (high molecular) adjunctive to subgingival debridement may represent a valuable approach to improve the outcomes of non-surgical periodontal treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dextranomer/cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Hyadex) in patients with a clinical diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).
METHODS: In this cross-sectional multicenter observational study, Hyadex was used in four different centers for the endoscopic treatment of VUR from 2020 to 2022. The study involved 74 patients (93 renal units) who were diagnosed with VUR according to voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) findings and were considered suitable for subureteric endoscopic treatment. The follow-up time (control VCUG time) was 3 months.
RESULTS: In the VCUG evaluation, grade I VUR was found in 13 renal units, grade II in 23 renal units, grade III in 42 renal units, and grade IV in 12 renal units. The success rates of Hyadex treatment according to the degree of VUR were as follows: 84.6% for grade I, 82.6% for grade II, 71.4% for grade III, and 66.0% for grade IV. No major complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic subureteric Hyadex injection had high success rates in appropriately selected patients with VUR and may be used as the first-line treatment for children with VUR.